The World Belongs to Chinese People Who Speak English

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-28Last updated on 2026-02-28

Abstract

The article argues that the world belongs to Chinese people who speak English, positing that a blend of Eastern and Western cultural values creates a powerful advantage, particularly in entrepreneurship. It contrasts Western "romanticism"—characterized by idealism, risk-taking, and long-term vision—with Chinese pragmatism and structural thinking. The author, educated in a US liberal arts college, credits Western education for fostering trust and ambition, while Chinese upbringing provides crucial grounding in practical business models. This hybrid mindset is presented as ideal for navigating global opportunities, exemplified by ventures like a crypto project that successfully merges centralized efficiency with decentralized security. The core message is an exhortation for Chinese individuals to learn English and engage with the world to leverage this cultural synthesis, asserting that limiting oneself to one hemisphere is a missed opportunity.

Just scroll through Instagram and TikTok, and you'll see all kinds of "chinamaxxing" wellness memes. Adidas' new Tang suit jacket sold out instantly online (all bought by foreigners).

Foreign media likes to attribute this to "the rise of China's soft power," but I tend to believe it's the result of a blend of opposition and fusion between Chinese and Western cultures, a result that is particularly evident among entrepreneurs.

On one hand, there's the pragmatism and structural sense ingrained in our DNA from our ancestors; on the other, there's modern Western thought that strips away the overly pedantic parts of traditional wisdom and reshapes a personal form. This combination is inherently well-suited for entrepreneurship.

Western society allows you to be romantic, to be impulsive, to bet on long-term, irrational things. Even if you fail, it doesn't immediately negate your worth as a person. This is a huge tolerance space granted at the institutional and cultural levels.

I studied at a liberal arts college in the US, majoring in psychology, taking courses like metaphysics and art history. My parents always complained that I was learning a bunch of "useless things." But it was precisely these seemingly useless courses that gave me develop an almost instinctive, even somewhat irrational, trust in human agency and mutual tolerance.

I call this state romantic because it is completely opposite to the cynical attitude of "早就看透了" (having seen through it all) or "一眼望到底" (seeing the end at a glance) that is deeply ingrained in many Chinese people.

It is this romanticism that enables a person to dare to give up a stable, high-paying job to start a business, to dare to invest money in a smart contract that hasn't been thoroughly audited. More importantly, it is a way to reconcile with oneself. When you allow yourself to be impulsive, to get excited, to have expectations for long-term value, you also allow yourself to be happy, allow others to be happy, and allow society to improve together.

Of course, if Western romanticism is taken to the extreme, it can easily become detached from reality, floating in the air and getting nothing done. At this point, the pragmatic educational philosophy inherent in Chinese culture becomes particularly important.

Chinese entrepreneurs often prefer to use the term "做生意 / make business," while in the English-speaking world, entrepreneurship is called "start-up." Chinese entrepreneurship prioritizes the business model first (aka, whose money are you making), while the West focuses on the act of starting up.

The crypto space in recent years has been harshly taught a lesson about "not getting things done." A massive amount of energy was spent on low-level narratives and conceptual packaging, while真正的 applications were few and far between. In the end, it was the most primitive赛道 of "speculating on coins" that was firmly controlled by a group of Asian players.

When I first saw Mega's whitepaper, I almost instinctively thought: "This architecture is so reasonable." Centralized sequencer + Ethereum security = faster chain. The logic was clear and straightforward. But this "Sino-Western hybrid" logic is taboo in the eyes of many foreigners because, in their context, centralization is almost synonymous with original sin.

But in my view, centralization was never the original sin; it's just a tool. Many Western teams, operating in a politically correct environment, could never make a choice like Mega's. Yet we can inherit the思维 of "concentrating resources to accomplish major tasks" while using decentralized security as the ultimate backing, instantly expanding the entire想象空间.

But if I had only received a Chinese education, I also know that at best, I could only run a small workshop or small business. What truly made me believe that this kind of "centralized trade-off" could spawn new applications and scale up the entire ecosystem was the Western education I received. It made me dare to believe in system design, believe in structural choices, believe in the possibility of scaling.

Finally, people often tell me I'm a typical "banana person," yellow on the outside, white on the inside. I beg to differ. The world is never black and white, nor is it strictly East or West. The greatest advantage of someone who has truly experienced multiple cultures is the ability to absorb the strengths of each and then recombine them.

Take me, for example. I finished high school in Beijing, went to university in the US, graduated and went to Nigeria in Africa, and later settled down in Dubai, the Middle East. You ask me if I'm a banana or a sweet date, I don't know. But I know one thing:

If you are also a Chinese person who speaks English, you must be brave enough to step out and face the clash of Eastern and Western cultures head-on; there will eventually be arbitrage opportunities for you here. If you were born in China and don't speak English, you must learn it, and then go out into the world.

The world is vast, and only playing half of it is such a waste.

Related Questions

QWhat does the author identify as the key advantage of combining Chinese and Eastern cultural perspectives?

AThe author believes the combination of Chinese pragmatism and structural thinking with Western romanticism and tolerance for risk creates a powerful hybrid mindset ideal for entrepreneurship, allowing individuals to leverage the strengths of both cultures—practical business acumen with innovative, long-term vision.

QHow does the author define 'romanticism' in the context of Western education's influence?

AThe author defines this 'romanticism' as a mindset that trusts human subjectivity, embraces impulsiveness, allows for long-term, non-rational bets, and fosters personal and societal happiness—contrasting with a cynical 'seen-it-all' attitude.

QAccording to the author, what is a fundamental difference between Chinese and Western approaches to entrepreneurship?

AThe author states that Chinese entrepreneurship often focuses first on the business model and revenue streams ('make business'), while Western entrepreneurship emphasizes the act of starting up itself and the vision behind it.

QWhy does the author argue that 'centralization is not an original sin' but a tool, using Mega as an example?

AThe author argues that centralization is merely a tool, and Mega's design—a centralized sequencer with Ethereum security for a faster chain—demonstrates a pragmatic, effective hybrid solution that Western 'political correctness' might reject outright, thus creating an advantage.

QWhat is the core advice the author gives to Chinese people regarding English and global engagement?

AThe author's core advice is that Chinese people who speak English should boldly engage with the world to leverage cultural differences for opportunity, and those who don't should learn English and then go global, because 'the world is big, and playing only half of it is a total waste.'

Related Reads

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbit25m ago

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbit25m ago

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbit27m ago

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbit27m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy PEOPLE

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)After purchasing your ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Easily trade ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

6.6k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2025.03.21

How to Buy PEOPLE

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of PEOPLE (PEOPLE) are presented below.

活动图片