The Day CZ Missed the Best Investment of His Life, Crypto Missed AI

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-09Last updated on 2026-02-09

Abstract

In 2014, CZ sold his Shanghai apartment to buy 1,500 BTC—a legendary investment in crypto history. But years later, he missed an even bigger opportunity: acquiring FTX in 2021. During FTX liquidity crisis negotiations, Binance signed a non-binding LOI to acquire the exchange but backed out within a day, citing issues “beyond control.” Unbeknownst to many, FTX held a hidden gem: a $500 million investment in AI startup Anthropic, acquired in 2021 for a 13.56% stake (later diluted to 7.84%). Post-ChatGPT, Anthropic’s valuation soared. It’s nearing a new funding round at a potential $350 billion valuation. FTX’s stake would now be worth ~$27.4 billion—enough to cover its collapse losses multiple times. Instead, FTX’s bankruptcy estate sold the shares for over $1.3 billion to traditional investors like Jane Street and Fidelity—not crypto firms. This missed chance represents what could have been a powerful intersection of Crypto and AI, with potential innovations lost as the opportunity moved entirely into traditional finance hands.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

In 2014, just one year after being introduced to the concept of cryptocurrency, CZ made the most daring investment of his life — he sold his apartment in Shanghai and "all-in" bought about 1,500 BTC at a three-digit price. 12 years later, if CZ had never sold, this investment could have yielded hundreds of millions of dollars in profits (peak return about $189 million).

Compared to his subsequent achievements of founding Binance and becoming an industry leader, the returns from this investment are insignificant to CZ. But from an external perspective, this idealistic "all-in" move remains CZ's most talked-about operation.

Yet, it is lamentable that even someone as resolute and decisive as CZ once missed an investment with potential profits a hundred times greater than "selling a house to buy coins" in a highly dramatic way.

Rewind 1555 Days: That Aborted Acquisition

November 9, 2021, was a sleepless night for the cryptocurrency industry.

Just the day before, the then high-flying FTX suspended withdrawals due to a liquidity crisis, causing panic to spread rapidly through the community. The musty smell before a storm was already permeating the market... The rest of the story is well-known: FTX collapsed, triggering a domino effect that plunged the market into a prolonged winter lasting years.

In a parallel universe, the story could have taken a different turn. In the early hours of November 9, SBF and CZ had issued statements indicating that FTX had preliminarily reached an acquisition agreement with Binance.

SBF: Hey everyone, I have an announcement. Things have come full circle. FTX's first and last investors are the same — we have reached a strategic transaction agreement with Binance (pending due diligence).

CZ: This afternoon, FTX asked us for help. The exchange is currently facing a severe liquidity crunch. To protect users, we signed a non-binding Letter of Intent, intending to fully acquire FTX to help alleviate the liquidity crisis. We will conduct full due diligence in the coming days.

However, the acquisition ultimately fell through. Just one day later, Binance officially announced the abandonment of the acquisition, citing "issues beyond our control", which became the final straw that broke FTX's back.

Did CZ ever seriously consider acquiring FTX? Was the hastily concluded acquisition farce a genuine attempt to help or merely a ploy to gauge the opponent's "health bar"? This may forever remain a mystery. From the outcome, CZ personally defeated his biggest competitor at the time, consolidating Binance's position as the industry's top dog.

But no one could have predicted that a seemingly insignificant "side bet" in FTX's asset portfolio at the time would rapidly appreciate in value over the next few years, its worth now even far exceeding the total value of the remaining assets involved in that unfinished acquisition.

Once a "Side Bet", Now an AI Focus

In April 2022 (this is the official announcement date; the deal was actually completed in 2021), FTX made its most important investment in the AI field — leading a $580 million funding round for AI startup Anthropic with a $500 million investment, initially acquiring a 13.56% equity stake, which was later diluted to 7.84% as Anthropic completed subsequent funding rounds.

That was an era when AI's potential had not yet exploded. Just half a year later (late November 2022, the month FTX collapsed), OpenAI's ChatGPT burst onto the scene, irreversibly ushering the world into the "Age of Exploration" for AI. Anthropic, with its Claude series of products (especially the programming-oriented Claude Code), repeatedly amazed the world, gradually becoming one of the most dazzling star companies.

As Claude continuously iterated, Anthropic's valuation also kept rising. Capital frantically waved banknotes, desperate to secure a berth on Anthropic's ship sailing towards IPO. The latest market rumor is that Anthropic is in the final stages of a new massive funding round, expected to exceed $20 billion (originally planned to raise $10 billion, but investor demand far exceeded expectations, potentially doubling the final amount), with a valuation possibly as high as $350 billion. The deal could be completed as early as this week.

Calculated at the latest valuation of $350 billion, the value of the Anthropic equity once held by FTX would be approximately $27.44 billion, enough to cover the reserve shortfall that led to its bankruptcy several times over... But history has happened, and the outcome is settled.

It's hard not to marvel at SBF being a rare venture capital genius (besides Anthropic, he also invested in the now-hot Cursor in its seed round), but clearly he was not a qualified business operator, especially lacking in risk control. CZ's profile is the complete opposite; he is an absolute master at operating a business. Binance's dominance is inseparable from his多次正确的战略决策 (many correct strategic decisions). But CZ also often positions himself not as a traditional investor solely pursuing returns; he doesn't trade coins and prefers to be a builder of the industry.

A Messy Ending: This Should Have Been the Best Intersection of Crypto and AI

You might wonder, what happened to those FTX equity shares?

The ending is not complicated. After FTX's bankruptcy, all assets, including the Anthropic equity, were handled by the FTX bankruptcy estate management team. In February 2024, the court approved the team's request to sell these shares; in March and June of the same year, the FTX bankruptcy team sold 29.5 million shares for $884 million and 15 million shares for $450 million respectively, totaling over $1.3 billion sold.

As for the buyers of these shares, they were primarily ATIC Third International Investment from Abu Dhabi, and traditional financial institutions from Wall Street like Jane Street and Fidelity. In other words, no crypto companies got a share of the pie.

Whether these shares were deliberately sold cheaply, or whether there was利益输送 (benefit transfer) under the guise of bankruptcy liquidation, is no longer important for the crypto industry.

This should have been the best intersection of Crypto and AI. In another worldline, whether these shares were in the hands of SBF or CZ, if leading companies in the crypto world had some say in the development of one of AI's most successful companies, there could have been more innovative attempts around Crypto + AI, potentially yielding unexpected fruits.

It's not just CZ who is slapping his thigh in regret.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the potential return on CZ's investment in BTC if he had not sold his apartment in Shanghai?

AIf CZ had not sold his BTC, the peak return on his investment would have been approximately $189 million.

QWhy did Binance ultimately decide not to acquire FTX in November 2021?

ABinance announced it was abandoning the acquisition because the issues at FTX were 'beyond their control or ability to help' after conducting initial due diligence.

QWhat was the significance of FTX's investment in Anthropic, and how much was it worth at its peak potential valuation?

AFTX invested $500 million in Anthropic, acquiring a 13.56% stake, which was later diluted to 7.84%. At a rumored $350 billion valuation, this stake would be worth approximately $27.44 billion.

QHow did the FTX bankruptcy estate handle its Anthropic shares, and who were the main buyers?

AThe FTX bankruptcy estate sold its Anthropic shares in two batches for a total of over $1.3 billion. The main buyers were ATIC Third International Investment from Abu Dhabi and traditional financial institutions like Jane Street and Fidelity.

QAccording to the article, what was the missed opportunity for the Crypto industry with the sale of FTX's Anthropic stake?

AThe missed opportunity was that no crypto companies acquired the Anthropic stake. If a crypto leader like SBF or CZ had retained influence over this leading AI company, it could have fostered more innovation at the intersection of Crypto and AI.

Related Reads

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手14m ago

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手14m ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit2h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit2h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手3h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手3h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit4h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片