The Culprit Behind Bitcoin's Plunge on Thursday: Massive IBIT-Related Leveraged Options Forced to Liquidate?

华尔街日报Published on 2026-02-06Last updated on 2026-02-06

Abstract

Bitcoin experienced a sharp decline on Thursday, with BlackRock's spot Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) hitting a record trading volume of over 284 million shares, valued at more than $10 billion—a 169% increase from the previous record. IBIT’s price fell 13% to around $36, its lowest since October 2024. Market analysts suggest the sell-off may have been triggered by the forced liquidation of highly leveraged IBIT options positions held by one or more non-crypto hedge funds. Redemptions from IBIT reached $175 million, accounting for 40% of the total net outflows from Bitcoin ETFs that day. Put option premiums surged over 25 volatility points above calls, indicating extreme fear. Parker White, CIO of DeFi Dev Corp, speculated that large leveraged positions, combined with broader market stress including silver sell-offs and unwinding yen carry trades, likely exacerbated the losses. While such extreme volume and price action often signal capitulation, it remains uncertain whether the market bottom has been reached. Full details of the institutional positions involved may not be clear until mid-May due to delayed regulatory disclosures.

BlackRock's spot Bitcoin ETF hit a record high in trading volume on Thursday, with market participants suspecting that the sharp volatility may have originated from the forced liquidation of highly leveraged positions in IBIT held by hedge funds.

According to Nasdaq data, BlackRock's spot Bitcoin ETF product IBIT traded over 284 million shares on Thursday, with a notional value exceeding $10 billion, a surge of 169% from the previous record. Meanwhile, the price of IBIT plummeted 13% to around $36, hitting a new low since October 2024, with its year-to-date loss widening to 27%.

The record trading volume was accompanied by massive redemptions and panic in the options market. According to SoSoValue data, redemptions from IBIT reached $175 million that day, accounting for 40% of the total net outflows of $434 million from the 11 Bitcoin ETFs. In the options market, put options were priced at a premium of over 25 volatility points compared to call options, a record high.

According to BlockBeats, Parker White, Chief Investment Officer and Chief Operating Officer of DeFi Dev Corp, stated on social media that he suspects this volatility originated from large IBIT holdings by one or more non-crypto hedge funds. These funds may have attempted to turn the situation around through highly leveraged options trading, but losses continued to widen, ultimately leading to their positions being completely wiped out by the decline in Bitcoin.

Dual Extremes in Trading Volume and Price

IBIT's trading volume of 284 million shares on Thursday far exceeded the previous record. The fund's previous record, set on November 21, was 169 million shares; this volume is almost double that. According to CoinDesk, the notional value corresponding to this trading volume exceeded $10 billion.

In terms of price, IBIT once fell below $35, its lowest level since October 11, 2024. The fund's price had reached a peak of $71.82 in early October last year and has been declining since then. As the world's largest publicly listed Bitcoin fund, IBIT holds physical Bitcoin and is designed to track the spot price of Bitcoin. Bitcoin fell to nearly $60,000 on Thursday.

The combination of record trading volume and a sharp price drop is often seen as a signal of capitulation selling, where long-term holders give up and liquidate their positions at a loss. This marks the most intense selling phase of a bear market and may indicate the beginning of a long and painful bottoming process.

Options market data further confirms the sentiment of panic. According to MarketChameleon data, the premium for long-term put options on IBIT exceeded that of call options by more than 25 volatility points on Thursday, a record high. Put options are contracts investors use to hedge against downside risk.

Parker White pointed out that the options premium was about $900 million, also a record high. However, according to CoinDesk, even with capitulation signals, there is no guarantee that the market has bottomed, as the duration of the bear market may exceed the financial capacity of those buying the dip.

Speculation on Hedge Fund Leveraged Liquidations

Parker White proposed a hypothesis about the root cause of this volatility. He stated that since Bitcoin and stocks fell simultaneously, and the liquidation volume on centralized finance platforms was relatively low, he suspects the volatility originated from large IBIT holders, likely one or more non-crypto hedge funds.

Data shows that some funds, even with extremely high positions in IBIT, even if they are single-asset funds, are designed to isolate margin risk. Silver also plummeted on Thursday, and the unwinding of yen carry trades accelerated, increasing market pressure and further impacting the leveraged positions of funds.

Parker White believes these funds may have attempted to reverse the situation through highly leveraged options trading, but losses continued to widen, and the decline in Bitcoin may have ultimately wiped out their positions. He noted that due to delays in 13F report disclosures, relevant position information is expected to be released only in mid-May, but the scale of the event is so large that it will be difficult to hide for long.

As the preferred investment vehicle for institutions seeking cryptocurrency exposure through regulated products, IBIT's abnormal trading activity may reveal the pressure institutional investors are facing in the current market environment.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the trading volume of BlackRock's Bitcoin spot ETF (IBIT) on Thursday and how did it increase compared to the previous record?

ABlackRock's Bitcoin spot ETF (IBIT) had a trading volume of over 284 million shares on Thursday, with a nominal value exceeding $10 billion. This represented a 169% increase from the previous record of 169 million shares set on November 21.

QWhat is the main suspected cause of the sharp decline in IBIT's price according to market analysts?

AMarket analysts, such as Parker White, suspect the sharp decline was caused by the forced liquidation of highly leveraged IBIT option positions held by one or more non-crypto hedge funds.

QHow much did IBIT's price drop and what was its new low?

AThe price of IBIT plummeted by 13% to around $36, hitting a new low since October 2024.

QWhat did the data on put-call option premiums indicate about market sentiment?

AThe data showed that put options were trading at a premium of over 25 volatility points compared to call options, reaching a historical high, which signifies extreme panic and bearish sentiment in the market.

QWhen is the information regarding the suspected large IBIT holdings expected to be officially revealed?

AThe information on these large holdings is expected to be officially disclosed in mid-May through the 13F reports, although the scale of the event may make it difficult to conceal until then.

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit3m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit3m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

972 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片