# Trust Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Trust", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

AxBlade × AWS Hong Kong Summit Wraps: Defining Accountability for Physical AI

AxBlade, the accountability layer for autonomous AI, co-hosted an exclusive side event, "From Agentic AI to Physical AI: What Gets Funded After the Model Wave?" during AWS Summit Hong Kong Week. The gathering of over 100 founders, researchers, and investors from institutions like AWS, NVIDIA, and Y Combinator examined the infrastructure gap between AI demos and real-world deployment. A key consensus emerged: for Physical AI to move from lab to production, it requires verifiable identity, trusted execution, and cryptographically provable behavior records. Three panels discussed investor shifts toward compliance-native infrastructure, the liability challenges of AI in physical systems, and the technical middleware needed for enterprise adoption. AxBlade showcased its compliance-native Layer 2 blockchain as a solution, combining decentralized identity (DID), Trusted Execution Environments (TEE), and Zero-Knowledge Proof of Behavior (PoB) to create an auditable trust infrastructure for autonomous AI. The event concluded with curated networking and a private dinner, fostering discussions across AI, healthcare, and Web3 sectors.

TheNewsCrypto07/08 15:18

AxBlade × AWS Hong Kong Summit Wraps: Defining Accountability for Physical AI

TheNewsCrypto07/08 15:18

Is OUSD's 'List of Over a Hundred Companies' Actually Just an 'Expression of Interest'? Name-Borrowing Marketing Sparks Trust Crisis

A new stablecoin, Open USD (OUSD), was announced by Open Standard on June 30th, promising fee-free minting/redemption, shared reserve yield, and multi-party governance. Its launch was accompanied by a list of over 140 purported partners, including major names like Western Union, Ripple, and MetaMask, causing a significant drop in competitor Circle's stock price. However, the announcement quickly faced backlash. Several listed companies, including Samsung Electronics and South Korean financial firms, stated they had never formally agreed to participate, with some claiming they were merely contacted for exploratory discussions. Critics, including Circle's CEO, Jeremy Allaire,质疑了 OUSD's business model sustainability and governance, calling the partner list misleading "legitimacy-borrowing" for marketing. Despite the controversy, some firms like Stripe and Coinbase confirmed support and integration plans. The incident has sparked a trust crisis for OUSD before its official launch, highlighting the challenges of entering the established stablecoin market.

marsbit07/06 09:59

Is OUSD's 'List of Over a Hundred Companies' Actually Just an 'Expression of Interest'? Name-Borrowing Marketing Sparks Trust Crisis

marsbit07/06 09:59

OUSD, Which Caused Circle to Plunge 17% Overnight, Is Mired in Marketing Controversy

On June 30th, Open Standard announced the upcoming launch of Open USD (OUSD), a new stablecoin promising features like free minting/burning, yield sharing, and shared governance by a coalition of over 140 partners, including major names like Western Union, Ripple, and MetaMask. This news caused a 17.55% drop in Circle's stock price. However, the announcement quickly faced controversy. Several listed companies, including Samsung Electronics and Dunamu (Upbit's parent), denied formal agreements, stating they were only approached for initial discussions. Critics accused Open Standard of "legitimacy-borrowing"—inflating its partner list for marketing. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire publicly questioned OUSD's sustainability, arguing that free transactions and full revenue sharing might underfund critical infrastructure, and that multi-company governance often scales poorly. Despite the backlash, some firms like Stripe and Coinbase confirmed support, with Stripe planning to set OUSD as a default stable币 for businesses. The incident has cast an early shadow of skepticism over OUSD's launch.

Foresight News07/06 08:34

OUSD, Which Caused Circle to Plunge 17% Overnight, Is Mired in Marketing Controversy

Foresight News07/06 08:34

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature delves into the state of stablecoin-based cross-border payments, noting rapid growth but a key shortfall: while faster and more accessible, they are not yet cheaper. At a recent industry conference in Mexico City, optimism about technology, regulation, and volume was tempered by discussions with practitioners. The core issue is liquidity. Traditional FX brokers charge 60-70 basis points, and stablecoins promise to slash this to 2-5 basis points. However, this theoretical cost advantage cannot be realized until deep liquidity pools are established at scale, requiring significant institutional capital inflow. A major adoption barrier is trust. Businesses often rely on long-standing relationships with traditional brokers, valuing reliability over marginal cost savings. This shift will be gradual. Furthermore, successful companies in the space are not positioning themselves as replacements for legacy systems like SWIFT, but as complements. They leverage stablecoins for speed while using traditional rails for their standardization and reliability in ensuring accurate payment details—a critical factor for supplier payments to avoid customs issues. Companies like Caliza, experiencing high monthly growth, exemplify this hybrid approach. The industry anticipates consolidation, as long-term viability will depend on securing the essential trifecta: proper licensing, robust fiat on/off-ramps, and deep liquidity. Without these, firms risk being mere intermediaries rather than building sustainable businesses.

marsbit07/05 09:23

Forbes Feature: Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

marsbit07/05 09:23

Forbes Feature: Cross-Border Payments with Stablecoins are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

A Forbes feature on stablecoin cross-border payments highlights rapid industry growth but notes the cost advantage remains theoretical. While stablecoins offer faster, 24/7, and more accessible international transfers compared to traditional forex brokers (charging 60-70 bps), they have not yet achieved their promised lower costs of 2-5 bps. The primary hurdle is a lack of deep, scaled liquidity pools, according to Imran Ahmad of Bitso Business. He states costs will only drop significantly with large-scale institutional and banking participation. Adoption faces a deeper challenge: trust. Businesses often stick with traditional brokers based on long-standing personal relationships, not just fees. Ezra Kebrab of cross-border payment firm Caliza emphasizes that reliability in handling complex details like tax codes is as critical as speed and cost. Contrary to some narratives, successful companies like Caliza see stablecoins as complementing, not replacing, existing infrastructure like SWIFT, which excels at payment standardization. Caliza itself uses SWIFT for many transactions and has seen monthly growth exceeding 40%. Ahmad predicts a future industry consolidation, where success will hinge on three pillars: proper licensing, reliable fiat on/off-ramps, and robust liquidity.

链捕手07/05 09:19

Forbes Feature: Cross-Border Payments with Stablecoins are Faster, But Not Yet Cheaper

链捕手07/05 09:19

Confirmed: Claude Code Secretly Inspects Users, Time Zone and Chinese AI Labs Are Key Factors

Today was a significant day for Anthropic. The company announced the launch of Claude Sonnet 5, described as its most agentic model yet, and separately confirmed that the U.S. Department of Commerce has lifted export controls on its Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models, allowing their distribution to resume. However, a separate controversy has emerged regarding its coding assistant, Claude Code. Developers have exposed that certain versions of the tool allegedly contain hidden code designed to detect specific user data. This code reportedly checks for the use of Chinese time zones (like Asia/Shanghai), the presence of custom API proxy URLs, and connections to domains associated with Chinese tech companies and AI labs. If triggered, this information is said to be encoded into the system prompt sent to the AI cloud, using subtle, nearly indistinguishable variations in characters (like different Unicode apostrophes in the "Today's date" line) as a form of steganography. The core issue is the covert nature of this data collection. While telemetry for security and abuse prevention is common, implementing it through hidden channels within the prompt—without user awareness or documented disclosure—fundamentally breaches trust. This is particularly sensitive for a coding assistant that operates with access to source code and system commands. Following the exposure, an Anthropic engineer acknowledged the code's existence and stated it would be removed in an upcoming release. The incident raises serious questions about transparency and the boundaries of data collection in AI developer tools.

marsbit07/01 03:44

Confirmed: Claude Code Secretly Inspects Users, Time Zone and Chinese AI Labs Are Key Factors

marsbit07/01 03:44

Goldman Sachs XRP Trust Filing Shows How Wall Street Is Testing Crypto Exposure

Goldman Sachs's SEC filings reveal exposure to XRP through regulated trust-style investment vehicles, not direct token holdings. This highlights how Wall Street institutions test exposure to crypto assets like XRP using familiar financial structures such as trusts, funds, and equities, rather than holding the underlying tokens directly. While backward-looking Form 13F data shows the bank later rotated capital into other crypto-linked equities, the filing is significant. It demonstrates that XRP is part of the menu of crypto exposures accessible to large institutions through regulated pathways, contributing to its visibility in professional investment channels beyond the retail community.

bitcoinist06/30 21:06

Goldman Sachs XRP Trust Filing Shows How Wall Street Is Testing Crypto Exposure

bitcoinist06/30 21:06

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbit06/30 15:57

marsbit06/30 15:57

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手06/30 15:48

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

链捕手06/30 15:48

SecondFi Outlines Two-Week Recovery Plan After $2.4 Million Cardano Wallet Breach

SecondFi (formerly Yoroi wallet) has detailed a two-week recovery plan following a Cardano wallet security exploit that drained approximately $2.4 million in ADA from 374 addresses. The breach was caused by a flaw in the wallet-generation software, raising significant concerns about user trust in self-custody tools. SecondFi's structured response aims to accurately identify affected addresses and transparently restore funds, with its execution being critical to limiting reputational damage. While the Cardano network itself remains unaffected, the incident underscores that security at the wallet and user-interface layer is vital for overall ecosystem confidence. The outcome for the broader Cardano community hinges on the successful return of user assets and the demonstrated resolution of the underlying vulnerability.

bitcoinist06/30 03:31

SecondFi Outlines Two-Week Recovery Plan After $2.4 Million Cardano Wallet Breach