# Trust İlgili Makaleler

HTX Haber Merkezi, kripto endüstrisindeki piyasa trendleri, proje güncellemeleri, teknoloji gelişmeleri ve düzenleyici politikaları kapsayan "Trust" hakkında en son makaleleri ve derinlemesine analizleri sunmaktadır.

Hacker Attack Halves Flow, Rollback Plan Sparks Civil War in Ecosystem

Flow, a Layer 1 blockchain built by Dapper Labs, suffered a major security breach last Saturday when a hacker exploited an execution layer vulnerability, transferring approximately $3.9 million in assets off-chain. The attack caused the price of FLOW to plummet by over 50%, dropping from $0.173 to $0.079, though it later partially recovered to around $0.107. Initially, the Flow Foundation proposed rolling back the network to a checkpoint before the attack occurred, which would have erased all transactions within a six-hour window. This decision was met with strong opposition from ecosystem partners, especially cross-chain bridges like deBridge and LayerZero, who warned that a rollback could cause asset duplication, inconsistencies, and significant losses for legitimate users. Facing community backlash and partner concerns, the foundation abandoned the rollback plan. Instead, it adopted an "Isolation Recovery Plan" developed in coordination with key partners. The new strategy involves no chain reorganization, preserves all legitimate user transactions, and temporarily restricts accounts that received illicitly minted tokens. The network will be restored in multiple stages, with full functionality expected within 24 to 48 hours. The incident has raised questions about network reliability and governance, shifting the crisis from a technical issue to a broader challenge of trust in Flow's decentralized integrity.

marsbit20 saat önce

Hacker Attack Halves Flow, Rollback Plan Sparks Civil War in Ecosystem

marsbit20 saat önce

Hacker Attack Cuts Flow in Half, Rollback Plan Sparks Civil War Within Ecosystem

A severe hack targeting the Flow blockchain, developed by Dapper Labs, led to the theft of approximately $3.9 million due to an execution layer vulnerability. The incident caused the token FLOW to plummet by over 50%, dropping from $0.173 to $0.079, though it later partially recovered to around $0.107. Initially, the Flow Foundation proposed rolling back the network to a checkpoint before the attack to remove all transactions within a six-hour window, aiming to eliminate fraudulent activity. However, this plan faced strong opposition from cross-chain bridge partners and community members. Key partners, including deBridge and LayerZero, warned that a rollback could cause severe issues like double-spending and inconsistent asset states across chains, potentially harming legitimate users and bridge operators. Under significant criticism, Flow abandoned the rollback plan and instead adopted an "Isolation and Recovery" strategy. This new approach involves no chain reorganization, preserves all legitimate user transactions, and temporarily restricts accounts that received illicitly minted assets. The recovery is being executed in phases, with Cadence environment repairs prioritized first, followed by gradual reactivation of EVM functionality and cross-chain services. The incident sparked a broader debate about decentralization and chain integrity, with critics arguing that the initial rollback proposal revealed excessive centralization. The revised recovery plan has eased some tensions, but the event remains a significant test for Flow's ecosystem stability and trustworthiness.

Odaily星球日报20 saat önce

Hacker Attack Cuts Flow in Half, Rollback Plan Sparks Civil War Within Ecosystem

Odaily星球日报20 saat önce

DeFi Is No Longer 'Sexy'

DeFi is losing its "sense of exploration" as it matures. While infrastructure and execution have improved, the ecosystem has become highly optimized around a narrow set of behaviors—primarily trading, short-term leverage, and incentive-driven participation. Capital now expects yield as compensation for risk rather than as a return on genuine utility. Lending functions more like instant financing than credit, and user engagement is often "rented" through incentives rather than sustained by organic demand. This efficiency comes at a cost: DeFi feels less like an open frontier and more like a refined but closed loop serving the same sophisticated users. Trust has been eroded by years of exploits, making users cautious and less willing to engage with experimental protocols. The core promise of DeFi—permissionless access, composability, and global liquidity—remains valid. However, the system now prioritizes speed, optionality, and exit liquidity, which limits its ability to attract new types of users or support long-term behaviors. For DeFi to regain its relevance, it must encourage different rational behaviors—such as capital staying through cycles, genuine credit markets, and yield based on real demand—not just repeated efficiency gains. Otherwise, it risks remaining a powerful but niche system.

marsbit12/25 10:09

marsbit12/25 10:09

Avon Co-founder's Viral Article: Why Has DeFi Lost Its Charm?

The article "Why DeFi Has Lost Its Charm" by Avon co-founder Prince argues that DeFi is no longer perceived as innovative or exciting, despite continued development and maturation. The core issue is a shift in user psychology from curiosity to caution, and a convergence of user behavior around incentives rather than genuine utility. DeFi Summer represented a period of rapid innovation and market structure formation, but today's DeFi often feels like a repetition of established patterns with better execution. User behavior has become highly speculative and optimized around trading, leverage, and easy exits. This has shaped the ecosystem's expectations: participation is now something that requires monetary compensation, rather than being driven by a product's inherent usefulness. Lending in DeFi, for example, has evolved into short-term financing for positions like leverage and arbitrage, rather than functioning as a true credit market. Yield has become a baseline expectation for participation, justified by the numerous risks (smart contract, governance, oracle, bridge risks). This leads to a "rented" adoption—activity spikes during incentive programs but vanishes afterward, making it difficult to build sustainable, long-term projects. Trust has also been eroded by years of exploits, scams, and governance failures, making users more cautious and less willing to explore new projects. This risk aversion, combined with the high compensation demanded for risk, has compressed the space for experimentation. The author concludes that DeFi hasn't failed; it has successfully optimized for a specific set of behaviors (liquidity, speed, exit ease) but in doing so, has made it harder to expand into new use cases. For DeFi to regain its charm, it must create structures that make different user behaviors rational—where capital stays for reasons beyond incentives, and yield represents a responsible decision rather than a headline number. This would lead to quieter, slower, but more sustainable growth driven by genuine need.

Odaily星球日报12/24 09:51

Avon Co-founder's Viral Article: Why Has DeFi Lost Its Charm?

Odaily星球日报12/24 09:51

DeFi Has Not Collapsed, But Why Has It Lost Its Charm?

DeFi has not collapsed, but it is losing its sense of exploration and novelty. While the infrastructure has matured and execution has become more efficient, participation has become highly homogenized, centered around incentives, short-term financing, and speculative trading rather than genuine credit markets or long-term engagement. The ecosystem has optimized for behaviors favored by traders—liquidity, leverage, and quick exits—making yield less a reward for risk-taking and more an expected compensation for participation. This has led to capital that is highly mobile but discontinuous, often “rented” during incentive periods rather than sustainably engaged. Trust has also shifted from curiosity to caution due to past failures, making users more risk-averse and less likely to experiment. DeFi’s current form successfully serves a niche group but struggles to expand beyond its optimized behaviors. For DeFi to regain relevance, it must encourage new types of rational behavior—such as longer-term capital commitment, structured credit, and sustainable yield—rather than perpetuating the same incentive-driven patterns. This would require building systems that attract users through real utility rather than subsidies, even if growth is slower and less dramatic.

marsbit12/24 07:06

DeFi Has Not Collapsed, But Why Has It Lost Its Charm?

marsbit12/24 07:06

Interview with Move Industries CEO Torab Torabi: After the Market Maker Scandal, How Will Movement Rebuild Trust?

Interview with Torab Torabi, CEO of Move Industries, on rebuilding trust after a market maker scandal that caused MOVE token's value to drop from $3 billion to under $500 million on its first day. Torabi discusses the formation of Move Industries, the focus on technology and community, and key initiatives like the Monza upgrade which reduced latency and increased TVL. He explains the Move Alliance, a program where ecosystem projects commit 50-100% of their revenue to buy back and hold MOVE tokens, creating aligned incentives. Movement has transitioned from an L2 to an independent L1, enabling staking and greater control. Torabi emphasizes a consumer and mobile-first strategy, partnerships with KAST and Replit, and a commitment to never issue another token beyond MOVE. He addresses past controversies minimally, focusing on future growth and adoption, including predictions about stablecoin regulation and a return to privacy-focused crypto values.

marsbit12/24 06:15

Interview with Move Industries CEO Torab Torabi: After the Market Maker Scandal, How Will Movement Rebuild Trust?

marsbit12/24 06:15

Publicly Pumping Ethereum, Internally Bearish in Reports: Is Tom Lee's Team Still Trustworthy?

Tom Lee, co-founder of Fundstrat and a prominent public Ethereum bull, faces credibility questions after an internal Fundstrat report presented a bearish short-term outlook, contrasting his highly optimistic public statements. Publicly, Lee repeatedly called Ethereum to reach $12,000-$15,000 by end-2025 and declared it "severely undervalued" at $3,000. He has been a vocal "perma-bull" in media appearances. However, Fundstrat's internal 2026 Crypto Outlook report, led by Digital Asset Strategist Sean Farrell, advised paying subscribers to expect a significant market correction in early 2026. Its base case predicted ETH could fall to $1,800-$2,000 and BTC to $60,000-$65,000, citing macroeconomic risks like a potential U.S. government shutdown and Federal Reserve leadership change. The report recommended clients increase cash/stablecoin holdings and wait for better entry points, while maintaining a long-term bullish year-end 2026 target of $4,500 for ETH. Fundstrat responded that the discrepancy stems from different analysts serving different client types: Lee's long-term, structural views are for traditional investors with low (1%-5%) crypto allocations, while Farrell's tactical, short-term risk management is for crypto-heavy portfolios. Critics argue this distinction was never clearly disclosed in Lee's public media appearances, which serve as marketing for Fundstrat's subscription service. Further complicating matters, Lee is also Chairman of BitMine, a company adopting an Ethereum treasury strategy, raising potential conflict of interest concerns about his public endorsements. The incident highlights the blurred lines between personal commentary, institutional research, and marketing in the crypto research space.

marsbit12/23 03:08

Publicly Pumping Ethereum, Internally Bearish in Reports: Is Tom Lee's Team Still Trustworthy?

marsbit12/23 03:08

CME's Cryptocurrency Portal

CME's Cryptocurrency Portal: CFTC's recent approval for CFTC-registered exchanges to list spot cryptocurrency products could pave the way for major platforms like CME to enter the market. This move may attract significant institutional capital from traditional markets into crypto, leveraging CME’s established trust, regulatory compliance, and infrastructure. CME already handles substantial crypto derivatives volume, with record daily contracts and growing year-over-year activity. Integrating spot trading could streamline hedging, reduce operational friction, and offer a regulated alternative to offshore platforms. It may also redefine "spot" for large traders who prioritize custody, settlement, and stability over mere price exposure. Additionally, shifting leveraged trading to regulated venues like CME could enhance transparency and consumer protection, reducing risks seen in events like the recent $19B liquidation crash. While initial adoption may be conservative, this step could gradually build trust and open crypto to broader, safer institutional participation.

marsbit12/23 01:57

Identity, Recourse, Attribution: Decoding the Three Breakthrough Points of the Next-Generation AI Agent Economy

Identity, Recourse, Attribution: Decoding the Three Breakthrough Points of the Next-Generation AI Agent Economy As AI agents begin to handle transactions, new standards like OpenAI's ACP and Google's AP2 are emerging to facilitate payments, while protocols like x402 enable machine-to-machine micropayments. However, these systems lack the trust infrastructure—identity verification, fraud detection, and dispute resolution—that underpins traditional commerce. This creates a critical gap: while blockchain enables fast, irreversible settlements, agents operate without mechanisms for recourse when errors occur. The solution requires building new layers for the agent economy: a "Know Your Agent" (KYA) identity system to establish persistent, verifiable credentials; a recourse mechanism to handle disputes and provide insurance-like protection; and an attribution layer to track influence on purchasing decisions. Established players like card networks and AI labs are unlikely to lead this effort due to misaligned incentives, creating opportunities for startups. The development of agent commerce will unfold in three stages: as an interface (current stage), executing under human supervision (where trust layers become critical), and fully autonomous transactions. Startups that build identity, recourse, and attribution infrastructure will enable the transition to an economy where agents transact freely and securely at scale.

深潮12/22 10:00

MEXC Under Fire Again After Users Flag Premarket Scams

MEXC faces renewed criticism as users report fund losses and premarket trading issues. Analyst Gautamgg highlighted two recent cases where the exchange allegedly violated its own rules. In one instance, a buyer purchased tokens at $0.40, but when the listing price reached $1.30, the seller defaulted. Instead of refunding the buyer as per Rule 10, MEXC retained the collateral. Another user reported canceled trades and frozen USDT for over 10 days with unclear support responses. This controversy follows previous accusations in late October when MEXC was accused of freezing over $3 million in user funds without justification. The exchange's CSO later apologized and released the funds. MEXC has since published Proof of Reserves and claims to combat fraud, having blocked over 70,000 fraud attempts recently. However, trust concerns persist as crypto scams surge industry-wide, with TRM Labs reporting a 456% increase in AI-related scams and $2.47 billion lost in the first half of the year.

TheNewsCrypto12/20 17:54

MEXC Under Fire Again After Users Flag Premarket Scams