# Stablecoins Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Stablecoins", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Stepping into the Stablecoin Wave for Six Years, He Sees the Embryonic Form of the Future of Payments

"Six years into the stablecoin wave, Raj Parekh, former head of crypto at Visa and now leading payments at Monad, reflects on the evolution and future of digital payments. He identifies 2019 and Facebook’s Libra project as a pivotal moment that forced traditional finance to take crypto seriously. At Visa, he led efforts to integrate USDC for near-instant settlement, overcoming slow, costly legacy systems. Parekh later founded Portal Finance to build payment infrastructure, but encountered scalability limitations across blockchains. This led to Portal’s acquisition by Monad, where he now focuses on high-performance, EVM-compatible chains capable of sub-second finality—critical for global payment adoption. He sees stablecoins entering a "email moment" for money: enabling instant, low-cost global value transfer. New business models are emerging where issuers share interest earnings with users, transforming stablecoins into interest-bearing assets even during transactions. This shift, coupled with supportive regulation like the GENIUS Act, is driving broader institutional adoption. Looking ahead, Parekh is excited about AI-powered agentic payments and high-frequency finance, where autonomous agents execute microsecond-speed transactions. He envisions a future where decentralized infrastructure seamlessly integrates into everyday apps, enabling global, efficient, and programmable money movement—ushering in a new era for both finance and user experience."

marsbit12/26 05:40

Stepping into the Stablecoin Wave for Six Years, He Sees the Embryonic Form of the Future of Payments

marsbit12/26 05:40

Founder's Account: From Start to Abandonment, Why I'm No Longer Doing Web3 Payments

In this candid reflection, a serial entrepreneur shares their decision to step away from Web3 payment ventures after six months of deep immersion. Initially drawn by the promise of faster, more transparent, and globally efficient settlements—especially for cross-border and remote work scenarios—the founder quickly realized that the industry’s core challenges aren’t product-based but structural. Through on-the-ground research in places like Yiwu, Mexico, and Shuibei, they observed that real-world adoption of Web3 payments remains fragmented, relationship-dependent, and far from the scalable, product-driven opportunity often portrayed. The critical barrier? Dependence on banking relationships, compliance, licensing, risk management, and regulatory navigation—areas where small, agile teams lack the resources and long-term leverage. The author emphasizes that many seemingly profitable payment operations actually profit from risk tolerance, not operational excellence, and that sustainability hinges on resilience to regulatory and financial shocks. While still believing in Web3 payment’s long-term potential—especially as a back-end upgrade for global treasury management—they concluded that the sector demands deep industry assets, patience, and risk capital ill-suited to their team’s strengths. Instead, they plan to focus on the next layer: helping users navigate on-chain asset management and risk-aware investing, turning payment flows into sustainable value. This isn’t a rejection of Web3 payments but a pragmatic shift based on resource alignment and structural reality.

marsbit12/26 02:13

Founder's Account: From Start to Abandonment, Why I'm No Longer Doing Web3 Payments

marsbit12/26 02:13

Decrypting the 2025 Crypto Wealth Map: 12 Winners and the Next Wave of Opportunities

The year 2025 marked a pivotal shift for the crypto industry, transitioning from a "recovery year" to one where infrastructure gained mainstream recognition. Key winners emerged, fundamentally reshaping the financial landscape. The U.S., under the Trump administration, became a dominant force by enacting pro-crypto policies like the GENIUS Act and banning CBDCs, positioning itself as a global crypto hub. U.S. spot ETFs, led by products like IBIT, saw massive institutional inflows, with Ethereum, Solana, and XRP ETFs gaining traction. Solana (SOL) evolved beyond a "meme coin casino" to become a core liquidity layer, with on-chain volumes surpassing major centralized exchanges. Base, an Ethereum L2 by Coinbase, leveraged its user base to drive consumer crypto adoption. Ripple and XRP overcame legal challenges, leading to ETF approvals and transforming into a liquidity engine. Privacy coins like Zcash surged, shedding their stigma and attracting institutional interest for compliant use cases. Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization grew significantly, with SEC support enabling traditional finance integration. Stablecoins surpassed a $300B market cap, cementing their role as critical financial infrastructure. Perpetual DEXs broke credibility barriers, recording $1.2T in monthly volume as traders migrated from CEXs. Prediction markets like Polymarket gained legitimacy, bridging gambling and finance. Hong Kong emerged as a key Asian hub, with growing ETP volumes and a robust regulatory framework for exchanges and stablecoins. Finally, early crypto believers were vindicated as major institutions entered the market, validating their long-term thesis. These winners collectively drove structural shifts, setting the stage for continued innovation and integration in 2026.

比推12/25 15:21

Decrypting the 2025 Crypto Wealth Map: 12 Winners and the Next Wave of Opportunities

比推12/25 15:21

Will the United States Use Encryption Technology to Resolve the 37 Trillion Dollar Debt Crisis?

The article explores the United States' potential use of cryptocurrency and stablecoins to manage its $37 trillion national debt, as suggested by a senior advisor to Russian President Putin. The core idea is that the U.S. could leverage its control over the global reserve currency to "export" inflation and effectively devalue its debt through digital asset systems, forcing other nations to bear the cost. This would not involve direct default but rather a strategic devaluation via monetary expansion, a historically common tactic. Stablecoins, backed by U.S. Treasury assets, could distribute this debt globally. As adoption grows, losses from dollar inflation would be shared by all stablecoin holders worldwide, not just U.S. citizens. This system offers the control of a central bank digital currency (CBDC) without the political baggage. However, trust remains a critical issue: stablecoin reserves cannot be fully independently audited, and the U.S. could unilaterally change rules, as it did when decoupling the dollar from gold in 1971. While a direct government move—like selling gold to buy Bitcoin, as proposed by MicroStrategy’s Michael Saylor—is unlikely, the U.S. may instead allow private companies to lead the adoption. Firms like MicroStrategy accumulating Bitcoin could serve as a backdoor for eventual state interest. The article concludes that some form of digital asset strategy to address the debt crisis is probable, though it may unfold gradually and discreetly.

比推12/25 14:48

Will the United States Use Encryption Technology to Resolve the 37 Trillion Dollar Debt Crisis?

比推12/25 14:48

On-Chain Metrics Practical Guide: Identifying Real Signals, Avoiding Data Traps

A practical guide to on-chain metrics for traders, focusing on identifying genuine signals and avoiding data traps. Key concepts include distinguishing between transaction fees (user-paid costs), protocol revenue (actual earnings), and MEV (maximal extractable value), emphasizing that sustainable revenue matters more than high fees. Total Value Locked (TVL) is often misleading due to double-counting, incentive-driven "mercenary capital," and idle stablecoins. Traders should analyze TVL alongside transaction volume and incentives. Daily Active Addresses (DAA) can be inflated by bots and airdrop farmers; it’s only meaningful when correlated with fees and real activity. Cross-chain bridges enable asset transfers but carry risks like smart contract vulnerabilities and centralization. Monitor bridge volumes for liquidity flow insights. Stablecoin supply acts as crypto’s money supply (M2); increasing supply suggests market liquidity, while decreases may signal withdrawals. Token unlocks and emissions create sell pressure; avoid tokens nearing large unlocks unless trading short-term. The ratio of transaction volume to TVL indicates capital efficiency—high ratios reflect active usage, while low ratios suggest "ghost liquidity." In summary, on-chain metrics are analytical tools, not absolute truths. Cross-verify signals and interpret data contextually for informed decisions.

比推12/25 13:06

On-Chain Metrics Practical Guide: Identifying Real Signals, Avoiding Data Traps

比推12/25 13:06

活动图片