# Revenue Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Revenue", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

On-Chain Metrics Practical Guide: Identifying Real Signals, Avoiding Data Traps

A practical guide to on-chain metrics for traders, focusing on identifying genuine signals and avoiding data traps. Key concepts include distinguishing between transaction fees (user-paid costs), protocol revenue (actual earnings), and MEV (maximal extractable value), emphasizing that sustainable revenue matters more than high fees. Total Value Locked (TVL) is often misleading due to double-counting, incentive-driven "mercenary capital," and idle stablecoins. Traders should analyze TVL alongside transaction volume and incentives. Daily Active Addresses (DAA) can be inflated by bots and airdrop farmers; it’s only meaningful when correlated with fees and real activity. Cross-chain bridges enable asset transfers but carry risks like smart contract vulnerabilities and centralization. Monitor bridge volumes for liquidity flow insights. Stablecoin supply acts as crypto’s money supply (M2); increasing supply suggests market liquidity, while decreases may signal withdrawals. Token unlocks and emissions create sell pressure; avoid tokens nearing large unlocks unless trading short-term. The ratio of transaction volume to TVL indicates capital efficiency—high ratios reflect active usage, while low ratios suggest "ghost liquidity." In summary, on-chain metrics are analytical tools, not absolute truths. Cross-verify signals and interpret data contextually for informed decisions.

比推12/25 13:06

On-Chain Metrics Practical Guide: Identifying Real Signals, Avoiding Data Traps

比推12/25 13:06

Second Largest Whale Cuts Losses and Liquidates, Can AAVE Still Be Bought Amid Deepening Divisions?

The second-largest AAVE whale, excluding the project team, protocol contracts, and CEXs, has sold 230,000 AAVE tokens at a significant loss of $13.45 million, causing a 12% price drop. This sell-off reflects growing tensions between Aave Labs and the community over governance and fund allocation. The conflict began when Aave switched its default swap aggregator to Cow Swap, redirecting front-end transaction fees—previously sent to the Aave DAO treasury—to Aave Labs instead. Community members estimated this change could divert over $10 million annually from the DAO to the team, raising concerns about transparency and control. Aave Labs argued that front-end products are separate from the protocol and that the team has the right to monetize them. In response, a proposal was made to transfer control of Aave’s brand assets (domains, social accounts, etc.) to token holders. Founder Stani Kulechov opposed the proposal, citing its oversimplification of complex legal and operational issues, further escalating community backlash. The situation highlights deeper structural challenges in DeFi governance, where protocol value, team control, and community rights intersect. The outcome of an ongoing snapshot vote on the proposal may determine AAVE’s short-term price direction and long-term community trust. If the conflict signals fundamental misalignment between Aave Labs and the DAO, this could mark the start of continued tension rather than an isolated incident.

marsbit12/22 04:13

Second Largest Whale Cuts Losses and Liquidates, Can AAVE Still Be Bought Amid Deepening Divisions?

marsbit12/22 04:13

Second Largest Whale Cuts Losses and Liquidates, Can AAVE Still Be Bought Amid Deepening Conflict?

The second-largest AAVE whale, excluding the project team, protocol contracts, and exchanges, has sold off 230,000 AAVE tokens (worth approximately $38 million) at a loss, causing a 12% price drop. The sale occurred amid growing tensions between the Aave team and its community over governance and financial control. The conflict began when the community discovered that Aave Labs, without prior communication, redirected front-end exchange fees—previously directed to the Aave DAO treasury—to its own address after switching the default trading path to Cow Swap. This change could divert an estimated $10 million annually from the community to the team. Aave Labs defended the move, arguing that front-end products are separate from the protocol and that the team has the right to monetize its own infrastructure. In response, a proposal was made to transfer control of Aave’s brand assets—including domains and social accounts—to AAVE token holders. Founder Stani Kulechov opposed the proposal, calling it oversimplified and poorly structured, further escalating community backlash. The situation highlights deeper structural tensions in DeFi between team-controlled products and community-governed protocols. The outcome of the ongoing snapshot vote on the proposal may significantly influence AAVE’s price and long-term community trust.

Odaily星球日报12/22 04:10

Second Largest Whale Cuts Losses and Liquidates, Can AAVE Still Be Bought Amid Deepening Conflict?

Odaily星球日报12/22 04:10

活动图片