# Capital Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Capital", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Can Solana reverse its ‘worst quarter’ since 2023 as fees drop 78%?

Solana's on-chain activity has hit its lowest point since late 2023, with network fees plummeting 78% year-over-year to $51 million in Q2 2026. This dramatic drop in user-paid fees signals a severe contraction in network usage, coinciding with a broader crypto market downturn that has diminished Solana's role as a speculative hub. Despite a projected market bottom and emerging positive signs in areas like stablecoins and tokenization, capital inflows into SOL remain weak. SOL's Realized Cap has fallen to $73 billion, indicating $24 billion in outflows since last year. While SOL's price recently recovered to $84, reclaiming a key support level of $75, its upside is capped near $92. A potential sell-off from $14.2 million in stolen SOL could further test this crucial support.

ambcrypto07/11 20:04

Can Solana reverse its ‘worst quarter’ since 2023 as fees drop 78%?

ambcrypto07/11 20:04

Strategy's Accounting Gimmick: The Cap on BTC Sales Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion

The article, originally from Bankless, discusses how MicroStrategy's (MSTR) recent Bitcoin (BTC) sales reveal a much larger potential selling capacity than the widely reported $1.25 billion "reserve-building" cap. On July 7, MicroStrategy disclosed a sale of 3,588 BTC (~$216M) to pay dividends for its STRAT (STRC) preferred shares and replenish its USD Reserve. Crucially, the company stated this sale did not count against its stated $1.25 billion "reserve-building capacity." The analysis explains that MicroStrategy's "BTC Monetization Plan," part of its broader "Digital Credit Capital Framework," actually outlines three main purposes for selling BTC, only one of which has the $1.25B cap: 1. **Building the USD Reserve** (capped at $1.25B). 2. **Covering preferred share/ debt costs** (replenishing the reserve after payments). 3. **Funding buybacks** (up to $10B for preferred shares and $10B for MSTR common stock). The key nuance is the accounting distinction between "building" the reserve (selling BTC before making payments) and "replenishing" it (selling BTC after using reserve funds for payments). While functionally the same—converting BTC to cash for obligations—only "building" counts against the publicized $1.25B limit. This means sales for "replenishing" and the $20B+ buyback pool allow for total potential sales exceeding $30B. The article frames this as part of MicroStrategy's shift from a simple "buy and hold" Bitcoin narrative to an "active capital management" model, where BTC becomes a balance-sheet tool to manage pressures between its common stock, preferred shares, dollar reserve, and Bitcoin holdings. This creates complex trade-offs and potential conflicts of interest. The conclusion warns investors that the $1.25B figure is not a total sales ceiling. Understanding terms like "build," "replenish," and "repurchase" in MicroStrategy's disclosures is now critical, as the company navigates a new, more complex role as an actively managed entity rather than a passive Bitcoin accumulator.

Odaily星球日报07/10 04:29

Strategy's Accounting Gimmick: The Cap on BTC Sales Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion

Odaily星球日报07/10 04:29

Tether’s Adecoagro Bet Shows Stablecoin Giants Want Exposure To Real Assets, Not Just Reserves

Tether, the world's largest stablecoin issuer, has invested $100 million to acquire a roughly 9.8% stake in Adecoagro, a company with significant agricultural assets. This move represents a strategic shift beyond traditional reserve management and signals Tether's desire for broader exposure to tangible, real-world assets. The investment expands its portfolio into physical agriculture and highlights the company's evolution into a major capital allocator. While some may view it as smart diversification into productive assets, others may see it inviting increased scrutiny. Ultimately, it underscores that major stablecoin issuers are becoming substantial pools of capital, assessed not just on reserves but also on their broader investment strategies.

bitcoinist07/08 09:20

Tether’s Adecoagro Bet Shows Stablecoin Giants Want Exposure To Real Assets, Not Just Reserves

bitcoinist07/08 09:20

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25 Billion Cap: MicroStrategy's Three-Pronged Bitcoin Sale Pools Hide Massive Selling Pressure

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25B Cap: Strategy's Three-Tier Bitcoin Sales Plan Hides Massive Potential Selling Pressure Strategy recently sold 3,588 BTC (~$216M) to fund a dividend and replenish its dollar reserve, while claiming its $1.25B "reserve build" capacity remains fully available. This highlights a key nuance: the widely cited $1.25B limit applies only to sales for "Building" the reserve. Strategy's broader capital framework, however, allows Bitcoin sales for three primary purposes, each with different scales: 1. **Building the Reserve:** Selling BTC to raise up to $1.25B for the reserve. 2. **Covering Priority Share Expenses:** Selling BTC to pay dividends/interest or to replenish the reserve after such payments are made from it (no specified limit). 3. **Share Repurchase Funding:** Selling BTC to fund up to $1B each in convertible note and common stock repurchases (totaling $2B potential). Combined, just the capped "Build" and "Repurchase" channels could facilitate over $3B in Bitcoin sales, excluding the uncapped "Cover Expenses" channel. The accounting distinction between "Building" (adding cash before a payout) and "Replenishing" (adding cash after a payout) is operationally blurry but allows sales like the recent $216M transaction without touching the $1.25B "Build" quota. This gives Strategy significant flexibility. The move signifies a strategic shift: Strategy is transforming from a simple Bitcoin accumulator into an active capital manager, akin to a hedge fund. Bitcoin is now a financial lever to balance pressures between common stock, convertible notes, dollar reserves, and Bitcoin holdings. This creates inherent tensions—actions benefiting one part of the capital structure may harm another. Investors must understand that the potential Bitcoin sales are far greater than the surface-level $1.25B figure. Strategy has become a complex financial entity where every term in its disclosures matters. Betting on it now is a wager on its active capital management skill to navigate these internal contradictions without a systemic failure.

Foresight News07/08 06:09

Don't Be Misled by the $1.25 Billion Cap: MicroStrategy's Three-Pronged Bitcoin Sale Pools Hide Massive Selling Pressure

Foresight News07/08 06:09

Is Monad’s record $477mln TVL organic or incentive-driven? Assessing…

Monad's DeFi ecosystem has witnessed substantial growth in Total Value Locked (TVL), rising from around $80 million in November to a peak of $477 million. This surge, which accelerated from March, signifies significant capital inflows. Key developments include the launch of Aave V3 on Monad, attracting nearly $100 million in deposits, and MetaMask selecting Monad for its "Money Account." However, the article questions whether this liquidity growth is organic or driven by incentives, emphasizing that sustainable network usage depends on continued increases in wallets, bridge inflows, and stablecoin adoption. Simultaneously, the piece highlights a broader market shift where capital is becoming more selective, concentrating around protocols with strong long-term value. Aave experienced over $1.3 billion in deposit growth ahead of its Aavenomics 3.0 update, driven by anticipation of improved tokenomics and automated buyback mechanisms. The critical challenge for both platforms is converting this liquidity into sustainable activity: for Aave, this means higher borrowing demand and protocol revenue; for Monad, it requires translating capital inflows into long-term ecosystem adoption and usage.

ambcrypto07/07 20:02

Is Monad’s record $477mln TVL organic or incentive-driven? Assessing…

ambcrypto07/07 20:02

CryptoQuant Founder: The Cost to Double BTC Has Increased by 20,000 Times, Where Will the $100 Billion Buying Power Come From?

CryptoQuant founder Ki Young Ju analyzes Bitcoin's current capital challenge. He notes that the cryptocurrency market has grown too large for retail-driven momentum alone to generate massive price increases as in past cycles. His calculations show that in 2011, approximately $2.7 million in capital inflow could push BTC's price up by 550x, whereas the current cycle requires an estimated $101 billion in new capital just for a 100% price increase. This shift underscores that sustaining a bull run now depends on attracting large-scale, long-term institutional capital rather than short-term speculative trading. Recent outflows from US spot Bitcoin ETFs, totaling nearly $10 billion since May, highlight the fragility of current demand and challenge the narrative of deep institutional support. While surveys indicate continued institutional interest, these entities prioritize regulated products, risk management, and portfolio integration over speculative gains. For the next significant bull market, Bitcoin must transition to being a core macro asset. The key drivers are no longer just more buyers, but capital allocation from larger, slower-moving entities like wealth advisors, corporate treasuries, banks, and sovereign wealth funds. This new phase pits Bitcoin against other major asset classes like AI for a share of institutional capital, making its growth trajectory dependent on sustained, high-quality inflows from diversified financial balance sheets.

marsbit07/07 05:07

CryptoQuant Founder: The Cost to Double BTC Has Increased by 20,000 Times, Where Will the $100 Billion Buying Power Come From?

marsbit07/07 05:07

The Market Trades on Expectations, But You're Waiting for Answers

The market trades on expectations, not on waiting for answers. A common misconception is that prices react after data is released. In reality, sensitive capital moves based on anticipated changes in policy, capital flows, and sentiment. Once an expectation forms, prices adjust in advance. For example, if the market expects the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, assets like gold, growth stocks, or BTC may rise ahead of the actual announcement. When the cut finally happens, the market might show little movement or even pull back—not because the news isn't significant, but because it was already priced in. The same applies to reports like non-farm payrolls. If weak employment data is anticipated, gold and bonds may rally beforehand. When the data confirms the weakness, prices may not rise further, as it merely validates existing expectations. This explains why markets sometimes appear irrational: good news doesn't always lift prices, and bad news doesn't always cause declines. The key is to assess whether an event was already anticipated and whether capital has begun to price it in or is now taking profits. The market is always trading the future, not the present. Price movements reflect bets on what comes next. Therefore, focusing solely on headlines can lead to losses. Instead, investors should ask: Was this news already expected? Is the market still pricing it in, or is it time to cash out? In short, the market doesn't wait for answers—it acts on the future it believes in, often long before the news becomes public.

marsbit07/03 01:27

The Market Trades on Expectations, But You're Waiting for Answers

marsbit07/03 01:27

UK Crypto Regulation Enters Countdown: What Changes Are in the FCA's New Rules?

UK Crypto Regulation Enters Countdown: Key Changes in FCA's New Rules The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published its final crypto asset regulatory policy, marking a shift from consultation to implementation. The new regime, set to fully expand from October 25, 2027, moves crypto businesses from registration to authorisation. A critical window from September 30, 2026, to February 28, 2027, allows existing firms to apply for transitional provisions, enabling them to continue operating while their authorisation is reviewed. Existing registrations will not automatically convert. The rules cover a broad range of activities including stablecoin issuance, custody, trading platform operation, arranging deals, staking, and lending. Authorised firms must meet new prudential capital requirements, with permanent minimum capital ranging from £750,000 for proprietary trading to £75,000 for arranging deals. They must also hold a basic liquid asset buffer for operational resilience. Market integrity rules now apply to trading platforms and intermediaries, covering areas like insider trading and requiring best execution checks against at least three UK-authorised venues. Custodians face enhanced client asset protection rules (CASS 17), focusing on ownership, reconciliation, and private key management. For stablecoins, issuers must provide full backing from issuance and allow redemption at par value within a T+1 timeframe. Reserve assets are categorised into core (e.g., demand deposits) and expanded types, with specific liquidity requirements (ODDR and CBAR) to ensure redemption capacity. Systemically important stablecoin issuers may be jointly regulated by the FCA and the Bank of England. The FCA cautions that the rules do not eliminate the high-risk, speculative nature of most crypto assets but establish a more comprehensive financial regulatory framework for the industry.

Foresight News07/02 09:16

UK Crypto Regulation Enters Countdown: What Changes Are in the FCA's New Rules?

Foresight News07/02 09:16

UK FCA unveils crypto rulebook: Risk-based approach starts October 2027

UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has unveiled a new, risk-based regulatory framework for cryptoasset companies, set to take effect in October 2027. This approach moves away from rigid, uniform rules to a system where capital requirements and disclosure obligations will vary based on a firm's individual risk profile. Companies will conduct their own annual risk assessments and stress tests, subject to FCA review. The rules aim to lower compliance costs for smaller firms, boost market confidence, and attract millions of new UK crypto users. The framework also establishes baseline rules for stablecoin issuers, including consumer protections, while allowing for stricter oversight of larger, systemic players. FCA executives state the rules provide needed clarity, though experts caution that regulation reduces but does not eliminate consumer risks.

ambcrypto06/30 13:17

UK FCA unveils crypto rulebook: Risk-based approach starts October 2027

ambcrypto06/30 13:17

Rate Hikes to Save STRC, Selling Bitcoin to Preserve Credit: Strategy Picks Its Two Most Expensive Paths

Over the past six weeks, Strategy has faced a significant crisis of confidence, with its core securities MSTR and STRC experiencing sharp price declines. The situation escalated as the company utilized dollar reserves intended for dividends and interest payments to repurchase debt, and then sold a small amount of Bitcoin for the first time since 2022—an action that contradicted its "never sell" narrative and signaled potential liquidity strain. In response, Strategy introduced a Digital Credit capital framework. This formalized a series of measures to manage the pressure down its capital structure: ordinary shareholders have already borne costs through equity dilution from an $11.5 billion ATM offering; new rules enforce a hard dollar reserve covering at least 12 months of expected dividend and interest payments; the STRC dividend rate was increased from 11.5% to 12%; and, most notably, Bitcoin was officially integrated into the capital toolkit, with board authorization to sell up to $1.25 billion worth if needed to support obligations and repurchase programs. The market reacted with a mix of relief and skepticism. While the announcement triggered a sharp single-day rally in both MSTR and STRC, the preferred shares still trade at a significant discount. Supporters view the framework as pragmatic crisis management that provides a price floor and clearer rules. Critics argue that institutionalizing Bitcoin sales undermines the core investment thesis and, with Bitcoin's price below the company's average cost basis, amounts to selling assets at a loss to maintain its financial structure. The broader context shows institutional Bitcoin buying drying up, highlighting that Strategy's challenges and new framework are now a key indicator for overall market risk sentiment. Ultimately, the framework buys time, but STRC's return to par value depends on market belief in the company's ability to cover dividends without further dilution or substantial Bitcoin sales—a task that would be easier if Bitcoin's price recovers.

链捕手06/30 10:17

Rate Hikes to Save STRC, Selling Bitcoin to Preserve Credit: Strategy Picks Its Two Most Expensive Paths