South Korea Plans Cap On Crypto Exchange Ownership Despite Industry Concerns

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-01-29Last updated on 2026-01-29

Abstract

South Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) is proceeding with a proposal to cap major shareholders' stakes in cryptocurrency exchanges at 15%-20%, despite opposition from industry players and the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK). FSC Chairman Lee Eog-weon argued the measure is necessary to align governance standards with exchanges' expanding public role and to prevent conflicts of interest. The cap would be part of the upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act, which would also transition exchanges from a renewable notification system to a permanent authorization system. Major exchanges like Upbit and Coinone oppose the move, warning it could hinder industry growth. Meanwhile, lawmakers aim to introduce the comprehensive digital asset framework before the Lunar New Year. The legislation also addresses stablecoin regulation, setting a minimum capital requirement of 5 billion won ($3.48 million) for issuers, though no agreement has been reached on won-pegged stablecoins.

South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) has shared its intention to move forward with the proposed cap on crypto exchange ownership despite concerns from industry players and the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK).

FSC Backs Ownership Cap For Crypto Exchanges

On Wednesday, Financial Services Commission Chairman Lee Eog-weon revealed that the regulatory agency is reviewing a proposal to cap major shareholders’ stakes in crypto exchanges at around 15%-20%.

According to The Korea Times, Lee stressed the need to limit the ownership stakes of controlling shareholders in crypto exchanges, claiming that the move is necessary to “align governance standards with the exchanges’ increasing public role.”

He argued that “excessive concentration of ownership” could increase the risk of conflicts of interest while undermining market integrity, noting that securities exchanges and other trading systems are subject to similar limits.

The chairman highlighted that existing regulations mainly focus on anti-money laundering and investor protection. The ownership cap proposal would be included in the upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act, also known as the Second Phase of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, which is expected to serve as a comprehensive framework for the entire industry.

“Under the current system, virtual asset exchanges operate under a notification system that requires renewal every three years. The proposed shift to an authorization system would effectively grant exchanges permanent operating status,” Lee explained.

He emphasized that “this higher status means exchanges need governance rules that match their larger role and greater responsibilities.” As a result, exchanges would assume characteristics similar to public infrastructure.

A joint council representing domestic crypto exchanges, including Upbit, Bithumb, and Coinone, has opposed the proposed cap, warning that it could hinder the development of South Korea’s digital asset sector.

Notably, major players like Song Chi-hyung, the chairman of Dunamu, the company that operates Upbit, and Cha Myung-hoon, the founder of Coinone, would be forced to sell significant portions of their holdings if the law is enacted.

The Democratic Party of Korea also expressed its concerns, observing that similar ownership caps are uncommon worldwide and could make South Korea’s framework inconsistent with global regulatory trends.

Lawmakers Set New Deadline For Digital Assets Framework

ChosunBiz reported that the DPK’s Digital Assets Task Force (TF) discussed key details of the Digital Asset Basic Act in a Wednesday meeting at the National Assembly members’ office building, attended by government officials.

According to the report, the ruling party’s members did not discuss the cap on crypto exchange ownership. Still, they revealed that they will introduce the framework before the Lunar New Year holiday on February 17.

DPK’s Lawmaker Ahn Do-geol said, “We plan to introduce the Digital Asset Basic Act before the Lunar New Year, and we hope that by then a plan agreed upon with the government as much as possible will be put together.”

Instead of the “unanimous consent system” proposed by the Bank of Korea (BOK), the task force settled on a consultative body to discuss stablecoin authorizations, comprised of the BOK, the FSC, the Ministry of Economy and Finance, and the Financial Supervisory Service.

The task force considered that requiring unanimity for stablecoin authorization would slow issuance, while observers believe that the central bank’s proposal was “a way to control stablecoins.”

In addition, the minimum statutory capital for stablecoin issuers was set at 5 billion won, approximately $3.48 million. Nonetheless, the report affirmed that there has not been an agreement on the issuance of won-pegged stablecoins.

As reported by Bitcoinist, the BOK and the FSC have been clashing over the extent of banks’ role in stablecoin issuance. While the central bank has been pushing for a consortium of banks owning at least 51% of any stablecoin issuer seeking approval in the country, the FSC has expressed concerns about this proposal.

Lee Kang-il, a DPK lawmaker on the task force, asserted that “the 50%+1 share rule remains contentious because there is still no willingness to concede among government ministries,” but added that they have prepared a mediation plan and will “make decisions in a direction that serves the national interest overall and benefits the public.”

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $89,993 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the proposed ownership cap for major shareholders in crypto exchanges by South Korea's FSC?

AThe Financial Services Commission (FSC) is reviewing a proposal to cap major shareholders’ stakes in crypto exchanges at around 15%-20%.

QWhy does the FSC believe an ownership cap is necessary for crypto exchanges?

AThe FSC argues that an 'excessive concentration of ownership' could increase the risk of conflicts of interest and undermine market integrity, and that exchanges need governance rules that match their larger public role and greater responsibilities.

QWhich major industry players have opposed the proposed ownership cap?

AA joint council representing domestic crypto exchanges, including Upbit, Bithumb, and Coinone, has opposed the cap. Key individuals like Dunamu's chairman Song Chi-hyung and Coinone founder Cha Myung-hoon would be forced to sell significant portions of their holdings.

QWhat is the new deadline for introducing the Digital Asset Basic Act, as set by lawmakers?

AThe ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to introduce the Digital Asset Basic Act before the Lunar New Year holiday on February 17.

QWhat was the minimum statutory capital set for stablecoin issuers, and what is its approximate value in US dollars?

AThe minimum statutory capital for stablecoin issuers was set at 5 billion won, which is approximately $3.48 million.

Related Reads

Stocks Fell Even More Violently Than Crypto, Where Did the Money Go?

From June to late July 2026, global stock markets, particularly technology and semiconductor stocks, experienced severe declines, with South Korea's KOSPI index facing historic circuit breakers and shedding 40% from its June peak. Key catalysts included SK Hynix's earnings miss despite record profits and competitive pressures from China's CXMT IPO. A global forced deleveraging event unfolded, devastating highly leveraged instruments like the 2x leveraged SK Hynix ETF, which lost over 80% of its value. Surprisingly, Bitcoin showed relative stability during this period, rising roughly 15% from its July low. The article clarifies this wasn't due to an inflow of equity flight capital but because Bitcoin had already undergone a significant correction in May and June, with U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs seeing record outflows. True safe-haven flows went to gold, severing Bitcoin's short-term "digital gold" narrative. The sell-off is characterized not as an AI story collapse but a liquidity-driven清算 of crowded leveraged positions, potentially halfway through according to some analysts. For substantial capital to return to Bitcoin, the article cites necessary conditions: eased global liquidity pressure, a soft-landing Fed rate cut, and regulatory clarity from the stalled U.S. CLARITY Act. The conclusion is that Bitcoin is not a current safe haven but a pre-cleared asset. Its decoupling from tech stocks highlights its potential future role as a non-correlated asset for institutional portfolios, positioning it favorably for when global capital reallocates post-crisis.

marsbit2h ago

Stocks Fell Even More Violently Than Crypto, Where Did the Money Go?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片