Solana’s leverage-driven tug of war puts $120 support at risk – How?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-26Last updated on 2025-12-26

Abstract

Solana's market is currently defined by high leverage and extreme volatility, with its price struggling to hold the critical $120 support level. After failing to break the $150 resistance multiple times, SOL has established a bearish structure. A significant factor is the split among whale investors: while bullish whales are facing substantial unrealized losses on leveraged long positions, bearish whales are profiting from shorting the asset. This dynamic creates a volatile tug-of-war. Despite Circle minting $55 billion in USDC on Solana in 2025, providing ample liquidity, the altcoin continues to face downward pressure. The influx of capital appears to be fueling speculation rather than stabilization. The current conditions, marked by a bearish structure and overexposed long positions, present an ideal setup for a bear trap that could break the key $120 support.

Right now, “time” is becoming a key commodity in the market.

The logic is simple – The longer the market chops sideways, the bigger the speculative bubble gets, pushing top-caps deeper into a volatility loop. Consequently, any move in either direction could end up costing millions.

Notably, Solana [SOL] is playing this perfectly. After failing to break the $150-resistance three times in November, it’s now showing a clear bearish structure, with $120 now acting as a major inflection zone.

Meanwhile, Circle [USDC] is taking full advantage of the volatility.

According to Onchain Lens, they just minted another $500 million USDC on Solana. More broadly, so far in 2025, Circle has minted a staggering $55 billion on the L1, providing the market with ample capital to work with.

However, despite the influx, SOL continues to struggle below key levels. Consequently, the question arises – Is this added liquidity actually stabilizing the market, or is it fueling further volatility in the altcoin?

Solana whales clash – Bulls bleed, bears cash in

At the time of writing, Solana whales seemed split as SOL traded around $120.

On one side, a whale loaded up on 20x longs, with the same now deep in the red with an unrealized loss of $5.88 million, crashing total profits from $18 million to just $3 million. Episodes like these directly puts pressure on key SOL levels.

On the other side, a bear whale is quietly shorting too, racking up over $27.7 million in gains while slowly taking profits. This is classic market polarity, reinforcing AMBCrypto’s thesis highlighting Solana’s brutal volatility loop.

Simply put, liquidity is clearly building on Solana’s speculative side.

However, here’s the catch – Whales are the ones making the bets, trying to profit off the volatility. And, judging by the current dynamics, shorting SOL might be racking up more gains, effectively putting whales against the token.

All in all, with Solana’s bearish market structure, long-heavy whales, and volatility still running hot, it’s shaping up as the perfect setup for bears to trap overexposed longs. This would put the $120-SOL support at risk of breaking.


Final Thoughts

  • Whales are split, with leveraged longs bleeding losses and shorts racking up gains, highlighting Solana’s brutal volatility loop.
  • Circle’s $55 billion USDC minting added to market liquidity, but SOL’s bearish structure created a setup for bears to trap overexposed longs.

Related Questions

QWhat is the key commodity in the market according to the article, and why?

AAccording to the article, 'time' is becoming a key commodity. The logic is that the longer the market moves sideways, the larger the speculative bubble grows, pushing top cryptocurrencies into a volatility loop where any significant price move could be extremely costly.

QWhat major support level for Solana (SOL) is at risk, and what is the identified bearish signal?

AThe $120 support level for Solana is at risk. The bearish signal is that SOL failed to break the $150 resistance three times in November, establishing a clear bearish market structure.

QHow has Circle (USDC) taken advantage of the market volatility on Solana?

ACircle has taken advantage of the volatility by minting a significant amount of USDC on the Solana blockchain. They recently minted another $500 million, bringing the total to a staggering $55 billion minted on the L1 so far in 2025, providing the market with ample capital.

QHow are the trading activities of Solana whales contributing to the market's volatility?

ASolana whales are split and contributing to volatility through high-leverage trading. One bull whale is deep in the red on a 20x long position with millions in unrealized losses, while a bear whale is profiting by shorting, having gained over $27.7 million. This clash creates a 'brutal volatility loop.'

QWhat is the article's conclusion on the overall market setup for Solana?

AThe article concludes that the combination of Solana's bearish market structure, long-heavy whales bleeding losses, and high volatility creates a perfect setup for bearish traders to trap overexposed long positions, which puts the crucial $120 support level at risk of breaking.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1h ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片