Solana’s leverage-driven tug of war puts $120 support at risk – How?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-26Last updated on 2025-12-26

Abstract

Solana's market is currently defined by high leverage and extreme volatility, with its price struggling to hold the critical $120 support level. After failing to break the $150 resistance multiple times, SOL has established a bearish structure. A significant factor is the split among whale investors: while bullish whales are facing substantial unrealized losses on leveraged long positions, bearish whales are profiting from shorting the asset. This dynamic creates a volatile tug-of-war. Despite Circle minting $55 billion in USDC on Solana in 2025, providing ample liquidity, the altcoin continues to face downward pressure. The influx of capital appears to be fueling speculation rather than stabilization. The current conditions, marked by a bearish structure and overexposed long positions, present an ideal setup for a bear trap that could break the key $120 support.

Right now, “time” is becoming a key commodity in the market.

The logic is simple – The longer the market chops sideways, the bigger the speculative bubble gets, pushing top-caps deeper into a volatility loop. Consequently, any move in either direction could end up costing millions.

Notably, Solana [SOL] is playing this perfectly. After failing to break the $150-resistance three times in November, it’s now showing a clear bearish structure, with $120 now acting as a major inflection zone.

Meanwhile, Circle [USDC] is taking full advantage of the volatility.

According to Onchain Lens, they just minted another $500 million USDC on Solana. More broadly, so far in 2025, Circle has minted a staggering $55 billion on the L1, providing the market with ample capital to work with.

However, despite the influx, SOL continues to struggle below key levels. Consequently, the question arises – Is this added liquidity actually stabilizing the market, or is it fueling further volatility in the altcoin?

Solana whales clash – Bulls bleed, bears cash in

At the time of writing, Solana whales seemed split as SOL traded around $120.

On one side, a whale loaded up on 20x longs, with the same now deep in the red with an unrealized loss of $5.88 million, crashing total profits from $18 million to just $3 million. Episodes like these directly puts pressure on key SOL levels.

On the other side, a bear whale is quietly shorting too, racking up over $27.7 million in gains while slowly taking profits. This is classic market polarity, reinforcing AMBCrypto’s thesis highlighting Solana’s brutal volatility loop.

Simply put, liquidity is clearly building on Solana’s speculative side.

However, here’s the catch – Whales are the ones making the bets, trying to profit off the volatility. And, judging by the current dynamics, shorting SOL might be racking up more gains, effectively putting whales against the token.

All in all, with Solana’s bearish market structure, long-heavy whales, and volatility still running hot, it’s shaping up as the perfect setup for bears to trap overexposed longs. This would put the $120-SOL support at risk of breaking.


Final Thoughts

  • Whales are split, with leveraged longs bleeding losses and shorts racking up gains, highlighting Solana’s brutal volatility loop.
  • Circle’s $55 billion USDC minting added to market liquidity, but SOL’s bearish structure created a setup for bears to trap overexposed longs.

Related Questions

QWhat is the key commodity in the market according to the article, and why?

AAccording to the article, 'time' is becoming a key commodity. The logic is that the longer the market moves sideways, the larger the speculative bubble grows, pushing top cryptocurrencies into a volatility loop where any significant price move could be extremely costly.

QWhat major support level for Solana (SOL) is at risk, and what is the identified bearish signal?

AThe $120 support level for Solana is at risk. The bearish signal is that SOL failed to break the $150 resistance three times in November, establishing a clear bearish market structure.

QHow has Circle (USDC) taken advantage of the market volatility on Solana?

ACircle has taken advantage of the volatility by minting a significant amount of USDC on the Solana blockchain. They recently minted another $500 million, bringing the total to a staggering $55 billion minted on the L1 so far in 2025, providing the market with ample capital.

QHow are the trading activities of Solana whales contributing to the market's volatility?

ASolana whales are split and contributing to volatility through high-leverage trading. One bull whale is deep in the red on a 20x long position with millions in unrealized losses, while a bear whale is profiting by shorting, having gained over $27.7 million. This clash creates a 'brutal volatility loop.'

QWhat is the article's conclusion on the overall market setup for Solana?

AThe article concludes that the combination of Solana's bearish market structure, long-heavy whales bleeding losses, and high volatility creates a perfect setup for bearish traders to trap overexposed long positions, which puts the crucial $120 support level at risk of breaking.

Related Reads

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit1h ago

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit1h ago

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit2h ago

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片