Solana wins January on-chain – So why did SOL still drop 20%?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-04Last updated on 2026-02-04

Abstract

Despite leading all blockchain networks in on-chain DEX volume in January with a 20% month-on-month increase to $117.7 billion in trades, Solana's native token, SOL, experienced a significant price drop of approximately 20%. This decline, which saw SOL fall from the $120-125 range to near $100, was attributed to broader market weakness rather than a loss of interest in the Solana network itself. The network demonstrated robust health, with transaction counts and overall activity reaching all-time highs, and an improved ratio of successful to reverted transactions. Notably, Solana accounted for nearly 35% of all on-chain DEX volume at its peak, significantly outperforming competitors like Ethereum, BNB Chain, Base, and Arbitrum. Looking forward, Standard Chartered Bank adjusted its near-term price target for SOL downward from $310 to $250 but raised its long-term forecasts. The bank predicts SOL could reach $400 by the end of 2027, $700 by the end of 2028, and $1,200 by the end of 2029. This optimistic outlook is based on Solana's expanding use cases beyond meme coins, with growing dominance in stablecoin transfers and micropayments, particularly due to its high efficiency and speed compared to other networks like Ethereum. The bank believes this efficiency could unlock new AI-driven micropayment applications, solidifying Solana's long-term value proposition.

Solana is having a moment. Just… not the kind that shows up on a price chart.

In January, the network was ranked No.1 in DEX Volume rankings, while transactions and usage pushed to ATHs. However, despite it all, SOL’s price has struggled to keep pace.

Will that change?

Solana leads by a wide margin

Recent data per CryptoRank showed that Solana has processed $117.7 billion in trades in January 2026.

Source: CryptoRank

That’s a 20% month-on-month increase, leaving Ethereum [ETH], BNB Chain [BNB], Base [BASE], and Arbitrum [ARB] far behind.

At its peak, Solana [SOL] accounted for nearly 35% of all on-chain DEX Volume.

Source: X

Meanwhile, Transaction Counts and overall network activity are at all-time highs, while the ratio of successful to reverted transactions improved meaningfully.

All these numbers, and yet…

…price has taken a good fall.

Over the past week, SOL dropped roughly 20%, retracing from the $120-125 range to trade near $100. The price dropped fast with big red candles – caused by the overall market weakness of the recent days, and NOT a loss of interest in Solana.

Source: TradingView

RSI indicated that selling pressure has been intense in a short span of time. In effect, SOL’s price has moved in the opposite direction from its on-chain growth.

The long game

That gap between activity and price is exactly where Standard Chartered sees Solana’s longer-term opportunity.

While the bank trimmed its near-term outlook for SOL from $310 to $250, it recently raised its forecasts further out.

They noted that the network is moving beyond meme coin-led trading cycles and that they will be dominant in stablecoin transfers and micropayments.

The forecasts state that SOL will reach $400 by the end of 2027, $700 by the end of 2028, and $1,200 by end-2029.

According to Geoff Kendrick, Global Head of Digital Assets Research, activity on Solana’s DEXs is moving toward SOL-stablecoin pairs, with stablecoins circulating far faster than on Ethereum.

That efficiency could unlock new use cases (particularly AI-driven micropayments), even if scale takes time to arrive.

Final Thoughts

  • Solana led January DEX volume, even as SOL fell 20%.
  • Standard Chartered’s long-term SOL target depends on stablecoins and micropayments.
Next: Stablecoin volume hit $10T in January – Here’s why it’s THE most bullish signal!
Share
  • Share
  • Tweet

Related Questions

QDespite leading in on-chain DEX volume in January, why did SOL's price drop by 20%?

ASOL's price dropped due to overall market weakness, not a loss of interest in Solana. The decline was characterized by big red candles and intense selling pressure in a short span, as indicated by RSI.

QWhat was Solana's ranking in DEX volume for January, and how much trade volume did it process?

ASolana was ranked No.1 in DEX volume for January, processing $117.7 billion in trades, which was a 20% month-on-month increase.

QWhat are Standard Chartered's long-term price forecasts for SOL, and what factors support these predictions?

AStandard Chartered forecasts SOL to reach $400 by end-2027, $700 by end-2028, and $1,200 by end-2029. The predictions are based on Solana's move beyond meme coin cycles, dominance in stablecoin transfers and micropayments, and faster stablecoin circulation efficiency compared to Ethereum.

QHow did Solana's network activity and transaction performance fare during this period?

ASolana's transaction counts and overall network activity reached all-time highs, with a meaningful improvement in the ratio of successful to reverted transactions.

QWhat new use cases does Standard Chartered believe Solana's efficiency could unlock?

AStandard Chartered believes Solana's efficiency, particularly in stablecoin circulation, could unlock new use cases such as AI-driven micropayments, even though scaling may take time.

Related Reads

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, suffered a historic collapse in price, losing over 50% of its value in 24 hours and erasing billions from its market cap. The dramatic sell-off was triggered by the disclosure of a major vulnerability in the Zcash Orchard privacy pool that had remained undetected since May 2022. A security researcher, using AI, developed a proof-of-concept to generate counterfeit ZEC. While the bug was patched by June 2, Zcash's privacy design makes it impossible to verify if any fake coins were minted before the fix, fueling market panic and uncertainty. This event highlights the trade-off between privacy and transparency. In response, Shielded Labs is exploring a network upgrade to allow supply verification. Despite the crisis, proponents argue that the discovery by world-class security researchers demonstrates the network's commitment to proactive hardening and resilience.

bitcoinist49m ago

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

bitcoinist49m ago

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit1h ago

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit1h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手1h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手1h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit1h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit1h ago

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手2h ago

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow