Saylor’s Bitcoin stash will be very hard for anyone to match: Pomp

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-17Last updated on 2025-12-17

Abstract

Anthony Pompliano, a Bitcoin entrepreneur, stated that Michael Saylor’s company, MicroStrategy, has accumulated such a significant amount of Bitcoin over time that it is highly unlikely any public company will be able to match its holdings. MicroStrategy currently owns 671,268 BTC, valued at approximately $58.61 billion, representing about 3.2% of Bitcoin’s total supply. Pompliano noted that while it's technically possible for another firm to catch up, the financial scale required—given MicroStrategy’s early and substantial purchases—makes it improbable. He also addressed concerns about the company's potential influence on Bitcoin’s price but highlighted that CEO Phong Lee has stated they do not plan to sell any Bitcoin until at least 2065. The company’s large purchases are conducted via over-the-counter desks to avoid market disruption.

Michael Saylor’s Strategy has been buying so much Bitcoin for so long that it is unlikely any public company will be able to catch up, according to Bitcoin entrepreneur Anthony Pompliano.

“Very hard to see that happening,” Pompliano said on The Pomp Podcast published to YouTube on Tuesday.

Strategy holds 671,268 Bitcoin (BTC) out of the total 21 million supply, valued at about $58.61 billion at the time of publication, according to Saylor Tracker. Strategy announced Monday that it acquired 10,645 Bitcoin for $980.3 million, paying an average price of $92,098 per coin.

“Is it possible? Absolutely. Is it likely? I don’t think so,” he said. Strategy holds around 3.2% of Bitcoin’s supply, which Pompliano said is “a big number, but it’s also a small number.”

“It’s not like they own 10%,” he said.

Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings have caused some concerns

However, Pompliano said that there are certain things that public companies could do, such as “tap capital markets,” but said that Saylor’s initial Bitcoin purchase in 2020 totaled around $500 million, when Bitcoin was trading between $9,000 and $10,000.

Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings is worth $58.16 billion at the time of publication. Source: Saylor Tracker

That purchase alone is now worth over $4.8 billion as Bitcoin is now trading at $87,578.

“So if you have 9X or 10X the amount of money for every purchase that they made, you gotta raise hundreds of billions of dollars, or you got the greatest business in the world that’s throwing hundreds of billions of dollars,” he said.

Strategy unlikely to sell Bitcoin until 2065: CEO

Pompliano also addressed concerns around Strategy’s growing share of Bitcoin holdings, explaining that some observers worry about the company’s potential ability to influence the price of the asset.

However, Strategy CEO Phong Lee recently told CNBC that the company probably won’t sell any Bitcoin until at least 2065. Meanwhile, Saylor has often said in X posts that he is “going to be buying the top forever.”

Related: Crypto ETPs to enter ‘cheesecake factory’ era in 2026: Bitwise

Many market participants view Strategy’s Bitcoin purchases as a bullish signal for Bitcoin’s price. However, the company executes its significant purchases through over-the-counter (OTC) desks, which are designed to absorb large flows without impacting the market.

Magazine: Big questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year power outage?

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

Title: U.S. Treasury Bonds, AI, and Inflation: A Trilemma Facing Washington, and Where BTC Fits In Core Thesis: The U.S. government faces a trilemma: stabilizing the Treasury market, sustaining the AI investment cycle, and controlling inflation. The likely political choice is to prioritize the first two, accepting higher inflation for longer. This creates a sustained tailwind for both gold and Bitcoin by injecting liquidity and shifting duration risk away from the private sector. Key Pressures on Treasuries: * Long-term yields (e.g., 10-year ~4.70%) are near multi-decade highs due to persistent inflation risks, high fiscal supply, weaker demand for long duration, and new competition from AI infrastructure financing. * AI investment, requiring massive capital (estimated ~$300B in investment-grade bond issuance), is now competing directly with the Treasury in long-duration debt markets. * Geopolitical tensions (e.g., Iran conflict) add upward pressure on oil prices and defense spending. Policy Response: The Treasury, under Secretary Besant, is focusing on market stability through measures like supporting the Yen (to prevent forced Japanese Treasury sales), increasing repo operations for long-dated bonds, and potentially shifting issuance toward the short end. This "aggressive Treasury issuance" can function like "stealth QE," easing financial conditions. Impact on Assets: * **Gold** has already benefited (up ~90% from Aug 2024 to Aug 2026), driven by declining trust in the USD, inflation fears, and a "monetary debasement" narrative. * **Bitcoin** is now showing stronger correlation with this theme. Recent outperformance vs. gold (BTC +22.2% vs. Gold +5.9% in late Aug) coincided with Treasury's enhanced repo actions, suggesting the market may be pricing it as a liquidity/ debasement hedge, not just a speculative tech asset. Conclusion: If high inflation, large deficits, and AI capital demands persist, the cost of stabilizing bonds and growth will be shorter debt maturity, constant liquidity support, and tolerance for higher inflation—a favorable environment for gold and BTC. This view would be challenged only by a return to ~2% inflation, credible fiscal consolidation, or AI becoming self-funding.

marsbit19m ago

U.S. Bonds, AI, Inflation: You Can't Have All Three – What's Bitcoin Betting On?

marsbit19m ago

HBM is Being Redefined

HBM is being redefined as AI-driven demand for computing power shifts the performance bottleneck from processing units to memory bandwidth, making High Bandwidth Memory the critical component for advanced AI hardware. At HotChips 2026, Samsung and SK Hynix unveiled new technical roadmaps for HBM4, moving away from the traditional approach of simply increasing DRAM speed and stacking layers. The focus for HBM4 has shifted from DRAM optimization to a comprehensive system-level redesign of the Base Die. Key innovations include upgrading the Base Die to advanced logic processes (e.g., Samsung's 4nm), adopting hybrid bonding for 3D stacking, and exploring heterogeneous packaging solutions like Intel's EMIB alongside the established CoWoS. This marks HBM's evolution from a simple memory component into an integrated system involving "memory + logic + packaging + IP + EDA." This transition brings benefits like better signal integrity, higher I/O bandwidth (up to 2048-bit), and potential for in-memory computing. However, it also introduces significant complexity. DRAM manufacturers now must deeply collaborate with logic foundries, extending design cycles and increasing supply chain challenges. Furthermore, the industry is moving towards multiple advanced packaging paths, with EMIB emerging as an alternative to CoWoS to alleviate capacity constraints, while hybrid bonding is being developed for future ultra-high (16+ layer) stacks. New core barriers have emerged beyond manufacturing. High-speed PHY/SERDES IP, crucial for HBM4's higher data rates, is concentrated among a few established players, creating an entry barrier for smaller firms. Similarly, the industry lacks mature 3D heterogeneous EDA toolchains capable of co-simulating the coupled electrical, thermal, and mechanical effects across the logic base, memory stacks, and interposer. These "soft" capabilities in IP and EDA are now critical determinants of HBM4's performance and yield. In summary, the HBM industry is entering a new era of systemic competition. The standardized approach is giving way to divergent vendor roadmaps, with multiple technologies coexisting. Success will depend on integrated architecture, packaging, process, and ecosystem capabilities, fundamentally reshaping the competitive landscape for AI memory.

marsbit24m ago

HBM is Being Redefined

marsbit24m ago

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

The era of turning 3,000 yuan into 200,000 yuan is over. AI-generated comic dramas are no longer a low-barrier gold rush. A wave of sudden account suspensions has hit creators in AI comic dramas, AI art, and AI tutorials, primarily triggered by new content and copyright compliance rules implemented by Tomato Novel on August 17. This "last straw" exposed the underlying issues: tightening platform rules, rising copyright requirements, increasing costs, and severe content homogenization. The business model was fundamentally unsustainable for most creators. One creator detailed the math: producing five minutes of content daily cost around 510 yuan in AI computing and editing, while a video with 60,000 views might only earn 45 yuan. While a few early viral hits like "Huo Qubing" and "Zombie Cleaner" achieved high returns with minimal investment, they were exceptions. The reality for most solo creators was barely covering costs or operating at a loss. The new regulations mandate formal authorization from original authors for adaptations, limit video length and the amount of原著 content used, and ban terms like "Episode 1" in titles. This directly dismantled the previous "produce first, authorize later" model. Faced with the inability to afford版权 costs and the threat of penalty, many creators chose to halt updates. While some fans expressed frustration, the rules protect original authors who often faced侵权 with little recourse. The shutdowns signal not the failure of AI technology, but an inevitable industry shift from wild growth to regulated refinement. The previous model prioritized quick cash over quality content, leading to formulaic, "AI-face" saturated dramas that audiences grew tired of. The future belongs to creators who use AI as a tool to serve solid storytelling, not replace it. Some are now seeking formal licenses, a slower but necessary process. Upcoming national regulations further underscore this move towards standardization, weeding out those seeking only fast money and making space for genuine creators.

marsbit25m ago

The Era of Earning 200,000 from a 3,000 Investment Is Over; AI Comic Dramas Are Not a Get-Rich-Quick Trend

marsbit25m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片