Ray Dalio's New Article: The World Is Entering a War Cycle

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-08Last updated on 2026-04-08

Abstract

Ray Dalio argues that the world is in the early stages of a prolonged "world war" that is unlikely to end soon. This conflict is not a single declared war but a combination of multiple regional hot wars (e.g., Russia-Ukraine, Israel-Gaza, US-Iran) and non-shooting wars (economic, technological, capital, and geopolitical influence wars). These interconnected conflicts are reshaping global order, driven by shifting alliances, resource competition, and the weaponization of critical trade routes like the Strait of Hormuz. Key powers are aligning into opposing blocs: China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea versus the US, Israel, Gulf states, Japan, and Australia. Dalio emphasizes that victory in such conflicts depends not on absolute strength but on which side can endure prolonged pain and resource depletion. He warns that the US, while powerful, is overextended globally and may struggle to manage multiple fronts simultaneously. The current phase resembles historical pre-war periods (e.g., 1913–1914, 1938–1939), where economic and military tensions escalate into broader conflicts. Dalio urges observers to look beyond short-term events and focus on structural shifts: rising debt, internal political pressures, and the erosion of the US-led multilateral order into a "might-makes-right" system. He assesses a >50% probability of at least one major conflict escalating within five years, including scenarios in Ukraine, Korea, or the South China Sea.

Original Title: The Big Thing: We Are In A World War That Isn’t Going To End Anytime Soon

Original Author: Ray Dalio

Original Compilation: Peggy, BlockBeats

Editor's Note: While the market continues to price in short-term questions like "How long will the conflict last?" and "How high will oil prices go?", this article attempts to pull the perspective back to a longer time scale. Bridgewater Associates founder Ray Dalio believes that the current series of regional conflicts are piecing together into an as-yet unnamed "world-class conflict", whose evolutionary logic is closer to the cyclical stage on the eve of major historical wars.

{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"According to Ray Dalio, what is the most important perspective to understand the current global situation?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The most important perspective is that we are in the early stages of a world war that will not end soon, and it is part of a larger 'Big Cycle' of structural changes in global order, rather than just focusing on short-term events."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What does Dalio identify as the key factor in determining which side wins a prolonged conflict, rather than absolute strength?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The key factor is which side can endure pain and sustain the conflict better, as victory comes not from weakening the enemy but from making them surrender, and the ability to承受痛苦 (endure suffering) is crucial."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How does Dalio describe the current shift in the world order?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The world order is shifting from one dominated by the US and its allies with rules-based multilateralism to a state with no single dominant power, where 'might makes right' prevails, resembling pre-1945 historical periods more than the post-war order."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What are some of the indicators or signals that Dalio uses to track the progression into a conflict phase?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Indicators include the depletion of military and resource stockpiles, rising fiscal spending, debt, money printing, and capital controls, rival nations learning from each other's strengths and weaknesses through conflicts, and overextended dominant powers facing multiple distant conflicts simultaneously."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Why does Dalio suggest that China might be less vulnerable in the context of a potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Because China has a supportive relationship with Iran, likely ensuring oil passage to China; strong ties with Russia for alternative oil supplies; significant other energy sources like coal and solar; large oil reserves (90-120 days); and consumes 80-90% of Iran's oil output, strengthening its leverage."}}]}

Related Questions

QAccording to Ray Dalio, what is the most important perspective to understand the current global situation?

AThe most important perspective is that we are in the early stages of a world war that will not end soon, and it is part of a larger 'Big Cycle' of structural changes in global order, rather than just focusing on short-term events.

QWhat does Dalio identify as the key factor in determining which side wins a prolonged conflict, rather than absolute strength?

AThe key factor is which side can endure pain and sustain the conflict better, as victory comes not from weakening the enemy but from making them surrender, and the ability to承受痛苦 (endure suffering) is crucial.

QHow does Dalio describe the current shift in the world order?

AThe world order is shifting from one dominated by the US and its allies with rules-based multilateralism to a state with no single dominant power, where 'might makes right' prevails, resembling pre-1945 historical periods more than the post-war order.

QWhat are some of the indicators or signals that Dalio uses to track the progression into a conflict phase?

AIndicators include the depletion of military and resource stockpiles, rising fiscal spending, debt, money printing, and capital controls, rival nations learning from each other's strengths and weaknesses through conflicts, and overextended dominant powers facing multiple distant conflicts simultaneously.

QWhy does Dalio suggest that China might be less vulnerable in the context of a potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz?

ABecause China has a supportive relationship with Iran, likely ensuring oil passage to China; strong ties with Russia for alternative oil supplies; significant other energy sources like coal and solar; large oil reserves (90-120 days); and consumes 80-90% of Iran's oil output, strengthening its leverage.

Related Reads

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

The article explains that the key to profiting on Polymarket, a prediction market platform, lies not just predicting real-world events correctly, but in meticulously understanding the specific rules that govern how each market will be resolved. It illustrates this with examples, such as a market on Venezuela's 2026 leader, where the official rules defining "officially holds" the office overruled the intuitive answer of who was in practical control. Other examples include debates over the definition of a "token" or what constitutes an "agreement." The core argument is that a "reality vs. rules" gap creates pricing discrepancies that savvy traders ("车头" or "whales") exploit. The platform has a formal dispute resolution process managed by UMA token holders to settle ambiguous outcomes. This process involves proposal submission, a challenge window, a discussion period, and a final vote. However, the article highlights a critical flaw in this system compared to a traditional court: the lack of separation between the arbiters (UMA voters) and the interested parties (traders with financial stakes in the outcome). This conflict of interest undermines the discussion phase, leads to herd mentality, and results in opaque final decisions without explanatory rulings. Consequently, the system lacks a body of precedent, making it difficult for users to learn from past disputes. The ultimate takeaway is that success on Polymarket requires a lawyer-like scrutiny of the rules to identify and capitalize on the cognitive gap between how events appear and how they are contractually defined for settlement.

marsbit22m ago

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

marsbit22m ago

Will the Fed Still Cut Interest Rates? Tonight's Data Is Crucial

The core debate surrounding the Federal Reserve's potential interest rate cuts is intensifying amid geopolitical conflict and rebounding inflation. The key question is whether high energy prices will cause persistent inflation or weaken consumer demand enough to force the Fed to cut rates. Citigroup presents a bullish case for cuts, arguing that oil supply disruptions from the Strait of Hormuz are temporary and will not lead to lasting inflationary pressure. They point to receding bond yields and oil prices as evidence the market is pricing in a short-lived shock. Citi's data also shows tightening financial conditions, a stabilizing labor market, and healthy tax returns, supporting their view that the path to lower rates remains open. Conversely, Deutsche Bank offers a starkly contrasting, more hawkish outlook. They argue the Fed's current policy is already neutral and expect rates to remain unchanged indefinitely. Their view is based on stalled disinflation progress and a shift toward more hawkish rhetoric from key Fed officials like Waller, who cited risks from prolonged Middle East conflict and tariffs. Other officials, including Williams and Hammack, signaled rates would likely stay on hold for a "considerable time." The market pricing has shifted dramatically, now forecasting zero cuts in 2026. The imminent release of the March retail sales "control group" data is highlighted as a critical test. This metric, which excludes gas station sales, will reveal if high gasoline prices are eroding consumer spending in other areas. A weak reading could support the case for imminent rate cuts, while a strong one would bolster the argument for the Fed to hold steady. This data is pivotal for determining the near-term policy path.

marsbit42m ago

Will the Fed Still Cut Interest Rates? Tonight's Data Is Crucial

marsbit42m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy WAR

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing WAR (WAR) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy WAR (WAR) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your WAR (WAR)After purchasing your WAR (WAR), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade WAR (WAR)Easily trade WAR (WAR) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

1.6k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.03.18

How to Buy WAR

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of WAR (WAR) are presented below.

活动图片