Pi coin price prediction – What next after altcoin rejects $0.190 retest?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-07Last updated on 2026-02-07

Abstract

Pi's price has maintained a clear bearish trend, accelerating downward after a decisive breakdown below the $0.190 support level, which has turned into resistance. Sellers have shown aggressive intent, with expanding candle bodies and repeated closes near session lows. Current market conditions and lack of buyers increase the risk of a decline toward the $0.1302 support level. As price approaches this liquidity floor, absorption potential may rise if bids convert into buying pressure, signaled by long lower wicks and firmer closes above $0.130. However, if selling volume overwhelms demand or broader market weakness persists, a breakdown below $0.130 could expose further downside toward the $0.115–$0.100 historical demand zone.

Pi’s [PI] price action has maintained a clearly defined bearish structure so far, with downside momentum accelerating with consistency.

Following a consolidation above $0.190, sellers forced a decisive breakdown that quickly shifted market positioning. That decline showed intent. Especially as candle bodies expanded on the lower trend, and repeated closes printed near the lower session – Reflecting aggressive supply rather than passive drift.

Structurally, the $0.190-level turned into resistance following the breakdown. Ongoing selling pressure and lack of buyers now increase the risk of prices moving down to the $0.1302 support level.

If the next sessions continue to follow the same pattern of selling, this level will serve as a test for demand.

$0.130 liquidity floor enters critical absorption zone

At the time of writing, Pi’s price seemed to be compressing towards the $0.130 liquidity floor. As the price approaches this range, liquidity concentration increases. This can slow down accelerated declines while testing sellers’ commitment.

Consequently, absorption probability rises if resting bids convert into aggressive market buys, often reflected through long lower wicks and firmer closes above $0.130.

In turn, tighter candle bodies may develop too, signaling an early demand response. However, sweep risk remains elevated if expanding sell volume overrides the bid wall.

Moreover, broader market weakness or liquidity rotation could hasten that breach. Should the price close below $0.130, it may quickly enter a low-liquidity pocket near $0.115, exposing further downside towards the $0.100 historical demand zone.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current bearish structure of Pi's price action indicating?

APi's price action has maintained a clearly defined bearish structure, showing consistent downside momentum with accelerated selling pressure.

QWhat level did the price break down from, turning it into resistance?

AThe price broke down from the $0.190 level, which subsequently turned into a resistance level.

QWhat is the next key support level that Pi's price is at risk of falling to?

AThe next key support level is $0.1302, which is at risk if selling pressure continues and buyers remain absent.

QWhat could happen if the price closes below the $0.130 support level?

AIf the price closes below $0.130, it could quickly drop to a low-liquidity pocket near $0.115, exposing further downside towards the $0.100 historical demand zone.

QWhat signs would indicate early demand response as the price approaches the $0.130 level?

AEarly signs of demand response would include long lower wicks, firmer closes above $0.130, and the development of tighter candle bodies.

Related Reads

How Many Tokens Away Is Yang Zhilin from the 'Moon Chasing the Light'?

The article explores the intense competition between two leading Chinese AI companies, DeepSeek and Kimi (Moon Dark Side), and the mounting pressure on Yang Zhilin, the founder of Kimi. While DeepSeek re-emerged after 15 months of silence with its powerful V4 model—boasting 1.6 trillion parameters and low-cost, long-context capabilities—Kimi has been focusing on long-context processing and multi-agent systems with its K2.6 model. Yang faces a threefold challenge: technological rivalry, commercialization pressure, and investor expectations. Despite Kimi’s high valuation (reaching $18 billion), its revenue heavily relies on a single product with low paid conversion rates, while DeepSeek’s strategic silence and open-source influence have strengthened its market position and valuation prospects, now targeting over $20 billion. Both companies reflect broader trends in China’s AI ecosystem: Kimi aims for global influence through open-source contributions and agent-based advancements, while DeepSeek prioritizes foundational innovation and hardware independence, notably shifting to Huawei’s chips. Their competition is seen as vital for China’s AI progress, with the gap between top Chinese and U.S. models narrowing to just 2.7% on the Elo rating scale. Ultimately, the article argues that this rivalry, though anxiety-inducing for leaders like Zhilin, is essential for driving innovation and solidifying China’s role in the global AI landscape.

marsbit7h ago

How Many Tokens Away Is Yang Zhilin from the 'Moon Chasing the Light'?

marsbit7h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片