Peter Schiff slams Saylor’s Bitcoin bet: ‘$10K over market price’

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-10Last updated on 2026-02-10

Abstract

Michael Saylor's company, MicroStrategy, purchased an additional 1,142 Bitcoin for $90 million in February 2026, at an average price of $78,815 per coin, raising its total holdings to 714,644 BTC. This move occurred amid a significant market downturn, with Bitcoin's price falling to around $69,000. Saylor views the price drop as a long-term buying opportunity. However, prominent Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff strongly criticized the purchase, noting the company paid nearly $10,000 above the market price, increasing its average cost and overall risk. He warned that MicroStrategy's heavy reliance on Bitcoin is risky and could lead to bankruptcy. Despite a short-term stock price increase, the company's shares have fallen over 260% in six months, highlighting the ongoing tension between long-term institutional strategy and short-term market pressures.

While most of the financial world spent early February recovering from the tough end of 2025, Michael Saylor was busy focusing on Bitcoin [BTC].

Just a day after his “Orange Dots Matter” tweet, his company, Strategy, once again showed strong confidence in Bitcoin.

On the 9th of February 2026, the company announced that it had bought another 1,142 Bitcoins for about $90 million, with each coin costing an average of $78,815.

This purchase pushed the company’s total Bitcoin holdings to around 714,644 BTC, equating to nearly 3.4% of all the Bitcoin that will ever exist.

Current market condition is concerning

This latest Bitcoin purchase came at a time when the market was under heavy pressure.

Along with the global market cap, Bitcoin’s price had also fallen to about $68,999 after dropping 1.55% in one day and nearly 24% over the past month.

For Saylor, this fall was not a danger sign but a chance to buy at a discount. By paying $78,815 per BTC, Strategy showed that it believes any price below $100,000 is a great long-term buying opportunity.

However, not everyone agrees with this view, as long-time Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff strongly disagreed with Saylor’s move.

Peter Schiff vs. Michael Saylor

Responding to Saylor’s tweet, Schiff said,

“Somehow you managed to buy at $78,815, averaging your cost up slightly, depsite Bitcoin trading below $60K during the week and its current price of around $68,500.”

Schiff criticized the move, noting that buying 1,142 Bitcoins at an average price of $78,815, above the company’s earlier average of $76,056, increased overall risk.

He also highlighted the timing: with Bitcoin trading near $69,000, Strategy paid almost $10,000 more per coin. To him, this reflected poor decision‐making.

What’s more...

Peter Schiff has previously argued that the company’s business model may be misleading, claiming it deliberately overpays for Bitcoin to sustain investor interest.

He warned that Strategy’s heavy reliance on Bitcoin is risky and predicted bankruptcy was inevitable, noting the firm now faces an unrealized loss of about 3% on its $54 billion investment.

While on one hand, Schiff looks at Bitcoin like a short-term trader, Saylor, on the other hand, looks at it like a long-term institution.

MSTR stock price and more

In the meantime, on the price front, the s stock (MSTR) rose to $138.44 after the announcement, gaining 3.51% in one day. But the bigger picture shows signs of strain, as over the past six months, the stock has fallen by more than 260%.

Additionally, reports from The Kobeissi Letter show how serious the firm’s losses are.

Ergo, if Strategy survives this huge drop without major damage, it could encourage other companies to follow the same path.

But if the pressure from falling prices and high average costs becomes too much, it may turn into a warning story for corporate Bitcoin investing for years to come.


Final Thoughts

  • Strategy’s latest purchase shows that the company sees falling prices as long-term opportunities, not warning signs.
  • Short-term stock gains show some investor confidence, but long-term performance remains weak.

Related Questions

QWhat was the average price per Bitcoin that MicroStrategy paid in its latest purchase, and how many Bitcoins did they buy?

AMicroStrategy bought 1,142 Bitcoins at an average price of $78,815 per coin.

QAccording to Peter Schiff, what was the main issue with MicroStrategy's recent Bitcoin purchase?

APeter Schiff criticized the purchase for being made at a price significantly above the market rate, paying nearly $10,000 more per coin than the current trading price, and for increasing the company's overall average cost and risk.

QWhat is the total amount of Bitcoin that MicroStrategy now holds, and what percentage of the total supply does this represent?

AMicroStrategy's total Bitcoin holdings are 714,644 BTC, which represents nearly 3.4% of all the Bitcoin that will ever exist.

QHow did MicroStrategy's stock (MSTR) perform following the announcement of the Bitcoin purchase?

AFollowing the announcement, MicroStrategy's stock (MSTR) rose to $138.44, gaining 3.51% in one day.

QWhat contrasting viewpoints do Peter Schiff and Michael Saylor represent regarding Bitcoin investment?

APeter Schiff looks at Bitcoin like a short-term trader, focusing on price fluctuations and immediate risk, while Michael Saylor views it from a long-term institutional perspective, seeing price dips as buying opportunities.

Related Reads

AI Giants Enter the Dark Forest

In the AI industry's "dark forest," major players like Anthropic, OpenAI, and DeepSeek are strategically withholding their most advanced models to avoid becoming targets in a high-stakes competitive landscape. Anthropic released Claude Opus 4.7 but admitted it underperforms compared to their unreleased model Mythos, citing safety concerns. They delayed addressing user complaints about performance regression until OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 launch, highlighting a tactic of controlled disclosure aligned with competitors’ moves. OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, though a full retrain since GPT-4.5, was seen as incremental rather than revolutionary. Leaks revealed internal models like Glacier and Heisenberg, indicating significant unreleased capabilities. OpenAI acknowledges a "capability overhang," where real model power exceeds what users experience, often due to infrastructure-driven throttling. DeepSeek launched V4 Preview, a cost-efficient model, but its full potential (V4 Pro Max) awaits Huawei’s Ascend 950 super-nodes量产 in late 2026. Their strategy focuses on affordability and scalability, aiming to democratize AI access globally, a move noted even by NVIDIA’s CEO as a disruptive threat. Together, these actions reflect a broader trend: leading AI labs are deliberately pacing releases, hiding strengths, and aligning disclosures with competitive dynamics—each avoiding the risk of exposure in a forest where first movers become targets.

marsbit1h ago

AI Giants Enter the Dark Forest

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片