Micron CEO's Latest Interview: 'Storage' is an Overlooked Bottleneck in AI, Supply Constraints to Continue

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-10Last updated on 2026-06-10

Abstract

Micron CEO Sanjay Mehrotra emphasizes that memory and storage are a critical, yet underestimated, bottleneck for AI development, stating that the "AI race is not just a compute race, it's a memory race." He argues that AI's evolution—driven by larger models, longer context windows, and growing token consumption—demands not only more computing power but significantly enhanced "memory" or storage capacity and bandwidth. Mehrotra highlights a structural supply constraint, predicting tight industry supply will persist beyond 2026. Building new fabs takes 3-4 years, with subsequent ramp-up periods. Furthermore, advancing technology nodes yield diminishing bit output gains per wafer. He notes that the manufacturing complexity of memory, involving physics, chemistry, and mass production precision, is vastly underappreciated. Despite announcing a $200 billion U.S. manufacturing investment, Mehrotra underscores that such decisions are based on disciplined analysis of data, technology trends, and customer needs, not speculation. He expresses no doubt about the long-term opportunity in memory, driven by AI's early-stage growth, while emphasizing the need for resilience, agility, and long-term focus to navigate industry cycles.

"The AI race is not just a computing power race, but also a storage race," concluded Sanjay Mehrotra, CEO of Micron Technology.

In the podcast "A Bit Personal" on June 5th, Sanjay gave a rare, in-depth interview recorded at home. Beyond the usual industry insights, this personal conversation led him to voluntarily discuss his upbringing, family influences, and career decisions.

AI is still in its very early stages, which is one of Sanjay's core judgments.

In his view, as large models, Agent AI, and inference applications evolve, AI needs not only more powerful computing but also stronger "memory capabilities."

Longer context windows, larger model sizes, and ever-increasing token consumption are all driving a continuous climb in storage demand.

The essence of AI is data, and data cannot exist without storage. Therefore, storage will become one of the most critical infrastructures in advancing AI capabilities.

At the same time, the supply side is not fully prepared. Sanjay pointed out that the storage industry faces not a short-term supply-demand mismatch but a structural supply constraint. Advanced storage products consume more wafers, and building new fabs typically takes three to four years, followed by a long capacity ramp-up period.

More importantly, as technology nodes advance, the increase in storage capacity output per wafer is diminishing. He predicts the industry's tight supply condition is likely to persist beyond 2026.

Explaining why storage technology has long been undervalued, Sanjay said bluntly: "People often misunderstand memory; they don't know how hard it is to make memory." The technical challenges are immense, spanning physics, chemistry, and materials science, to ensuring every single one of trillions of bits behaves correctly in mass production. He believes the AI race is equally a storage race, a point long overlooked by the market.

From a longer-term perspective, Sanjay believes the fundamental logic for success for both companies and individuals remains unchanged. Whether driving a $200 billion investment plan or leading Micron through storage industry cycles, the keywords he repeatedly emphasizes are resilience, discipline, and long-termism. Investments must be based on data and fundamentals. Leaders must see industry trends clearly and also deeply understand technical details.

Just as he learned from his father, success requires both the resilience to persist and the ability to seize opportunities at critical moments.


Core points from the interview with Sanjay Mehrotra, CEO of Micron Technology:

Storage is an underestimated bottleneck for AI; its manufacturing difficulty and strategic value far exceed market recognition. AI is extending from a "computing power race" to a "storage race." Expanding model sizes, longer context windows, and surging token consumption mean AI relies not only on stronger computing power but also on stronger "memory capabilities." Without sufficient storage capacity and bandwidth, even the strongest computing power cannot be unleashed.

Structural constraints on the supply side mean the storage shortage is not a short-term fluctuation but a long-term condition. Advanced storage products consume more wafers, while building new fabs takes three to four years, with equally long capacity ramps. Meanwhile, advancing technology nodes reduce the output gain per wafer. With supply-demand mismatch, tight supply will last at least beyond 2026.

People always underestimate the difficulty of manufacturing memory, but this is precisely the industry's deepest moat. The engineering complexity is extremely high—from physics, chemistry, and materials science to ensuring trillions of bits are error-free in mass production from design to manufacturing. Making memory chips is as difficult as any semiconductor field, and in many aspects, even harder.

Success comes from resilience, discipline, and long-termism, not short-term trend spotting. Whether driving a $200 billion investment or navigating the cyclical volatility of the storage industry, leaders need to see industry trends clearly and dive deep into technical details. Just as his father did not give up after his visa was rejected three times, success requires both the resilience to persist to the end and the ability to seize opportunities at key moments.

Storage is Becoming the Backbone of AI

Speaking about the storage industry's current historical position, Sanjay said bluntly: "I've been in this industry for over 45 years. This is the most exciting moment I've experienced for the entire industry."

He further explained the strategic importance of storage for AI:

"Without semiconductors, there is no AI. And storage is the backbone of AI, the key foundation supporting AI's continuous evolution."

In his view, storage's role is no longer just a component in devices but directly carries "intelligence" itself: "Today, storage isn't just making devices run; it is supporting the 'intelligence' within AI itself, helping artificial intelligence become smarter."

As model sizes expand, inference demand explodes, and agent AI rapidly emerges, the logic behind storage demand growth is clear to Sanjay: "As models get larger, as inference demand continues to grow, as AI moves from training to inference, from data centers to the edge, demand for storage will only increase—it needs greater capacity, higher performance, and lower power consumption."

He also specifically mentioned token economics' reliance on storage: "When you look at token economics, it also heavily depends on storage. As token usage grows, context windows become longer, KV cache demand increases, and models themselves become larger. AI needs not just computational ability, but also the ability to 'remember.'"

Tight Supply to Persist Beyond 2026

Regarding the market's most concerned supply-demand issue, Sanjay gave a clear judgment: The industry's tight supply will persist beyond 2026 and continue for a considerable period.

He explained the structural constraints on the supply side: "It takes a long time to build a fab. From groundbreaking to the first wafer out, it typically takes three to four years. After that, there's continued ramp-up to gradually increase the output."

More critically, rising technical difficulty is compressing output efficiency per wafer: "The productivity improvement from each new generation of technology, the bit increase each wafer can bring, is becoming less."

Sanjay revealed that Micron anticipated this trend as early as around 2021.

At that time, High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) accounted for less than 1% of the entire storage industry, but they already saw that future generations of HBM would consume massive amounts of silicon and significantly impact the supply landscape: "So as early as 2021, we said the industry needed to build new fabs from scratch. It's just that no one truly predicted AI would explode at such a speed."

Regarding market concerns about "overcapacity returning once supply catches up," Sanjay did not directly dismiss them, but he emphasized that AI is still in its early stages, and long-term structural demand growth is his basis for confidence: "From the demand side, all of this is still at a very, very early stage. We believe AI still has a long way to go."

The Underlying Logic of the $200 Billion Investment: Discipline

Micron's announcement of a $200 billion investment in building a storage manufacturing system in the U.S. is one of the most notable capital decisions in the semiconductor industry in recent years. Regarding the underlying logic of this decision, Sanjay repeatedly emphasized the word "discipline":

"Investments are never made blindly; they must be disciplined and based on data. You need to understand the technology, understand the applications, understand where those applications are going. You also need to work closely with customers to understand where they are headed in the future and what role Micron will play in that."

He further explained the discipline in execution: "Today, we are investing in building several new fabs from scratch. The first step is constructing the building and infrastructure. Once those buildings are complete, we will still maintain discipline when installing equipment and forming actual capacity—continuously evaluating demand forecasts, assessing how much growth technological progress can bring, evaluating how product demand will change."

When asked if he ever had self-doubt, Sanjay's reply was straightforward:

"We have no self-doubt. We absolutely believe in the opportunity for storage; today, that is very clear. Of course, in our business, it's always important to maintain adaptability and agility."

Related Questions

QAccording to Micron CEO Sanjay Mehrotra, what is one of the most overlooked bottlenecks in the development of AI?

AAccording to Micron CEO Sanjay Mehrotra, storage (or memory) is one of the most overlooked and underestimated bottlenecks in AI development. He states that the AI race is not just a competition in computing power but also a storage competition.

QWhat key factor does Sanjay Mehrotra cite as causing a structural supply constraint in the memory industry?

ASanjay Mehrotra cites the long lead time for building new semiconductor fabrication plants (fabs) and the diminishing gains in bit output per wafer with each new technology node as key factors causing a structural supply constraint. Building a new fab takes three to four years, followed by a lengthy capacity ramp-up period.

QUntil when does Sanjay Mehrotra predict the tight supply conditions in the memory industry will last?

ASanjay Mehrotra predicts that the tight supply conditions in the memory industry will last through at least 2026 and continue for a considerable period beyond that.

QWhat are the three key principles Sanjay Mehrotra repeatedly emphasizes as the foundation for success, both for individuals and companies?

AThe three key principles Sanjay Mehrotra repeatedly emphasizes are resilience, discipline, and long-termism.

QWhy does Sanjay Mehrotra believe the difficulty of manufacturing memory is often misunderstood, and why is it a significant moat for the industry?

ASanjay Mehrotra believes the difficulty is misunderstood because people don't realize the immense technical challenges involved, spanning physics, chemistry, materials science, and the engineering complexity of mass-producing trillions of bits with flawless behavior. This extreme difficulty creates a deep moat and significant barrier to entry for the industry.

Related Reads

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

Apple Pays Rent Too: The Two-Way Flow of "Traffic Tax" and "AI Capability Rent" Between Tech Giants For over two decades, Google has paid Apple an estimated $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine on Safari, a "traffic tax" for a critical user entry point. However, in 2026, the direction of this cash flow partially reversed. Apple agreed to pay Google roughly $1 billion per year to license its Gemini AI models, as Apple's own models reportedly struggled with complex tasks. This creates a unique dynamic: Apple acts as the "landlord" in the established search ecosystem, collecting rent from Google for access. Simultaneously, in the emerging AI arena, Apple becomes the "tenant," paying Google for access to cutting-edge AI capabilities it cannot currently match internally. While Apple claims its new models are "distilled" from Gemini outputs and contain "not a drop" of Google's original code, core dependencies remain. Its knowledge base is refined using Gemini's outputs, and its most powerful cloud model runs on Google's infrastructure. Apple has structured the deal as non-exclusive, allowing it to theoretically switch AI suppliers—a hedge against over-reliance. The future hinges on whether advanced AI models become a commodity (cheap and abundant) or remain a concentrated, scarce resource (expensive and controlled by few). Apple is betting on the former, leveraging its massive device ecosystem to be a powerful, choosy customer. If the latter proves true, its bargaining power could erode. This power dynamic is extending to developers. Apple, Google, and WeChat are all pushing for apps to expose their core functions as standardized "actions" or "intents" that their respective AI assistants (Siri, Gemini, WeChat AI) can directly call. The new scarce resource is no longer just app store visibility, but "being selected by the AI." The currency of "rent" has changed from a 30% revenue share to ceding control over how users interact with an app's functions.

marsbit4m ago

Apple Also Has to Pay Rent Now

marsbit4m ago

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

With the excitement around SpaceX's recent public listing reigniting interest in the US stock market, Chinese investors face significant challenges accessing compliant and convenient trading channels following regulatory actions against major online brokers. This article explores the available options, highlighting their risks and limitations. Traditional paths for US stock investments remain problematic. Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) and Listed Open-Ended Fund (LOF) products, while compliant, suffer from high fees, significant purchase premiums, and a very limited selection of assets. Small, unregulated offshore brokers pose substantial risks, including potential insolvency. While secure, VIP accounts at banks in Hong Kong or Singapore require high minimum deposits (often 1-2 million RMB) and in-person visits, placing them out of reach for most retail investors. The article positions cryptocurrency exchanges, specifically their TradFi (traditional finance on-chain) offerings, as a compelling alternative. Platforms like WEEX are noted for providing access to a wide range of US stocks and ETFs, including SpaceX (SPCXON), through tokenized assets. This method offers advantages such as a single account for both crypto and traditional assets, USDT-based settlement avoiding fiat complexities, flexible leverage, and robust risk management. To attract users, WEEX is promoting a "First Trade Guarantee" campaign. Running from June 15 to July 8 (UTC+8), it features a $30,000 prize pool. Users who trade $500 worth of US stock contracts can qualify for a guarantee on their first eligible trade: 100% loss coverage up to $30 or a 20% bonus on profits up to $30. The campaign is presented as a low-risk opportunity for both crypto natives and traditional investors to experience US stock trading.

marsbit5m ago

Missed the SpaceX IPO? WEEX's "First Trade Protection" Lets You Experience US Stock Trading Risk-Free.

marsbit5m ago

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

How Hard Is It to Make a Chip? A Division Error Cost $475 Million Chip expert Shi Kan, a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a popular tech creator, explains the immense challenges of chip development. Chips are foundational to modern technology, but their creation is extraordinarily difficult. The journey from sand to a functional chip involves complex design and manufacturing, but a critical bottleneck is verification—ensuring the design works flawlessly before costly production. A single, undetected bug can have catastrophic consequences, as illustrated by the infamous 1994 Intel Pentium FDIV bug. A flaw in the floating-point division unit forced a recall costing $475 million. Unlike software, chips cannot be easily patched after manufacture, making "first-time success" paramount. However, industry surveys show only 24% of chip projects achieve this; over three-quarters require at least one costly re-spin due to design flaws. Verification has thus become the dominant phase, consuming up to 70% of the design cycle. The core challenge is a "verification impossible triangle" between high performance, good debuggability, and low cost. Exhaustively verifying a modern CPU core could take 15,000 years with software simulation, or 30 years with advanced hardware emulation—timeframes utterly impractical for development. Despite being essential, verification is often seen as unglamorous "dirty work," receiving less academic attention than fields like AI. Shi and his team are tackling this by developing an agile verification research framework called ENCORE, based on FPGA technology, to improve verification efficiency and debug capability. Beyond research, Shi engages in public science communication through long-form video content, aiming to demystify chip technology, AI, and computer science. He argues for the value of pursuing "hard and long-term" endeavors, whether in the meticulous world of chip verification or in creating substantive educational content, believing such sustained effort is likely the right path forward.

marsbit15m ago

How Difficult is Chip Making? A Division Error Costs 475 Million Dollars

marsbit15m ago

Blockchain Has Finally Started to Sail into the Mainstream After 18 Years

Blockchain Finds Its True Path After 18 Years: Becoming the Financial Backbone for AI Agents and Autonomy This analysis explores a pivotal shift in the blockchain and crypto investment landscape, driven by the dominance of AI. Major venture capital firms, including Variant, Paradigm, Haun Ventures, and YZi Labs, are moving beyond pure "crypto" investment theses. They are expanding their focus to AI, robotics, and frontier tech, signaling that blockchain is no longer seen as a standalone sector but as an underlying infrastructure layer. The core argument is that blockchain's killer application may not be user-facing apps, but rather providing the economic rails for the coming wave of AI agents, autonomous robots, and automated systems. Key capabilities like self-custody wallets, programmable stablecoins for micropayments, on-chain identity, and verifiable smart contracts are positioned as essential for a future where machines conduct economic activity. The recent $1.4 billion investment by Tether (via its venture arm) in German robotics company NEURA Robotics exemplifies this, aiming to embed Tether's wallet tools directly into robots for autonomous transactions. While many "AI + Crypto" projects remain superficial, the article concludes that true value lies where crypto is a necessary component—enabling machine-to-machine payments, agent autonomy, verifiable data provenance, and open financial settlement for the AI era. For crypto venture capital, this convergence with AI represents both an adaptation to shifting capital flows and a potential path to unlocking the large-scale, non-speculative utility the industry has long sought.

marsbit35m ago

Blockchain Has Finally Started to Sail into the Mainstream After 18 Years

marsbit35m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片