Meme Fading, Narrative Cooling: Falling Below $80, Has Solana's Cycle Dividend Ended?

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-13Last updated on 2026-02-13

Abstract

Solana (SOL) has experienced a significant downturn, with its token price dropping to a low of $67 in early February 2026, down over 71% from its October 2025 peak of $295. Currently trading around $80, SOL has been declining for five consecutive months. The NFT market on Solana, exemplified by Mad Lads, has also suffered, with floor prices collapsing from over $40,000 to around $1,760. The decline is largely attributed to the cooling of the Meme coin frenzy that previously drove Solana's growth. Platforms like Pump.fun saw weekly trading volumes plummet from over $3 billion to around $500 million. Meanwhile, competitors like BNB Chain gained traction with meme platforms such as Four.Meme, diverting attention and capital away from Solana. Broader narratives around high-throughput blockchains have also weakened. Ethereum's Fusaka and upcoming Glamsterdam upgrades have significantly improved its scalability and reduced fees, diminishing Solana's technical advantages. Additionally, Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization, dominated by Ethereum with $149 billion in assets compared to Solana's $17 billion, has further marginalized Solana's ecosystem. Despite earlier support from corporate Digital Asset Treasuries (DATs) that purchased SOL, the ongoing bear market has overwhelmed this buy-side pressure. Companies like Forward Industries face massive unrealized losses on their SOL holdings. With declining user engagement beyond meme culture and intensified competition, Solana confron...

Author: Ma He, Foresight News

Even one of the most successful public chains, Solana, has encountered a winter moment.

On February 5th, during the market crash, Solana's token SOL once fell to $67, hitting a new low since December 2023. As of now, SOL is trading at $80, with a 24-hour decline of 3.57%. On a monthly chart, SOL has been declining for five consecutive months since its high in October 2025, with a maximum drop of over 71% during this period. The floor price of its most famous NFT, Mad Lads, once dropped to 22 SOL, approximately $1,760, while at its peak, this NFT was worth over $40,000.

Looking back during this bull market, SOL rose from a low of $8 to $295, performing quite impressively among public chains. Coupled with the explosion of the Meme sector, even U.S. President Donald Trump chose to launch his token first on the Solana network, creating countless wealth stories during this period.

However, as the market turns bearish, with token prices falling, TVL halved, on-chain transaction volume sharply decreasing, and the growth flywheel stalling, Solana also faces its own various problems.

Meme Craze Ends

This cycle, the Meme craze began on Solana. From late 2024 to early 2025, Solana sparked the "Meme Summer" with the Pump.fun platform, with the number of new tokens issued daily once exceeding ten thousand, and transaction volume peaking at over $6 billion. Meme coins like Dogwifhat and Bonk saw their market caps soar, pushing Solana's overall activity to its peak. This reached its zenith when Trump issued TRUMP, creating a historic high of $295. However, as various frauds emerged and the wealth effect diminished, starting from mid-2025, the Meme craze began to cool, with many projects having a graduation rate of less than 2%, and capital began to outflow.

Defilama data shows that around the beginning of 2025, the trading volume of the Meme platform pump.fun reached a historical high. Weekly trading volume exceeded $3 billion twice, followed by a continuous decline. In early 2026, its trading volume hovered around $500 million, only one-sixth of its peak.

At the same time, some Meme traffic shifted to BNB Chain. BNB Chain rapidly rose through the Four.Meme platform. In the second half of 2025, Chinese-themed Memes like "Binance Life" and "I'm F*cking Coming" sparked FOMO sentiment. BNB Chain's Meme market cap grew from almost zero to hundreds of millions of dollars, with a 24-hour trading volume reaching $460 million. In comparison, although Solana's Meme market cap still amounts to billions of dollars, its growth has stagnated, with many projects falling over 95% from their peaks.

In October 2025, BNB Chain once replaced Solana on the trending Meme list, showing obvious capital rotation: when BNB Chain Memes surged, Solana's capital contracted; after BNB Chain receded, capital partially flowed back, but the momentum had weakened. Furthermore, under the influence of key figures like CZ/He Yi, BNB Chain saw short-term traction, while Solana's Pump.fun, despite its first-mover advantage, weakened due to narrative exhaustion and a lack of incremental funds.

The end of the Meme wave means that the demand for its public chain token has also decreased simultaneously.

Public Chain Narrative Cools

Additionally, the overall cooling of the public chain narrative has further weakened Solana's ecosystem expansion plans. Between 2025 and 2026, the crypto market retreated from early high leverage and excessive narrative expansion. Many weak narratives, such as celebrity tokens and the Meme craze, quickly faded, shifting focus to areas with more practicality and institutional support. Solana's narrative as a "high-speed public chain" once attracted developers, but as the market entered the "deep water of value," investors tended to prefer mainstream assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum for their "digital gold" or "settlement layer" positioning, leading to a continued overall bear market and intensified capital outflows from Solana.

This narrative fatigue reflects that public chain competition has shifted from pure TPS competition to ecosystem maturity and regulatory adaptability. Solana's previous TPS and ecosystem advantages have been diluted. Whether in terms of Memes or airdrop incentives, Solana's appeal to new users has weakened.

Meanwhile, the significant speed improvement of the Ethereum mainnet has also weakened Solana's core advantage. Through the Fusaka upgrade in 2025, Ethereum increased data blob capacity from 3 to 6-9 and introduced the PeerDAS mechanism, significantly reducing transaction fees and increasing throughput. Transaction volume and active addresses subsequently rebounded.

Data shows that DEX trading volume on Ethereum overall rose at the end of 2025. Entering 2026, the Glamsterdam upgrade will achieve near-perfect parallel processing, further accelerating block verification and reducing fees, bringing the mainnet closer to an "operating system" level. These improvements have brought Ethereum mainnet's TPS and cost close to Solana's levels, while retaining higher security and decentralization, reducing the necessity for users to switch to Solana.

Another rising competitor, Base, is also growing rapidly, particularly attracting many users with AI tokens. According to DefiLlama data, its TVL is still maintained at a high level of $4 billion.

Under the tokenization热潮, RWA (Real World Assets) activities occur more on Ethereum, further marginalizing Solana's ecosystem. As of February 12, 2026, data from rwa.xyz shows that RWA assets on the Ethereum mainnet amount to $14.9 billion, while Solana has only $1.7 billion, still a significant gap. The tokenization trend of RWA emphasizes stability and compliance, and Ethereum's leading position makes it difficult for Solana to get a share.

Digital Asset Treasury Buyers Fail to Offset Overall Bearish Selling Pressure

From the perspective of Digital Asset Treasuries (DAT), in 2025, the DAT model was once popular. Many publicly traded companies like Forward Industries, Upexi, and Sharps Technology purchased large amounts of SOL as treasury assets through private financing or debt issuance.

Entering 2026, as the price of SOL fell from its 2025 peak of around $200 to about $80, the market capitalization of these DAT companies shrank significantly. For example, Forward Industries spent $158 million to purchase SOL, now worth only $55.5 million, shaking the confidence of some investors.

Furthermore, the DAT purchasing热潮 has weakened, with fewer new companies joining. Although the early purchased locked SOL reduces circulating supply, it has failed to offset the overall bearish market pressure.

Bitcoin and Ethereum prices have also been severely hit in the bearish market of recent months. BTC fell from $126,000 to the current $67,000, and ETH dropped from $4,900 to the current $2,000.

In January 2026, Solana founder toly once asked on X in Chinese: What do you think is the biggest challenge for Solana now? The comments section received a variety of feedback and answers, including: no direct exchange, users have less perception of other product ecosystems besides Memes, etc.

Perhaps Solana will find its own solutions.

Related Questions

QWhat was the peak price of SOL during the recent bull market and what is its current price as mentioned in the article?

AThe peak price of SOL during the recent bull market was $295. Its current price is $80.

QAccording to the article, what was a major driver of Solana's activity that has now cooled down?

AThe major driver of Solana's activity that has now cooled down was the Meme coin frenzy, which was popularized by platforms like Pump.fun.

QWhich competing blockchain saw a rise in Meme activity, partially at the expense of Solana, according to the article?

ABNB Chain saw a rise in Meme activity, partially at the expense of Solana, through its platform Four.Meme.

QHow has Ethereum's recent upgrade, as described in the article, impacted its competitive position against Solana?

AEthereum's Fusaka upgrade increased data blob capacity and introduced PeerDAS, significantly reducing transaction fees and increasing throughput. The upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade will further improve parallel processing, making its TPS and cost competitive with Solana while offering higher security and decentralization.

QWhat is the significant difference in RWA (Real World Asset) tokenization value between Ethereum and Solana mentioned in the article?

AAs of February 12, 2026, the value of RWA assets on Ethereum was $149 billion, compared to only $17 billion on Solana, indicating a substantial gap.

Related Reads

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News28m ago

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News28m ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News46m ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News46m ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit56m ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit56m ago

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片