London Bitcoin Treasury Company at the End of Its Rope, Shareholders Vote to Sell All 668 BTC and Delist

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-17Last updated on 2026-07-17

Abstract

London-based bitcoin treasury company Satsuma Technology faces a critical shareholder vote on July 20th. Shareholders holding over 20% of the company have proposed a plan to sell all of the company's 668.48 BTC and delist from the London Stock Exchange. The proposal requires at least 75% approval for two special resolutions, which are interdependent. If passed, the process would begin in early August, with the aim of returning net cash to shareholders after costs and a £2 million operational reserve. If either resolution fails, the company will continue its treasury strategy. The board is divided, with four directors recommending rejection and two in support. The company's shares have been suspended since July 1st due to delayed audited accounts. As of June 30th, Satsuma's BTC holdings were valued at £29.44 million, with the stock trading at a discount to its net asset value. This situation highlights the pressure on listed treasury companies during bear markets, testing their long-term "hold" strategies against shareholder demands for liquidity when shares trade at a persistent discount.

Author: CryptoSlate

Compiled by: Deep Chao TechFlow

Deep Chao Guide: Satsuma Technology becomes the first treasury company in Europe likely to liquidate its Bitcoin holdings. This vote not only decides the fate of 668 BTC but also exposes a fatal flaw in the treasury company model—when a stock trades at a long-term discount, the faith in holding Bitcoin crumbles under the pressure to cash out. For investors, this is an excellent case study to observe how long the "never sell" pledge can hold up during a bear market.

Satsuma Technology missed the final proxy vote deadline today for a proposal to sell all the company's Bitcoin and delist from the London Stock Exchange.

The next decision point will be the general meeting of shareholders on July 20.

If both special resolutions are passed, the company will initiate the process to sell all its Bitcoin, return the net cash, and cancel its listing on the London Stock Exchange. As of June 30, the company held 668.48 BTC.

Both special resolutions require at least 75% of votes in favor and are interdependent—if either fails, the capital return and delisting will be blocked. The deadline applied to paper, online, and CREST proxy voting; eligible shareholders can still vote in person at the July 20 meeting.

The proposal was put forward by shareholders holding over 20% of Satsuma's issued share capital, with the board agreeing to include it on the agenda without a formal application. Of the six-member board, four directors recommend rejecting the proposal, while two support it.

Trading was suspended at 7:30 AM on July 1 because the unresolved vote prevented Satsuma's directors and auditors from timely assessing the company's prospects, making it impossible to publish audited accounts by June 30. The company expects to complete the accounts by the end of the month and stated that trading is likely to resume after obtaining approval from the Financial Conduct Authority.

Satsuma's June 30 fact sheet shows its 668.48 BTC were valued at £29.44 million, with a total net asset value of £33.23 million. The report indicates a price-to-book ratio of 0.80x, no debt or other significant liabilities, an average cost per BTC of £84,026, and a book loss per coin of £39,984 at that time.

Calculating the June 30 holdings at CryptoSlate's July 16 Bitcoin price of £48,372.69 gives a total value of approximately £32.34 million. This is not a distribution estimate but clearly presents the choice: retain a publicly traded company whose shares trade below the value of its Bitcoin holdings, or seek to liquidate after deducting costs.

Bitcoin Treasury Companies Once Said 'Never Sell'—A Bear Market Quickly Changes That Promise

If both votes pass and all other approvals are obtained, the company's indicative timeline calls for the sale of all Bitcoin around August 3 and the issuance of one non-tradable Class B share per ordinary share around August 4.

After deducting a £2 million working capital reserve and transaction and termination costs, the cash proceeds from the sale will be distributed to Class B shareholders. A court confirmation hearing is expected around September 8, delisting on September 14, and payment completed by September 28. All dates are conditional on execution.

A US Bitcoin Treasury Company Sold All Its BTC Because Debt and Nasdaq Pressure Made It Unsustainable

If either vote fails, the proposal will neither trigger a Bitcoin sale nor lead to delisting. Satsuma stated it would continue its treasury strategy, and the trading suspension would depend on the publication of accounts and FCA consent.

The Same Price, Vastly Different Returns

Satsuma's July 3 update separates former CLN1 and CLN2 convertible loan note holders, as the proposed pro-rata distribution would yield vastly different return rates relative to the original investment. In a scenario with a Bitcoin price of $59,923, the return per £100 invested is as follows:

These figures are illustrative, not predictive. They deduct estimated transaction costs and the £2 million working capital, assume original CLN holders still hold their shares, and for CLN1 warrant cases, deduct approximately £3.2 million in exercise proceeds.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is Satsuma Technology proposing to do with its Bitcoin holdings and stock market listing?

ASatsuma Technology is proposing to sell all 668.48 BTC it holds, return the net cash to shareholders, and cancel its listing on the London Stock Exchange.

QWhat percentage of shareholder votes is required for the special resolutions on BTC sale and delisting to pass?

AEach of the two special resolutions requires at least 75% of the votes to pass, and they are conditional on each other.

QWhy was Satsuma Technology's trading suspended on July 1st?

ATrading was suspended because the unresolved voting situation prevented the company's directors and auditors from assessing the company's prospects in time to publish audited accounts by June 30th.

QWhat was the average cost per Bitcoin for Satsuma Technology and its approximate floating loss per coin as of June 30th?

AThe average cost per Bitcoin was £84,026, and the approximate floating loss per coin was £39,984 as of June 30th.

QWhat happens if either of the two shareholder votes on July 20th fails?

AIf either vote fails, the proposal to sell Bitcoin and delist will be blocked. Satsuma will continue with its treasury strategy, and the trading suspension will be resolved upon publishing accounts and receiving FCA approval.

Related Reads

The Price of DeFi Mass Adoption: Understanding the Profit Distribution and Hidden Risks of Aave Stable Vaults

**Title:** The Price of DeFi Mass Adoption: Understanding Aave Stable Vaults' Profit Distribution and Hidden Risks **Summary:** Aave Labs' new "Stable Vaults" product aims to simplify DeFi for mainstream users by offering fixed yields, a rarity in crypto. The model inserts a middleman layer between users and Aave's underlying lending pools. This layer, often a fintech app or digital bank, absorbs interest rate volatility, guaranteeing users a pre-set stable return while capturing any excess yield from Aave's underlying pools. In exchange for this predictable "peace of mind" and services like customer support and simplified onboarding, users sacrifice potential higher yields and take on new counterparty risks from the operating entity and its infrastructure. The article illustrates this with the example of payroll provider Rise, which transparently passes through most Aave yield, versus the higher profit margins possible through Stable Vaults. While a rational trade-off for many non-expert users prioritizing simplicity and security, the system centralizes risk and obfuscates true market yields. Aave benefits by attracting sticky, non-speculative capital crucial for its long-term economic model, highlighting the industry's shift towards catering to fundamental human preferences for convenience over complex, self-managed financial systems.

Foresight News31m ago

The Price of DeFi Mass Adoption: Understanding the Profit Distribution and Hidden Risks of Aave Stable Vaults

Foresight News31m ago

Stripe's $53.4 Billion Acquisition of PayPal: The Final Piece of the Stablecoin Empire Puzzle

Stripe has reportedly made a $53.4 billion acquisition offer for PayPal, a move that could signal a major shift in the stablecoin landscape from a "technology race" to a "customer war." Over recent years, Stripe has been quietly building nearly every layer of a stablecoin empire: acquiring the issuance platform Bridge, wallet provider Privy, co-incubating the payments-focused Layer 1 network Tempo with Paradigm, and joining the Open USD (OUSD) alliance stablecoin initiative. What it lacks, however, is a massive direct consumer user base. PayPal, with its hundreds of millions of active accounts, the Venmo app, and its own PYUSD stablecoin, would provide exactly that. The acquisition could create a closed-loop system where Stripe handles the merchant side, PayPal/Venmo serve consumers, and transactions are settled via stablecoins on a blockchain like Tempo, potentially bypassing traditional card networks and their fees. While the deal is not yet finalized and may face hurdles—including potential resistance from PayPal's board or a higher bid—the mere offer suggests Stripe's strategic focus may have evolved. It indicates that having superior infrastructure alone may not be enough; distribution and user access are critical battlegrounds. Questions remain about how PYUSD, OUSD, and Venmo would integrate with Stripe's stack, and whether private equity co-investor Advent International would prioritize such crypto experiments. If successful, this acquisition could significantly boost Tempo's position in the competitive public blockchain space and further push crypto-based payments into the mainstream, potentially fulfilling PayPal's original vision of an internet-native currency through a new, crypto-native infrastructure.

marsbit44m ago

Stripe's $53.4 Billion Acquisition of PayPal: The Final Piece of the Stablecoin Empire Puzzle

marsbit44m ago

Hyperliquid's "Stock Price" for ChangXin Memory Tech Hits $8.64: How Was This Price Determined Before the IPO?

Title: Hyperliquid's "Stock Price" for CXMT Hits $8.64: How is This Pre-IPO Price Determined? Summary: On Hyperliquid, a derivative contract tracking the pre-IPO value of Chinese chipmaker Changxin Xinqiao (CXMT) has been trading, with its price reaching $8.64. This price is not a real stock price or a direct IPO valuation, but the result of a specific market mechanism. Trade.xyz deployed this "Pre-IPO Perpetual" (IPOP) contract via Hyperliquid's HIP-3 framework. It tracks the expected USD value of one Changxin A-share post-listing. The contract started with an artificial "discretionary reference price" of $5 set by Trade.xyz. Subsequent trading prices are primarily determined by supply and demand on Hyperliquid's on-chain order book. Since there's no tradable现货 before the IPO, the contract price isn't forced to align with the official IPO price of 8.66 RMB (~$1.28). Key mechanics shape the price: 1. **Order Book-Driven**: The actual成交价 comes from limit orders matched on-chain. 2. **Internal Oracle & Smoothing**: An internal oracle, run by Trade.xyz, calculates a smoothed price based on the order book's "impact price" using a 30-minute exponential moving average (EWMA). This oracle price influences funding rates. 3. **Mark Price for Risk**: A separate Mark Price, derived from the median of the internal oracle and other inputs, is used for calculating profit/loss and liquidation. 4. **Discovery Bound (Price护栏)**: A 20% "Discovery Bound" limits how far the price can move from the current reference point. However, if the price hits the bound, the reference price can be re-anchored upward (or downward) up to 7 times. This explains the阶梯状 jumps to $6, $7.2, and $8.64. 5. **Low Funding Rate**: A minimal funding rate (0.005 multiplier) allows positions to be held with low cost before the IPO, but it provides a weak anchor. Post-IPO, the contract is expected to convert to a standard stock perpetual, with its oracle switching to the actual A-share price converted to USD. This transition could cause price jumps and potential liquidations if there's a significant gap between the pre-IPO contract price and the real market price. In essence, the $8.64 price is a composite of: a人为设定的起点 + on-chain order book supply/demand +内部 oracle 平滑 + low funding rate damping + a moving price护栏. It represents a collective bet by specific market participants on the future public market valuation, not the company's current or official IPO price.

marsbit45m ago

Hyperliquid's "Stock Price" for ChangXin Memory Tech Hits $8.64: How Was This Price Determined Before the IPO?

marsbit45m ago

Prices From the Future Fool the Oracle, Ostium Drained of $24 Million in Five Minutes

Ostium, a perpetual trading platform, suffered a security incident on July 15, resulting in significant losses from its public liquidity vault. Initial analyses from Blockaid, Cyvers, and PeckShield estimate losses of up to $24 million. The exploit occurred over a five-minute window. According to security firms, the core issue was not a missing signature, but a data integrity failure: a registered price oracle (PriceUpKeep) submitted authorized price reports with manipulated future timestamps, creating false trading profits. The protocol’s verification process confirmed the signatures as authorized but did not enforce price sanity checks or timestamp boundaries, allowing the manipulated data to be accepted for settlement. This caused the liquidity vault to pay out on these fraudulent profits. Ostium’s co-founder confirmed the team paused trading within an hour and is collaborating with law enforcement and security experts. The extracted funds were reportedly swapped for ETH, with a portion moved to Tornado Cash. The incident highlights risks in DeFi oracle designs where cryptographic signature verification is insufficient without additional safeguards for data validity, timestamp freshness, and price reasonableness. Ostium's response and planned fixes—including stricter timestamp validation, independent price checks, and circuit breakers—will be critical to preventing similar exploits.

marsbit1h ago

Prices From the Future Fool the Oracle, Ostium Drained of $24 Million in Five Minutes

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

849 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片