Hungary Abolishes Strict Crypto Rules to Align with EU's MiCA Framework

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-21Last updated on 2026-08-21

Abstract

Hungary has repealed its strict national cryptocurrency regulations to align with the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework. The Hungarian Parliament passed the Act on the Repeal of Certain Legislative Provisions Concerning Crypto-Asset Conversion Services, which eliminates pre-existing verification procedures required for crypto exchanges to operate legally in the country. The repealed law had established severe criminal penalties, including imprisonment, for unauthorized crypto-asset transactions and service provision. Under the old rules, converting crypto-assets via an unauthorized service was a crime punishable by up to five years in prison, while providing unauthorized exchange services could lead to up to eight years. Legal experts noted this national legislation was incompatible with the EU's single market and duplicated provisions of MiCA, which fully came into force on July 1st and aims to ensure user access to reliable crypto service providers. Consequently, payment institutions and crypto service providers must now halt the previously mandatory verification processes directed to Hungarian authorities.

Hungary is scrapping draconian regulations to avoid conflict with the pan-European Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework, abandoning national requirements and abolishing offenses related to the unauthorized use of cryptocurrencies.

The Hungarian Parliament recently passed Act No. XXXVIII of 2026 "On the Repeal of Certain Legislative Provisions Concerning Crypto-Asset Conversion Services," which eliminated verification procedures that any European exchange had to undergo to operate legally in Hungary.

According to András Gaál, an attorney at the law firm Schonherr, under the old rules, converting crypto-assets without prior verification was considered an unauthorized crypto transaction—an offense classified under Act C of 2012 "On the Criminal Code."

The repeal, voted on July 31 and effective August 7, was unique to Hungary and established two offenses for the unauthorized use of crypto-assets:

The first—"Abuse of crypto-assets"—stipulated that "a person exchanging crypto-assets of significant value for cash or other crypto-assets using an unauthorized crypto-asset exchange service is guilty of a misdemeanor and is punishable by imprisonment for up to two years, unless the commission of a more serious crime is established," however, the penalty was increased to 5 years if the offense was committed "to a particularly significant extent."

The second repealed offense was "Unauthorized provision of crypto-asset exchange services," which stipulated that "a person conducting crypto-asset exchange activities to a significant extent in violation of the verification obligation stipulated by the Crypto-Asset Market Act is guilty of a criminal offense and is punishable by imprisonment for up to three years," with the prison term increasing to up to eight years under certain circumstances.

Katalin Horváth, a partner at CMS Budapest, emphasized that this Act was incompatible with the EU's internal market and duplicated the provisions of MiCA, which guarantee users access to reliable crypto service providers and came fully into force on July 1.

"Payment institutions, crypto-asset service providers, and intermediaries carrying out conversion within the scope of the Act, directed at authorized validators, must now cease these processes," she concluded.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhy did Hungary repeal its previous regulations on crypto assets?

AHungary repealed its previous regulations to avoid conflicts with the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework and to align its national laws with the EU-wide directive.

QWhat was the specific law passed by the Hungarian Parliament to implement this change?

AThe Hungarian Parliament passed Law No. XXXVIII of 2026 'On the Repeal of Certain Legislative Provisions concerning Crypto-Asset Conversion Services' to implement this change.

QWhat was one of the criminal offenses abolished by the repeal, and what was its potential penalty?

AOne abolished offense was 'Abuse of Crypto-Assets.' It stipulated that a person exchanging crypto-assets of significant value using an unauthorized service could face up to two years of imprisonment, which could be extended to five years if the offense involved a particularly significant amount.

QAccording to Katalin Horvath from CMS Budapest, what was the main problem with Hungary's previous crypto law?

AKatalin Horvath stated that the previous law was incompatible with the EU's internal market and duplicated the provisions of MiCA, which already guarantees users access to trustworthy crypto service providers.

QWhat must authorized validators and related service providers in Hungary do now following the repeal, according to the lawyer quoted in the article?

AAccording to the quoted lawyer, payment institutions, crypto-asset service providers, and intermediaries performing conversions under the scope of the repealed law must now cease those specific verification processes.

Related Reads

Perspective: Value Investing in U.S. Stocks Is Not the Same as Fundamental Investing

The article challenges the notion that value investing in US stocks is equivalent to fundamental investing. It uses the astronomical analogy of Henrietta Leavitt separating a star's apparent brightness from its intrinsic luminosity to illustrate a key investment framework: an observed valuation multiple (like brightness) conflates two things—the actual quality of a business and the premium the market is willing to pay for its future (its "distance" or duration). The author argues that the popular narrative of "fundamentals are dead"—fueled by momentum and concentration in mega-cap tech—is flawed. While recognizing factors like winner-take-all dynamics and AI scale advantages, the piece warns against confusing broad thematic truths (e.g., "AI is big") with justified valuations for specific companies. It introduces a 2x2 matrix categorizing stocks based on whether they *looked* cheap/expensive at a point in time versus whether they *were* actually cheap/expensive in hindsight (e.g., expensive-looking Meta in 2022 was actually cheap). The core formula presented is: Forward Return ≈ Fundamental Growth × Change in Valuation Multiple. Over short periods, multiple changes drive returns, making markets seem narrative-driven. Over the long term, fundamental growth dominates. The article concludes that markets may be becoming *less* efficient due to complex, long-duration business models, narrative cycles, and private market dynamics, creating more opportunities for investors who can disentangle real quality from market sentiment.

marsbit44m ago

Perspective: Value Investing in U.S. Stocks Is Not the Same as Fundamental Investing

marsbit44m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片