Here’s why Bitcoin’s bull market case shouldn’t be dismissed just yet!

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-23Last updated on 2026-01-23

Abstract

Despite recent consolidation between $88,000 and $91,000, Bitcoin's bull market case remains intact. Key on-chain metrics suggest underlying strength: 71.5% of the supply is still in profit, though a move back above 75% would support a more stable upward trend. Whales are accumulating significantly, with balances reaching 3.2 million BTC—the highest since early January—indicating strong conviction at current levels. Meanwhile, long-term holders remain inactive, as shown by a Binary CDD reading of 0, reflecting a continued bullish outlook. While retail investors are selling, institutional and long-term player behavior suggests the market is building a foundation for a potential rebound.

Bitcoin’s price has delivered an underwhelming performance in recent sessions, with the crypto entering another consolidation phase between $88,000 and $91,000 – A range it previously broke out of.

Debate over whether the market has entered a broader bearish phase has resurfaced, with data points supporting both sides. Several structural and on-chain factors remain in play and are likely to shape Bitcoin’s next major move.

Investor profitability remains central

Bitcoin’s [BTC] near-term stability appears increasingly tied to market structure, particularly the share of supply held in profit. Analysts often describe this condition as latent profit – A scenario in which investors are more inclined to hold, rather than sell.

According to CryptoQuant, such an environment typically emerges when at least 75% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply is in profit. At that level, investor sentiment tends to stay constructive, reducing the likelihood of heavy sell pressure.

While Bitcoin briefly moved into this zone, the metric has since declined to 71.5% of supply in profit. A sustained drawdown could increase downside risk, potentially pushing the price towards the lower $80,000 range.

That said, the path to a rebound remains intact. A recovery back towards the 75%–80% supply-in-profit range would likely restore relative stability and support a sustained upward trend.

Commenting on the setup, on-chain analyst Darkfost said the market “should be able to stabilize and build a much stronger foundation for a genuine bullish recovery.”

Whales step in as retail exits

Whale conviction has remained strong—and appears to have strengthened—despite heightened volatility so far this January.

Retail investors, who typically hold smaller Bitcoin positions and operate on shorter time horizons, have continued to sell into weakness. Whales, on the contrary, have taken the opposite approach.

These large holders, which control a meaningful share of Bitcoin’s supply, can influence broader market direction. In fact, data revealed that the monthly hike in whale holdings has climbed to its highest level since early January – Underscoring sustained accumulation. At the time of writing, whale balances stood near 3.2 million BTC.

This also seemed to align with rising inflows into accumulation addresses, confirming that a segment of these large holders may be active buyers.

Taken together, it can be argued that some investors view current price levels as an opportunity to accumulate Bitcoin at a perceived discount. It can also mean they are positioning for a continuation of the broader uptrend.

Long-term holders remain unfazed

Finally, long-term holders’ actions seemed to be consistent with whale behavior too.

The Binary Coin Days Destroyed (CDD) metric, which ranges from 0 to 1, helps track whether long-held Bitcoin is being moved. Readings closer to 1 typically indicate greater activity, often associated with selling, while a reading near 0 means long-term holdings remain dormant.

Right now, the Long-Term Holder Binary CDD remains at 0, signaling that these investors continue to hold their positions and maintain a long-term outlook on the price.

For now, the combined behavior of whales and long-term holders suggests that only an additional 3.5% of Bitcoin’s supply would need to move back into profit to return the market to the 75% threshold. This is a level historically associated with greater stability and stronger price structure.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitcoin’s supply in profit remains a critical indicator for assessing whether the market is slipping into a bearish phase or positioning for a renewed bullish move.
  • While retail investors have continued to exit, whales have been increasing their exposure.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what percentage of Bitcoin's circulating supply needs to be in profit to create a constructive investor sentiment and reduce sell pressure?

AAt least 75% of Bitcoin's circulating supply needs to be in profit to create a constructive investor sentiment and reduce the likelihood of heavy sell pressure.

QWhat is the current level of Bitcoin's supply in profit, and what is the potential downside risk if it declines further?

AThe current level of Bitcoin's supply in profit is 71.5%. A sustained drawdown from this level could increase downside risk, potentially pushing the price towards the lower $80,000 range.

QHow have whale investors behaved compared to retail investors amidst recent market volatility?

AWhale investors have strengthened their conviction and are accumulating Bitcoin, while retail investors have continued to sell into weakness.

QWhat does a Binary Coin Days Destroyed (CDD) reading of 0 indicate about long-term Bitcoin holders?

AA Binary CDD reading of 0 indicates that long-term holders are not moving their Bitcoin, meaning their holdings remain dormant and they are maintaining a long-term outlook on the price.

QWhat two key on-chain behaviors suggest that the market could be positioning for a continued uptrend?

AThe two key behaviors are: 1) Whales are accumulating Bitcoin, with their monthly holdings hike reaching the highest level since early January. 2) Long-term holders are not selling, as indicated by a Binary CDD reading of 0.

Related Reads

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

The on-chain lending market has evolved from a peripheral DeFi niche into core financial infrastructure. As of early 2026, total value locked (TVL) in on-chain lending protocols has reached $64.3 billion, accounting for 53.54% of total DeFi TVL, making it the largest and most mature vertical within decentralized finance. Aave dominates the sector with approximately $32.9 billion in TVL, commanding nearly half of the market—a leadership position that is unlikely to be challenged in the foreseeable future. However, the path of on-chain lending forward is not without risk. Liquidation cascades, credit defaults, and cross-chain vulnerabilities remain systemic threats hanging over the industry. At the same time, a deeper structural transformation is underway: on-chain lending is shifting from a “leverage tool for crypto-native users” to a “compliant gateway for institutional capital”. The scale of RWA (Real World Asset) lending has surpassed $18.5 billion, with U.S. Treasuries and government securities increasingly serving as core collateral. Institutional capital inflows are reshaping both the user base and risk appetite of the sector. This report systematically analyzes the evolution of on-chain lending definitions, competitive dynamics, core risks, and future trends, providing a comprehensive industry outlook for investors and trade practitioners. Key findings suggest that the “one dominant player with several strong challengers” structure will persist in the short term, while fixed-rate lending, compliant collateral, and institutional credit underwriting will define the next phase of competition. For investors focused on DeFi infrastructure, three key opportunity tracks stand out, namely, the Aave ecosystem (Morpho, Spark), RWA lending protocols (Ondo, Maple) and fixed-rate innovation (Notional, Pendle).

HTX Learn8m ago

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

HTX Learn8m ago

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

Fu Peng, a renowned macroeconomist and now Chief Economist at New火 Group, delivered his first public speech of 2026 at the Hong Kong Web3 Festival. He explained his perspective on crypto assets and why he joined the industry, framing it within the context of macroeconomic trends and financial evolution. Fu emphasized that crypto assets are transitioning from an early, belief-driven phase to a mature, institutionally integrated asset class. He drew parallels to the 1970s-80s, when technological advances (like computing) revolutionized traditional finance, leading to the rise of FICC (Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities). Similarly, current advancements in AI, data, and blockchain are reshaping finance, with crypto assets becoming part of a new "FICC + C" (C for Crypto) framework. He noted that institutional capital, including traditional hedge funds, avoided early crypto due to its speculative nature but are now engaging as regulatory clarity emerges (e.g., stablecoin laws, CFTC classifying crypto as a commodity). Fu predicted that 2025-2026 marks a turning point where crypto becomes a standardized, financially viable asset for diversified portfolios, akin to commodities or derivatives in traditional finance. Fu defined Bitcoin not as "digital gold" in a simplistic sense but as a value-preserving, financially tradable asset. He highlighted that crypto's future lies in regulated, institutional adoption, moving away from retail-dominated trading. His entry into crypto signals this maturation, where traditional finance integrates crypto into mainstream asset management.

marsbit1h ago

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

marsbit1h ago

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

Justin Sun, founder of Tron, has filed a lawsuit in federal court against World Liberty Financial (WLF), alleging he was made the "primary target of a fraudulent scheme" after investing $75 million. Sun claims the investment secured him an advisor title and WLFI tokens, which were later frozen by WLF, causing "hundreds of millions in losses." The dispute began in late 2024 when Sun's investment helped revive WLF's struggling token sale, which ultimately raised $550 million. Shortly after, the SEC dropped its lawsuit against Sun following Donald Trump's inauguration. However, relations soured when Sun refused WLF's demands for additional funding. In August 2025, WLF added a "blacklist" function to its smart contract, allowing it to unilaterally freeze tokens. Sun's holdings, worth approximately $107 million, were frozen, and he was threatened with token destruction. The lawsuit highlights WLF's structure, which directs 75% of token sale profits to the Trump family, who had earned $1 billion by December 2025. WLF's CEO is Zach Witkoff, son of U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. The project faces scrutiny for opaque operations, including a controversial loan arrangement on the Dolomite platform, co-founded by a WLF advisor. Despite Sun's history with the SEC, the case underscores centralization risks within DeFi, as WLF controls governance and holds powers to freeze assets arbitrarily. Sun's tokens remain frozen as legal proceedings begin.

marsbit1h ago

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片