Founder of Baixing.com: My Fourteen Experience Points in Using Claude Code

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-08Last updated on 2026-06-08

Abstract

Founder of Baixing.com: My Fourteen Claude Code Usage Experiences The author shares personal insights from using Claude Code. Key recommendations include: focusing deeply on one primary tool; mastering essential shortcuts like Control+G for the editor; utilizing voice input; starting projects with a structured PROJECT.md; defaulting to Claude agents; integrating with GitHub and Cloudflare for infrastructure; clearly separating human-written core files (like CLAUDE.md) from AI-generated content, and interacting with AI output only through queries; dragging various files (audio, video, screenshots) into the interface for clarification. He advises centralizing and version-controlling memory and skill files in git (e.g., ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md) to build a permanent, cumulative knowledge base across projects. Skills should be continuously refined and used to capture learnings. For complex tasks, using ultracode for dynamic workflows is recommended despite cost. Using git documentation as handoff between agents ensures task continuity without relying solely on context. Finally, he suggests treating Claude Code like a horse with its own path-finding abilities—setting goals and boundaries rather than micromanaging—viewing its autonomy as a feature, not a bug.

Author: Wang Jianshuo

Simply record my experience with Claude Code up to this point. This is purely personal exploration and may not be suitable for everyone.

1. Focus on mastering one tool intensely. I use Claude Code. I don't necessarily think it's better than Codex, but the ROI of comparing tools may not be high, even though being able to articulate the differences eloquently gives a false sense of accomplishment.

2. Remember the most important shortcuts. Control+G to open the editor, helpful for writing longer content; shortcuts like Control+A, Control+E, Control+U which are very practical for quickly moving the cursor in the command line. Although not new to the AI era, they are as important as Control+C and Control+V when in use.

3. Use voice input. HoldSpeak is very helpful.

4. For a project, start by writing PROJECT.md, using a structured method to jot down all thoughts at once.

5. Claude agents are the default way to start.

6. Claude Code, github.com, and cloudflare.com are a perfect match. Hand over the build process, release process, and all domain-related operations to the infrastructure.

7. Separate what is written by humans and by machines. Manually maintain the core CLAUDE.md; don't read the .md files or code written by Claude Code. Let machines handle machine things, humans handle human things. Understand AI-written content by asking the AI, don't look at the source code.

8. Drag and drop files into the Claude Code window—audio, video, documents, screenshots—if you can't explain it clearly, use Command+Shift+5 to take a screenshot and drag it over, it's the fastest.

9. Reconstruct the memory system. Center it around ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md, categorically referencing multiple memory files. Require not using the project's memory, and keep all memory files in git, synchronized to github (private). This way, your memory becomes permanent and cumulative, not scattered across each project.

10. Write Skills, and at the end of each work session, ask Claude to "precipitate what was learned into Skills"—it can do this automatically.

11. Whenever possible, use ultracode to trigger dynamic workflows for complex tasks. Although expensive and slow, the results are still guaranteed.

12. Accumulate skills and refactor skills along the way. Skills need to be kept in git.

13. Use git documents as the output of the previous task and the input for the next task. Let agents have clear handover documents, not relying on context for transitions.

14. Treat Claude Code as a horse (or a person), not as a car. A car turns under your command; a horse has its own ideas, we just need to set goals and boundaries. Its autonomous pathfinding feature is a characteristic, not a bug.

Does anyone have anything to add?

Related Questions

QAccording to the author, what is the most critical shortcut to remember when using Claude Code?

AThe author considers the Control+G shortcut (to open the editor for writing longer content) and the Control+A, Control+E, Control+U shortcuts (for quickly moving the cursor in the command line) to be the most important, comparable to Control+C and Control+V.

QWhat does the author suggest is the best practice for handling content written by AI versus content written by humans?

AThe author advises to clearly separate human-written and machine-written content. Manually maintain the core CLAUDE.md file and do not read the .md files or code written by Claude Code. To understand AI-generated content, ask the AI directly instead of reading its source code.

QHow does the author recommend managing one's permanent and accumulative memory system with Claude Code?

AThe author recommends refactoring the memory system by centering it around ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md, which categorically references multiple memory files. One should disable project-specific memory, store all memory files in a git repository, and sync them to a private GitHub repository to ensure memory is permanent, accumulative, and not scattered across projects.

QWhat is the author's analogy for how to treat Claude Code, and what characteristic does this highlight?

AThe author suggests treating Claude Code like a horse (or a person) rather than a car. A car turns under direct command, but a horse has its own ideas; you only need to set the goal and boundaries. This highlights its autonomous pathfinding feature as a characteristic, not a bug.

QWhat infrastructure services does the author mention as a perfect match for use with Claude Code?

AThe author states that Claude Code, github.com, and cloudflare.com are a perfect combination. They recommend handing over the build process, release process, and all domain-related operations to this infrastructure.

Related Reads

Navigating the World of Event Trading: Top 5 Prediction Markets for Every Type of User

The prediction market industry has grown significantly, with trading volumes exceeding $20 billion monthly by mid-2026, driven by sports, politics, and macroeconomics. Success now depends heavily on platform choice and execution logistics. This guide compares five leading networks: **Polymarket**: A high-volume, decentralized platform on Polygon, using USDC for international and crypto-native users. It offers diverse markets but lacks built-in risk tools. **Kalshi**: A CFTC-regulated U.S. exchange for institutional traders, using direct fiat. It leads in regulated volume, especially for major sports and economic events, but has limited contract listings. **Outpoll**: A CeDeFi platform for advanced traders, focusing on professional tools. It uniquely features built-in stop-loss/take-profit orders, 0.1% fees, and full API support, with settlement in USDC. **OG Predictive**: A CFTC-regulated, sports-focused platform from Crypto.com. It offers granular player props and a flat fee structure, appealing to long-term position traders. **Manifold Markets**: A play-money, no-KYC platform for casual users and developers. It allows user-generated markets on any topic with zero fees, serving as a sandbox for strategy testing. Key differentiators include regulatory models (regulated vs. decentralized), funding (fiat vs. crypto), order types, risk management features, API access, and mobile support. The conclusion emphasizes that in today's event trading, profitability hinges not just on accurate predictions but on optimizing execution through platform infrastructure, liquidity, fees, and risk tools.

TheNewsCrypto23m ago

Navigating the World of Event Trading: Top 5 Prediction Markets for Every Type of User

TheNewsCrypto23m ago

Why Are Large-Scale Crypto Conferences No Longer Glamorous?

Why Are Major Crypto Conferences Losing Their Allure? A growing sense of fatigue surrounds large in-person crypto conferences, with many founders and investors now avoiding events they would never have missed just two years ago. While complaints cite declining ROI and information quality, the root causes are more structural. Crypto, global from inception, once relied on these mega-conferences as neutral hubs for essential face-to-face connections. However, their core value has been fragmented. High-quality participants—developers, investors—have largely migrated to smaller, private side-events, leaving main stages for repetitive content already shared online. The main conference often just becomes the excuse for being in the same city, with attendees scrambling between exclusive dinners and micro-events. While these intimate gatherings offer signal-rich conversations, they lose the "serendipitous encounters" of large conferences and can create insular echo chambers, especially as talent concentrates in hubs like New York. Meanwhile, invite-only, high-caliber summits are rising, offering quality and scale but at the cost of accessibility and crypto's early egalitarian ethos. This shift isn't unique to crypto; AI events in San Francisco show a similar trend. The perception of higher-value interactions drives core groups towards smaller, private settings, potentially creating a vicious cycle that drains larger events of their vitality. Yet, a more optimistic view exists. The apparent decline of crypto-centric events may signal industry maturation. Leading projects are now focused outward—on stablecoins for traditional finance, consumer-facing digital banks, or real-world assets. Crypto topics are increasingly integrated into mainstream finance and tech conferences. Just as dedicated "internet conferences" faded, dedicated crypto summits may become redundant as the technology embeds into every sector. The future likely holds far fewer large, inward-looking crypto conferences. The industry has moved past needing frequent self-congratulatory gatherings. True growth lies in engaging with the broader economy. This evolution towards private networking and mainstream integration, for better or worse, is a mark of the industry coming of age.

marsbit35m ago

Why Are Large-Scale Crypto Conferences No Longer Glamorous?

marsbit35m ago

Coin & Stock Compass: Global Listed Companies Net Sold $85.45 Million in BTC Last Week, Strategy's Dollar Reserves Scale Up to $3 Billion (July 14)

Global Public Companies Net Sell $85.45 Million in BTC; Strategy's Dollar Reserves Hit $3 Billion (July 14) Last week saw a significant net sell-off of Bitcoin by global public companies, excluding miners, totaling $85.45 million—a 908.42% decrease from the prior week. Major buyers like Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) and Japan's Metaplanet were notably absent from the market. However, two companies, Brazil's OrangeBTC and asset manager Strive, made purchases, adding 8 and 18 BTC, respectively. The aggregate BTC holdings of tracked public companies now stand at 1,139,635 BTC, valued at approximately $71.38 billion and representing 5.7% of Bitcoin's circulating market cap. In corporate updates, Strategy announced its dollar reserves have grown by $450 million to reach $3 billion, while its BTC holdings remain at 843,775 coins. Hyperscale Data increased its BTC reserves past 1,000 coins. Strategy will report its Q2 2026 financial results on July 30. Mining firm Cleanspark added 454 BTC, bringing its total to 13,924 BTC. Conversely, BitFuFu sold 184 BTC, Bitdeer maintained zero net BTC holdings after selling its weekly production, and Empery Digital sold 1,400 BTC to fund an AI data center project and repay debt. Overall, public companies purchased 110,000 BTC in Q2 2026, 1.8 times the volume of the previous two quarters combined. In other cryptocurrency-related corporate news, Ethereum treasury company Bitmine increased its ETH holdings by 27,801 coins, with total staked ETH exceeding 4.9 million. Solana-focused company DFDV transferred daily operations of its meme coin DONT to an independent team. BNB treasury company BNB Plus was delisted from Nasdaq for failing to meet the $1 minimum bid price and moved to trade on the OTCQB market under the symbol BNBX. The broader equity markets showed mixed signals. Bank of America warned that bullish investor positioning indicated a potential pullback risk for stocks. In contrast, Morgan Stanley predicted the ongoing earnings season could broaden market gains beyond tech giants. Specific regional highlights included continued foreign investor outflows from South Korean stocks, pressure on US equities, and the upcoming IPO of Chinese memory chip maker ChangXin Memory. Most crypto-linked stocks remained in a downtrend.

marsbit48m ago

Coin & Stock Compass: Global Listed Companies Net Sold $85.45 Million in BTC Last Week, Strategy's Dollar Reserves Scale Up to $3 Billion (July 14)

marsbit48m ago

Why Are Major Crypto Conferences Losing Their Luster?

Why Are Major Crypto Conferences Losing Their Appeal? A growing sense of fatigue surrounds large-scale offline crypto conferences. Participants complain of declining returns and less substantial information, but the root cause is deeper. Initially, these global summits were vital for a decentralized industry without a physical hub, enabling crucial face-to-face connections. However, the value of large main-stage events has been eroded. High-quality developers and investors have migrated to exclusive, invitation-only side events and private dinners. While these offer focused networking, they lose the "serendipitous encounters" of larger gatherings and can create elitist barriers, contradicting crypto's open ethos. This fragmentation triggers a vicious cycle: as key people leave main events, their value diminishes further. Simultaneously, the industry's focus is shifting outward. Leading crypto firms are now engaging with traditional finance and real-world applications like stablecoins, digital banking, and prediction markets. Consequently, crypto-specific topics are increasingly integrated into mainstream financial conferences, making dedicated crypto summits potentially redundant. Looking ahead, the frequency of top-tier crypto conferences will likely decrease significantly. The industry has moved past its inward-looking phase. The migration of quality discourse to private settings and the push for mainstream adoption, while diluting the large conference model, are ultimately signs of the sector's maturation.

Foresight News1h ago

Why Are Major Crypto Conferences Losing Their Luster?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片