Fintech Stablecoins Just Got a Boost in South Korea as Lawmakers Oppose 51% Rule

ccn.comPublished on 2025-12-23Last updated on 2025-12-23

Abstract

South Korea is preparing to regulate stablecoins by 2026, with a key debate between the Bank of Korea (BoK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC). The BoK supports a "51% rule" that would limit the issuance of KRW-backed stablecoins to entities majority-owned by banks, arguing that non-bank issuance could cause chaos. In contrast, the FSC favors a more open approach, allowing fintech companies to participate to encourage innovation. Recently, the Democratic Party of Korea’s Digital Asset Task Force expressed opposition to the BoK’s proposal, siding with the FSC. They argue that restricting stablecoin issuance to banks could hinder innovation and reduce competitiveness with global standards.

Key Takeaways
  • The Bank of Korea wants to limit KRW stablecoin issuance to entities that are at least 51% owned by banks.
  • Meanwhile, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) favors more fintech-friendly stablecoin regulation.
  • With legislation expected in 2026, influential lawmakers have sided with the FSC.

As South Korea prepares to regulate stablecoins in 2026, one question has come to dominate the policy debate.

Should legislation enshrine a role for banks in law, or should South Korea’s stablecoin market be open to a broader range of fintech players?

The latter position recently got a major boost from the Democratic Party of Korea’s Digital Asset Task Force, which looks set to oppose the central bank’s “51% rule.”

New Trending Crypto Wallet Offers
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Tangem

promotions
Trusted & Secure
Coins
111
Claim Offer

BitBox

promotions
Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly
Coins
Claim Offer

Blockstream

promotions
Trusted, Secure & Crypto Friendly
Coins
Claim Offer

South Korea’s 51% Rule for Stablecoin Issuers

Calls to anchor Won-backed stablecoins in the banking sector have been spearheaded by the Bank of Korea (BoK).

For instance, in July, BoK Governor Rhee Chang-yong cautioned that “If we allow non-banks to issue stablecoins, this will cause major chaos.”

To ensure banks have a controlling stake in the new market, the central bank has drawn up draft proposals for the Digital Asset Basic Act that would require stablecoin issuers to be at least 51% owned by licensed banks.

Any such provision would ensure that banking consortia effectively control South Korea’s stablecoin supply, while fintechs would be relegated to the sidelines, only ever able to play a supporting role.

However, as Digital Asset Basic Act negotiations enter the final stretch, powerful forces within the National Assembly are opposed to the 51% rule.

Digital Asset Task Force Opposes Stablecoin Restrictions

Opponents of the BoK’s proposal argue that limiting fintech involvement risks stifling innovation and would bring South Korea out of line with emerging global standards.

For instance, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) is reportedly preparing an alternative legislative draft that doesn’t include the 51% rule.

And there are signs that it has the support of National Assembly lawmakers.

According to Ahn Do-geol, who leads the Digital Asset Task Force, a majority of the 20 experts on the group’s advisory committee expressed concerns about the BoK’s proposal.

“They argue that this governance structure could make it difficult to achieve the innovation and network effects that stablecoins are intended to achieve,” he observed, per local media reports .

“Issuers should be selected based on their ability to advance innovation rather than their institutional classification,” the lawmaker added.

Recommended Secure Partners
  • Safest Exchanges Best Safest (Most Secure) Crypto Exchanges? Check Out These Exchanges
  • File Crypto Taxes Easily Reviews of Top Crypto Tax Software
  • Play Crypto Poker Best PvP Crypto Poker Sites

Related Questions

QWhat is the '51% rule' proposed by the Bank of Korea for stablecoin issuance?

AThe '51% rule' is a draft proposal from the Bank of Korea that would require any entity issuing KRW-backed stablecoins to be at least 51% owned by licensed banks, ensuring banks have a controlling stake in the stablecoin market.

QWhich South Korean regulatory body favors more fintech-friendly stablecoin regulations and opposes the 51% rule?

AThe Financial Services Commission (FSC) favors more fintech-friendly stablecoin regulation and is preparing an alternative legislative draft that does not include the 51% rule.

QWhat is the name of the political group that has recently opposed the Bank of Korea's stablecoin proposal?

AThe Democratic Party of Korea's Digital Asset Task Force, led by Ahn Do-geol, has expressed opposition to the Bank of Korea's '51% rule'.

QWhat is the main argument against the Bank of Korea's proposal to restrict stablecoin issuance to bank-dominated entities?

AOpponents argue that the restriction would stifle innovation, make it difficult to achieve the intended network effects of stablecoins, and bring South Korea out of line with emerging global standards.

QBy what year is stablecoin legislation expected to be introduced in South Korea?

AStablecoin legislation is expected to be introduced in South Korea in 2026.

Related Reads

When AI Begins to Audit the World: From Claude Discovering the ZEC Vulnerability, Watching the Encryption Industry Enter the 'Recursive Security Era'

**When AI Audits the World: From Claude's Discovery of a ZEC Vulnerability, Viewing the Crypto Industry Entering a "Recursive Security Era"** This article examines a pivotal shift in the blockchain security landscape, triggered by the convergence of two events: Anthropic's research on AI's "Recursive Self-Improvement" and Claude Opus 4.8's discovery of a critical vulnerability in Zcash's code. Traditionally, crypto security has relied on human experts and automated tools for periodic audits. However, the article argues AI is transitioning from a mere tool to an active participant in understanding and analyzing complex systems. Claude's ability to identify a subtle flaw in Zcash's zero-knowledge proof system demonstrates AI's potential to dramatically lower the cost and time required for risk discovery. This goes beyond finding a single bug; it signals a change in the very mechanism of how vulnerabilities are found. The core thesis introduces the concept of "Recursive Security," drawing a parallel to Anthropic's "Recursive Self-Improvement." Just as AI can accelerate its own development through feedback loops, security systems are evolving towards a continuous cycle of analysis, risk identification, remediation, and re-analysis. Security is becoming a persistent, evolving capability integrated into a system's lifecycle, rather than a one-time pre-launch audit. This shift is particularly urgent for the crypto industry, where system complexity from Layer-2 networks, modular architectures, and ZK-proofs is growing faster than human analysis capacity. AI excels at the pattern recognition and contextual understanding needed to navigate this complexity. Importantly, the article cautions that AI augments both defenders and potential attackers, accelerating the entire threat landscape. The future competitive advantage may not lie in having zero vulnerabilities, but in having the fastest risk discovery, validation, and response capabilities. The Claude-Zcash incident is thus an early signal of an era where AI-driven, recursive security systems become essential for managing risk in an increasingly complex digital world.

marsbit26m ago

When AI Begins to Audit the World: From Claude Discovering the ZEC Vulnerability, Watching the Encryption Industry Enter the 'Recursive Security Era'

marsbit26m ago

From MSTR to STRC+: Where Is the Limit of the Strategy Universe?

From MSTR to STRC+: The Evolution and Limits of the Strategy Universe This article examines the transformation of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) from a simple "Bitcoin treasury" company into a complex financial engineering firm building a BTC-backed credit system. **Core Thesis:** Strategy's true significance lies not just in its massive BTC holdings (~844k BTC), but in its attempt to transform this static reserve into a multi-layered credit curve within traditional capital markets and, subsequently, into on-chain yield infrastructure. **The MSTR Flywheel:** The initial model was a reflexive loop: BTC price rises → MSTR stock rises → company raises capital (debt/equity) at a premium → buys more BTC → increases per-share BTC exposure → MSTR premium grows. This "amplified Bitcoin" equity (MSTR) thrives on bullish momentum but is vulnerable to tightening premiums and rising funding costs. **Building the Credit Curve:** Strategy's innovation is slicing its single BTC balance sheet into different risk/return profiles via specialized securities: * **MSTR:** High-volatility equity layer absorbing full BTC upside/downside. * **STRC:** Key product. A perpetual preferred stock designed as "short duration high yield credit," offering ~11.5% floating monthly dividends. It attracts fixed-income investors seeking yield without direct BTC exposure, funding Strategy's operations. * **STRD/STRK/STRF:** Other preferred/share classes with varying durations, conversion rights, and fixed dividends. **Risks of the STRC Model:** STRC's high yield is not risk-free. Its stability depends on: 1) Sufficient BTC asset coverage, 2) Strategy's continued ability to pay dividends, and 3) Market faith in the MSTR/STRC funding flywheel. Stress points include deep BTC price declines eroding the asset buffer, rising dividend costs if STRC trades below par, and a broken flywheel if MSTR's premium (mNAV) falls persistently. **On-Chain Expansion: STRC+:** Projects like **Saturn** and **Apyx** aim to package STRC's (and other DAT preferred stock) cash flows into on-chain stablecoin yield (e.g., sUSDat, apyUSD). They offer DeFi a new yield source distinct from trading fees or incentives—cash dividends from traditional securities. However, this introduces compounded risks: off-chain custody, issuer credit risk, BTC volatility, and protocol execution risk. **Conclusion: The Ultimate Boundary** Strategy's endgame is not infinite BTC accumulation. It is the market's long-term acceptance of a new credit system where BTC serves as collateral for tradable securities whose cash flows can power on-chain financial applications. Its "universe" expands if this BTC-native credit curve gains legitimacy, but contracts if these instruments are repriced purely as high-risk, yield-bearing credit assets without stablecoin mythology.

marsbit45m ago

From MSTR to STRC+: Where Is the Limit of the Strategy Universe?

marsbit45m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy SFP

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing SafePal (SFP) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy SafePal (SFP) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your SafePal (SFP)After purchasing your SafePal (SFP), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade SafePal (SFP)Easily trade SafePal (SFP) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

700 Total ViewsPublished 2026.05.22Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy SFP

How to Buy CTR

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Citrea (CTR) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Citrea (CTR) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Citrea (CTR)After purchasing your Citrea (CTR), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Citrea (CTR)Easily trade Citrea (CTR) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

578 Total ViewsPublished 2026.05.25Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy CTR

What is USOIL

USOILUSDT Perpetual Contract is the trading symbol for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) Crude Oil priced in US dollars, representing 1 barrel of crude oil.

580 Total ViewsPublished 2026.05.25Updated 2026.05.25

What is USOIL

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of A (A) are presented below.

活动图片