February 3 Market Summary: U.S. Stocks and Gold Rebound Together, Fed Still Mired in Independence Crisis

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-03Last updated on 2026-02-03

Abstract

Market Summary, February 3: U.S. stocks and gold both rebounded, while the Federal Reserve faces an ongoing independence crisis. Spot gold surged 3.56% to close at $4,826/oz, marking a strong recovery after its sharpest single-day drop since 1980 the previous Friday. The sell-off was triggered by Donald Trump's nomination of Kevin Warsh—a known hawk—as the next Fed Chair, raising fears of prolonged high interest rates. However, markets are reassessing: Warsh’s potential appointment is not immediate, and the long-term "de-dollarization" narrative for gold remains intact. Technical factors, including margin hikes and stop-loss triggers, exacerbated the initial drop but also cleared excess leverage. Major banks like JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank maintain bullish long-term targets. Bitcoin struggled around $78,700, up 2% on the day but down over 10% for the week. It faced pressure from broader risk-off sentiment, liquidations of long positions exceeding $500 million, and a lack of new catalysts. Ethereum fell even more sharply, down 19% weekly. Altcoins broadly declined as capital concentrated in Bitcoin and a few high-quality assets. U.S. stocks rose, with the Dow up 1.05%, the S&P 500 up 0.54%, and the Nasdaq up 0.56%. The rebound was driven by stronger-than-expected manufacturing PMI data, gains in AI-related and transportation stocks, and a general recovery from Friday’s panic. However, underlying weaknesses persisted, as seen in Disney’s 7% drop on poor earnings. The core ...

Written by: Mamengniu, Deep Tide TechFlow

Gold: From "Epic Crash" to "Epic Rebound"

Spot gold closed at $4,826 per ounce today, surging 3.56% in a single day.

This is a textbook "V-shaped reversal." Last Friday, gold experienced its most brutal single-day plunge since 1980, plummeting from a historical high of $5,600 to around $4,400, a drop of over 10%. Silver fared even worse, plunging 28% in a single day, marking its largest decline in over 40 years.

The trigger for the crash was, of course, Trump's nomination of Kevin Warsh as the next Federal Reserve Chair.

Who is Warsh? A former Federal Reserve Governor, a typical hawk who advocates for tightening monetary policy. The market's logic chain was: Warsh takes office → interest rates remain high or even increase → the dollar strengthens → gold loses its appeal.

But what does today's rebound indicate? The market is repricing.

Investors realized two things:

  1. Warsh's nomination does not mean immediate tightening. He won't take office until May at the earliest; panic selling now might be excessive.
  2. Gold's "de-dollarization narrative" remains unchanged. Central banks have been frantically hoarding gold over the past three years, not because of Fed easing, but due to long-term distrust in the dollar credit system. Trump's interference with Fed independence has instead intensified this concern.

From a technical perspective, last Friday's plunge triggered massive stop-losses and margin calls (CME raised gold futures margins from 6% to 8%, and silver from 11% to 15%). This mechanical selling exacerbated the decline but also cleared out leveraged泡沫, creating conditions for a rebound.

Today's rebound is essentially a "overreaction repair." Gold's long-term logic still holds: geopolitical uncertainty, long-term dollar depreciation pressure, and global de-dollarization trends. JPMorgan reiterated today: gold target price of $6,300 by the end of 2026. Deutsche Bank also maintains a $6,000 target.

In the short term, gold may oscillate in the $4,500-$5,000 range, awaiting clear signals from the Fed meeting at the end of February.

Bitcoin: Struggling in the $78,000 "Quagmire"

Bitcoin is currently priced at $78,700, up 2% in 24 hours, but down over 10% for the week.

Bitcoin fell below $75,000 over the weekend, hitting a near two-month low. Although it rebounded slightly today, it is still overall in a "bleeding state."

Why the decline?

  1. Deteriorating macro environment. The collapse in risk sentiment triggered by gold's暴跌 spilled over to all risk assets. Although often called "digital gold," Bitcoin behaves more like a high-beta tech stock in times of panic.
  2. Leverage liquidations. In the thin weekend liquidity, over $500 million in long positions were liquidated. Low market depth means that even small selling pressure can break through key support levels, triggering cascading liquidations.
  3. Lack of new catalysts. Trump's promised "strategic Bitcoin reserves" have yet to see substantial progress. The market is watching: is this real action or pre-election promises?

Ethereum is weaker, currently at $2,340, down 19% for the week. The ETH/BTC ratio fell to 0.030, a multi-year low. The困境 of the Ethereum ecosystem has not improved; unless a killer app emerges, its weakness relative to Bitcoin will be difficult to reverse.

Altcoins are wailing across the board. Except for a few projects with real revenue (like Hyperliquid), most altcoins are in "survival mode." The market's "wealth gap" is extreme: funds are only paying for Bitcoin and a very few quality assets.

Bitcoin's short-term support is at $75,000; if broken, the next stop is $70,000. Resistance above is in the $82,000-$85,000 range.

U.S. Stocks: Rebounding from Panic, but the Dance on the Tightrope Has Just Begun

February 3 (Monday) U.S. three major indices all closed higher

  • Dow: 49,407 points (+1.05%, +515 points)
  • S&P 500: 6,976 points (+0.54%)
  • Nasdaq: 23,592 points (+0.56%)

This is a typical "panic repair rebound." Last Friday, gold's 11% crash and silver's 28% plunge triggered panic selling; today, the market rebounded strongly after confirming "the world is not ending."

Three supporting forces:

Manufacturing data unexpectedly strengthened. The U.S. January ISM Manufacturing PMI rose to 52.6, far exceeding expectations of 48.3, returning to expansion territory for the first time in a year. This gave the market confidence that "the economy is not that fragile."

AI infrastructure stocks led gains. Apple rose 4.1%, Micron Technology rose 5.5%, SanDisk surged 15.4%. The strength in memory chip stocks reflects continued optimism about AI infrastructure demand. Although Nvidia fell 2.9% on news of the "shelving of a planned $100 billion investment in OpenAI," the overall AI narrative is not broken.

Transportation stocks hit record highs. The Dow Jones Transportation Average rose about 2%, United Airlines and Delta Air Lines rose 4-5%, FedEx hit an all-time high since its 1978 IPO. Strength in transportation stocks is usually a leading indicator of accelerating economic activity.

But the cracks within the market are clearly visible:

Disney plummeted 7%, its report showed profit decline and rising costs. The impact of slowing consumption on the entertainment industry is beginning to show.

Strategy fell 6.7%, reflecting the continued weakness in cryptocurrencies.

More critically, the non-farm payrolls report originally scheduled for February 6 was postponed. This rare situation means the market will "fly blind" for longer—lacking key data, the uncertainty about whether the Fed will cut rates in March (current probability about 40-50%) increases.

The Core Market Contradiction: The Fed's Independence Crisis

The recent剧烈 volatility in all assets stems from the same question: Can the Fed remain independent?

Trump's nomination of Warsh as Fed Chair is itself a strong political signal. Warsh is an old friend of Trump's and is seen as more likely to follow White House orders. This breaks the Fed's traditional image of "political neutrality."

The market is worried about two extreme scenarios:

  1. Scenario A: Warsh is truly hawkish to the end. Rates remain high for a long time, the dollar strengthens, gold and Bitcoin continue to be under pressure, but U.S. stocks fall as corporate profits are eroded by high rates. This is a "lose-lose" situation.
  2. Scenario B: Warsh becomes "Trump's tool". Forced to cut rates under political pressure,配合 fiscal expansion. Short-term risk asset狂欢, but long-term dollar credit collapse, inflation失控. This is "slow poison."

In either scenario, the Fed's credibility will be damaged. This is the real reason for market panic.

Gold's rebound today is essentially betting on "Scenario B."

Weakened Fed independence, long-term decline in dollar credit, enhances gold's value as the "ultimate currency."

Bitcoin's continued weakness is because it is "unappealing either way" in this narrative: if the Fed is truly hawkish, tightening liquidity is unfavorable for risk assets; if the Fed becomes a political tool, Bitcoin's "decentralization" narrative seems ironic—if even the Fed can't maintain independence, what's the talk about对抗 "fiat currency hegemony"?

Key Events This Week: Data Determines Direction

February 4 (Tuesday): U.S. ADP Employment Data, ISM Services PMI

February 5 (Wednesday): U.S. Initial Jobless Claims

February 6 (Thursday): Non-Farm Payrolls Report, University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index

The Non-Farm Payrolls report is the most important data this week.

If the data is strong (new jobs 250k+), the market will interpret it as "no reason for the Fed to cut rates," the dollar strengthens, gold and Bitcoin face short-term pressure.

If the data is weak (new jobs below 150k), the market will bet on "the Fed being forced to cut rates," risk assets rebound, gold continues to rise.

Current market consensus: No rate cut in February, possibility for March rises to around 40%.

Related Questions

QWhat was the main reason for the sharp rebound in gold prices on February 3rd?

AThe rebound was a 'textbook V-shaped reversal' driven by market repricing. Investors realized that the panic selling after Trump nominated Kevin Warsh as the next Fed Chair was overdone, as he wouldn't take office until May at the earliest. Additionally, the long-term 'de-dollarization narrative' for gold remained intact, with central banks continuing to hoard gold due to long-term distrust in the US credit system.

QHow did Bitcoin perform compared to gold, and what were the key reasons for its weakness?

ABitcoin struggled, trading around $78,700 with a modest 2% daily gain but a weekly loss of over 10%. Its weakness was attributed to a deteriorating macro environment (spillover from gold's crash), massive leverage liquidations (over $500 million in long positions were liquidated), and a lack of new catalysts, such as concrete progress on Trump's promised 'strategic Bitcoin reserve'.

QWhat were the three main factors that supported the rebound in US stock markets on February 3rd?

AThe three main supporting factors were: 1. Stronger-than-expected manufacturing data (ISM Manufacturing PMI rose to 52.6, entering expansion territory for the first time in a year). 2. Leadership from AI infrastructure stocks (e.g., Apple, Micron, SanDisk). 3. A surge in transportation sector stocks, with the Dow Jones Transportation Average hitting a record high, signaling potential economic acceleration.

QWhat is the core market contradiction identified in the article, and what are the two extreme scenarios it presents?

AThe core contradiction is the crisis of the Federal Reserve's independence. The two extreme scenarios are: Scenario A: Warsh remains truly hawkish, keeping rates high long-term, strengthening the dollar, and pressuring gold and Bitcoin, while also hurting US stocks due to eroded corporate profits. Scenario B: Warsh becomes a 'tool of Trump,' cutting rates under political pressure to enable fiscal expansion, leading to a short-term risk asset rally but long-term collapse of dollar credibility and runaway inflation.

QWhy is the upcoming Non-Farm Payrolls (NFP) report so critical for market direction this week?

AThe NFP report is critical because it will heavily influence expectations for the Fed's next move on interest rates. Strong data (e.g., +250K jobs) would be interpreted as the Fed having no reason to cut rates, strengthening the dollar and pressuring gold and Bitcoin. Weak data (e.g., below +150K jobs) would increase bets that the Fed will be forced to cut rates, leading to a rebound in risk assets and further gains for gold. The current market consensus is no cut in February, with a ~40% chance of a cut in March.

Related Reads

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit2h ago

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit2h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit3h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片