Ethereum under pressure: Founder sales, whale losses, and bearish odds collide

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-22Last updated on 2026-02-22

Abstract

Ethereum's price declined below $1,980 due to macro pressure, leverage unwinds, and reduced liquidity. This caused unrealized losses across all whale wallet cohorts, with spot prices falling below the major holder cost basis. Despite the pressure, on-chain data suggests whales are holding rather than selling, indicating strategic absorption and potential accumulation. Founder Vitalik Buterin's recent sales of ETH, including a withdrawal of 3,500 ETH, are seen as a continuation of a staggered disposal pattern rather than panic selling, reflecting cautious portfolio rebalancing in a fragile market.

Ethereum’s decline unfolded progressively as macro pressure, leverage unwinds, and thinning liquidity weighed on price structure.

As downside momentum accelerated, Ethereum [ETH] slipped below the $1,980 threshold on the 21st of February, compressing profitability across major holder groups.

This breakdown did not occur in isolation; it followed sustained distribution, derivatives deleveraging, and reduced risk appetite across large balance sheets.

As prices weakened, unrealized losses spread simultaneously across all whale cohorts, from 1,000–10,000 to 100,000+ ETH wallets.

Spot now trades below the $2,075 mega-holder cost basis, confirming losses even among the largest addresses.

Long-term holders hovers near breakeven, while short-term cohorts remain deeply underwater near 0.5.

Despite this pressure, on-chain positioning shows restrained sell behavior. Realized cap trends indicate whales are largely holding rather than distributing, suggesting strategic absorption.

Historically, such cohort-wide stress reflects conviction testing, where unrealized pain precedes accumulation-led bottom formation rather than structural exit.

Vitalik’s sales re-emerge amid broader whale loss pressure

Liquidity absorption trends continued to develop even as founder-linked wallets returned to distribution flows. This activity did not begin recently.

A fortnight earlier, Vitalik had already conducted smaller ETH sales, forming a staggered disposal pattern rather than a single liquidation event.

The latest withdrawal of 3,500 ETH, worth approximately $6.95 million, from Aave [AAVE] therefore reflects continuation, not sudden capitulation.

This pacing differs from distress selling, where large volumes typically hit exchanges quickly. Instead, collateral withdrawals suggest treasury rebalancing or liquidity repositioning.

These flows also align with rising unrealized losses across whale cohorts. However, on-chain positioning shows limited aggressive distribution.

The activity therefore reflects cautious loss management rather than a panic exit.

While founder sales can influence sentiment, their scale here signals measured portfolio adjustment within a fragile market environment.

Kalshi markets price heavy on ETH weakness

Related Questions

QWhat are the main factors contributing to Ethereum's recent price decline?

AEthereum's decline is attributed to macro pressure, leverage unwinds, thinning liquidity, sustained distribution, derivatives deleveraging, and reduced risk appetite across large balance sheets.

QBelow which key price threshold did Ethereum slip on February 21st, and what was the consequence?

AEthereum slipped below the $1,980 threshold on February 21st, which compressed profitability across major holder groups and confirmed losses even among the largest addresses as spot trades fell below the $2,075 mega-holder cost basis.

QHow are Ethereum whales responding to the current market pressure according to on-chain data?

AOn-chain positioning shows restrained sell behavior, with realized cap trends indicating that whales are largely holding rather than distributing, suggesting strategic absorption and loss management rather than panic exits.

QWhat recent activity did Vitalik Buterin engage in, and how does it differ from distress selling?

AVitalik Buterin conducted a withdrawal of 3,500 ETH (worth ~$6.95M) from Aave, continuing a pattern of staggered disposal. This pacing differs from distress selling as it suggests treasury rebalancing or liquidity repositioning rather than large volumes hitting exchanges quickly.

QWhat is the historical significance of the current cohort-wide stress in Ethereum's market?

AHistorically, such cohort-wide stress reflects conviction testing, where unrealized pain precedes accumulation-led bottom formation rather than structural exit, indicating a potential market bottoming process.

Related Reads

MoneyGram: Why Did We Launch Our Own Stablecoin?

MoneyGram, a global leader in cross-border remittances for over 80 years, has launched its own stablecoin, MGUSD. The initiative aims to evolve from single-transaction services to becoming a more integral part of users' financial lives. By allowing customers to hold a stable US dollar balance within the MoneyGram app, MGUSD enables not only remittances but also everyday spending, currency exchange, cash access, and future financial services. Targeting the billions globally who face challenges like currency volatility or lack of bank accounts, MGUSD leverages Stellar blockchain technology with a self-custody wallet architecture. This gives users control over their assets while providing a secure, compliant experience through a trusted brand. The approach focuses on solving existing customer pain points within MoneyGram's established network, rather than competing for broad crypto market liquidity. A key advantage is MoneyGram's hybrid model, combining digital services with the world's largest physical network for crypto-to-cash conversions. The stablecoin also modernizes the company's internal infrastructure, streamlining treasury management and partner settlements, with annual forex volume via stablecoins already reaching $2 billion. The project was delivered in about a year, driven by a reorganization into agile, cross-functional teams that operate with startup-like speed while leveraging decades of institutional expertise. Partners include Stablecoin (issuance), Crossmint (wallet APIs), Fireblocks (enterprise treasury), m0 (smart contracts), and the Stellar network. MoneyGram emphasizes that enhancing direct consumer offerings strengthens its partner ecosystem. The future direction is clear: to provide users worldwide with stable value storage, better financial tools, and greater control over their funds through a trusted, existing network.

Foresight News36m ago

MoneyGram: Why Did We Launch Our Own Stablecoin?

Foresight News36m ago

BIP-110 Controversy Intensifies: Bitcoin May Face Its Most Divisive Hard Fork Battle in Years

Bitcoin is approaching a critical block height of 961,632, which could activate the controversial BIP-110 proposal. This proposal aims to restrict the amount of non-financial data, such as inscriptions and other large data payloads, within Bitcoin transactions. Supporters, including some node operators and Bitcoin purists, argue that BIP-110 is necessary to preserve Bitcoin's core function as a monetary settlement layer by reducing network congestion and node operational burdens caused by non-essential data. They frame it as a correction to keep the network true to its original purpose. However, critics, including prominent figures like Blockstream's Adam Back and developer Jameson Lopp, warn that the proposal's implementation mechanism is dangerously flawed. They highlight that its low 55% miner signaling threshold, coupled with a contentious enforcement mechanism allowing nodes to unilaterally reject non-compliant blocks, significantly increases the risk of a chain split. Opponents argue this sets a dangerous precedent for transaction censorship, undermines Bitcoin's protocol neutrality, and creates excessive uncertainty for developers and businesses, especially since the rule is proposed as a temporary one-year measure. Market analysts, such as those from Bitfinex, suggest a full-scale network split is unlikely due to a lack of broad economic consensus. Major mining pools remain neutral, and adoption of the new rules is minimal. They view the situation more as a governance stress test. The primary risk is operational disruption: if a minority chain persists, major exchanges and custodians may need to temporarily suspend Bitcoin deposits and withdrawals to manage security and liquidity, potentially unsettling newer institutional investors. While BIP-110 is not expected to succeed in overtaking the main chain, its approach has ignited a significant debate about Bitcoin's governance, core values, and resilience.

Foresight News1h ago

BIP-110 Controversy Intensifies: Bitcoin May Face Its Most Divisive Hard Fork Battle in Years

Foresight News1h ago

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

**Summary: Crypto Market Makers Adapt as Margins Shrink** Leading crypto market maker GSR exemplifies a broader industry shift, moving beyond traditional market-making to become a full-service "Web3 investment bank." Its recent strategic acquisitions—including an SEC-registered broker-dealer, rebranded as GSR Securities—and purchases of token advisory firms aim to create an integrated platform covering token design, fundraising, listing, liquidity provision, and asset management. This includes launching an ETF and investing in tokenization platforms like Libeara, backed by a strategic investment from Standard Chartered's SC Ventures. This transformation is not unique to GSR. Other major players like Keyrock, B2C2, Wintermute, and DWF Labs are also expanding geographically, pursuing regulatory licenses (especially under frameworks like MiCA in the EU), and diversifying into over-the-counter (OTC) trading, asset management, and real-world asset tokenization. The driving force behind this collective pivot is a rapidly changing market. Profits from traditional altcoin market-making are declining due to fewer viable projects, reduced client budgets, increased competition, and smarter, more demanding clients. Simultaneously, regulatory pressures are mounting, making compliance a baseline cost. Extreme market events further expose teams lacking robust risk controls. Consequently, the crypto market-making business model is evolving from one reliant on information asymmetry and volatility to a more institutionalized, regulated, and service-diverse industry. Survival now depends on building systemic capabilities beyond mere liquidity provision.

marsbit2h ago

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片