End of a Decade-Long Debate: US Legislatively Distinguishes 'Digital Commodities vs. Digital Securities' for the First Time, CFTC Takes Over Secondary Market

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-10Last updated on 2025-12-10

Abstract

The U.S. is advancing the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act (CLARITY Act), which aims to resolve the long-standing regulatory debate over whether digital assets are securities or commodities. The bill establishes a clear distinction: tokens issued on sufficiently decentralized blockchains are classified as "digital commodities" under CFTC oversight, while those meeting the Howey test remain "digital securities" regulated by the SEC. It introduces a "mature blockchain" exemption, allowing networks like Bitcoin to avoid SEC registration if they meet decentralization criteria. The CFTC will oversee secondary markets, requiring trading platforms to register as digital commodity exchanges. The legislation also includes limited fundraising exemptions and mandates coordination between the CFTC and SEC via a joint advisory committee. This move, supported by crypto-friendly appointments under the Trump administration, signals a structured regulatory approach aimed at fostering innovation while protecting investors.

On December 10, US Senators Gillibrand and Lummis stated at the Blockchain Association Policy Summit that the draft of the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act (CLARITY Act) is expected to be released this weekend and enter the revision and hearing voting stage next week. This means this long-awaited legislative project has officially entered its decisive window.

The bill was first introduced in the US House of Representatives on May 29, 2025, by House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry and Digital Assets and Innovation Subcommittee Chairman French Hill. It passed the House vote by an overwhelming majority (294 votes in favor) on July 17 and is currently awaiting final review by the Senate.

Core Design of the Bill: Classification Over a One-Size-Fits-All Approach

The core of the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act lies in its attempt to end the decade-long tug-of-war between US regulators and the industry over "whether it is a security or a commodity." It is the first legislation to draw a clear boundary for digital assets, avoiding a one-size-fits-all regulatory model in favor of a classified regulatory framework. Specifically:

Legal Distinction Between "Digital Commodities" and "Digital Securities"

The bill explicitly defines the vast majority of tokens natively issued on decentralized blockchains as "digital commodities," transferring their regulatory authority to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Only those tokens that meet the Howey Test and possess typical "investment contract" characteristics will continue to be regulated by the SEC under securities laws.

"Mature Blockchain" Exemption Path

To prevent all tokens from being forcibly classified as securities, the bill establishes a "mature blockchain system" standard: a blockchain must simultaneously satisfy conditions such as "high decentralization" (no single entity controls more than 20% of the token supply or validation power) and derive its value primarily from the actual use of the network to be exempt from SEC securities registration requirements. This provides a clear path for mainstream assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, ensuring that regulation does not stifle technological progress.

Secondary Market Fully Transitions to CFTC Oversight

The bill requires all platforms engaged in the trading of digital commodity spots or derivatives to register with the CFTC as a "Digital Commodity Exchange" (DCE), digital commodity broker, or dealer. Considering industry realities, the bill also specifically sets up a 360-day "provisional registration" channel to ensure that existing compliant platforms are not forced to shut down due to technical violations during the transition period, thereby achieving a stable transition.

Limited Fundraising Exemption

Even for initial token offerings on mature blockchains, if still deemed an "investment contract," the issuer can apply for an exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Securities Act. However, the total annual fundraising amount must not exceed $75 million, and stricter information disclosure obligations must be fulfilled. This design attempts to strike a balance between encouraging innovation and protecting investors.

Division of Labor Between CFTC and SEC: From Confrontation to Collaboration

The prolonged jurisdictional tug-of-war between the SEC and CFTC over digital assets has long been described as the "Achilles' heel" of the crypto industry. Regulatory uncertainty was even considered a significant hidden cost suppressing innovation vitality in the US. If the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act officially takes effect, it will legislatively end this situation, establishing a clear division of responsibilities: the CFTC becomes the core regulator of the digital commodity secondary market, while the SEC focuses on token offerings and private placement behaviors in the primary market that still possess securities attributes.

To ensure coordination between the two agencies in overlapping areas, the bill requires the establishment of a permanent "Joint Advisory Committee". Either agency must formally respond to non-binding recommendations put forward by the committee when formulating rules that may affect the other's jurisdictional scope. This mechanism aims to avoid future regulatory gaps or overlapping regulations.

Simultaneously, the bill provides clear protection for the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem: protocol front-end developers, node validators, miners, and other non-custodial, non-profit roles will be explicitly excluded from the definitions of "broker" or "dealer," significantly reducing the compliance burden at the protocol level and preserving reasonable space for technological innovation.

Supporting Actions Progressing Simultaneously: CFTC is "Implementing First"

As the Senate review of the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act enters a critical stage, on December 5, Acting Chairman of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Caroline D. Pham, announced that spot cryptocurrency products will, for the first time, be permitted to trade on CFTC-registered regulated futures exchanges.

Pham stated that this move is part of the Trump administration's plan to establish the US as the "cryptocurrency capital of the world," aiming to address the lack of safeguards on offshore exchanges by providing a regulated domestic market.

Furthermore, as part of the "Crypto Sprint" initiative, the CFTC will also promote the use of tokenized collateral (including stablecoins) in derivatives markets and revise rules to support the application of blockchain technology in infrastructure such as clearing and settlement. This will strengthen the CFTC's leadership role in the digital asset space, highly aligning with the spirit of the bill.

Trump's Nominations Accelerate: Crypto-Friendly Leadership in Place

Since Trump's second term, the personnel layout of major US financial regulatory agencies has continued to tilt towards supporting digital assets. This shift has become a key catalyst for the development of the crypto industry.

US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Paul Atkins stated in an interview with CNBC that the US "resistance" to cryptocurrency has lasted "too long." Paul Atkins was appointed by Trump and took office in 2025. He views the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act as part of "Project Crypto," which aims to bring order and fairness to digital asset classification through legislation and rules.

Simultaneously, on October 25, 2025, Trump nominated Brian Quintenz to serve as CFTC Chairman and Commissioner. He is a former crypto lawyer who represented numerous crypto companies (such as venture capital funds and blockchain projects) at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP and has served as Chief Legal Counsel of the SEC's Crypto Task Force since March 2025, reporting directly to Atkins.

Trump also nominated Travis Hill to serve as Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); he had been serving as Acting Chairman since 2025. Hill is also crypto-friendly, having publicly supported banks' involvement in crypto custody and stablecoin issuance, believing it can enhance financial inclusion. The FDIC regulates the interface between banks and crypto (e.g., stablecoin issuers), and his appointment may facilitate banks' entry into the crypto space.

After the government resumed operations, the SEC has also successively introduced system optimization plans to accelerate the ETF approval pace. The overall signal is very clear: regulatory logic is transitioning from defensive management to structural acceptance.

Conclusion: The US is Completing the "Crypto Rule of Law Puzzle"

More importantly, the progress of the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act may consolidate the effectiveness of the U.S. Stablecoin Innovation Act signed by Trump earlier this year, which already provides a safety framework for stablecoin issuance. This bill further completes the legislative puzzle for the crypto industry, fills market structure gaps, and promotes the US from a "follower" to a "leader" in global crypto regulation.

Overall, these policy and personnel changes预示 (foreshadow) structural opportunities for the US crypto ecosystem. Regulatory clarity could attract more institutional capital inflows. However, challenges have not disappeared, such as coordinating DeFi regulatory details and aligning with international standards. But for global crypto practitioners, this is not just an American story; it is a crucial window period for the entire industry.

Related Questions

QWhat is the core design principle of the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act (CLARITY Act) regarding digital asset regulation?

AThe core design principle is to avoid a 'one-size-fits-all' regulatory model and instead adopt a classification framework. It clearly distinguishes between 'digital commodities' and 'digital securities' by law, ending the decade-long jurisdictional tug-of-war between regulators.

QWhich US regulatory agency is given primary oversight of the secondary market for digital commodities under the proposed bill?

AThe Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is given primary regulatory authority over the secondary market for digital commodities. Trading platforms must register with the CFTC as Digital Commodity Exchanges (DCEs), brokers, or dealers.

QWhat is the 'mature blockchain' exemption path outlined in the CLARITY Act?

AThe 'mature blockchain' exemption allows a token to be exempt from SEC securities registration if its underlying blockchain is 'highly decentralized'—meaning no single entity controls more than 20% of the token supply or validation power—and its value is primarily derived from the network's actual use.

QWhat key personnel changes has the Trump administration made to foster a more crypto-friendly regulatory environment?

AThe Trump administration has appointed crypto-friendly leaders, including SEC Chairman Paul Atkins, CFTC Chairman nominee Brian Quintenz (a former crypto lawyer), and FDIC Acting Chairman Travis Hill, who supports banks engaging in crypto custody and stablecoin issuance.

QHow does the bill aim to ensure coordination between the CFTC and SEC to avoid future regulatory gaps or overlaps?

AThe bill mandates the establishment of a permanent 'Joint Advisory Committee.' Both agencies must formally respond to the committee's non-binding recommendations when formulating rules that could impact the other's jurisdiction, ensuring coordination and preventing regulatory gaps or duplication.

Related Reads

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit8m ago

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbit8m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit12m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbit12m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报17m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报17m ago

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit22m ago

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit22m ago

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbit23m ago

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbit23m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy SFP

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing SafePal (SFP) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy SafePal (SFP) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your SafePal (SFP)After purchasing your SafePal (SFP), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade SafePal (SFP)Easily trade SafePal (SFP) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

696 Total ViewsPublished 2026.05.22Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy SFP

How to Buy CTR

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Citrea (CTR) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Citrea (CTR) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Citrea (CTR)After purchasing your Citrea (CTR), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Citrea (CTR)Easily trade Citrea (CTR) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

575 Total ViewsPublished 2026.05.25Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy CTR

What is USOIL

USOILUSDT Perpetual Contract is the trading symbol for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) Crude Oil priced in US dollars, representing 1 barrel of crude oil.

580 Total ViewsPublished 2026.05.25Updated 2026.05.25

What is USOIL

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of A (A) are presented below.

活动图片