Elon Musk's 'Granny Drain'

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-28Last updated on 2026-05-28

Abstract

Title: Musk "Milking the Old Folks" Author: Nancy, PANews As the memory sector surges with Micron and SK Hynix each surpassing a trillion-dollar market cap, Elon Musk is accelerating his own myth of becoming the world's first trillionaire. SpaceX, with its astronomical valuation, is speeding toward the capital markets. This potentially wealth-history-rewriting super IPO is pushing Musk toward that unprecedented personal fortune and delivering hundredfold or even thousandfold returns to early backers like Google, Valor Equity Partners, Founders Fund, and others. However, to sustain this most expensive space narrative in human history, new buyers are ultimately needed. As massive pension funds are set to be "forced to buy," the retirement savings of Americans are becoming the fuel for Musk's space dreams. Wall Street has begun paving a fast track for such super IPOs. Major indices like Nasdaq and S&P have recently eased rules, allowing mega-companies like SpaceX to be incorporated into key benchmarks like the Nasdaq 100 much faster post-listing. This matters because a vast portion of the U.S. retirement system—trillions in 401(k)s and pension funds—relies on passive index investing. Once a company enters a major index, all funds tracking it are compelled to buy its shares automatically, regardless of valuation, profitability, or risk. This has sparked significant backlash. Teacher unions and major public pension funds (collectively managing trillions) have warned the SEC ...

Author: Nancy, PANews

While the storage sector is going crazy, with Micron and SK Hynix both surpassing the trillion-dollar market capitalization mark, Elon Musk is personally accelerating the myth of creating a trillion-dollar fortune.

SpaceX, with its sky-high valuation, is accelerating towards the capital market. This super IPO, which may rewrite wealth history, is pushing Musk towards becoming the world's first trillionaire, while also delivering astounding returns of hundreds or even thousands of times to early allies.

However, for humanity's most expensive space narrative to continue, new buyers are ultimately needed. As massive pension funds will be 'forced to buy in,' Americans' retirement savings become the fuel for Musk's space dream.

Elon Musk is making American retirees 'pay up.'

Countdown to History's Largest IPO, Early Allies Reap Huge Profits

Wall Street has been waiting for SpaceX's IPO for many years.

Over the past decade, the company has grown from a startup valued at just $27 million into today's super unicorn valued at nearly $1.75 to $2 trillion, becoming one of the world's highest-valued private companies.

Now, this super IPO is finally set to list as early as June 12. This is not only the largest IPO event in human history but also means the wealth feast is entering its cash-out moment. Musk's long-term followers have finally waited for substantial returns.

For example, Google, through early investment, may become the biggest external winner. As of the end of 2025, it holds about 6.11% of SpaceX shares. An investment of just $900 million back then is now worth close to $120 billion; Valor Equity Partners, as a major shareholder second only to Musk, holds over 500 million SpaceX Class A shares, with equity value ranging roughly between $90 billion and $140 billion; Peter Thiel's Founders Fund, through multiple rounds of follow-on investments, holds about 3.5% of the shares, with paper gains exceeding $60 billion; Fidelity, as a major institutional investor in a 2015 co-investment round, holds shares worth about $35 billion; even Sequoia Capital, which entered relatively late, sees considerable returns, expected to be over $20 billion.

As for Musk himself, he is also poised to become the world's first trillion-dollar billionaire.

Bank of America strategist Michael Hartnett warns in a recent report that once super IPOs like SpaceX and OpenAI materialize, the weight of tech stocks in equity benchmark indices could easily surpass about 48%, exceeding the market concentration levels of all major bubble periods in history such as the 'Roaring Twenties' of the 1920s, the 'Nifty Fifty' of the 1970s, the Japanese bubble of the 1980s, and the dot-com bubble of the 1990s.

However, who will ultimately take on such a massive valuation?

To reduce selling pressure after listing and maintain stock price stability, SpaceX has made some adjustments. For instance, insider shares will use a phased unlocking mechanism instead of the traditional unified 6-month lock-up period common in IPOs. Additionally, the company approved a 5-for-1 stock split for common shares to lower the psychological barrier for retail investors and enhance liquidity. Musk has also publicly stated that he will not sell any SpaceX shares.

But market concerns haven't disappeared. Putting aside the uncertainty of the grand Mars narrative and looking just at financial data, SpaceX remains a fast-burning company. The prospectus shows that in the first quarter of 2026 alone, SpaceX's net loss was nearly $4.3 billion, almost equivalent to the full-year loss of the previous year. Meanwhile, Musk controls an absolute 85% of the voting rights, meaning the board can hardly fire him, and external shareholders can almost never push through any major business decisions.

To some extent, SpaceX is a highly Musk-ified company. Its valuation, governance, and future expectations are deeply tied to Musk personally.

After all early investors have made a fortune, who is still willing to buy this already outrageously expensive space ticket at a high price?

Wall Street Paves an Index Fast Lane, U.S. Pensions Become the 'Bag Holders'

Americans' retirement savings may become the potential fuel for Musk's space dream.

Wall Street has already started opening express lanes for super IPOs. On May 1 this year, new Nasdaq rules officially took effect. Newly listed companies ranking in the top 40 of the Nasdaq-100 index by market cap can be included in the index after just 15 trading days, compared to the usual wait of about three months previously.

S&P also launched a consultation in May, proposing to shorten the minimum listing time required for inclusion from 12 months to 6 months and considering exempting extremely large companies from profitability requirements. FTSE Russell similarly relaxed restrictions, allowing large IPOs to be assessed for inclusion in the Russell U.S. Equity Indexes (including Russell 1000, Top 200, etc.) as early as the 5th trading day after listing, without waiting for quarterly reviews.

Major U.S. indices quietly relaxing rules is undoubtedly paving a dedicated runway for SpaceX.

According to Business Insider disclosures, after SpaceX goes public, it may quickly enter mainstream indices and ETFs. The speed of passive fund allocation could far exceed that of previous large IPOs. For example, the CRSP indices tracked by Vanguard's VTI and Growth ETF VUG could include SpaceX as early as 5 trading days post-listing; the Nasdaq-100 index tracked by QQQ could include SpaceX after 15 trading days; and the S&P 500 index tracked by SPY might include SpaceX in 2027 after rule changes, among others.

Within the U.S. retirement system, a vast number of 401(k) plans, pension funds, and long-term savings accounts employ passive index investment strategies. Funds typically automatically allocate assets according to index constituents and their market cap weightings.

This strategy originated from the first index fund for ordinary investors launched in 1976 by index fund pioneer John Bogle. The core philosophy is to 'replicate the market, not beat it.' With extremely low management fees and high diversification, it became the preferred allocation method for pensions and 401(k) accounts. To date, total U.S. retirement assets exceed $49 trillion.

This means that once SpaceX is included in an index, all funds tracking that benchmark, without analyzing valuation, judging bubbles, or even caring if the company is profitable, are forced to buy according to the weight.

However, this game has sparked strong dissatisfaction within the pension system.

Recently, the American Federation of Teachers sent a letter to the SEC urging strengthened scrutiny of SpaceX's listing, warning that workers' lifetime savings could be controlled by a company that resembles a Musk family business more than a transparent public company.

Simultaneously, three major U.S. public pension funds managing over $1 trillion in assets (CalPERS, New York State, and New York City pension systems) also co-signed a letter to Musk, strongly opposing SpaceX's extreme governance structure. This includes super-voting rights, veto power over his own removal as CEO, and immunity from lawsuits.

They pointed out that Musk simultaneously leads SpaceX, Tesla, xAI, Neuralink, and other companies, posing significant risks due to divided attention. The letter demanded that SpaceX transition to a one-share-one-vote structure within seven years, establish a board with a majority of external shareholders, separate the CEO and Chairman roles, and remove Musk's self-veto rights.

This rule change, tailored by Wall Street for super IPOs, ultimately tightly binds the retirement savings of tens of millions of Americans to Musk's grand space dream. After early investors enjoy hundred-fold returns, the remaining 'bag-holding' cost is shifted onto passive investors incapable of making a choice.

The largest 'Granny Drain' game in history, under the guise of indexing, is officially beginning.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument of the article regarding the upcoming SpaceX IPO and its potential impact on certain investors?

AThe article argues that the massive upcoming SpaceX IPO, facilitated by Wall Street rule changes allowing rapid inclusion in major indices, will force passive investment funds (like ETFs and index funds) to automatically buy SpaceX stock. As these funds manage trillions in American retirement savings (e.g., 401(k)s and pensions), ordinary retirees' savings become the primary source of capital to 'fuel' Musk's space ambitions, effectively making them the 'bag holders' after early investors cash out their enormous gains.

QHow does SpaceX's proposed corporate governance structure pose a risk according to the article and certain institutional investors?

AThe article highlights that SpaceX's governance gives Elon Musk 85% of voting control, making the board unable to fire him and external shareholders powerless over major decisions. Major U.S. public pension funds (like CalPERS) have protested this structure, citing risks from Musk's divided attention across multiple companies and the lack of standard shareholder protections. They demand a shift to one-share-one-vote, an independent board majority, and the separation of CEO and chairman roles.

QWhat concerns are raised about SpaceX's financial performance as it prepares for its IPO?

AThe article points out that despite its high valuation, SpaceX is a company burning cash at a significant rate. Its IPO prospectus reportedly shows a net loss of nearly $4.3 billion in just the first quarter of 2026, approaching its total loss for the previous full year. This raises questions about the sustainability of its valuation and who will buy the stock at such a high price after early investors sell.

QWhat specific rule changes by major index providers are mentioned as paving a 'fast track' for SpaceX's inclusion post-IPO?

AThe article details several rule changes: Nasdaq reduced the waiting period for new listings to join the Nasdaq-100 index to just 15 trading days if ranked in the top 40 by market cap. S&P is considering shortening its listing requirement from 12 to 6 months and waiving profitability rules for mega-companies. FTSE Russell now allows large IPOs to be evaluated for inclusion in its U.S. indexes as early as the 5th trading day.

QWho are some of the early investors in SpaceX mentioned in the article, and what are their potential returns?

AThe article lists several early SpaceX investors and their potential gains: Google's initial $900 million investment could be worth about $120 billion; Valor Equity Partners' stake is valued between $90-$140 billion; Peter Thiel's Founders Fund could see over $60 billion; Fidelity's stake is around $35 billion; and Sequoia Capital could gain over $20 billion. These figures illustrate the immense returns for early backers compared to the perceived risk for later passive investors.

Related Reads

a16z Partner: Being in the Flow of Capital Is the True Moat

A16z Partner: Standing in the Cash Flow is the True Moat Historically, many of the strongest companies built their moats by positioning themselves within "cash flows"—facilitating value creation and transfer in a network and taking a cut. The more value flows, the larger they grow. Crypto is the first modern technology natively built for this. With open ledgers, programmable settlement, and stablecoins enabling internet-speed global value transfer, it allows startups to inherit network effects from day one. Well-designed tokens align users, developers, and the protocol towards network growth, distributing value to contributors. This model isn't new (e.g., railroads, Visa, Google, AWS) but Crypto democratizes it. It lets entrepreneurs target areas with high inefficiency and profit extraction—like traditional finance's payments, custody, FX, and settlement—to compress costs, increase speed, and redistribute value by standing in the new flow. The opportunity extends beyond finance to emerging markets like GPU/compute, AI training data, energy, and space, where new, programmable infrastructure can be built without legacy constraints. Key questions for founders: Are you already in the cash flow? Does your revenue scale 10x with network activity? Where is profit extraction highest relative to value created in your market? The strategy is clear: compress the old cost structure, position yourself in the new value stream, and let the network compound.

marsbit14m ago

a16z Partner: Being in the Flow of Capital Is the True Moat

marsbit14m ago

Capturing 15 Top-Tier Zero-Day Vulnerabilities: A Consensus Protocol Debug Agent Framework Built by 0G Lab in Collaboration with Teams from NUS, PKU, and BUPT

"Agents Capture 15 Critical Zero-Day Bugs: 0G Lab's Multi-Agent Framework Automates Debugging in Consensus Protocols" Distributed consensus protocols are notoriously difficult to debug due to complex, intertwined states. A novel framework, Agora, developed by 0G Labs with researchers from NUS, Peking University, and Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, tackles this by fusing deep domain expertise with a collaborative multi-agent LLM architecture. Agora moves beyond the limitations of single LLMs and traditional testing like fuzzing. It employs three specialized agents: an Orchestrator for global state, a Strategy agent for generating attack scenarios using distributed systems knowledge, and a TestGen agent that creates executable tests. A core innovation is its efficient "Succinct Memory & Communication" mechanism and a dynamic test harness. This allows the system to translate abstract hypotheses into concrete tests across languages like Go and Rust, run them, capture failures, and refine the approach in a closed loop—all with minimal token overhead. In rigorous evaluations on production-level protocols including Raft, EPaxos, and components from etcd and Sui, Agora discovered 15 previously unknown deep logic bugs (e.g., execution divergence, liveness violations). In stark contrast, powerful standalone LLMs like GPT-5.2 and Claude 4.5 found zero such bugs. Agora achieved this with a high precision of 73.9% and at an average cost of only about $40 per bug found. The framework demonstrates high generalizability. Its decoupled design allows the "Multi-Agent + Hypothesis-Driven Testing" paradigm to be applied to other complex domains like database concurrency control, OS kernels, and Web3 smart contract auditing. By enabling efficient, automated detection of deep logic flaws, Agora points the way for AI-powered security in critical infrastructure, aligning with the growing trends of agentic systems and automated quality control.

marsbit18m ago

Capturing 15 Top-Tier Zero-Day Vulnerabilities: A Consensus Protocol Debug Agent Framework Built by 0G Lab in Collaboration with Teams from NUS, PKU, and BUPT

marsbit18m ago

a16z crypto Partner: Cash Flow Is the True Moat

Title: a16z Crypto Partner: Capital Flow is the True Moat In business history, enduringly successful enterprises often share a core logic: capturing value by facilitating its creation and transfer within an ecosystem, taking a share of the proceeds. The scale of value flowing through the ecosystem directly correlates with the company's growth. Cryptography is the first modern technology natively suited to this commercial logic. Startups that don't leverage this framework in product design and business model construction miss significant opportunities. Stablecoins enable internet-speed, 24/7 global settlement of value with end-to-end programmability. With open underlying channels for capital flow and transparent unit economics, every circulating dollar globally represents potential flow in this arena. Blockchain is inherently a network business model. All transactions are recorded on a shared ledger, and each new participant strengthens this foundational system for future developers. More users and applications increase the network's value for all. Crypto entrepreneurs start with built-in network effects, unlike traditional businesses that spend years building them on legacy infrastructure. Network tokens amplify this advantage. A well-designed token system aligns users, developers, service providers, and validators around a common goal—network growth—while distributing rewards based on contribution. All proceeds flow back to ecosystem participants, creating a virtuous cycle of value circulation. This is not a new logic; the crypto industry simply makes it easier for startups to implement and scale. Historic giants like railroads, Standard Oil, AT&T, and modern leaders like Google and AWS succeeded by positioning themselves at critical junctures of value flow. In finance, Visa processed $15.7 trillion in payments (net revenue: $35.9B), and top market makers like Jane Street thrive by being in the path of order flow, benefiting from volume. Combining capital flow with network effects creates one of business's most robust models. As Jeff Bezos noted, "Your margin is my opportunity." This is acutely true in traditional finance, where sectors like payments, custody, and settlements extract significant fees (e.g., 2-3% for card networks, 6-9% for cross-border transfers). These profits represent opportunities for disruption by reducing costs and increasing efficiency, as proven by Stripe and Square in payments. Crypto founders can build the next-generation infrastructure: programmable, instant, global, and inherently embedded in capital flow paths. Opportunities extend beyond finance to markets like compute/GPU trading, AI training data, energy, robotics, and critical minerals—areas poised for massive global value movement that existing channels cannot handle. These are blue oceans for new, programmable infrastructure centered on capital flow, free from entrenched platforms and intermediaries. Founders should ask: Is your business at the heart of a value flow? Does your revenue scale 10x with ecosystem transaction growth? Where are the highest margins relative to value created in your target market? The answers point to the opportunity: cut existing costs, enter new value flow arenas, and grow through network effects.

Foresight News19m ago

a16z crypto Partner: Cash Flow Is the True Moat

Foresight News19m ago

Unveiling the 'White-haired Stock God' Serenity: A Spiritual Remedy for Anxious Retail Investors

The article details the rise of Serenity, dubbed the "White-Haired Stock God," whose social media posts have recently caused significant volatility in China's A-share market. Previously gaining fame in international retail investor communities, Serenity is known for his "Chokepoint Investment" strategy targeting small monopolies in the AI supply chain, reportedly achieving returns over 3612% this year. His influence stems from his background as a former AI research scientist, detailed analysis, and a massive following on X, where his subscriber count has surpassed Elon Musk's. In early June, Serenity's Chinese-language posts mentioning A-shares like LeaderDrive (Lide Xiebo), Easun, and Innolight triggered immediate 20% surges in their stock prices. He later clarified that some recommendations were crowdsourced from followers and claimed he did not hold positions in these stocks, stating his actions were "just for fun" to offer a foreign perspective on Chinese markets. This activity drew scrutiny from Chinese financial media, which warned of potential "pump-and-dump" schemes and legal risks. While anonymous, clues suggest Serenity is likely a Chinese-speaking individual living in Japan. He maintains his anonymity due to past harassment but enjoys substantial monthly income from his paid subscriptions. The article posits that Serenity embodies the market's current appetite for a charismatic, successful figure during the AI bull run, serving as an "outward projection" of bullish sentiment. It concludes by noting the cyclical nature of such market icons, warning that the same crowds that elevate them often seek scapegoats when trends reverse.

Odaily星球日报24m ago

Unveiling the 'White-haired Stock God' Serenity: A Spiritual Remedy for Anxious Retail Investors

Odaily星球日报24m ago

Unveiling the 'White-Haired Stock God' Serenity: The Mental Elixir for Anxious Retail Investors

The anonymous stock influencer known as "White-Haired Stock God" Serenity has ignited a frenzy in the A-share market. From June 5-9, Serenity's posts on platform X mentioning A-shares like LeaderDrive, Easun, and Innolight triggered sharp price surges, with some stocks hitting 20% daily limits. Serenity, who claims a 3612% personal return this year, gained fame internationally using a "chokepoint investment" strategy focused on small, monopolistic AI supply chain companies. With over 810k X followers, his influence rivals top analysts. His recent foray into Chinese stocks, which he claims is "for fun" to offer a "foreign perspective," has drawn scrutiny. While Serenity denies holding positions in these A-shares and states his posts are not recommendations, his actions have caused significant market volatility. He monetizes through a $1/month subscription, earning an estimated $54k monthly. Facing accusations of market manipulation, he maintains he promotes "information democracy." Community analysis suggests Serenity is likely an English-speaking Chinese national living in Japan, based on his posting patterns and shared personal details. He maintains anonymity due to past harassment. Ultimately, Serenity is seen by many as a manifestation of the current AI bull market's euphoria—a mysterious, seemingly successful figure who fulfills the market's desire for a "stock god," though such personas often face intense scrutiny when market sentiment shifts.

marsbit24m ago

Unveiling the 'White-Haired Stock God' Serenity: The Mental Elixir for Anxious Retail Investors

marsbit24m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片