Culper Research: Why We Are Firmly Shorting ETH?

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-09Last updated on 2026-03-09

Abstract

Culper Research, a Wall Street short-selling firm, presents a case for shorting Ethereum (ETH) and related securities. Their report argues that the Fusaka upgrade in December 2025 severely damaged Ethereum's tokenomics by increasing the gas limit, which caused a 90% collapse in transaction fees—far worse than the 10-30% drop predicted. This created a surplus of cheap block space, enabling a massive increase in "address poisoning" or "wallet dusting" attacks. The analysis claims that 95% of new wallet growth and over 50% of the increased transaction volume are inorganic, stemming from these spam attacks rather than genuine adoption. The report further states that Vitalik Buterin is aware of these issues and has been selling significant amounts of ETH. It also criticizes prominent bull Tom Lee for using flawed on-chain activity data as evidence of strength. Additionally, lower validator earnings are reducing staking incentives, and Ethereum is losing developer mindshare and market share to competitors like Solana, which is attracting major institutional partnerships. Culper concludes that Ethereum's economic model is broken and its value will continue to decline.

Author: Culper Research(@CulperResearch)

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: Culper Research is a well-known short-selling institution on Wall Street, having accurately targeted several prominent companies. This report directly addresses the core issues of Ethereum: the Fusaka upgrade in December 2025 brought a large amount of cheap block space, but real organic demand has not kept up—the "prosperous" on-chain data is actually fabricated by address poisoning attacks. Vitalik himself has been selling a significant amount of ETH, while Tom Lee, Ethereum's most staunch bull advocate, continues to defend it with incorrect data. This article is not a prediction; it is a well-researched short thesis with data and verification, worth reading carefully for every ETH holder.

We are shorting Ethereum and ETH-linked securities, including BMNR.

We believe that the Fusaka upgrade in December 2025 has severely damaged Ethereum's token economic model. Vitalik himself knows this and is continuously selling; meanwhile, Tom Lee, ETH's most steadfast bull, is pouring good money into a bad bet.

$ETH will continue to decline.

Tom Lee's Defense: Active Addresses and Transaction Volume Are Rising

Tom Lee's $BMNR defends ETH, claiming that "ETH is not entering a death spiral because utility is increasing." He cites the surge in ETH active addresses and transaction volume after Fusaka as evidence of "strengthening fundamentals" and institutional adoption.

Lee's logic is wrong.

By his own logic, if ETH's on-chain activity does not reflect real utility growth, then ETH is heading toward a death spiral.

Our research shows that this is exactly what is happening.

The full report and disclosure information are now available at culperresearch.com.

The Truth About On-Chain Data: 95% of New Wallets Are Poisoning Attacks

Our comprehensive analysis of on-chain data from January 2025 to February 2026 shows: the "institutional adoption" data cited by Tom Lee is actually explained by large-scale low-value address poisoning/wallet dusting attacks triggered by the block space surplus brought by Fusaka.

Specific data after Fusaka:

  • 95% of new wallet growth is explained by newly created "poisoned" wallets
  • Address poisoning attacks have increased more than 3 times
  • Poisoning attacks explain over 50% of ETH transaction volume growth
  • Poisoning attacks now account for 22.5% of all ETH transactions

Fusaka Upgrade: Gas Fees Collapsed by 90%, 3-9 Times Worse Than Expected

Fusaka increased the gas limit from 45 million to 60 million, aiming to scale Ethereum L1. Vitalik and PTG estimated that gas fees would drop by 10-30%.

The reality is: gas fees dropped by approximately 90%.

Vitalik and the validators severely underestimated L1 demand elasticity, with an error of 3-9 times—using outdated mathematical models from before EIP-1559 and before L2s emerged.

Vitalik Is Selling Like Crazy

This is why we believe Vitalik is selling ETH heavily. On January 30, he announced he would sell 16,384 ETH to fund the Ethereum Foundation's "austerity period." Since then, he has sold over 19,300 ETH and is still continuing.

He knows what Tom Lee does not: ETH's token economic model has broken.

We Personally Verified the Address Poisoning Attack

We documented the ETH address poisoning process firsthand: we created two new wallets, initiated a transfer between them, and were targeted by a poisoning attack within 5 minutes.

We encourage readers to verify this themselves.

Losses from poisoning attacks have grown at a rate more than 8 times faster than before Fusaka.

The Validator Flywheel Is Reversing

Additionally, the gas limit increase has severely impacted ETH validators, who now see a 40-50% drop in tips per unit of gas. Lower returns reduce staking demand and high-value activity, thereby weakening the foundation for institutional adoption.

The flywheel is now reversing.

Ethereum Is Losing to Solana and Its Own L2s

Meanwhile, ETH continues to lose market share:

  • Solana developers grew by 29% in 2025, while Ethereum only grew by 6%; talent is draining away
  • Visa and Citigroup chose Solana to build DeFi applications
  • Solana DEX trading volume is now more than double that of Ethereum

Conclusion: The Next Nokia

During the internet bubble era, Netscape and Nokia dominated the market for over a decade, but ultimately, Google and Apple reaped the rewards.

We view ETH in the same light.

We believe the token economic model has broken, Tom Lee is in over his head, and $ETH will continue to decline.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument presented by Culper Research for shorting ETH?

ACulper Research argues that the Fusaka upgrade in December 2025 severely damaged Ethereum's tokenomics by creating an oversupply of cheap block space, which led to a surge in artificial 'address poisoning' attacks rather than genuine organic demand. They claim this has caused a breakdown in ETH's economic model, leading to a downward price spiral.

QAccording to the report, what percentage of new wallet growth is attributed to 'poisoned' wallets post-Fusaka?

AAccording to the report, 95% of new wallet growth is explained by newly created 'poisoned' wallets following the Fusaka upgrade.

QHow did the actual gas fee reduction after Fusaka compare to the initial estimates by Vitalik and the Ethereum team?

AVitalik and the Ethereum team initially estimated that gas fees would decrease by 10-30% after the Fusaka upgrade. However, the actual reduction was about 90%, which was 3 to 9 times more severe than their projections.

QWhat evidence does the report provide to suggest that Vitalik Buterin is selling his ETH holdings?

AThe report states that on January 30th, Vitalik announced he would sell 16,384 ETH to fund the Ethereum Foundation during a 'period of austerity.' Since then, he has sold over 19,300 ETH and continues to sell, indicating his awareness of the broken tokenomics.

QWhat is 'address poisoning' or 'wallet dusting' as described in the article, and what impact does it have on Ethereum's metrics?

AAddress poisoning or wallet dusting is a type of attack where spammers send tiny, worthless amounts of ETH to a large number of wallets to create artificial on-chain activity. According to the report, this attack accounts for 95% of new wallet growth, over 50% of transaction volume growth, and 22.5% of all ETH transactions post-Fusaka, artificially inflating metrics like active addresses and transaction counts.

Related Reads

NEAR to Airdrop 330,000 Tokens, Betting on TVL Reaching $70 Million

On June 11th, NEAR Protocol launched the Near@3.33 Milestone Incentive Program, targeting users of its Confidential Intents privacy cross-chain execution feature. The program will distribute 333,333 milestone tokens when the Confidential Intents Total Value Locked (TVL) reaches $70 million. Users must have conducted Confidential transactions on near.com and maintain a Confidential balance above $100 in any asset to qualify, with a single wallet capped at 2% of the current airdrop pool. The milestone tokens will be locked upon receipt and cannot be sold or transferred. They can only be converted 1:1 to NEAR tokens once NEAR's Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) maintains $3.33 or higher for three consecutive trading days. As of the report, Confidential Intents TVL exceeds $20.69 million, needing roughly a 3x increase to trigger the airdrop. Confidential Intents, launched in February 2026, is NEAR's privacy execution layer designed to prevent MEV, front-running, and strategy leaks by building confidentiality directly into the execution environment. Its TVL has grown from zero to approximately $15 million in about three months. NEAR token price, which surged from around $1 in April to a peak of $3.08, currently trades near $2. The program aims to boost user activity for Confidential Intents, with future incentive rounds planned as community engagement increases.

Foresight News41m ago

NEAR to Airdrop 330,000 Tokens, Betting on TVL Reaching $70 Million

Foresight News41m ago

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

**Summary: Crypto Market Makers Adapt as Margins Shrink** Leading crypto market maker GSR exemplifies a broader industry shift, moving beyond traditional market-making to become a full-service "Web3 investment bank." Its recent strategic acquisitions—including an SEC-registered broker-dealer, rebranded as GSR Securities—and purchases of token advisory firms aim to create an integrated platform covering token design, fundraising, listing, liquidity provision, and asset management. This includes launching an ETF and investing in tokenization platforms like Libeara, backed by a strategic investment from Standard Chartered's SC Ventures. This transformation is not unique to GSR. Other major players like Keyrock, B2C2, Wintermute, and DWF Labs are also expanding geographically, pursuing regulatory licenses (especially under frameworks like MiCA in the EU), and diversifying into over-the-counter (OTC) trading, asset management, and real-world asset tokenization. The driving force behind this collective pivot is a rapidly changing market. Profits from traditional altcoin market-making are declining due to fewer viable projects, reduced client budgets, increased competition, and smarter, more demanding clients. Simultaneously, regulatory pressures are mounting, making compliance a baseline cost. Extreme market events further expose teams lacking robust risk controls. Consequently, the crypto market-making business model is evolving from one reliant on information asymmetry and volatility to a more institutionalized, regulated, and service-diverse industry. Survival now depends on building systemic capabilities beyond mere liquidity provision.

marsbit46m ago

Crypto Market Makers Are Collectively Seeking Change as Money Becomes Harder to Earn

marsbit46m ago

Crypto Market Makers Collectively Seek Transformation as Money Becomes Increasingly Difficult to Earn

Major crypto market makers like GSR are collectively pivoting as profitability declines in their traditional business. GSR has pursued an aggressive "Web3 investment bank" strategy through acquisitions and partnerships, including buying a US SEC-registered broker-dealer, acquiring token advisory firms, launching an ETF, and securing strategic investment from Standard Chartered's SC Ventures. This transformation aims to integrate fragmented services—token design, fundraising, listing, liquidity provision, and asset management—into a unified platform. Other leading market makers, such as Keyrock, B2C2, Wintermute, and DWF Labs, are following a similar path: strengthening regulatory compliance, expanding into institutional OTC services, and diversifying into areas like asset management, tokenized assets, and complex financial products. Key drivers for this shift include shrinking project budgets, increased competition for fewer viable tokens, and smarter, more demanding clients. Regulatory pressures (e.g., MiCA in the EU) and market volatility are raising the stakes, forcing firms to build systemic risk controls. The industry is evolving from a high-margin, volatility-driven trading model toward a more institutional, compliance-heavy, and service-integrated structure.

链捕手52m ago

Crypto Market Makers Collectively Seek Transformation as Money Becomes Increasingly Difficult to Earn

链捕手52m ago

Market Adjusts Following Google's $84.7 Billion Fundraising, AI Valuations Now Focus on Payback Speed

After Alphabet's announcement of an $84.75 billion equity financing round, market focus for AI investment is shifting from pure growth narratives to capital efficiency and payback periods. The core argument is that AI is being re-priced from a software-like growth story into a heavy-asset infrastructure cycle, requiring massive capital expenditure (CapEx) on chips, data centers, and power grids. While Alphabet's financing itself is not a distress signal—part of it is for administrative purposes like tax obligations on stock compensation—it highlights the enormous capital demands of AI infrastructure. This demand extends beyond tech giants to pure-play AI model companies (like OpenAI, Anthropic), data center REITs, and utilities. Major tech firms are projected to spend heavily on AI data centers in 2026, signaling a broad-based capital cycle the market must absorb. Consequently, valuation logic is changing. Investors are moving away from questions about who has the strongest AI narrative and are now prioritizing clear visibility into orders, stable cash flows, and the cost of capital. This has led to recent pressure on high-multiple AI software and semiconductor stocks, while "picks-and-shovels" hardware, data center, and power assets with firmer near-term demand may see relative support. The key going forward will be monitoring whether rising CapEx guidance across companies is matched by a timely monetization of AI investments into revenue and cash flow. The market's tolerance for high spending depends on demonstrable returns. While the long-term AI thesis remains intact, the valuation framework has fundamentally shifted to emphasize capital discipline and payback speed.

marsbit53m ago

Market Adjusts Following Google's $84.7 Billion Fundraising, AI Valuations Now Focus on Payback Speed

marsbit53m ago

Orbs Launches Institutional DeFi Trading Infrastructure

Orbs has launched "Orbs Institutional," a new infrastructure offering designed to provide institutional clients like trading desks, OTC firms, and custodians with direct access to its on-chain execution technology. This move expands the reach of its protocol, which has processed over $2.5 billion in spot volume since 2023. The core of the service is the Liquidity Hub, an aggregation protocol that sources liquidity from professional market makers and DEXes to improve execution quality and reduce MEV risks. Institutions gain access to trading tools like dTWAP and dLIMIT, while maintaining control of their assets through EIP-712 compatible custody solutions. Orbs Institutional offers integration via direct APIs for clients or white-label solutions for platforms. The company believes this direct, transparent, and self-custodied infrastructure will drive the next phase of institutional DeFi adoption as demand for sophisticated on-chain trading grows.

TheNewsCrypto1h ago

Orbs Launches Institutional DeFi Trading Infrastructure

TheNewsCrypto1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow