‘Crypto bill is inevitable,’ says Trump’s advisor as CLARITY Act talks drag on

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-21Last updated on 2026-01-21

Abstract

Trump's digital asset advisor Patrick Witt stated that a crypto market structure bill is inevitable, emphasizing the need for compromise to secure Senate passage. He criticized Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's opposition to the current CLARITY Act draft, warning that industry resistance could lead to stricter Democratic legislation. While some executives support the bill, Armstrong opposes its restrictions on stablecoin yield and DeFi. Market optimism has declined, with prediction odds dropping to 40% for the bill's passage by 2026. The bill's future remains uncertain as stakeholders seek consensus.

The White House is still hopeful that the CLARITY Act can be advanced, but it still appeared mad at Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong for withdrawing its support for the crypto bill.

In a statement, Patrick Witt, Executive Director, President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, said,

“There will be a crypto market structure bill — it’s a question of when, not if.”

On the contentious issues that stalled the bill’s momentum last week, Witt called for a compromise and added,

“Let’s keep working to improve the product, recognizing that compromises will need to be made in order to get 60 votes in the Senate, but let’s not let perfect be the enemy of the good.”

However, Trump’s advisor didn’t miss the opportunity to take a swipe at Coinase’s CEO’s ‘no bill is better than a bad bill’ stance.

He said that the Coinbase CEO’s stance was a ‘privilege’ because of Trump’s pro-crypto administration.

He warned that the industry could be forced to deal with even worse and ‘punitive’ legislation from Democrats if it fumbles the current opportunity.

Opposing views on the CLARITY Act

A section of industry leaders, such as Ripple’s Brad Garlinghouse and issuers of tokenized products like Securitize’s Carlos Domingo, were okay with the Senate’s draft as it is.

But Armstrong decried a ban on stablecoin yield, tokenized stocks, and DeFi. Since the markup for the bill faltered last week, the outlook for its progress has been mixed.

According to Galaxy’s Mike Novogratz, the stablecoin yield issue may cost the bill, and he blamed banks and lawmakers supporting them.

“The dynamics of yield in the stablecoin bill are fascinating and might cost the bill. Politics over good policy. The big loser will be the US consumer.”

Market expectations on the CLARITY Act decline

As of writing, the next Senate markup schedule was not yet public. Although SEC Chairman Paul Atkins projected that the bill would be passed, the market became less optimistic after its momentum stalled last week.

Prediction site Polymarket placed a 50/50 chance for the bill’s passage last week. At press time, however, the odds of the bill becoming law in 2026 have dropped further to 40%.

It remains to be seen whether stakeholders will reach a consensus on the crypto market structure in January or Q1 2026.


Final Thoughts

  • Trump’s crypto advisor blasted Coinbase’s ‘holdout’ on the bill and warned the industry could lose the window to get a ‘good’ bill.
  • As of writing, the bill’s progress remained uncertain, with the market’s expectations dropping to 40%.

Related Questions

QWhat is the stance of Trump's advisor, Patrick Witt, on the future of crypto market structure legislation?

APatrick Witt stated that a crypto market structure bill is inevitable, saying 'it's a question of when, not if,' and called for compromises to get the necessary votes in the Senate.

QWhy did the White House criticize Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong regarding the CLARITY Act?

AThe White House was critical of Armstrong for withdrawing support for the bill and adopting a 'no bill is better than a bad bill' stance, which Witt called a 'privilege' afforded by the current pro-crypto administration.

QWhat are some of the specific issues in the bill that Coinbase's CEO opposed?

ABrian Armstrong decried a ban on stablecoin yield, tokenized stocks, and DeFi within the proposed legislation.

QAccording to the article, what has happened to the market's expectations for the CLARITY Act becoming law?

AMarket expectations have declined. Prediction site Polymarket showed the odds of the bill becoming law by 2026 dropped from 50/50 to 40% after its momentum stalled.

QWhat warning did Patrick Witt give to the crypto industry regarding the legislative process?

AWitt warned that if the industry fails to seize the current opportunity, it could be forced to deal with even worse and 'punitive' legislation from Democrats in the future.

Related Reads

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit5h ago

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit5h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手5h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手5h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit5h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片