CleanSpark and Bitcoin miners’ selling spree – Is the miner HODL era ending?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-07Last updated on 2026-03-07

Abstract

Bitcoin's retreat from its October 2025 peak has triggered a significant shift in miner behavior, with public mining companies accelerating BTC transfers to exchanges. As mining profitability tightens due to a declining hashprice and rising operational costs, miners are increasingly liquidating reserves to maintain cash flow. Since October 2025, publicly listed miners have sold over 15,000 BTC, reducing total miner balances. This trend is exemplified by CleanSpark, which sold nearly all its February production (553 of 568 BTC mined), a stark contrast to its previous retention strategy. This signals a broader industry move away from long-term accumulation toward immediate monetization. Current miner selling patterns resemble late-cycle capitulation phases, though the selling pressure appears more controlled than in previous bear markets. The Miner Position Index remains low, while the Hash Ribbons indicator recently flashed a buy signal, historically preceding market rebounds. However, corporate miners' use of hedging and diversified revenue streams suggests this cycle may feature a more gradual transition rather than violent capitulation.

Bitcoin’s [BTC] retreat from the $126,000 peak in October 2025 triggered a notable shift in miner treasury behavior. As prices cooled down, public mining companies began accelerating transfers of BTC to exchanges.

At the same time, mining profitability tightened sharply as hashprice dropped below $30 per PH/s, compressing margins across the industry. Meanwhile, the post-halving reward remains 3.125 BTC per block, producing roughly 450 BTC of new supply daily. As operational costs rise, miners have been increasingly liquidating reserves to maintain cash flows.

Since October 2025, publicly listed miners have sold more than 15,000 BTC. Major transactions include Cango’s 4,451 BTC disposal, alongside large sales from Bitdeer, Riot Platforms, and Core Scientific. As a result, the total miner balance now stands near 1,780,305 BTC.

This shift carries structural implications. Miners represent the primary source of new Bitcoin supply. When treasury holdings decline, additional coins enter circulation, temporarily expanding sell-side liquidity and reinforcing downward pressure across the market.

CleanSpark signals miner treasury shift

The recent wave of miner distribution became clearer when examining CleanSpark’s treasury activity in February. As profitability tightened across the mining sector, the company shifted towards immediate monetization of new production.

Across the sector, Glassnode reported a 30-day net position change of about -490 BTC, indicating miners have been collectively selling more coins than they produce.

Within this environment, CleanSpark’s strategy mirrors the shift towards liquidity, as evidenced by their significant sales of mined BTC to generate cash flow amidst broader market trends.

The company mined 568 BTC in February, yet sold 553 BTC, generating roughly $36.6 million in proceeds. This near-total liquidation was in contrast with January, when CleanSpark sold 159 BTC out of 573 mined – Retaining a larger portion of production.

At the same time, total holdings declined from 13,513 BTC to 13,363 BTC, signaling a gradual treasury drawdown. Meanwhile, operational capacity expanded to roughly 50 EH/s, raising both production scale and capital requirements.

Together, these signals pointed to miners increasingly converting new issuance into liquidity, reinforcing the broader shift away from long-term accumulation.

Current miner selling echoes past capitulation phases

Right now, Bitcoin miner behavior increasingly resembles late-stage capitulation patterns seen in previous cycles. The Miner Position Index (MPI) sat near -0.38 at press time, signaling reduced outflows relative to the yearly average.

In previous bear markets, capitulation appeared far more aggressive. During 2018 and 2022, the Miner Position Index (MPI) surged above 2 and even 3.5 – Reflecting intense miner selling before major recoveries.

Meanwhile, structural signals are beginning to shift too.

The Hash Ribbon indicators flashed a buy signal in late February, as the 30-day hash rate moving average crossed above the 60-day. Similar crossovers followed deep drawdowns in 2019 and 2022, both preceding strong market rebounds.

However, the current cycle might just have new dynamics. Corporate miners are increasingly relying on hedging strategies and diversified revenue streams. As a result, the selling pressure is now more controlled, hinting at a gradual transition rather than the violent capitulation seen in previous cycles.


Final Summary

  • Bitcoin [BTC] miner liquidations are increasing sell-side supply as profitability declines, adding pressure during the current market correction.
  • Bitcoin miner behavior increasingly resembles late-cycle capitulation phases, where controlled distribution and structural signals historically precede market stabilization.

Related Questions

QWhat triggered the shift in Bitcoin miner treasury behavior according to the article?

ABitcoin's retreat from the $126,000 peak in October 2025 triggered a notable shift in miner treasury behavior.

QHow much BTC have publicly listed miners sold since October 2025, and which companies were major sellers?

APublicly listed miners have sold more than 15,000 BTC since October 2025. Major sellers included Cango (4,451 BTC), Bitdeer, Riot Platforms, and Core Scientific.

QWhat does CleanSpark's treasury activity in February indicate about the broader mining sector's strategy?

ACleanSpark's activity, selling 553 of the 568 BTC it mined, signals a broader industry shift towards immediate monetization of new production to generate cash flow, moving away from long-term accumulation.

QWhat is the significance of the Hash Ribbon indicators flashing a buy signal in late February?

AThe Hash Ribbon indicators flashed a buy signal when the 30-day hash rate moving average crossed above the 60-day average. Similar crossovers in 2019 and 2022 preceded strong market rebounds.

QHow does the current miner selling pressure differ from the capitulation phases of previous cycles like 2018 and 2022?

AThe current selling pressure is more controlled. Unlike the intense capitulation in 2018 and 2022 where the MPI surged above 2 and 3.5, miners now use hedging strategies and diversified revenue streams, suggesting a gradual transition rather than violent selling.

Related Reads

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

Investors flock to a physical AI startup as the race for the "OpenAI of the physical world" heats up. Ji Jia Shi Jie (GigaWorld), a company dedicated to developing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) for the physical world, has raised 3.5 billion RMB (approximately $490 million) in just three months, according to a report from investment media outlet Touzijie. The latest B2 funding round of 1 billion RMB attracted a wide range of top-tier investors, including sovereign wealth funds, industrial capital, and financial institutions. This brings the total funding for the young company, now valued over 10 billion RMB, to 3.5 billion RMB across three recent rounds. The company is led by Huang Guan, a post-90s Tsinghua University PhD with extensive experience in AI, autonomous driving, and entrepreneurship. Its core innovation is a "dual-pyramid" system comprising a five-layer data pyramid (from internet videos to real-world robot data) and a three-layer algorithm pyramid focused on world simulation, action alignment, and reinforcement learning. This system underpins its key models: the "World Action Model" (e.g., GigaBrain series for robot control) and the "World Generation Model" (e.g., GigaWorld series for simulating and understanding the physical world). Its models have reportedly achieved top rankings in global robotics benchmarks. Ji Jia Shi Jie argues that while current digital AGI excels in information processing, the next frontier is physical AGI—systems that can understand and interact with the real world. The company believes the field is approaching its "GPT-3 moment," a key inflection point in capability scaling. To achieve this, the company is pursuing a dual-market strategy. For the consumer (C) market, it launched the "SeeLight" brand and its S1 general-purpose humanoid robot, which has secured initial orders for deployment in real homes. For the business (B) market, it focuses on industrial automation with its Maker series robots, having signed agreements for large-scale deployment in factories, and its DriveDreamer world model for autonomous driving, which is already in use with over 30 automakers and tech companies. The report concludes that by bridging the gap between digital intelligence and physical action, Ji Jia Shi Jie aims to unlock a new wave of productivity, ultimately bringing physical AGI into everyday life.

marsbit12m ago

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

marsbit12m ago

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手1h ago

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手1h ago

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbit1h ago

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbit1h ago

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinist6h ago

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinist6h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片