Claude to Mandate "Face-Scan ID Verification", No ID No Service Starting July?

链捕手Published on 2026-06-15Last updated on 2026-06-15

Abstract

Anthropic, the creator of Claude AI, has sent privacy policy update emails to users, signaling a significant shift. The key change, effective July 8, is the potential requirement for consumer-level users (Free, Pro, Max plans) to verify their age or identity. This verification would be conducted through the third-party service Persona, involving uploading a government-issued photo ID and taking a live selfie for comparison. Anthropic states this data is for security purposes only, will not be used for model training, and is processed by Persona, not stored on its own servers. The update also clarifies data handling for Claude's new capabilities: when performing multi-step tasks or connecting to third-party apps, user data may flow between Anthropic and those external services. Additionally, more information may be collected from users who participate in Anthropic research. This move is seen as a major step towards establishing accountability as AI agents become more powerful and autonomous, capable of executing complex, real-world tasks. It follows previous enforcement actions, like the banning of the "Fable 5" account, and indicates a broader industry trend toward stricter user identification and safety measures. The verification is expected to apply in specific scenarios, particularly as users engage Claude in more complex agentic workflows.

Author: New Zhiyuan

Anthropic is in the headlines again!

In recent days, many Claude users opened their email to find a message from Anthropic. The title seemed innocuous - "Privacy Policy Update Notification". But the content left them stunned:

"We may ask you to verify your age or identity."

Someone shared a screenshot of the email on X, and the comments exploded. According to the email content, starting July 8th, Claude will likely start asking for your ID. Has Anthropic's real-name verification finally arrived?

Anthropic Suddenly Announces, Is Real-Name Verification Really Coming?

On June 10th, many Claude users' inboxes received an email from Anthropic.

The email mentions that starting July 8th, Anthropic may ask users to verify their age or identity, citing the reason as "enhancing security." More interestingly, some found they just received this email today, while their other accounts hadn't received it at all before, suggesting it might be a batch rollout or an A/B test.

According to the officially updated privacy policy in the email, there are three core changes:

1. Data Flow for Multi-Step Tasks and Third-Party Apps

As Claude's capabilities improve, it can perform multi-step tasks on behalf of users (like helping you plan a full trip: checking flights, booking hotels, arranging itineraries), and can also connect to third-party apps (like Google Drive, Slack, Notion, etc.).

Moreover, your data no longer stays solely on Anthropic's servers. Anthropic explicitly states in the updated privacy policy: When you connect a service or have Claude perform tasks for you, data can flow between you and third parties.

This means your conversation content, uploaded files, and even your commands may leave Anthropic's servers and enter third-party app processing pipelines. For ordinary users, the more powerful the AI's "agentic capabilities," the broader your data footprint becomes.

2. Verification Data (Core Change)

This is the most impactful part of this update. The policy text reads:

As part of our efforts to maintain the security and reliability of our services, we may ask you to verify your age or identity. We are explaining here what information we collect and how.

How will verification be done?

According to Anthropic's official support page, verification will be conducted through the third-party service Persona. The specific process includes:

  • Uploading a government-issued, photo ID document (passport, driver's license, ID card, etc.)

  • Taking a real-time selfie (for comparison with the ID photo)

Anthropic attempts to reassure users, emphasizing that this data is only used to confirm identity, and will not be used for model training; data will not be stored on Anthropic's own servers (handled by Persona); and the entire process is only for specific security and compliance scenarios.

Nevertheless, this notification still shocked the user base. On platform X, one user shared an email screenshot with the caption: "Received on June 10th, thought it was just a regular update at the time... looking back now, terrifying to contemplate." Another user joked: They said they need to verify identity, so is Fable 5 coming back?

3. Research Participation Information

If you participate in Anthropic's research surveys or interviews, they will collect more information.

⚠️ Important Note:

The above three changes apply only to consumer accounts (Free, Pro, Max). Business customers (Team, Enterprise) are not affected. This means ordinary individual users will be the first batch to undergo "verification."

Anthropic explains on its official support page: Identity verification was previously only used in specific scenarios targeting minors, violators, or accounts in unsupported regions. In the future, as agent tasks become more complex, the scope of verification will gradually expand.

Identity verification is not something Anthropic is doing for the first time. Previously, when dealing with minor protection, violators, and accounts in some unsupported regions, similar verification methods have been used. The difference is that this time, the wording and scope are more explicit, and they specifically highlighted one sentence—in the future, as Agent tasks become increasingly complex, verification scenarios may continue to expand.

Many heavy Agent users worry: in the future, when using Claude to run automated tasks, will there be constant pop-ups asking for face scans? Currently, the official has not provided more detailed trigger conditions; after July 8th, there will likely be more specific explanations.

AI's "Wild West Era" Is Coming to an End

Thinking back to the recent uproar over the "Fable 5 Ban" incident, everything seems to have been foreshadowed.

When the Fable 5 account was banned by the authorities for crossing safety red lines, it shocked everyone. Many thought it might be a one-off disciplinary action for an extreme case, but now it appears that Fable 5's downfall is not an isolated incident, but rather a prelude to a comprehensive tightening by Anthropic and even the entire AI industry.

As AI's capabilities evolve from a "chat companion tool" to an "all-powerful agent" capable of operating third-party applications and executing complex tasks, the authorities will never allow another Fable 5 to run wild beyond legal boundaries.

The so-called "real-name system" and "face-scan verification" mark that on the eve of the full-scale explosion of AI Agents, major players must establish an unbreakable accountability tracing mechanism in advance. Once AI causes trouble while booking tickets, editing files, or even executing more complex business commands on your behalf, the platform must know exactly which real-life "person" is giving the orders behind the screen.

From July 8th onward, every time you attempt to have Claude help you complete multi-step complex tasks, it might be accompanied by a pop-up: Please upload your ID document.

Anthropic's message reveals—winter is coming. From now on, face-scan verification and account purging will likely become the norm for the AI industry in 2026.

In another month, when using Claude, one must be prepared to hold up their ID at any moment.

References:

  • https://x.com/ryanmcadams/status/2066201356034011370?s=20

  • https://privacy.claude.com/en/articles/10301952-updates-to-our-privacy-polic

Related Questions

QWhat is the main announcement Anthropic made to its users regarding Claude's privacy policy, and what change is expected starting July 8th?

AAnthropic announced an update to Claude's privacy policy, notifying users that starting July 8th, the company may require them to verify their age or identity to enhance security. This verification would be conducted through the third-party service Persona and could involve uploading a government-issued photo ID and taking a live selfie.

QAccording to the article, what are the three key changes outlined in the updated privacy policy?

AThe three key changes are: 1) Clarification on how user data flows during multi-step tasks and interactions with third-party apps connected to Claude. 2) The introduction of identity and age verification for users. 3) Clarification on the collection of information for users participating in Anthropic's research programs, such as surveys and interviews.

QWhich group of Claude users will primarily be affected by the new identity verification requirement?

AThe new identity verification requirement will primarily affect consumer-level accounts, including Free, Pro, and Max plans. Business customers using Team or Enterprise plans are not impacted by this change.

QWhat is the stated reason Anthropic is implementing identity verification, and how does the company claim to handle the collected data?

AAnthropic states the reason for implementing identity verification is to enhance the safety and reliability of its services. The company claims the data will only be used to confirm identity, not for model training. The verification process is handled by the third-party service Persona, and the data is not stored on Anthropic's own servers.

QHow does the article connect this policy change to the broader trend in the AI industry, specifically mentioning the 'Fable 5' incident?

AThe article suggests this policy change is part of a broader industry-wide tightening of regulations. It connects it to the 'Fable 5' incident, where an account was banned for safety violations, implying that as AI agents like Claude become capable of performing complex, multi-step tasks, companies must establish clear accountability and traceability to prevent misuse, marking the end of a more 'wild' era for AI.

Related Reads

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

On June 15, 2026, Li Auto unveiled details of its self-developed chip, Mahe M100, for its new L9 Livis model. CTO Xie Yan stated the goal was not just a faster chip, but a fundamentally different one, targeting the chip architecture itself. While competitors like NIO, Xpeng, and Huawei highlight TOPS (computing power) figures for their self-developed chips, Li Auto’s Mahe M100 focuses on redesigning the underlying architecture. It employs a "dynamic data flow architecture" to address memory bandwidth bottlenecks in large model inference, claiming up to 3x the effective computing power of Nvidia's Thor U for its specific workloads and a 40% reduction in latency. The chip's design was peer-reviewed and accepted at ISCA 2026. However, this performance is highly optimized for Li Auto's own VLA2.1 algorithm, meaning it may not generalize as well to other tasks. Li Auto aims to achieve full-stack in-house development with Mahe M100, covering chip, compiler, OS, AI algorithms, and domain controller—a level of vertical integration few competitors match. Beyond the chip, CEO Li Xiang introduced a new strategic narrative: the "embodied intelligent vehicle," defined as an integration of an EV, a professional driver, an AI computer, and a life assistant. This shifts competition from features like large screens to systemic AI capabilities. A key commitment was that Li Auto's Mahe VLA autonomous driving model will match Tesla's FSD V14 by Q4 2026, with specific OTA milestones set for July, September, and December. Financially, Li Auto faces pressure with declining revenue and vehicle gross margins since Q4 2025, while maintaining high R&D investment (approx. ¥12B in 2026, 50% AI-related). Its 2026 sales target is 550,000 vehicles, up from 406,000 in 2025. The new L9 Livis garnered over 10,000 pre-orders in two weeks. The effectiveness of these strategic moves—new products, OTAs, and the novel chip architecture—will begin to show in Q3 2026 financial results, with the year-end FSD V14 benchmark being the ultimate test.

marsbit38m ago

Xpeng and NIO Compete on Computing Power, Li Auto Shifts Architecture

marsbit38m ago

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

The Year of AI Applications: Blindly Saying "Yes" While Ignoring Risks? A Software Development Log Goes Fully Open Source. AI-generated code harbors risks hidden within seemingly correct programs, potentially leading to data leaks or asset loss. The open-source project "Narwhal AI Code Risks," from Peking University's Narwhal-Lab, compiles real-world cases, early warning signs, and typical risk pathways. Its goal is to help developers identify potential hazards early and avoid repeating past mistakes. In 2026, code is generated faster than ever but deployed with less scrutiny. The danger often lies not in glaring errors, but in code that appears normal—syntactically correct, passing all checks—yet introduces subtle but critical flaws like non-existent dependencies, excessive permissions, or exposed databases. A stark example is the Moonwell cbETH oracle incident. A configuration file error, where a cryptocurrency price was set to ~$1.12 instead of ~$2,200, slipped through 28 checks and a pull request signed by both AI (Claude, Copilot) and human developers. This "semantic deviation" resulted in a loss of $1.78 million. The risk is that AI can produce functionally valid code that is semantically wrong for the business context. As AI moves beyond simple code completion to modifying configurations, installing dependencies, and operating via autonomous agents, it traverses longer, less traceable paths within software engineering, blurring traditional boundaries and oversight points. The Narwhal AI Code Risks project structures information into three layers: `/cases` for documented real-world incidents, `/inferred` for early warning signals, and `/scenarios` for clear, generalized risk patterns not yet tied to specific events. This aims to create a lasting, public record to prevent collective amnesia about past AI-coding pitfalls. Risks are categorized into seven areas: Software Supply Chain (e.g., recommending fake packages), Code-Level Vulnerabilities (e.g., reintroducing path traversal bugs), Cloud & Infrastructure Misconfiguration (e.g., overly permissive settings), Agent Risks (from autonomous tool execution), Vertical Domain Risks (e.g., in finance, healthcare), Intellectual Property & Compliance issues, and Human Factors (like over-reliance on AI output). The project's core value is transforming isolated incidents into reusable knowledge—a foundational resource for developers to spot similar issues, for security researchers to build upon, for toolmakers to create detection rules, and for the community to contribute new findings. As AI integration accelerates, this open-source "logbook" serves as a crucial navigational aid, charting past errors to help future projects steer clear of the same traps.

marsbit38m ago

The Year of AI Applications: Saying 'Yes' While Ignoring Risks? A Comprehensive Open Source Log of Software Development's Journey

marsbit38m ago

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit1h ago

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit1h ago

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手1h ago

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy ID

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing SPACE ID (ID) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy SPACE ID (ID) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your SPACE ID (ID)After purchasing your SPACE ID (ID), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade SPACE ID (ID)Easily trade SPACE ID (ID) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

3.0k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy ID

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ID (ID) are presented below.

活动图片