CLARITY Act: Hoskinson questions Ripple CEO’s ‘better than no clarity’ remark

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-20Last updated on 2026-01-20

Abstract

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson criticized Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse for supporting the CLARITY Act, arguing that flawed legislation could be worse than no regulation at all. Hoskinson questioned the logic of trusting the same regulatory system that previously targeted crypto firms like Ripple, which had a lengthy legal battle with the SEC. He warned that rushing the act without addressing key issues risks repeating past mistakes. The comments sparked a surge in bullish sentiment around Cardano (ADA), with social metrics showing a peak of 27 positive comments for every negative one. However, ADA's price initially dropped from nearly $0.40 to around $0.36 before stabilizing in a tight range. Technical indicators showed neutral RSI and negative MACD at the time of writing, suggesting cautious market sentiment despite the brief social media spike.

Cardano [ADA] Founder Charles Hoskinson publicly took aim at Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse over his support for the CLARITY Act in a live broadcast on Sunday.

He argued that backing it in its current form could do more harm than good.

Is something really better than nothing?

Hoskinson’s criticism was based on whether flawed legislation is preferable to non-clear regulations. While Garlinghouse has backed the CLARITY Act despite its gaps, Hoskinson questioned the logic of trusting the same system that previously targeted crypto firms.

Ripple’s own battle with regulators like the SEC lasted years before the dust settled.

Source: X

In a recent broadcast on X, he warned against rushing the act at any cost, saying that handing power back to regulators without fixing key issues risks repeating old mistakes. Taking shots at Garlinghouse, he said,

“And you still got people like Brad (Garlinghouse) saying, well, it’s not perfect,  but we just got to get something, you know, it’s better than no clarity. Handed to the same people who sued us!”

Bullish sentiment is up!

Hoskinson’s comments lit up social media around Cardano [ADA] almost instantly.

Source: Santiment

Bullish commentary briefly overwhelmed bearish takes per Santiment data, with more than 27 positive comments for every one negative at the peak.

Source: Santiment

Social Volume and Dominance for ADA also jumped, so there was a short-lived surge in attention and optimism.

ADA falls, and then gets back up

Following these events, ADA’s price action turned defensive.

The token slipped from just under $0.40 to around $0.36 within hours, a proper rejection after the surge in attention. Since then, the price has moved sideways, holding in a tight $0.36-$0.37 range.

Source: TradingView

RSI had settled near 43, with no oversold stress or buying pressure. Meanwhile, MACD was below the zero line, even though selling pace had eased.

At the time of writing, ADA was digesting the fallout.


Final Thoughts

  • Cardano sentiment spiked to 27:1 bullish-to-bearish, but price action went the other way.
  • Any and all hype looks like it’d fade when regulation fears come around.
Next: How USDD’s $1.1B stablecoin supply taps Chainlink for cross-chain pricing
Share
  • Share
  • Tweet

Related Questions

QWhat is the main criticism of the CLARITY Act according to the article?

AHoskinson's main criticism is that backing the CLARITY Act in its current, flawed form could do more harm than good. He questions the logic of trusting the same regulatory system that previously targeted crypto firms, warning that rushing the act at any cost risks repeating old mistakes.

QWhat did Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse say about the CLARITY Act that Hoskinson disagreed with?

ABrad Garlinghouse supported the CLARITY Act despite its gaps, stating that 'it's better than no clarity.' Hoskinson directly quoted and criticized this remark, highlighting the act's imperfections.

QHow did the crypto community react to Hoskinson's comments on social media?

AThe community reaction was overwhelmingly positive. According to Santiment data, bullish commentary briefly spiked to a ratio of more than 27 positive comments for every one negative comment, and both Social Volume and Dominance for ADA increased.

QWhat was the immediate impact on ADA's price following these events?

AADA's price turned defensive, slipping from just under $0.40 to around $0.36 within hours. It then moved sideways, holding in a tight range between $0.36 and $0.37 as it digested the fallout.

QWhat were the key technical indicators for ADA mentioned in the article at the time of writing?

AAt the time of writing, the RSI had settled near 43, indicating no oversold stress or significant buying pressure. The MACD was below the zero line, though the pace of selling had eased.

Related Reads

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

Investors flock to a physical AI startup as the race for the "OpenAI of the physical world" heats up. Ji Jia Shi Jie (GigaWorld), a company dedicated to developing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) for the physical world, has raised 3.5 billion RMB (approximately $490 million) in just three months, according to a report from investment media outlet Touzijie. The latest B2 funding round of 1 billion RMB attracted a wide range of top-tier investors, including sovereign wealth funds, industrial capital, and financial institutions. This brings the total funding for the young company, now valued over 10 billion RMB, to 3.5 billion RMB across three recent rounds. The company is led by Huang Guan, a post-90s Tsinghua University PhD with extensive experience in AI, autonomous driving, and entrepreneurship. Its core innovation is a "dual-pyramid" system comprising a five-layer data pyramid (from internet videos to real-world robot data) and a three-layer algorithm pyramid focused on world simulation, action alignment, and reinforcement learning. This system underpins its key models: the "World Action Model" (e.g., GigaBrain series for robot control) and the "World Generation Model" (e.g., GigaWorld series for simulating and understanding the physical world). Its models have reportedly achieved top rankings in global robotics benchmarks. Ji Jia Shi Jie argues that while current digital AGI excels in information processing, the next frontier is physical AGI—systems that can understand and interact with the real world. The company believes the field is approaching its "GPT-3 moment," a key inflection point in capability scaling. To achieve this, the company is pursuing a dual-market strategy. For the consumer (C) market, it launched the "SeeLight" brand and its S1 general-purpose humanoid robot, which has secured initial orders for deployment in real homes. For the business (B) market, it focuses on industrial automation with its Maker series robots, having signed agreements for large-scale deployment in factories, and its DriveDreamer world model for autonomous driving, which is already in use with over 30 automakers and tech companies. The report concludes that by bridging the gap between digital intelligence and physical action, Ji Jia Shi Jie aims to unlock a new wave of productivity, ultimately bringing physical AGI into everyday life.

marsbit24m ago

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

marsbit24m ago

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手1h ago

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手1h ago

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbit1h ago

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbit1h ago

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinist6h ago

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinist6h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片