BubbleMaps Classifies XST as a Potentially Dangerous Road Section Following a 99% Collapse Warning

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-13Last updated on 2026-08-13

Abstract

Analytics firm BubbleMaps has classified the memecoin XST, popular on TikTok, as a potentially dangerous investment after its analysis revealed that roughly 74% of the token's supply is concentrated within a small cluster of 244 wallets. The firm, known for prior warnings preceding major market collapses, advised buyers to avoid the token. Despite a recent 28.8% price increase to around $0.06 and a $70 million market cap, concerns center on the risk of coordinated price manipulation by this narrow holder group. The project is promoted on TikTok as a quick money-making scheme, featuring AI-generated videos of Donald Trump, which critics have labeled a fraudulent operation. BubbleMaps's warning follows its accurate alert about the $LAB token, which crashed 99% a day earlier. The firm has also previously flagged other tokens like CASHDOG for similar coordinated launch patterns and poor trader outcomes.

The blockchain analytics company BubbleMaps has warned that XST, a meme coin rapidly spreading on TikTok, has approximately 74% of its supply concentrated in a small cluster of wallets.

BubbleMaps, known for its warnings prior to major market crashes, advised potential buyers to stay away from this token.

Is it Safe to Invest in TikTok-Viral Token XST?

BubbleMaps published its analysis of the XST token on X, accompanied by a characteristically brief, one-word message: "bro".

bro https://t.co/Qx1278eHsh pic.twitter.com/letj3Q8FLg

— Bubblemaps (@bubblemaps) August 13, 2026

The analysis showed that around 74% of the total XST supply is concentrated in the hands of a narrow group of addresses, which could coordinate their actions to manipulate the price. The company has pointed out this same distribution issue in many other projects.

A token distribution map created by the company itself, dated August 13, shows that a single cluster of 244 wallets holds almost half of the entire supply. However, TikTok users, to whom the project is marketed as a quick way to make money through viral influencer videos, may never find out who controls the token supply.

According to BubbleMaps data, the XST token price rose by 28.8% and was trading around $0.06 at the time of publication, with the project's market capitalization valued at approximately $70 million.

A trader named Bando described XST on X as a "$70 million rug, marketed on TikTok," echoing BubbleMaps' findings and adding fake profit screenshots. The project's tactics even include AI-generated Trump videos.

Jack Duval also posted, calling the project a "Trump-themed fraudulent crime RPG."

He argued that the coin's listing on the FOMO trading platform lends it an air of legitimacy and called for the token's verification badge to be revoked and for it to be delisted.

What Other Projects Has BubbleMaps Warned About?

The day before posting about XST, the token $LAB, which BubbleMaps had previously warned about, collapsed by 99%.

Cryptopolitan reported that a group of 313 wallets that conducted a pre-sale dump saw their collective paper assets fall from over $1 billion to roughly $6.8 million. The $LAB token is currently trading around $0.12, while its all-time high was $27.22.

BubbleMaps also issued a warning about CASHDOG back in July while analyzing meme coins on the Robinhood Chain. The token's top wallets were funded by one-time dumps, indicating a coordinated coin launch rather than organic purchases.

The same study found that 63% of the 164,538 traders actively using the top 50 tokens on the chain had incurred losses.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat did the blockchain analytics company BubbleMaps warn about concerning the XST token?

ABubbleMaps warned that approximately 74% of the XST token's supply is concentrated within a small cluster of wallets, making it a potentially dangerous market section and advising buyers to stay away.

QAccording to the article, how did BubbleMaps describe their analysis of XST in their social media post?

ABubbleMaps posted their analysis of XST on X (formerly Twitter) accompanied by a characteristically laconic message consisting of a single Russian word: 'bro' ('брат').

QWhich previous token did BubbleMaps also warn about, and what happened to its price?

ABubbleMaps had previously warned about the token $LAB. One day after the warning about XST was published, $LAB crashed by 99%, falling from a high of $27.22 to trade around $0.12.

QWhat specific tactic used by the XST project is mentioned in the article?

AThe article mentions that the project's tactics even included AI-generated videos of Donald Trump to promote the token.

QWhat finding did BubbleMaps' research on Robinhood Chain meme coins reveal about trader performance?

AThe research found that 63% of the 164,538 traders actively using the 50 most popular tokens on the Robinhood Chain had incurred losses.

Related Reads

Token Buyback Volumes Continue to Rise, But Price Lows Keep Falling

The volume of token buybacks continues to grow, but the minimum price level is constantly declining, according to an internal memo by Bitwise CIO Matt Hogan. He argues that most crypto tokens, except Bitcoin, are undervalued as investors are unaware of the revenue now being returned to holders. He highlights the example of Hyperliquid, which has bought back and burned $1.3 billion worth of its $HYPE token. Hogan posits that tokens are beginning to trade based on revenue, similar to stocks and bonds, marking the end of an era where scaling networks provided little token utility. He links token valuation to strengthening protocol revenue, noting that Hyperliquid has earned over $800 million in the past year and spends nearly all fees on $HYPE buybacks. Following this model, protocols like Uniswap and Aave have implemented fee mechanisms to buy back and burn their own tokens. The trend has also affected base chains like Solana and Aptos, which have proposed or enacted higher fee burns. However, the memo acknowledges that reducing token supply has not reliably boosted prices. A Cryptopolitan report found many tokens with regular buybacks still underperformed the market. Even Hyperliquid's upward trend broke, and Pump.fun conducted significant buybacks near token lows. Hogan cautions that token buybacks differ from stock buybacks due to the lack of contractual claims on profits or assets, as governance rules can always be rewritten.

cryptonews.ru11m ago

Token Buyback Volumes Continue to Rise, But Price Lows Keep Falling

cryptonews.ru11m ago

NullReceiver abandons the recording address that made EtherHiding easy to detect

**Sonatype Research Labs has uncovered six malicious npm packages that retrieve command-and-control server addresses from an attacker's Ethereum wallet.** Three of the packages are legitimate, popular libraries that were compromised: `@kolbo/mcp`, `agentgui`, and `godot-kit`. The other three are purely malicious packages: `envpack-conf`, `postcss-initial-provider`, and `tailwindcss-motion-advanced`. All six deploy the same payload. The malware loader queries the Ethereum blockchain for the latest outgoing transaction from a specific wallet. It extracts bytes from the recipient field of that transaction, converts them into two IPv4 addresses, and uses these as primary and backup command-and-control servers. After connecting, it fetches, decodes, and executes a second-stage payload using `eval()` or by spawning a child process. This method, dubbed **"NullReceiver,"** is an evolution of the earlier "EtherHiding" technique. While EtherHiding hid data in transaction fields and sent funds to a fixed "burner" address (creating a monitoring point), NullReceiver sends no funds and generates unique, dynamic receiver addresses, making detection harder. OpenSourceMalware has linked this activity to the North Korean Lazarus group's "Contagious Interview" campaign. Sonatype advises developers to remove the affected package versions immediately and check their systems for signs of secondary payload execution.

cryptonews.ru13m ago

NullReceiver abandons the recording address that made EtherHiding easy to detect

cryptonews.ru13m ago

Cryptomarket Loses $14 Billion Due to Hacks. What Was Special About 2026?

The cryptocurrency market lost over $14 billion due to hacks and code exploits from 2016 to 2026, according to a CoinGecko report. The year 2026 has seen a significant spike, with 164 separate incidents recorded as of August—a 70% increase from all of 2025. Although the total financial loss for 2026 currently stands at about $1.2 billion, still below the peak of $2.77 billion in 2022, the number of attacks is unprecedented. Analysts attribute this rise to improved tracking methods and increased malicious activity, possibly fueled by advancements in artificial intelligence. Notable 2026 breaches include the April hacks of Drift and Kelp protocols, resulting in losses of $295 million and $293 million, respectively. The Kelp exploit, linked to North Korean hackers, involved minting unbacked tokens via a LayerZero bridge vulnerability, which were then used as collateral on Aave. This triggered a massive withdrawal of liquidity from Aave and the broader DeFi sector, leading to over $20 billion in sector-wide outflows by August, despite the eventual recovery of the stolen Kelp funds. The report also highlights that market reactions to hacks often inflict greater financial damage than the exploits themselves. For instance, following the BonkDAO hack, the token's market cap fell by nearly $140 million, far exceeding the $21 million direct loss. Other examples include the DRIFT token dropping 80% and Step Finance's token losing over 99% of its value, leading to the protocol's bankruptcy. The analysis notes that the real total damage is likely higher, as it excludes individual wallet breaches and broader ecosystem losses.

cryptonews.ru15m ago

Cryptomarket Loses $14 Billion Due to Hacks. What Was Special About 2026?

cryptonews.ru15m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of MEME (MEME) are presented below.

活动图片