Bitwise: ETFs to consume over 100% of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana’s new supply in 2026

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-17Last updated on 2025-12-17

Abstract

Bitwise Asset Management predicts that by 2026, U.S.-listed crypto ETFs will collectively purchase more than 100% of the new supply of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. This would mark a historic supply squeeze, shifting market dynamics toward institutional dominance. The firm estimates new annual supplies of approximately 166,000 BTC, 960,000 ETH, and 23 million SOL. Current data shows Bitcoin ETFs have already bought twice the newly mined supply since their launch. Major financial institutions are expanding access to these ETFs, reinforcing demand. This trend is expected to create upward price pressure and structurally constrain supply, potentially raising long-term price floors significantly.

Bitwise Asset Management has released its 2026 outlook, and its most striking prediction is a potential historic supply squeeze.

The firm expects U.S.-listed crypto ETFs to collectively purchase more than 100% of all newly issued BTC, ETH, and SOL next year—a milestone that would mark a new phase of institutional dominance in digital assets.

According to Bitwise, demand dynamics have shifted far beyond the traditional four-year crypto cycle. ETF inflows, institutional approvals, and broad market accessibility now outweigh halving patterns and speculative leverage.

Fresh ETF flow data provides a glimpse of how this could happen.

What Bitwise is predicting for 2026

Bitwise calculates roughly:

  • 166,000 BTC in new supply
  • 960,000 ETH
  • 23 million SOL

But ETF demand is expected to exceed these totals as more institutions gain access in 2026. Since ETF launches in 2024, Bitcoin funds alone have bought 710,777 BTC, compared to just 363,047 BTC newly mined in the same period—an early sign of the imbalance.

With major wealth platforms like Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Wells Fargo, Citi, and Vanguard expanding retail and institutional ETF access, Bitwise expects this consumption gap to widen.

Real-world ETF flows show why Bitwise is confident

Bitcoin ETFs remain the largest market force

Despite volatility, U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs sit on $114.28 billion in assets [6.54% of Bitcoin’s market cap], with $57.27 billion in cumulative net inflows.

Even on a red day like 16 December — when flows dipped –$277.09 million — trading volumes exceeded $4.26 billion, showing persistent institutional activity.

The scale: BTC ETFs generated more inflow this year than the entire supply produced by the network.

Ethereum ETFs are tracking a similar trajectory

U.S. Ethereum ETFs now hold $18.17 billion in assets, equal to 5.11% of ETH’s market cap. Cumulative inflows sit at $12.64 billion, with daily trading volumes at $1.17 billion.

Even after a daily outflow of –$224.26 million on 16 December, net accumulation remains strong — a dynamic Bitwise expects to accelerate as ETF access expands to more U.S. wealth platforms.

Solana ETFs are the early growth story

While smaller in size, Solana ETFs have quickly gained traction:

  • $714.92 million cumulative inflows
  • $926.33 million in total net assets
  • 1.28% of SOL’s market cap already held by ETFs

Daily flows remain positive at +$3.64 million, and the sector traded $39.53 million on 16 December — notable for a product less than a year old.

XRP’s ETF debut adds another layer

XRP ETFs, launched even more recently, recorded:

  • +$10.89 million daily inflow
  • $1.12 billion cumulative inflow

With XRP trading near $1.88, inflows have been consecutive for several days, signalling steady adoption by retail and advisors integrating XRP into diversified crypto baskets.

Together, these flow patterns support Bitwise’s thesis: ETF demand is deep, persistent, and broadening across multiple assets.

Why 2026 could be the tipping point

Bitwise lists several drivers behind its prediction:

  • Institutional onboarding — Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Citi, Wells Fargo and others are now opening access to crypto ETFs.
  • The pro-crypto regulatory shift, including bipartisan support for digital asset clarity.
  • Growing demand for tokenized assets, stablecoins and onchain financial products.
  • Declining volatility, which Bitwise argues reflects “the derisking of Bitcoin as an investable asset.”

The firm also expects crypto-linked equities to outperform tech stocks next year, onchain vaults to double AUM, Polymarket to hit new open-interest highs, and Ivy League endowments to accelerate their allocation to crypto.

Market implications of Bitwise prediction

If ETFs absorb more than 100% of newly issued BTC, ETH and SOL, crypto’s supply side becomes structurally constrained.

That scenario mirrors traditional commodity markets where financial vehicles consume more supply than miners can produce.

For crypto, this dynamic introduces upward pressure on prices — especially as ETF access broadens globally.


Final Thoughts

  • ETF accumulation across BTC, ETH, SOL and XRP already shows the structural demand trend Bitwise forecasts for 2026.
  • If ETFs do consume more than 100% of new supply next year, crypto’s long-term price floor could rise significantly.

Related Reads

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit25m ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit25m ago

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Elon Musk's much-anticipated "WeChat-like" app, XChat, has officially launched after multiple delays. The initial review reveals a product that falls short of expectations, offering an experience largely similar to X Platform's (formerly Twitter) direct messages, despite being marketed as an encrypted communication tool. Key observations from the first-day test include: 1. The app's promoted "end-to-end encryption" and its claimed relation to Bitcoin's architecture were criticized by experts as a superficial attempt to capitalize on crypto buzz, with no real technical connection. 2. Musk's vision of an ad-free "secure communication system" is technically met, but only because the app is currently extremely basic, featuring only a single chat interface. 3. A promised anti-screenshot feature appears inconsistent; it works in X Platform group chats but fails within the XChat app itself, where screenshots still capture avatars. 4. The app supports 45 languages and has a 16+ age rating, indicating a broader tolerance for content compared to WeChat's 13+ rating. 5. A puzzling login process requires users to verify the email associated with their X account. 6. The touted encryption" feels minimal in practice, with its presence only indicated by a simple "Encrypted - Yes" label on messages. 7. Disappearing message timers for groups can be set from 5 minutes to 4 weeks, with the timer starting upon being read by a user. 8. Group invite links are shared with X Platform groups. 9. Group size limits are planned to be increased, aiming for 1000 members, a move that has drawn user criticism. 10. The app offers 8 different colored icons, and its chat bubbles are notably similar to WeChat's. Message deletion options mimic Telegram's. Crucially, many pre-announced features like importing X contacts, integrating Grok AI, X Money payments, and Cashtags are not yet available. The initial release is seen as a bare-bones and underwhelming first step.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片