Bitfarms grows revenue 72%, but losses widen – Here’s why!

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-02Last updated on 2026-04-02

Abstract

Bitcoin mining faces significant pressure as hashprice drops to $30–$35, well below production costs of $80,000–$88,000 per BTC, leading to losses of $17,000–$19,000 per coin. Despite this, miners like Bitfarms continue expanding hashrate. Bitfarms reported a 72% revenue increase to $229 million, but net losses widened to $209 million due to non-cash accounting charges, including depreciation and Bitcoin price volatility. In response, the company is pivoting to high-performance computing (HPC) and AI infrastructure, with 2.2 GW of power capacity in development, aiming for more predictable revenue streams. This strategic shift may reposition Bitfarms as an infrastructure-focused business, reducing reliance on Bitcoin's cyclical volatility.

A clear tension is building in Bitcoin’s mining sector, where growth in activity no longer translates into financial stability.

According to CoinShares Q1 2026 report on Bitcoin mining, Hashrate held near 1,020 EH/s after peaking around 1,160 EH/s, showing miners continue expanding despite pressure.

However, hashprice has dropped to $30–$35 from over $60, cutting revenue per unit sharply. This happens because the halving reduced block rewards while the price has not risen enough to offset costs.

As a result, production costs near $80,000–$88,000 exceed current prices, leaving losses of $17,000–$19,000 per BTC.

Meanwhile, accounting rules amplify these losses through asset revaluation. This implies weaker miners may exit, while stronger players consolidate, tightening supply and influencing future price stability.

Bitfarms growth rises as accounting losses widen

As mining margins tighten across the sector, Bitfarms’ report results reveal how operational growth clashes with financial outcomes. Revenue rose 72% to $229 million, showing stronger output from expanded hashrate.

Source: Bitfarms

However, net losses widened to around $209 million, not from weak operations but from accounting pressure.

Depreciation hit $98 million, impairments reached $28 million, while $22 million reflected BTC price swings. This happens because fair-value accounting captures past volatility, even as current production improves.

Meanwhile, hashprice kept margins compressed, limiting cash generation.

Yet shares rose about 6%, showing investors’ focus on future positioning. This implies markets expect miners to evolve beyond BTC exposure, where diversification could reshape long-term valuation.

Bitfarms pivots to HPC and AI as mining margins compress

As mining margins remain under pressure, Bitfarms is actively repositioning its business toward HPC and AI infrastructure to secure more stable revenue. The company is building a 2.2 GW pipeline, with 341 MW already active and 1.5 GW in expansion, targeting high-demand data markets.

Source: Bitfarms

This shift is happening because hashprice stays compressed, making mining returns less predictable.

In response, Bitfarms is redirecting power capacity toward AI workloads, where long-term contracts offer higher margins and steady cash flow.

Industry trends support this move, with HPC revenue projected to reach 70% of miner income by 2026. The rebrand to Keel Infrastructure reinforces this transition.

This implies Bitfarms is evolving beyond Bitcoin exposure, positioning for more resilient, infrastructure-driven growth.

All this together, Bitfarms may reprice as an infrastructure play if HPC and AI drive stable revenue growth. However, if mining remains dominant, BTC volatility will continue shaping earnings, keeping the stock tied to cyclical crypto movements.


Final Summary

  • Bitcoin [BTC] mining margins compress as hashprice falls below costs, forcing weaker miners out while efficient players consolidate supply dynamics.
  • Bitcoin volatility still drives Bitfarms’ performance, but the HPC and AI pivot may shift valuation toward stable, infrastructure-led growth.

Related Questions

QWhy did Bitfarms' revenue grow by 72% despite widening losses?

ABitfarms' revenue grew 72% to $229 million due to increased output from expanded hashrate, but net losses widened to $209 million primarily due to non-cash accounting pressures including $98 million in depreciation, $28 million in impairments, and $22 million from BTC price volatility.

QWhat is the current hashprice range and how does it compare to previous levels?

AHashprice has dropped to $30–$35 per exahash from over $60 previously, representing a sharp decline in revenue per unit of computing power.

QHow are production costs comparing to Bitcoin's current price according to the article?

AProduction costs are near $80,000–$88,000 per Bitcoin, which exceeds current market prices, resulting in losses of $17,000–$19,000 per BTC mined.

QWhat strategic shift is Bitfarms making to address compressed mining margins?

ABitfarms is pivoting to High Performance Computing (HPC) and AI infrastructure, building a 2.2 GW pipeline with 341 MW already active, targeting high-demand data markets with long-term contracts that offer higher margins and steady cash flow.

QWhat percentage of miner income is HPC revenue projected to reach by 2026?

AHPC revenue is projected to reach 70% of miner income by 2026 according to industry trends mentioned in the article.

Related Reads

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit1h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit1h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手1h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手1h ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit3h ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片