Bitfarms grows revenue 72%, but losses widen – Here’s why!

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-02Last updated on 2026-04-02

Abstract

Bitcoin mining faces significant pressure as hashprice drops to $30–$35, well below production costs of $80,000–$88,000 per BTC, leading to losses of $17,000–$19,000 per coin. Despite this, miners like Bitfarms continue expanding hashrate. Bitfarms reported a 72% revenue increase to $229 million, but net losses widened to $209 million due to non-cash accounting charges, including depreciation and Bitcoin price volatility. In response, the company is pivoting to high-performance computing (HPC) and AI infrastructure, with 2.2 GW of power capacity in development, aiming for more predictable revenue streams. This strategic shift may reposition Bitfarms as an infrastructure-focused business, reducing reliance on Bitcoin's cyclical volatility.

A clear tension is building in Bitcoin’s mining sector, where growth in activity no longer translates into financial stability.

According to CoinShares Q1 2026 report on Bitcoin mining, Hashrate held near 1,020 EH/s after peaking around 1,160 EH/s, showing miners continue expanding despite pressure.

However, hashprice has dropped to $30–$35 from over $60, cutting revenue per unit sharply. This happens because the halving reduced block rewards while the price has not risen enough to offset costs.

As a result, production costs near $80,000–$88,000 exceed current prices, leaving losses of $17,000–$19,000 per BTC.

Meanwhile, accounting rules amplify these losses through asset revaluation. This implies weaker miners may exit, while stronger players consolidate, tightening supply and influencing future price stability.

Bitfarms growth rises as accounting losses widen

As mining margins tighten across the sector, Bitfarms’ report results reveal how operational growth clashes with financial outcomes. Revenue rose 72% to $229 million, showing stronger output from expanded hashrate.

Source: Bitfarms

However, net losses widened to around $209 million, not from weak operations but from accounting pressure.

Depreciation hit $98 million, impairments reached $28 million, while $22 million reflected BTC price swings. This happens because fair-value accounting captures past volatility, even as current production improves.

Meanwhile, hashprice kept margins compressed, limiting cash generation.

Yet shares rose about 6%, showing investors’ focus on future positioning. This implies markets expect miners to evolve beyond BTC exposure, where diversification could reshape long-term valuation.

Bitfarms pivots to HPC and AI as mining margins compress

As mining margins remain under pressure, Bitfarms is actively repositioning its business toward HPC and AI infrastructure to secure more stable revenue. The company is building a 2.2 GW pipeline, with 341 MW already active and 1.5 GW in expansion, targeting high-demand data markets.

Source: Bitfarms

This shift is happening because hashprice stays compressed, making mining returns less predictable.

In response, Bitfarms is redirecting power capacity toward AI workloads, where long-term contracts offer higher margins and steady cash flow.

Industry trends support this move, with HPC revenue projected to reach 70% of miner income by 2026. The rebrand to Keel Infrastructure reinforces this transition.

This implies Bitfarms is evolving beyond Bitcoin exposure, positioning for more resilient, infrastructure-driven growth.

All this together, Bitfarms may reprice as an infrastructure play if HPC and AI drive stable revenue growth. However, if mining remains dominant, BTC volatility will continue shaping earnings, keeping the stock tied to cyclical crypto movements.


Final Summary

  • Bitcoin [BTC] mining margins compress as hashprice falls below costs, forcing weaker miners out while efficient players consolidate supply dynamics.
  • Bitcoin volatility still drives Bitfarms’ performance, but the HPC and AI pivot may shift valuation toward stable, infrastructure-led growth.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhy did Bitfarms' revenue grow by 72% despite widening losses?

ABitfarms' revenue grew 72% to $229 million due to increased output from expanded hashrate, but net losses widened to $209 million primarily due to non-cash accounting pressures including $98 million in depreciation, $28 million in impairments, and $22 million from BTC price volatility.

QWhat is the current hashprice range and how does it compare to previous levels?

AHashprice has dropped to $30–$35 per exahash from over $60 previously, representing a sharp decline in revenue per unit of computing power.

QHow are production costs comparing to Bitcoin's current price according to the article?

AProduction costs are near $80,000–$88,000 per Bitcoin, which exceeds current market prices, resulting in losses of $17,000–$19,000 per BTC mined.

QWhat strategic shift is Bitfarms making to address compressed mining margins?

ABitfarms is pivoting to High Performance Computing (HPC) and AI infrastructure, building a 2.2 GW pipeline with 341 MW already active, targeting high-demand data markets with long-term contracts that offer higher margins and steady cash flow.

QWhat percentage of miner income is HPC revenue projected to reach by 2026?

AHPC revenue is projected to reach 70% of miner income by 2026 according to industry trends mentioned in the article.

Related Reads

Hong Kong Stock Market in July: Super IPOs Coexist with Wave of Breakings, Hard Tech Still the Main Theme

The Hong Kong IPO market in July presented a "two-tiered" scenario characterized by both a mega-IPO and a significant wave of new stock listings falling below their issue price ("breaking issue"). The highlight was Zhongji Innolight's (stock code: 03308.HK) listing on July 30, which raised approximately HK$53.41 billion. This marked the largest IPO on the Hong Kong exchange in nearly seven years since Alibaba's secondary listing. A prominent trend was the continued dominance of A+H listings, with companies like Luxshare (02475.HK) and others contributing significantly to the total monthly fundraising of around HK$116 billion. In stark contrast, the market saw a sharp rise in "broken issues." Out of 17 new listings for the month, 7 broke issue on their debut, with the rate climbing to 47% by month-end. Factors contributing to this included an intense concentration of listings (15 in one week), profit-taking by investors, and a market reassessment of valuations, particularly for companies with unclear commercial prospects. Despite the sell-off, hard tech remained the core theme, accounting for over 70% of July's listings. Key sectors were semiconductors and AI/autonomous driving. However, market enthusiasm became highly selective, with extreme over-subscription for certain niche players while others were heavily sold off. This signals a shift from speculative fervor towards a more value-driven assessment. Looking ahead, recent listing reforms by the Hong Kong Exchanges are expected to attract more tech firms. With a large pipeline of over 350 companies awaiting listing, including potential large offerings like SHEIN, the market is poised for continued activity. Analysts view July's correction not as a downturn but as a healthy valuation reset, emphasizing the need for investors to carefully discern company fundamentals.

marsbit3m ago

Hong Kong Stock Market in July: Super IPOs Coexist with Wave of Breakings, Hard Tech Still the Main Theme

marsbit3m ago

Wall Street Shows Sharp Divergence in CRCL Valuation on the Eve of Circle's Earnings Report

On the eve of its earnings report on August 5th, significant divergence emerged on Wall Street regarding the valuation of Circle (CRCL). Morgan Stanley downgraded Circle from "Equal Weight" to "Underweight," slashing its target price from $106 to $38. Analyst James Faucette argues that the market has overestimated the growth potential of USDC, noting stagnant circulation since Q3 2025 and a lack of major new use cases beyond remittances and card spending. He warns that slower USDC growth could pressure Circle's core "reserve income" and shift its revenue mix toward lower-margin transaction fees, making current valuations excessive. In contrast, TD Cowen initiated coverage with a "Buy" rating and an $82 target price. Analyst Bryan Bergin believes the market underestimates Circle's potential to evolve from a stablecoin issuer into a broader digital financial infrastructure platform. He focuses on future services like payments, asset management, RWA tokenization, and blockchain infrastructure, forecasting a ~31% CAGR for USDC circulation through 2030 and faster growth in fee-based revenues. A key external variable is the delayed progress of the CLARITY Act, whose uncertainty may pressure market sentiment by slowing regulatory clarity for stablecoins. Ultimately, the split centers on whether Circle's value hinges on USDC growth or its platform transformation. The upcoming earnings report will be scrutinized for details on reserve income, payment services, and RWA initiatives.

Odaily星球日报6m ago

Wall Street Shows Sharp Divergence in CRCL Valuation on the Eve of Circle's Earnings Report

Odaily星球日报6m ago

July Security Report: Total Losses Approximately $97 Million, Cross-Chain Bridge Attacks Concentrated with Over $35 Million

In July 2026, the cryptocurrency sector suffered total losses of approximately $97 million, with hacker attacks and contract vulnerabilities accounting for about $94 million. A significant trend was the shift in attack vectors from smart contract code to off-chain infrastructure, signature key leaks, and governance manipulation. Major incidents included: * **Ostium ($23.75M loss):** An attacker gained access to its off-chain price oracle signing system, manipulated BTC prices, and drained funds. * **AFX Trade Bridge ($24.15M loss):** The private validator key for its cross-chain bridge was compromised, allowing unauthorized withdrawals. * **BonkDAO ($20M loss):** An attacker acquired enough tokens to pass a malicious governance proposal and drain the treasury, exploiting low voting thresholds. * **Bonzo Lend ($9.05M loss):** A third-party oracle provider's signature verification was exploited to inject manipulated token prices. * **Verus Bridge ($7.55M loss):** A repeat attack exploiting the same unpatched bridge vulnerability. * **B2 Network ($3.86M loss):** An attacker seized the upgrade authority for a staking contract. Cross-chain bridges remained a prime target, with concentrated attacks causing over $35 million in losses. Phishing scams resulted in roughly $3 million in losses, employing sophisticated methods like fake mobile apps and physical counterfeit letters targeting Ledger users. Key takeaways are the acceleration of attacks on off-chain infrastructure, the persistent vulnerability of cross-chain bridges, and the rising prominence of governance-layer exploits. Recommendations include enhancing off-chain key management with multi-sig security, implementing stricter governance controls, and increasing user vigilance against phishing.

marsbit41m ago

July Security Report: Total Losses Approximately $97 Million, Cross-Chain Bridge Attacks Concentrated with Over $35 Million

marsbit41m ago

AI Bulk Bombards Apple Bug Bounty Program, Review Team Has Gone Offline

Apple has temporarily suspended and limited submissions to its Bug Bounty Program due to a flood of AI-generated vulnerability reports. The program, launched in 2016 and offering rewards up to $5 million, has been overwhelmed by reports from amateur researchers using tools like ChatGPT, many containing false positives or "AI hallucinations." This AI-driven surge in bug reports is straining Apple's security review team, leading the company to impose a 30-day "cooling-off" period and submission caps. The trend highlights a broader industry challenge, with other major firms like Google and GitHub also adjusting their vulnerability disclosure programs. Paradoxically, while AI is creating a reporting bottleneck, it's also accelerating defense. Apple's recent macOS Tahoe 26.6 security update, which patched 194 vulnerabilities, included its first-ever acknowledgments to AI tools (Claude, Codex Security, etc.) for helping discover flaws. This forces Apple into faster, more frequent security updates, a departure from its traditionally controlled release cadence. A key example involves Apple's advanced "Memory Integrity Enforcement" (MIE) security feature, touted as a major breakthrough. However, researchers using an AI model bypassed its protections in just five days, demonstrating both the power and disruptive pace of AI in cybersecurity. The incident underscores a critical shift: as AI compresses the vulnerability discovery cycle to days, traditional monthly security update cycles may become dangerously long exposure windows.

marsbit1h ago

AI Bulk Bombards Apple Bug Bounty Program, Review Team Has Gone Offline

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片