Bitcoin Value Days Destroyed Reaches Lowest Point Of The Current Cycle, A Structural Calm?

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-01-07Last updated on 2026-01-07

Abstract

Bitcoin's price is retesting the $94,000 level, yet on-chain metrics indicate a divergence. The Bitcoin Value Days Destroyed (VDD) ratio has dropped to a cycle low of 0.55, signaling a significant decline in selling pressure from long-term holders. This suggests reduced coin movement and a structural calm, as long-term investors are holding at current prices. Despite recent volatility, BTC remains within a multi-year ascending channel, forming higher lows and maintaining its upward trend as long as it stays above key support levels.

With bullish sentiment returning to the market, Bitcoin is demonstrating renewed upward momentum, allowing it to retest the $94,000 price level last seen in early December 2025. Despite the recent rebound in BTC’s price, several key metrics are down, showing that on-chain activity is trending in a different direction.

Cycle-Low Bitcoin VDD Hints At Minimal Coin Movement

Bitcoin’s price is gradually undergoing a recovery, but its on-chain action is moving into an unusually subtle phase. This divergence is observed in the recent performance of the Bitcoin Value Days Destroyed (VDD) metric, which has fallen sharply.

It is worth noting that the BTC VDD is a method of measuring long-term holders’ activity similar to the BTC Coin Days Destroyed (CDD) metric, but including a valuation component. In other words, it allocates a value based on the price of Bitcoin at the time the UTXO is spent, in addition to the number of holding days lost.

In this case, VDD is expressed as a ratio to evaluate its velocity in relation to its annual average. Furthermore, the ratio between the annual average and the monthly average helps to position current activity in relation to the annual norm.

After examining the BTC VDD metric, Darkfost, a market expert and CryptoQuant author, noted that the metric has fallen to historical low levels for this market cycle. According to the expert, this shift comes following a period of heavy long-term holder distribution that has now significantly declined.

Source: Chart from Darkfost on X

As seen in the chart, the market is now entering a period in which the VDD has dropped sharply and is now at extremely low levels relative to its annual average. This trend indicates a huge decline in selling pressure from long-term BTC holders.

With the metric at 0.55, the current VDD is roughly twice the annual average. Such levels have repeatedly been observed following significant corrections in the ongoing cycle. Interestingly, this suggests that long-term holders are presently choosing to hold onto their coins at current price levels.

BTC’s Upward Trend Is Still Intact

The price of Bitcoin experienced a brief pullback as Tuesday drew to a close, which raised questions about its price stability. Amid this discussion, Milk Road, a crypto and macro researcher, has offered insights into BTC’s current price action, highlighting that the market is still bullish.

Milk Road’s objective is based on a multi-year Ascending Channel pattern. According to the expert, BTC has been moving inside the upward channel since 2022, making higher highs and higher lows.

While the recent drop pushed BTC’s price toward the bottom of the upward channel, the support line held strong, leading to a bounce. Following the bounce, Bitcoin formed another higher low, which is the line that is keeping the upward trend intact. Therefore, unless BTC goes below that range, the larger pattern is still heading higher despite the fact that the price has been sideways for months.

BTC trading at $92,890 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QWhat is Bitcoin Value Days Destroyed (VDD) and how does it differ from Coin Days Destroyed (CDD)?

ABitcoin Value Days Destroyed (VDD) is a metric that measures long-term holder activity by including a valuation component. It allocates a value based on the price of Bitcoin at the time the UTXO is spent, in addition to the number of holding days lost. This differs from Coin Days Destroyed (CDD), which primarily focuses on the number of days coins were held before being moved, without the price valuation aspect.

QWhat does the current low level of Bitcoin VDD indicate about market activity?

AThe current low level of Bitcoin VDD, at a ratio of 0.55 relative to its annual average, indicates a significant decline in selling pressure from long-term Bitcoin holders. It suggests that long-term holders are choosing to hold onto their coins at current price levels, following a period of heavy distribution that has now subsided.

QAccording to the article, what pattern has Bitcoin's price been following since 2022?

AAccording to the article, Bitcoin's price has been moving inside a multi-year Ascending Channel pattern since 2022, making higher highs and higher lows. This pattern indicates a sustained upward trend despite recent periods of sideways movement.

QWhat was the significance of the recent bounce in Bitcoin price mentioned in the article?

AThe recent bounce in Bitcoin price was significant because it occurred after the price approached the bottom of the upward channel and the support line held strong. This bounce formed another higher low, which is keeping the larger upward trend intact according to the analysis.

QWhat price level did Bitcoin recently retest according to the article?

ABitcoin recently retested the $94,000 price level, which was last seen in early December 2025, as bullish sentiment returned to the market.

Related Reads

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

On April 24, 2026, DeepSeek released V4, a Chinese large language model offering a free "million-token context window," enabling it to process vast amounts of data like entire books or years of corporate documents in one go. In contrast, OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, released around the same time, is more powerful but significantly more expensive, charging up to $180 per million output tokens. DeepSeek’s strategy represents a shift from a pure AI research firm to a heavy-infrastructure player, building data centers in Inner Mongolia’s Ulanqab to bypass U.S. chip export restrictions. This move, supported by Huawei’s Ascend chips and China’s cheap green electricity, highlights a fundamental divergence in AI development models: U.S. firms focus on high-cost, high-margin services, while Chinese players like DeepSeek prioritize accessibility and affordability. Facing intense talent poaching from tech giants, DeepSeek is seeking a $44 billion valuation funding round to retain researchers and scale infrastructure. Meanwhile, Chinese manufacturers are compressing AI models to run on smartphones, making AI accessible offline and across the Global South. Through open-source models and localized solutions, Chinese AI is empowering non-English speakers and low-income users, driving a form of "digital equality." While Silicon Valley builds walled gardens, DeepSeek and others are turning AI into a public utility—like tap water—flowing freely to those previously left behind.

marsbit5m ago

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

marsbit5m ago

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

On April 18, 2026, an attacker stole 116,500 rsETH (worth ~$292M) from KelpDAO’s cross-chain bridge in 46 minutes—the largest DeFi exploit of 2026. The stolen assets were deposited into Aave V3 as collateral, causing $177–200M in bad debt and triggering a cascade of losses across nine DeFi protocols. Aave’s TVL dropped by ~$6B overnight. This legal analysis argues that KelpDAO and LayerZero Labs share concurrent liability, with fault apportioned 60%/40%. KelpDAO negligently configured its bridge with a 1-of-1 decentralized verifier network (DVN)—a single point of failure—despite LayerZero’s explicit recommendation of a 2-of-3 setup. LayerZero, which operated the compromised DVN, failed to secure its RPC infrastructure against a known poisoning attack vector. Both protocols’ terms of service cap liability at $200 (KelpDAO) or $50 (LayerZero), but these limits are likely unenforceable due to unconscionability, gross negligence exceptions, and potential securities law invalidation (if rsETH is deemed a security under the Howey test). Aave’s governance also faces fiduciary duty claims for raising rsETH’s loan-to-value ratio to 93%—far above competitors’ 72–75%—without adequately assessing bridge risks, amplifying the systemic fallout. Practical recovery targets include LayerZero Labs (a registered Canadian entity), KelpDAO’s founders, auditors, and identifiable Aave governance delegates. The incident underscores escalating legal risks for DeFi protocols, infrastructure providers, and governance participants.

marsbit1h ago

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

marsbit1h ago

Insider Trading in War: 5 People Involved, the Highest Earner Was Arrested

On April 24, the U.S. Department of Justice arrested U.S. Army Special Forces Staff Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke for insider trading related to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro on January 3. Van Dyke allegedly profited over $400,000 by placing bets on a prediction market, Polymarket, using insider knowledge of the covert operation. According to the indictment, Van Dyke registered an account (0x31a5) on December 26 and made a series of bets predicting Maduro’s capture and U.S. military involvement in Venezuela. He withdrew most of his funds on the day of the operation and attempted to obscure his tracks by transferring assets through crypto and brokerage accounts. This case marks the first time the DOJ has prosecuted insider trading on Polymarket. PolyBeats had previously identified five suspicious accounts, including Van Dyke’s—the highest earner—in January. The other accounts, with profits ranging from $34,000 to $145,000, remain under unofficial scrutiny but have not been charged. Their lower profits, indirect access to information, and unclear legal boundaries may complicate prosecution. Polymarket has since strengthened its market integrity rules, explicitly prohibiting trading based on confidential or insider information. Van Dyke’s arrest, nearly four months after his trades, signals increased regulatory attention and the persistent traceability of blockchain-based transactions.

marsbit1h ago

Insider Trading in War: 5 People Involved, the Highest Earner Was Arrested

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片