Bitcoin trades below ETF cost basis as profitable supply falls to cycle lows

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-02Last updated on 2026-02-02

Abstract

Bitcoin is trading below the average cost basis of U.S. spot ETF investors, estimated above $84,000, following significant weekly outflows. This has pushed many institutional and on-chain holders into unrealized losses. The supply of Bitcoin held in profit has dropped sharply to 11–12 million BTC, nearing cycle lows, down from 19–20 million BTC in August. The market shows signs of profit exhaustion, with reduced liquidity and muted rebound attempts. Recovery may depend on either reclaiming the ETF cost basis or a prolonged consolidation phase to rebuild profitability.

Bitcoin is trading below the average cost basis of U.S. spot exchange-traded fund [ETF] investors after recording its second- and third-largest weekly outflows on record.

The shift coincides with a sharp contraction in the amount of BTC held in profit across the network.

According to Galaxy Research data, Bitcoin slipped below the aggregate ETF average purchase price following consecutive weeks of heavy redemptions. This pushed the average ETF holder into unrealized losses.

Weekly outflows exceeded several billion dollars in late January, and figures are expected to rise further.

At the same time, on-chain data shows a broad deterioration in holder profitability.

CryptoQuant’s Supply in Profit metric indicates that the number of bitcoins held at an unrealized gain has dropped to around 11–12 million BTC, down from roughly 19–20 million BTC in August. The decline marks one of the lowest readings of the current cycle.

Bitcoin ETF positioning flips underwater

The ETF cost-basis chart highlights a rare alignment between institutional positioning and on-chain stress.

While earlier drawdowns left ETF buyers largely insulated, the latest pullback has pushed spot prices below the blended entry level of U.S. ETF inflows accumulated since launch.

Bitcoin was trading near $74,000 at the time of the latest data. At the same time, the ETF average cost basis sits above $84,000, indicating that a significant share of institutional inflows are now underwater.

Historically, periods when spot prices remain below ETF cost basis tend to suppress short-term demand, as inflows slow and redemptions become more sensitive to volatility.

Profitable supply compression deepens

The drop in supply held in profit suggests the drawdown is no longer confined to recent buyers or leveraged traders. Instead, profitability has been eroded across a wide range of holder cohorts.

Since October, every rebound attempt has failed to meaningfully rebuild profitable supply. Rallies into December and early January saw only modest recoveries before renewed downside pressure pushed more coins into unrealized loss.

The latest move lower erased much of that progress, returning the metric toward cycle lows.

This pattern points to a market transitioning away from profit-driven distribution toward loss-driven consolidation.

As more holders slip underwater, selling pressure often slows after the initial decline. Also, price action becomes increasingly range-bound as participants hesitate to realize losses.

Market implications

The convergence of ETF losses and declining on-chain profitability helps explain the market’s recent behavior: muted rebounds, thinner liquidity, and heightened sensitivity to macro headlines.

Rather than a leverage-led liquidation cascade, current price action reflects a structural reset in positioning.

Stabilization typically requires either a prolonged consolidation that allows cost bases to adjust, or renewed demand strong enough to lift prices back above key aggregate entry levels. Until then, upside momentum may remain constrained.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitcoin’s drawdown is increasingly driven by profitability exhaustion, with both ETF investors and on-chain holders now largely underwater.
  • A sustained recovery will likely depend on prices reclaiming the ETF cost basis or a period of consolidation that rebuilds profitable supply.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the current status of Bitcoin's price relative to the average cost basis of U.S. spot ETF investors?

ABitcoin is trading below the average cost basis of U.S. spot ETF investors, with the price near $74,000 compared to an average cost basis above $84,000.

QHow has the amount of Bitcoin held at a profit changed recently, according to CryptoQuant's data?

AThe amount of Bitcoin held at an unrealized gain has dropped to around 11-12 million BTC, down from roughly 19-20 million BTC in August, marking one of the lowest readings of the current cycle.

QWhat are the two main factors that the article suggests are needed for market stabilization?

AStabilization typically requires either a prolonged consolidation period that allows cost bases to adjust, or renewed demand strong enough to lift prices back above key aggregate entry levels.

QWhat does the convergence of ETF losses and declining on-chain profitability explain about the market's recent behavior?

AThis convergence helps explain the market's recent behavior of muted rebounds, thinner liquidity, and heightened sensitivity to macro headlines.

QHow does the article characterize the nature of the current price action, as opposed to a leverage-led liquidation cascade?

AThe current price action reflects a structural reset in positioning rather than a leverage-led liquidation cascade.

Related Reads

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit9m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit9m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

Japan's cabinet has introduced the 2026 Basic Policy on Economic and Fiscal Management and Reform, shifting its primary fiscal target. The new framework moves away from the traditional annual primary balance goal and instead prioritizes a stable reduction of the debt-to-GDP ratio. This change is tied to a strategy of increased "responsible proactive fiscal" spending, aiming to boost long-term growth through investments in strategic sectors like AI, semiconductors, energy, and robotics. The government estimates total public and private investment in 62 key technologies could exceed 370 trillion yen by 2040. The market reaction has been mixed and cautious. While equity markets may respond to policy signals, bond markets are focused on fiscal credibility. Concerns center on whether the weakening of the clear primary balance anchor could lead to looser fiscal discipline. If investors doubt that these strategic investments will generate sufficient productivity gains, tax revenue, and nominal growth to outpace rising interest costs, they may demand higher yields on Japanese Government Bonds (JGBs). Recent volatility in the yen and JGB yields, with the 10-year yield briefly reaching 2.9%, reflects this skepticism. The success of this new framework hinges on two factors: whether Japan can achieve a nominal growth rate consistently higher than its long-term interest rates, and whether future budgets demonstrate disciplined control over bond issuance. The government's narrative is that strategic investment is essential to break Japan's cycle of low growth, aging, and labor shortages. However, the bond market will continuously assess the credibility of this plan, pricing the risk that it may represent fiscal expansion rather than a viable growth strategy.

marsbit46m ago

Can Japan Buy Growth with AI? Will the Bond Market Believe It?

marsbit46m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit1h ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

972 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片