Bitcoin LTH activity hits cycle lows: Is $63K BTC’s next key support?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-11Last updated on 2026-03-11

Abstract

Bitcoin's long-term holders (LTHs) have significantly reduced their spending activity, reaching levels typically seen in bear markets, indicating exhausted selling pressure. The LTH Sell Side Risk Ratio hit October 2025 lows, with both realized profits and losses declining sharply. This suggests a shift toward holding and market indifference, historically coinciding with cycle bottoms. Despite reduced selling, Bitcoin remains structurally weak, trading at $69,800 with dominant downside momentum. Indicators like the Directional Movement Index and ADXR point to continued weakness, with the Future Grand Trend indicator identifying $63k as a critical support level. Sustained low LTH selling may help BTC consolidate between $65k and $74k in the short term.

Bitcoin [BTC] faced sustained bearish pressure, with the downtrend holding since its October 2025 peaks. Amid this prolonged downtrend, Bitcoin long-term holders saw their positions go from extreme profitability to deep losses.

As a result, some long-term holders capitulated and closed their positions at a loss. However, with prolonged loss-selling, it seems long-term holders are exhausted.

Bitcoin LTH activity hit bear market levels

Despite continued market weakness, Bitcoin long-term holders have significantly reduced spending.

According to Darkfost, LTH activity has decreased, returning to levels typically seen during bear markets. Such a drop, given the prevailing market conditions, suggests reduced selling activity from the cohort.

In fact, the group has reduced profit or loss realization in equal measures. According to Checkonchain data, LTH Sell Side Risk Ratio dropped to 0.000395, at press time, having touched October 2025 lows, suggesting exhausted selling pressure.

As a result, long-term holders’ realized profit fell to 1.1k BTC, the lowest since September 2022. At the same time, their realized loss declined to 2.7k BTC, underscoring reduced loss-making activity within the cohort.

Such market conditions suggest that fewer holders are exiting the market regardless of their current positions; instead, they have turned to holding. Thus, most holders have shown market indifference and are currently waiting for the next market move.

Historically, these market conditions have coincided with cycle bottoms, when sellers lose incentive to sell, and weaker hands exit the market.

This creates room for accumulation and sets the stage for a new price move. Darkfost’s analysis noted that reduced activity from long-term holders (LTHs) could keep BTC in a consolidation phase.

What about BTC?

Although long-term holders have sharply reduced spending, the shift has yet to lift Bitcoin’s price. BTC remains structurally weak, with downside momentum still dominating.

In fact, as of writing, Bitcoin [BTC] traded at $69,800 after falling 0.32% on the daily charts, indicating prevailing downside volatility.

Additionally, Bitcoin momentum and directional indicators have further shown this structural weakness. Looking at the Directional Movement Index, its positive index is barely holding above its negative index, which was at 22.

At the same time, ADXR remained above ADX, suggesting the trend is weaker than the recent average and is continually losing momentum. Taken together, these indicators suggest strong downside risk, and the current situation is likely to persist.

The Future Grand Trend (FGT) indicator clearly indicates the likelihood of this trend’s continuation. Based on FGT, BTC still has more room to fall, with $63k serving as critical support.

However, with LTHs reducing selling pressure, it provides short-term relief, and sustained such behavior could see BTC hold between $65k and $74k.


Final Summary

  • Bitcoin’s long-term holders’ activity plummeted to bear-market levels, signaling reduced selling pressure.
  • BTC remains structurally weak, suggesting continued bearish dominance.

Related Questions

QWhat has happened to Bitcoin long-term holders' (LTH) activity according to the article?

ABitcoin long-term holders' activity has significantly decreased, returning to levels typically seen during bear markets, which suggests reduced selling pressure from this cohort.

QWhat does the LTH Sell Side Risk Ratio dropping to 0.000395 indicate?

AThe drop in the LTH Sell Side Risk Ratio to 0.000395, touching October 2025 lows, indicates that selling pressure from long-term holders is exhausted.

QWhat is the critical support level for BTC mentioned in the article?

AThe critical support level for BTC mentioned in the article is $63,000.

QWhat does the reduction in LTH selling pressure provide for the market?

AThe reduction in LTH selling pressure provides short-term relief for the market and could help BTC hold within a consolidation phase between $65,000 and $74,000.

QWhat do historical market conditions similar to the current one often coincide with?

AHistorically, these market conditions have coincided with cycle bottoms, when sellers lose the incentive to sell and weaker hands exit the market, creating room for accumulation.

Related Reads

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbit36m ago

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbit36m ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit7h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit7h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手7h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手7h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

367 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片