Bitcoin Long-Term Holder Holdings Hit Eight-Month Low: Bullish Precursor or Bearish Signal?

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-16Last updated on 2025-12-16

Abstract

Bitcoin's long-term holder (LTH) supply has reached an eight-month low, dropping to 14.3 million BTC, or 71.92% of the circulating supply—levels last seen in April. This decline suggests some LTHs are selling amid recent market pressure, with 761,000 BTC sold in the past 30 days. Historically, such reductions have occurred during retail-driven bull runs or near cycle tops when LTHs take profits. Technically, Bitcoin has broken below key supports, including the 50-week moving average and a bear flag pattern, with potential further downside toward the $80,000–$84,000 support area. A break below could see a test of the 200-week moving average near $68,500. While increased selling by whales ($2.78 billion in BTC sold recently) and weak technical indicators suggest short-term bearish momentum, the current LTH supply drop may also present an accumulation opportunity. If history repeats, as it did in April–July when LTH buying helped drive a 65% price surge, this could set the stage for a future rally. Market direction hinges on whether Bitcoin holds the $80k–$84k support zone.

The Bitcoin market has recently seen a key development: the amount of Bitcoin in long-term holder wallets has dropped to a cyclical low. This change has drawn widespread market attention—could it be enough to help bullish forces stabilize and prevent further declines toward $70,000?

Long-Term Holder Supply Falls to April Levels

So-called "Long-Term Holders" (LTHs) typically refer to entities holding Bitcoin for at least 155 days. According to the latest data from Glassnode, Bitcoin holdings by these investors have gradually decreased from 14.8 million in mid-July to approximately 14.3 million in December.

Correspondingly, the proportion of Bitcoin held by long-term holders relative to the total circulating supply has also fallen to 71.92%, a level comparable to that of April this year, as shown in the chart below.

Chart of Bitcoin Long-Term Holder Supply Percentage Change, Source: Capriole Investments


Looking back at the market in April, Bitcoin's price was retreating from its all-time high of $109,000 on January 20, falling to around $74,000 at one point. At that time, long-term holders took the opportunity to buy at lower levels, pushing their holding ratio to around 76% by July. The market then saw a rebound, with Bitcoin's price reaching a new high of approximately $123,000 on July 14, marking a gain of about 65% during that period.


If history repeats itself, current long-term holders are likely to view the recent drop in Bitcoin's price to around $84,000 as another accumulation opportunity, potentially driving the price to challenge all-time highs again in the coming months.


Cyclical Perspective: Patterns in Long-Term Holder Supply Changes


From a broader cyclical perspective, long-term holder supply typically shows significant declines during two phases:


First, during periods of market euphoria dominated by retail investors;


Second, near cycle tops, when long-term holders begin to take profits. This was evident in the bull markets of 2017 and 2021.


Focusing on recent data, CryptoQuant's statistics show that in the 30 days leading up to November 26, long-term holder supply decreased by approximately 1.1 million Bitcoin, the second-largest decline in history. As of December 15, long-term holder holdings have decreased by about 761,000 Bitcoin over the past 30 days. This seems to indicate that, as prices continue to face pressure, some long-term holders are choosing to exit, reflecting increased market concern.

Bitcoin 30-Day Rolling Long-Term Holder Supply Change Chart, Source: CryptoQuant


According to a Marsbit report, over the past month, Bitcoin whale addresses (typically entities holding large amounts of Bitcoin) have collectively sold approximately $2.78 billion worth of Bitcoin, adding sustained downward pressure to the market.


Technical Analysis: Can Bitcoin Hold Key Support Levels?


From a technical structure perspective, Bitcoin's recent performance has weakened, having successively lost support at the 50-week moving average and the year's opening price level of around $93,300.


The chart below shows that the BTC/USD trading pair broke below the lower boundary of the flag consolidation pattern near $92,000 on December 12, confirming a bearish flag pattern. Currently, the first support area of focus lies between the local low of $83,800 on December 1 and the multi-month low of $80,500 on November 21. If this area is breached, Bitcoin could further test the 200-week moving average near $68,500. This potential decline implies a drop of approximately 20% from the current price.

BTC/USD Daily Chart, Source: TradingView


Analyst Nic pointed out via social platform X on Tuesday: "Bitcoin has broken below key levels again, confirming a bearish signal." He added that the next "potential support" is the 100-week exponential moving average, around $85,500.


He further analyzed: "If this level is also broken, subsequent attention should turn to some important on-chain cost levels, such as $83,800 (ETF average cost basis) and $81,200 (realized market average cost), before potentially testing the psychological $80,000 level."


As previously analyzed by Marsbit, Bitcoin's 20-day exponential moving average has begun to turn downward, and the Relative Strength Index (RSI) is also in negative territory, both indicating that bears are dominant in the short term.


Summary and Outlook


The current Bitcoin market is in a delicate phase. The drop in the long-term holder supply ratio to an eight-month low can be interpreted from two angles:

On one hand, this may mean that some steadfast investors are choosing to sell during the price adjustment, perhaps due to concerns about further declines ahead or to take profits, which puts short-term pressure on the market.


On the other hand, historical patterns show that accumulation by long-term holders during price pullbacks often builds momentum for subsequent rallies.


The current decline in holding ratios might also create conditions for them to buy back at lower prices, thus forming new support. However, the market also faces clear short-term challenges: whale selling is adding pressure, technical charts show weakness, and key support levels are being tested one by one. Whether Bitcoin can find effective support in the $80,000 to $84,000 range will be crucial for determining the medium-term trend.



Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat does the recent drop in Bitcoin long-term holder supply to an eight-month low indicate?

AThe recent decline in Bitcoin long-term holder (LTH) supply to an eight-month low, falling from 14.8 million BTC in mid-July to around 14.3 million BTC in December, can be interpreted in two ways. It may signal selling by steadfast investors due to concerns about further price declines or profit-taking, which adds short-term pressure. Alternatively, historically, such reductions have often preceded accumulation during price dips, potentially setting the stage for future rally, as seen in April when LTH buying helped drive a 65% price surge.

QHow does the current long-term holder supply percentage compare to April levels, and what was the market context then?

AThe current long-term holder supply percentage has decreased to 71.92%, which is comparable to the level seen in April. In April, Bitcoin's price had retreated from a high of $109,000 to around $74,000, and long-term holders seized the opportunity to accumulate at lower prices, boosting their holdings to about 76% by July. This accumulation phase preceded a significant price rebound, with Bitcoin reaching a new high of approximately $123,000 by mid-July.

QWhat are the key technical support levels for Bitcoin if the price continues to decline?

AKey technical support levels for Bitcoin include the region between the local low of $83,800 on December 1 and the multi-month low of $80,500 from November 21. If this area fails, the next major support is the 200-week moving average around $68,500. Additionally, the 100-week exponential moving average at approximately $85,500 and on-chain cost bases like the ETF average cost benchmark at $83,800 and the realized market average cost at $81,200 are critical levels to watch.

QWhat recent activity by Bitcoin whales has impacted the market, according to the article?

AAccording to the article, Bitcoin whale addresses have sold approximately $2.78 billion worth of Bitcoin over the past month. This substantial selling activity has contributed to ongoing downward pressure on the market, exacerbating the price decline and testing key support levels.

QHow do historical cycles show long-term holder supply changes typically behaving during market peaks?

AHistorically, long-term holder supply tends to decrease significantly during two phases: retail investor-driven market euphoria and near cycle tops when long-term holders begin profit-taking. This pattern was evident in the 2017 and 2021 bull markets, where LTHs reduced their holdings as prices peaked, indicating distribution to new buyers and often signaling a market top or correction.

Related Reads

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

Michael Burry, the famed "Big Short" investor, has once again captured Wall Street's attention with a series of short positions against major tech and semiconductor stocks, most notably Nvidia. In late June and July, through his "Cassandra Unchained" newsletter, Burry disclosed short bets against Nvidia, Tesla, Applied Materials, Caterpillar, the SOXX semiconductor ETF, and later, Micron Technology. His core thesis revolves around potential distortions in the AI infrastructure boom, specifically questioning whether extended depreciation schedules (e.g., 6 years vs. a realistic 2-3 years for AI chips) by cloud giants like Microsoft and Google artificially inflate profits. He also raises concerns about possible "off-balance-sheet circular financing," where chip demand might be propped up by vendor-backed funding to clients. Nvidia's stock experienced volatility following these disclosures, briefly dipping but largely holding near Burry's reported entry points, leaving his positions roughly flat or slightly underwater as of late July. This move is part of a pattern for Burry, whose track record since his legendary 2008 bet is mixed. He has faced notable losses, such as on Tesla in 2021, while scoring on broader market turns like the 2020 pandemic crash. His methodology focuses intensely on free cash flow and scrutinizing original financial documents to spot overvaluation and structural risks, but it often struggles with timing the market. The article contrasts Burry's stance with other prominent investors. Steve Eisman, another "Big Short" figure, is not shorting Nvidia, citing strong fundamentals but expressing nervousness about sustainability. Jim Chanos agrees with the broad "accounting mismatch" concern—comparing it to the dot-com bubble—but targets financial leverage in private equity firms rather than the chip stocks themselves. While Nvidia's short interest remains relatively low at 1.3-1.4% of float, the massive stock size means absolute short losses have been significant, exceeding $5 billion earlier this year. The piece concludes that for ordinary investors, the key takeaway is not replicating specific short bets but learning from the critical frameworks these investors use: questioning rosy accounting, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and maintaining skepticism during market euphoria, even if pinpointing the exact catalyst for a downturn remains elusive.

marsbit22m ago

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

marsbit22m ago

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

PANews Weekly Digest: Market Turmoil, Tech Breakthroughs, and Crypto Developments. The week saw significant volatility across global markets. South Korea's KOSPI index experienced extreme turbulence, including multiple trading halts, largely driven by sharp declines in AI hardware stocks like SK Hynix. In contrast, China's Changxin Xinqiao (CXC) achieved a landmark IPO with a market cap surpassing 4 trillion yuan, marking a major success for the domestic DRAM industry after a decade of losses. In the crypto and Web3 space, several key narratives emerged. AI is driving demand for new infrastructure, with projects like AI agent wallets and programmable payments gaining traction, attracting interest from firms like Coinbase. The Bitcoin mining sector is pivoting, with companies like MARA focusing on energy management as electricity becomes a core AI-era asset. Meanwhile, the RWA (Real World Assets) sector faces a "utilization puzzle," with hundreds of billions in on-chain assets remaining dormant. Notable market movements included a historic single-day surge of over 17% for the KOSPI index and a significant migration of $16.5 billion in staked ETH within the Lido ecosystem. Michael Saylor announced a target to re-peg the STRC stablecoin around September 8th. Other highlights include discussions on Ethereum's ambitious 2030 roadmap for scaling and privacy, analysis showing high protocol revenues not always translating to token price gains, and warnings from Citi about potential extreme commodity price shocks by late 2026.

marsbit28m ago

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

marsbit28m ago

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

In late July 2026, five major US tech giants—Alphabet, Intel, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple—released their Q2 earnings reports. While all companies exceeded revenue and profit expectations, driven by strong AI-related business growth, investor reactions diverged sharply due to concerns over escalating AI capital expenditures (capex) and their impact on free cash flow. Alphabet reported strong revenue growth and a surging cloud business, but its stock fell after announcing a doubled year-on-year capex and negative quarterly free cash flow for the first time. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in over 15 years, but its stock experienced volatile trading after significantly raising its full-year capex guidance. Microsoft saw its stock surge after beating estimates and, crucially, lowering its capex forecast while projecting positive free cash flow. Meta faced the most severe sell-off as its profits declined despite revenue beats, with free cash flow plunging over 90% and its capex guidance raised. Apple reported record June-quarter results, but its stock plummeted after providing Q4 revenue guidance that fell short of expectations, citing supply chain constraints and forex headwinds. The overall takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from validating AI demand to scrutinizing the timeline for returns on massive AI investments. Companies demonstrating a clearer path to managing capex and preserving free cash flow, like Microsoft, were rewarded, while those signaling continued aggressive spending faced investor skepticism.

Odaily星球日报37m ago

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

Odaily星球日报37m ago

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbit1h ago

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbit1h ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbit2h ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.3k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片