Bitcoin gains after Jerome Powell warns of Fed ‘intimidation’ – Here’s why

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-13Last updated on 2026-01-13

Abstract

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell publicly criticized political pressure from President Trump, calling a DoJ probe into the Fed a "pretext" and vowing to resist intimidation. Analysts suggest that compromised Fed independence could boost demand for safe-haven assets like Bitcoin and gold. Following Powell’s remarks, BTC rose from $90.5k to over $91k. Historical patterns show that similar political tensions in 2025 triggered rallies in Bitcoin and gold. Experts warn that the escalating conflict may increase market volatility but could ultimately benefit Bitcoin as an emerging store of value, especially if the White House pushes for rate cuts and stimulus measures.

The U.S. Federal Reserve’s independence has hit the headlines again this week after Chair Jerome Powell publicly criticized political pressure from President Donald Trump.

According to analysts, the recent Department of Justice (DoJ) probe into Powell could ultimately benefit safe havens such as gold and emerging alternatives like Bitcoin [BTC].

Fed’s Powell pushback

For Powell, the investigation into the Federal Reserve buildings’ renovations was a “pretext.” According to him, Trump was after him for failing to cut interest rates aggressively to suit the President’s demands.

“The threat of criminal charges is a consequence of the Federal Reserve setting interest rates based on our best assessment of what will serve the public, rather than following the preferences of the President.”

He vowed to fight back against what he perceived as “intimidation” against the central bank. He added,

“This is about whether the Fed will be able to continue to set interest rates based on evidence and economic conditions—or whether instead monetary policy will be directed by political pressure or intimidation.”

Fed’s crisis and impact on BTC

Following Powell’s statement, BTC surged immediately from $90.5k to over $91k, while the U.S. dollar index (DXY) slipped slightly.

According to analysts at Presto Research, a “compromised Fed independence” would fuel demand for alternative safe havens.

In April 2025, Trump threatened to dismiss Powell, and BTC rallied while U.S. equities sold off. Similar reports later in 2025 triggered the same market reactions, which reinforced BTC as a “safe haven” asset, much like gold.

With the Fed-Trump tussle culminating in a formal investigation of Powell in 2026, analysts believe that past trends will likely repeat themselves.

In an email statement to AMBCrypto, Eliézer Ndinga, Global Head of Research at 21Shares, said,

“Recent remarks from Jerome Powell on the importance of maintaining central bank independence highlight how essential trust and transparency are to modern monetary policy.”

He added,

“In that context, Bitcoin continues to evolve as an emerging store of value with attributes that complement rather than compete with traditional financial systems.”

On his part, Farzam Ehsani, CEO of cryptocurrency exchange VALR, told AMBCrypto that the escalating White House-Fed conflict was a “concerning precedent.”

He called for caution in the coming weeks, noting that,

“Investors should exercise extreme caution in the coming weeks. The crypto market could react sharply to the outcome of the conflict. “

But if the White House wins, it could fuel a massive BTC rally, Ehsani added.

“If the Fed holds firm, the market could return to its fundamental scenario. If the White House is able to push through a rate cut and launches stimulus measures, Bitcoin and gold could surge higher.”


Final Thoughts

  • Regardless of the outcome of the Fed-Trump conflict, analysts believe it would benefit BTC as a ‘safe haven.’
  • In 2025, a similar escalation fueled a gold rally and alternative stores of value such as BTC and silver.

Related Questions

QWhy did Bitcoin's price increase after Jerome Powell's statement?

ABitcoin's price increased because Powell's criticism of political pressure highlighted concerns about the Federal Reserve's independence, which analysts believe fuels demand for alternative safe havens like Bitcoin.

QWhat was Jerome Powell's response to the Department of Justice probe?

AJerome Powell characterized the investigation as a 'pretext' and vowed to fight back against what he perceived as 'intimidation' against the central bank's independence.

QHow did the market react to similar events in the past involving Trump and the Fed?

AIn the past, similar escalations, such as when Trump threatened to dismiss Powell in 2025, led to Bitcoin rallying and U.S. equities selling off, reinforcing BTC's status as a 'safe haven' asset.

QWhat did analysts from Presto Research say about a 'compromised Fed independence'?

AAnalysts at Presto Research stated that a 'compromised Fed independence' would fuel demand for alternative safe havens, such as Bitcoin and gold.

QWhat potential outcomes did Farzam Ehsani outline for the White House-Fed conflict and its impact on Bitcoin?

AFarzam Ehsani noted that if the White House wins and pushes through a rate cut with stimulus measures, Bitcoin and gold could surge higher. If the Fed holds firm, the market might return to its fundamental scenario.

Related Reads

La Liga Team Bets $1 Million Against Themselves Before Match: Does Using Prediction Markets for Insurance Comply with Sports Regulations?

A Spanish La Liga club, reportedly Osasuna, purchased insurance against relegation and was linked to a transaction of over $1 million on the prediction market platform Kalshi, betting against its own victory in a crucial season-ending match. While Osasuna confirmed buying €1.2 million insurance for a potential €6 million payout in case of relegation through broker Howden, it did not confirm involvement with Kalshi. The reported trade involved intermediaries like Game Point Capital and Greenlight Commodities, with quant firm Susquehanna as the counterparty. This incident highlights the blurring line between financial hedging and gambling in prediction markets. Such markets allow trading on future event outcomes, like sports results. In the US, Kalshi operates as a regulated event contract market under the CFTC. However, Spanish authorities recently initiated penalties against Kalshi and Polymarket, considering their activities unlicensed gambling. The case raises core questions about prediction markets: who can trade, how insider information is handled, and whether participants can influence outcomes, especially in sports where results are human-driven. While leagues like La Liga and Serie A have partnered with Polymarket in North America, the regulatory clash and potential for conflicts of interest, as seen in this club's alleged transaction, present significant challenges as prediction markets evolve toward institutional risk management.

Foresight News26m ago

La Liga Team Bets $1 Million Against Themselves Before Match: Does Using Prediction Markets for Insurance Comply with Sports Regulations?

Foresight News26m ago

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

How much of Arthur Hayes's market credibility remains? Recently, the "godfather of crypto perpetual swaps" and BitMEX co-founder has faced public criticism, including accusations from on-chain investigator ZachXBT about creating exit liquidity for his followers. Starting last week, Hayes executed multiple sudden sell-offs. He had repeatedly publicly predicted the HYPE token would reach $150. After a $100,000 bet defending Hyperliquid on June 1st, he announced just three days later that he had completely sold his HYPE and NEAR holdings, successfully exiting near the peak. He also sold ZEC and WLD. His sale of WLD appeared to be a classic "pump and dump" maneuver. On June 3rd, he publicly set a $10 target for WLD, causing its price to surge over 35%. By June 6th, he announced he had sold his WLD, citing "anomalous" SpaceX pre-IPO price action, which triggered a sharp price drop. On June 9th, Hayes published a lengthy article explaining his actions, citing factors like rising energy costs and a potential AI bubble burst. Consequently, his family office, Maelstrom, now holds positions in US energy producers and only core crypto assets BTC and ETH, having sold AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. This pattern is not new. In 2025, he similarly touted HYPE before selling it at what turned out to be a cycle peak, only to repurchase it at the next cycle's low. Similar scenarios played out with tokens like ETHFI and ENA. Long-term observers have developed a strategy: ignore Hayes's public statements but closely monitor his on-chain actions—be cautious following his buys, but decisively follow his sells. If he continues these tactics, especially as seen with the WLD case, his market credibility risks being permanently damaged. As Hayes himself admitted in his latest article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

marsbit45m ago

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

marsbit45m ago

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

The article details a series of absurd and revealing anecdotes shared by Silicon Valley founders about their venture capital fundraising experiences, sparked by Greg Isenberg's story of pitching to a sleeping a16z partner. Founders describe surreal pitch meetings: one faced a barefoot, peanut-eating investor who offered triple the requested amount after 30 seconds; another performed a pitch in a VC's parked car; a founder discovered his audience understood no English beyond "yes." These stories highlight the often irrational and performative nature of fundraising. Beyond the absurdity, darker power imbalances are exposed. Stories include investors suggesting founders fire co-founders for their equity, blatant market misjudgments, disrespectful behavior from LPs, and discriminatory remarks. A debate also emerges around "Sequoia's" practice of splitting a round into two valuations. However, the thread isn't solely critical. Positive counter-narratives celebrate supportive VCs who offered crucial advice during crises, respected founders' timelines, and showed simple gestures of respect—like a partner personally fetching coffee before a major pitch. Ultimately, the collective sharing acts as a pressure release, illustrating that fundraising is a complex dance of power, trust, and sometimes sheer theater. It underscores that beyond capital, mutual respect and integrity remain the most enduring foundations of the founder-investor relationship.

marsbit58m ago

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

marsbit58m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片