Aptos: Downtrend deepens, but APT’s relief bounce is still possible

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-01Last updated on 2026-02-01

Abstract

Aptos (APT) has been in a persistent bearish trend throughout 2025, hitting a new all-time low of $1.14 and declining 8.55% in a single day. Despite the strong downward momentum, a short-term relief bounce toward the $1.50–$1.55 range is possible due to imbalanced liquidation levels. However, the overall structure remains bearish, with key resistance at $1.72 and consistent capital outflows. Traders are advised to consider selling into any bounce, as further losses are expected. APT continues to lag behind Sui in key metrics like developer activity and Total Value Locked.

Aptos [APT] has been in a bearish longer-term trend throughout 2025. The token was down 8.55% for the day, having made a new all-time low at $1.14.

Further downside appeared highly likely, though a minor relief rally is possible before Monday.

In December 2025, AMBCrypto noted that Sui [SUI] outperformed Aptos in DeFi liquidity, though both were powered by the Move programming language. More recently, it was observed that Sui had maintained this lead.

The monthly active developers count for Sui was twice that of Aptos, and a similar disparity was seen in their Total Value Locked (TVL). On the price action front, APT’s fall to new lows was disheartening for holders.

No light at the end of the tunnel

On the 3-day timeframe, Aptos has possessed a bearish swing structure since June 2025, when the $4.32 was breached.

Over the past few months, the 23.6% southward extension level at $1.72 has also been tested, then flipped from support to resistance.

The 20-period moving average served as a dynamic resistance and captured the strength of the downward momentum. The CMF was well below -0.05 for over two months to signal heavy capital outflows.

More losses appeared highly likely.

The chance of a brief APT relief rally

The liquidation map showed that the cumulative short liquidation leverage outweighed the nearby long leverage.

Therefore, it is highly likely that APT would see a bounce toward $1.50-$1.55. It is unclear if this bounce will come immediately.

Traders’ call to action – Sell the bounce

Using the latest H4 impulse move lower to plot a set of Fibonacci levels, the $1.44 and $1.52 retracement levels immediately stand out.

What’s more, they line up well with the high-leverage short liquidations on the liquidation map earlier.

Therefore, APT traders can wait for a price bounce to this zone before selling.

Final Thoughts

  • The Aptos price trend has been bearish for many months, leading to the token setting new all-time lows.
  • The 4-hour price chart showed there was potential for an APT bounce to $1.52 before a bearish move commenced.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Related Questions

QWhat was the new all-time low price for Aptos (APT) mentioned in the article?

AThe new all-time low price for Aptos (APT) was $1.14.

QAccording to the article, which blockchain outperformed Aptos in DeFi liquidity and had more active developers?

ASui (SUI) outperformed Aptos in DeFi liquidity and had twice the number of monthly active developers.

QWhat key price level on the 3-day chart was breached in June 2025, confirming a bearish swing structure for APT?

AThe $4.32 level was breached in June 2025, confirming a bearish swing structure.

QWhat is the potential price target zone for the expected relief bounce in APT?

AThe potential price target zone for the relief bounce is $1.50 to $1.55.

QWhat does the article suggest traders should do if APT's price bounces to the $1.44-$1.52 zone?

AThe article suggests that traders should sell or take short positions if APT's price bounces to the $1.44-$1.52 zone.

Related Reads

Prediction Markets Under Bias

The article "Prediction Markets Under Bias" by Jeff Park of Bitwise argues against the common media portrayal of prediction markets as mere gambling or a social ill. It distinguishes between gambling and investment based on whether a participant's strategy has a positive expected value (+EV), not the market's structure. The author contends that prediction markets, like poker, are skill-based and can be a legitimate form of investment, offering individuals autonomy, truth discovery, and decentralized value. The piece critiques the common conflation of prediction markets with casino gambling, highlighting their role in risk hedging and capital efficiency, similar to insurance and securitization. A key differentiator is their precision and finite expiration, which makes prices directly anchor to factual outcomes, rewarding deep research and information advantage rather than punishing the uninformed. The author concludes that media opposition often stems from a structural bias, as these markets challenge traditional information gatekeepers and promote a more democratic, transparent system for pricing truth. The real debate is not about information having a price, but about who controls and profits from it.

marsbit11m ago

Prediction Markets Under Bias

marsbit11m ago

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit22m ago

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit22m ago

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit1h ago

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit1h ago

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

Kevin Warsh, a nominee for the Federal Reserve chair, faces a challenging confirmation hearing amid political pressure from former President Donald Trump to implement immediate and significant interest rate cuts. Warsh has proposed reforms including reducing the Fed’s communication frequency and shrinking its $6.7 trillion balance sheet. However, market expectations for rate cuts remain limited, creating tension with Trump’s demands. Warsh’s stance has shifted over time, from hawkish during the financial crisis to more dovish recently, citing AI-driven productivity gains. His confirmation is further complicated by Republican Senator Thom Tillis’s threat to block the nomination unless an investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell is dropped. Trump has warned of firing Powell if he doesn’t leave on time. Observers note that Warsh risks becoming a "scapegoat"—either by yielding to political pressure and fueling inflation, or by resisting and facing Trump’s backlash. His ties to Trump’s circle and Wall Street support may aid his nomination, but his ability to balance political demands with the Fed’s credibility remains uncertain. Historical precedents, like Arthur Burns’s compliance with Nixon, highlight the risks of political interference in monetary policy.

marsbit1h ago

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

marsbit1h ago

Plunging 10% Then Surging: Weekend Crude Oil Market Watch

Following a 10% plunge, oil prices surged over the weekend as geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz escalated dramatically. The initial market optimism, driven by the strait’s brief reopening on Friday, quickly reversed on Saturday when Iran reinstated restrictions and fired on vessels, halting nearly all traffic. In response, oil contracts rose approximately 4.52%, while S&P futures fell nearly 0.8%. U.S. President Trump alternated between diplomatic gestures—sending an envoy for talks—and threats to destroy Iranian infrastructure if no deal was reached. Iran rejected further negotiations, fearing a U.S. attack before the midweek ceasefire deadline. This triggered another spike in oil, surpassing Saturday’s highs, and further pressured equity markets. Crypto-related stocks underperformed significantly. Market optimism is expected to be punished, and the week ahead hinges on whether Iran maintains its refusal to negotiate.

marsbit1h ago

Plunging 10% Then Surging: Weekend Crude Oil Market Watch

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow