$ANSEM deployer sends 60% of supply to Ansem, who says he has airdropped $7M to holders

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-06-29Last updated on 2026-06-29

Abstract

The Solana memecoin $ANSEM is facing scrutiny after on-chain analysts revealed the token's deployer transferred approximately 60% of its total supply—650 million tokens—to crypto influencer Ansem. The deployer then sold their remaining tokens for about $11,800, securing an estimated profit of $5,500, despite the token briefly reaching a valuation above $120 million. In response, Ansem stated he has already distributed roughly $7 million worth of $ANSEM through community airdrops and plans further distributions as the token's market cap grows, aiming to expand the holder base. However, analytics platform Bubblemaps identified an early holder cluster that has sold about $500,000 of tokens and still holds around 1% of the supply, indicating continued selling pressure amidst the token's volatile rally and $43 million market capitalization.

Solana memecoin $ANSEM has come under fresh scrutiny after on-chain investigators revealed that its deployer transferred roughly 60% of the token’s supply to crypto influencer Ansem, who later said he had distributed about $7 million worth of the token through community airdrops.

The findings from Lookonchain and Bubblemaps come as $ANSEM traded around $0.10 at the time of writing. This gave the token a market capitalization of roughly $43 million after a volatile rally. The on-chain reports have sparked debate over the token’s distribution and early holder activity.

Deployer transferred majority of supply to Ansem

According to Lookonchain, the wallet identified as “yHCxHB” deployed $ANSEM. It spent approximately $6,300 to create the token before acquiring 792.45 million $ANSEM.

The analytics platform said the deployer subsequently transferred 650 million $ANSEM to Ansem before selling the remaining 142.45 million tokens for roughly $11,800. This resulted in an estimated profit of about $5,500.

The transaction drew attention because the deployer retained only a small realized gain. This is despite the token briefly reaching a valuation above $120 million, according to Lookonchain’s analysis.

Ansem says $7M has already been distributed

Following the on-chain disclosures, Ansem said he had already distributed approximately $7 million worth of $ANSEM through multiple rounds of community airdrops.

In a post on X, he said more distributions would follow as the token’s market capitalization increased. He added that his long-term goal was to grow $ANSEM to one million holders from roughly 25,000 currently.

Separately, Bubblemaps said Ansem received approximately 60% of the token supply, much of which was later distributed to the community.

The analytics platform also identified a separate holder cluster that has already sold around $500,000 worth of $ANSEM. Also, it continues to hold roughly 1% of the token’s supply, suggesting some early wallets remain active sellers despite the token’s rapid rise.


Final Summary

  • Lookonchain said the $ANSEM deployer transferred 650 million tokens, around 60% of the supply, to Ansem before exiting, with an estimated profit of $5,500.
  • Ansem said he has already airdropped roughly $7 million worth of $ANSEM. At the same time, Bubblemaps flagged a separate cluster of early holders that continues to sell into the rally.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat percentage of the total $ANSEM token supply did the deployer transfer to the crypto influencer Ansem, according to the article?

AThe deployer transferred approximately 60% of the $ANSEM token supply to the crypto influencer Ansem.

QHow much money worth of $ANSEM tokens does Ansem claim to have already distributed to the community?

AAnsem claims to have already distributed approximately $7 million worth of $ANSEM tokens to the community through airdrops.

QWhat was the estimated profit the $ANSEM deployer made from creating and selling their portion of the tokens?

AThe $ANSEM deployer made an estimated profit of about $5,500 from creating and selling their portion of the tokens.

QAccording to Bubblemaps, what did a separate cluster of early holders do with their $ANSEM tokens during the price rally?

AAccording to Bubblemaps, a separate cluster of early holders sold around $500,000 worth of $ANSEM and continues to hold about 1% of the supply, acting as active sellers during the price rally.

QWhat is Ansem's stated long-term goal for the $ANSEM token regarding its number of holders?

AAnsem's stated long-term goal is to grow the number of $ANSEM token holders to one million, up from roughly 25,000 currently.

Related Reads

$2 Trillion: Countdown to AI's Largest IPO in History

The countdown for the largest IPO in AI history, a potential $2 trillion listing for Anthropic, is underway for October. The staggering valuation, reportedly projected by several investors, contrasts with the company's own internal restraint on setting a public target. Founded five years ago by former OpenAI core members, Anthropic's growth has been meteoric. Annual recurring revenue (ARR) surged from ~$9B in late 2025 to $47B by May 2026, with Q2 2026 revenue of $11.5B marking a 14x year-over-year increase. Bank valuations are even based on internal 2028 revenue forecasts of $190-200B. A key growth driver is Claude Code, its AI coding assistant. Its ARR quintupled in five months to $2.5B by February 2026, now constituting nearly 20% of total revenue. Surveys indicate Anthropic commands roughly 40% of enterprise LLM spending, doubling OpenAI's share in programming-specific use. However, alongside this explosive growth, reports detail significant internal cultural strife. Critics describe a divisive "priesthood" of PhD executives, led by CEO Dario Amodei, who promote a "save humanity" narrative that some employees find cult-like and alienating. This has reportedly created a demoralized workforce and a covert "underground network" of dissent among engineers torn between lucrative pre-IPO equity and a toxic work environment. Anthropic now faces a pivotal paradox: pursuing its mission of "safe" AI requires immense capital for compute, yet that capital demands relentless commercial growth. As it approaches its historic IPO, the company must navigate intense regulatory scrutiny, soaring operational costs, and internal tensions—any of which could destabilize its post-listing trajectory, much like SpaceX's significant post-IPO stock drop. The stage is set for a defining moment in tech history.

marsbit1h ago

$2 Trillion: Countdown to AI's Largest IPO in History

marsbit1h ago

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

"AI for Cost Reduction Makes VC Funding More Expensive" Despite the "cost-reduction and efficiency" narrative of AI, venture capital (VC) investment in the AI sector is becoming increasingly costly. While AI tools lower the initial costs for many startups—with team sizes shrinking across funding stages—the market is polarizing. For top-tier AI teams, especially those from leading companies like Google and OpenAI, funding rounds are now larger and valuations are higher than ever at the seed and early stages. For example, new ventures by prominent researchers are securing billions in funding with valuations reaching tens of billions before having a mature product. This creates a "barbell" market: lightweight startups need less capital, while elite AI firms attract massive investments early on. This dynamic raises the cost for VCs to acquire and maintain meaningful ownership stakes. As valuations soar early, securing the same equity percentage requires significantly larger capital commitments. VCs must now invest more upfront and reserve substantial funds for follow-on rounds to avoid dilution, prompting large firms like Accel and a16z to raise massive new funds. Consequently, capital is concentrating intensely in a few perceived winners like OpenAI and Anthropic, widening the gap between large and small VC funds. While high valuations bake in future growth expectations, they also compress potential returns, demanding that portfolio companies achieve unprecedented scale. For major VCs, the core strategy is clear: secure early positions in potential winners and maintain the capital to keep investing as valuations rapidly escalate.

marsbit2h ago

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

marsbit2h ago

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

On August 13, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake announced a significant shift in Ethereum's Layer-1 cryptographic roadmap: abandoning the SNARK-friendly hash function Poseidon in favor of traditional functions like SHA2 or BLAKE2. This decision ends eight years of research and investment, marking a major revision to the post-quantum security strategy. Poseidon, introduced in 2019, was highly efficient for zkRollups and zkVMs within SNARK circuits. However, its need for prolonged cryptanalysis and the pressing timeline for quantum resistance revealed limitations. Recent breakthroughs in SNARK design, specifically using binary fields, now enable traditional, battle-tested hash functions to perform as efficiently as Poseidon within SNARKs. Benchmarks show modern laptops can now verify over a million traditional hash calls per second. This change is partly driven by accelerated concerns over quantum computing threats. Reports warn that "Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers" could break current blockchain signatures like ECDSA by the early 2030s, risking trillions in assets. Ethereum's response focuses on hash-based post-quantum signature schemes, deemed more quantum-resistant than some lattice-based alternatives under pressure from AI cryptanalysis. Ethereum's updated post-quantum roadmap targets a production-ready "leanVM" for signature aggregation by 2027, with full deployment across consensus, execution, and data layers by 2028. The shift to mature hash functions like SHA2 reduces reliance on newer algorithms and aligns with the goal of using widely analyzed cryptographic primitives. Other major blockchains are also preparing. Solana's core teams have independently chosen the NIST-standardized Falcon signature scheme for its compact size. Starknet plans a phased migration, starting with replacing its Pedersen hash with BLAKE2. Ethereum's move signifies a strategic pivot towards proven security foundations for the quantum era.

marsbit3h ago

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

marsbit3h ago

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

Anthropic recently published guidelines to help developers using Claude Code reduce unnecessary token costs. The key recommendations include: 1) Clear (/clear) conversations after completing a task to avoid carrying irrelevant file reads and command outputs into the next task. 2) Set the model and reasoning effort level at the start of a session, as switching mid-session invalidates the prompt cache, requiring a full-price recalculation of the entire dialog history. 3) Attach files using @ references instead of typing paths manually to avoid extra tool calls and searches that bloat the context. 4) Add quiet flags to verbose commands (e.g., in CLAUDE.md) to minimize lengthy output in the dialog history. 5) Use /compact while the session cache is still warm (before breaks) to compress the dialog at one-tenth the cost. 6) Offload large-output tasks to a sub-agent, which runs in an isolated context and only returns conclusions, preventing intermediate outputs from polluting the main dialog. The article explains token pricing: input tokens (prefill) are processed in parallel, while output tokens (decode) are generated serially, making output tokens five times more expensive. Caching is crucial for savings—if a request's prefix (system prompt, CLAUDE.md, dialog history) matches the previous one byte-for-byte, reading it costs only 10% of the standard input price. However, cache invalidation occurs when changing models, effort levels, fast mode, compressing dialogs, after cache expiration, or when resuming old sessions. Dialog history also grows quadratically (O(n²)) as file contents and command outputs accumulate, increasing costs per round. Proactive context management—like isolating noisy tasks, using /rewind to trim unproductive turns, and task-based session clearing—is becoming an essential skill for cost-effective AI-assisted development.

marsbit5h ago

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

marsbit5h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片