Analyzing how Bitcoin’s short-term holders and $64K-level can unlock market bulls

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-08Last updated on 2026-04-08

Abstract

Bitcoin's price is struggling amid bearish sentiment, but key shifts among short-term holders (STHs) could signal a potential bullish turn. STHs, who purchased BTC in the last month at an average cost basis of $85,450, are currently at a 19% unrealized loss. Historically, a 25% or greater loss often marks a market bottom, suggesting Bitcoin may need to decline another 6% to around $64,000 to trigger a rebound. At this level, STH selling typically subsides, reducing supply pressure. Meanwhile, approximately 300,000 BTC (worth ~$27 billion) have recently moved from STHs to long-term holders (LTHs), who are less likely to sell during downturns, thereby supporting price stability. Additionally, exchange reserves have slightly declined from 2.46 million to 2.45 million BTC, indicating a tightening supply. A sustained reduction in reserves could further limit downside risk and lay the foundation for a potential rally.

Bitcoin’s price has lately struggled to generate sufficient demand to push itself higher. Especially since bearish sentiment has continued to dominate.

However, shifting dynamics among short-term holders may be emerging. These could influence Bitcoin’s [BTC] trajectory, particularly if a near-term bullish scenario unfolds.

Bitcoin to $64,000 may trigger bulls

Data from CryptoQuant highlighted the cost basis of short-term holders—the average price at which they purchased Bitcoin—revealing a potential market pattern.

STHs who bought within the last month have an average cost basis of approximately $85,450. At Bitcoin’s press time price, this puts them at a 19% unrealized loss – A significant drawdown.

Source: CryptoQuant

Historically, when the STH cost basis drops to 25% or lower, it often marks a market bottom. At a 19% loss, Bitcoin would need an additional 6% decline—bringing it to roughly $64,000—before conditions for a rebound may emerge.

At these levels, two behaviors typically occur – Some STHs hold longer, while others sell, unable to bear further losses. For Bitcoin to reach a historical low and potentially repeat past fractal patterns, the selling from the latter group is usually required.

Foundations for a rally

Signs of a foundational shift may be forming too. In fact, some short-term holders are already taking actions that could tighten Bitcoin’s supply dynamics.

At the time of writing, reports from CryptoQuant hinted at an ongoing transition from STHs to LTHs – Generally positive for Bitcoin. Long-term holders, investors who have held Bitcoin for at least six months, tend to reduce the likelihood of sudden sell-offs.

Source: CryptoQuant

In fact, approximately 300,000 BTC have recently moved from STHs to LTHs, representing around $27 billion removed from the liquid market.

This reduced supply can support price stability, especially during downtrends, as LTHs are less likely to sell under pressure.

Exchange reserve dynamics

Another critical metric is the availability of Bitcoin on exchanges, reflected in the exchange reserves. High reserves can increase selling pressure as more Bitcoin is readily available for trading.

At the time of writing, exchange reserves stood at 2.45 million BTC, declining slightly from a high of 2.46 million on 02 April.

A sustained decline in exchange reserves would indicate tightening supply, which could reduce the risk of major price drops. Nevertheless, exchange flow dynamics will remain crucial for any rebound to levels historically associated with market bottoms.


Final Summary

  • Short-term holders are at a 19% unrealized loss and a further 6% decline could push Bitcoin towards levels historically associated with market bottoms.
  • Over 300,000 BTC previously held by STHs have not yet transitioned to long-term holders.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the current unrealized loss percentage for short-term holders (STHs) who bought Bitcoin in the last month, and what price level might trigger a potential market bottom?

AShort-term holders who bought Bitcoin in the last month are at a 19% unrealized loss. A further 6% decline, bringing Bitcoin to roughly $64,000, could trigger conditions historically associated with a market bottom.

QAccording to the article, what are the typical behaviors of short-term holders when their cost basis drops to 25% or lower?

AWhen the short-term holder cost basis drops to 25% or lower, some STHs hold their Bitcoin for longer, while others sell because they cannot bear further losses. The selling from the latter group is usually required to reach a historical market bottom.

QHow has the movement of Bitcoin from short-term to long-term holders (LTHs) impacted the market, according to the data?

AApproximately 300,000 BTC (worth around $27 billion) have recently moved from short-term holders to long-term holders. This transition removes liquid supply from the market, which can support price stability as LTHs are less likely to sell under pressure.

QWhat is the significance of declining exchange reserves for Bitcoin's price stability?

ADeclining exchange reserves indicate a reduction in the Bitcoin available for immediate trading, which tightens supply. This can reduce selling pressure and the risk of major price drops, supporting price stability, especially during downtrends.

QWhat two key points are summarized as the foundation for a potential Bitcoin rally?

AThe two key points are: 1) Short-term holders are at a 19% unrealized loss, and a further 6% decline could push Bitcoin to levels historically associated with market bottoms. 2) Over 300,000 BTC previously held by STHs have transitioned to long-term holders, reducing liquid supply.

Related Reads

Saeed Al-Marri: How Tokenization Unlocks New Opportunities for Shipping Funds

Said Al-Marri: How Tokenization Opens New Opportunities for Shipping Funds For centuries, commercial shipping has been a capital-intensive asset class limited to institutional funds and shipping dynasties. Said bin Saleh Al-Marri, CEO of Ethra Invest and Ethra Ship, aims to break down these barriers by combining Real World Asset (RWA) tokenization with conservative private equity principles. This bridges decentralized finance (DeFi) with the physical realities of global trade. Tokenization allows fractional ownership of ships on a blockchain, giving smaller investors access to previously inaccessible markets. However, Al-Marri warns it is not a regulatory loophole or a cure for asset illiquidity. The core physical risks are isolated in Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) for qualified investors. While tokenization enhances transparency and ownership record-keeping, Al-Marri stresses that a liquid secondary market depends on transparent asset valuation and must not interfere with ship operations managed by professionals. Regarding legal enforcement, smart contracts cannot physically seize a ship. Legal recourse still relies on traditional maritime courts, ship mortgages, and flag state laws, with blockchain records needing to mirror legal ownership in the SPV perfectly. Beyond ownership, the industry faces administrative hurdles like paper-based bills of lading. Al-Marri argues the bottleneck is legal and operational standardization, not technology. He advocates for a hybrid model combining digital trade documents and programmable settlements with support from regulated financial institutions, rather than a full crypto replacement for tools like Letters of Credit. A major challenge is decarbonizing the global fleet by 2050. Transitioning to green fuels requires massive upfront investment. Al-Marri emphasizes a conservative, holistic approach to underwriting these projects, evaluating technology, fuel availability, safety, and resale value. Investments must be justified under conservative forecasts, not just optimistic ones. By combining pragmatic risk management with digital infrastructure, leaders like Al-Marri show that the evolution of maritime finance is about mobilizing capital to build a modernized and sustainable global fleet, not just putting ships on a blockchain.

cryptonews.ru11m ago

Saeed Al-Marri: How Tokenization Unlocks New Opportunities for Shipping Funds

cryptonews.ru11m ago

Six Years Later, UNI Finally Welcomes Its Own "Buyback Bull"

After years of debate, Uniswap's UNI token has finally entered a 'buyback bull' phase following the long-awaited activation of its fee-switch mechanism. The UNIfication proposal, executed in December 2025, redirected a portion of protocol fees from select pools and Unichain sequencer revenue into a treasury (TokenJar) dedicated to buying back and permanently burning UNI. Initial market reaction was muted due to modest early burn rates. A significant shift occurred in July 2026 with the launch of Robinhood Chain. Uniswap's immediate deployment there skyrocketed trading volume, making it a top fee-generator. Subsequently, governance votes extended the fee mechanism to v4 pools and Robinhood Chain, causing protocol revenue to nearly triple. Daily funds directed to UNI burns rose sharply, with Robinhood Chain contributing over half. This transitioned UNI's narrative from a governance token to a cash-flow asset backed by a perpetual automatic buyer. UNI's price, which had languished around $2.30 in early June, nearly doubled to approach $4.60 by late July. Analysts credit this to the tangible cash flow from fees rather than mere speculation. Unlike many newer projects where buybacks are offset by large investor unlocks, UNI's six-year history has resulted in a widely distributed and relatively clean supply, allowing the buyback pressure to effectively impact the secondary market. The key test will be whether trading activity, particularly on Robinhood Chain, sustains after its initial gas subsidies expire.

marsbit16m ago

Six Years Later, UNI Finally Welcomes Its Own "Buyback Bull"

marsbit16m ago

Only 153 Venture Capital Firms Invested in July: Is the Crypto VC Industry Experiencing a 'Mass Extinction'?

In July 2026, only 153 unique venture capital firms participated in disclosed crypto funding rounds, marking the lowest monthly count since November 2020. This figure represents an 87% decline from the peak of 1,177 firms in 2022. Overall, the first seven months of 2026 saw crypto projects raise approximately $11.78 billion across 481 rounds. This crypto VC contraction contrasts sharply with the broader venture capital landscape, where global VC investment reached a record $560.4 billion in H1 2026, heavily fueled by major AI company financings. This shift in capital allocation has drawn funds away from the crypto sector. Within crypto, funding is highly concentrated. Trading platforms, prediction markets, and payment sectors absorbed 53% of the total capital. While early-stage deals remain frequent, the largest sums flow to a few late-stage rounds and mergers & acquisitions, which surged to $7.23 billion in Q2 2026. The market is consolidating around top funds like a16z crypto and Dragonfly, which successfully raised new multi-billion dollar funds, while many smaller firms have retreated. Analysts describe this as a "great extinction" for crypto VCs, where capital is becoming more selective, favoring proven business models and assets over early-stage speculation. This raises the bar for project quality, funding efficiency, and viable exit paths.

marsbit36m ago

Only 153 Venture Capital Firms Invested in July: Is the Crypto VC Industry Experiencing a 'Mass Extinction'?

marsbit36m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片