Analyst Flags $65-$71 Solana Support Zone After 60 Million SOL Changed Hands

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-06-30Last updated on 2026-06-30

Abstract

Analyst Ali Martinez has identified a critical support zone for Solana between $65 and $71, where over 60 million SOL tokens previously changed hands. This price range is significant as it represents a major demand area where a large number of market participants have a cost basis. If this zone holds, it could support SOL's bullish structure and act as a base. Conversely, a decisive break below it may signal a shift in momentum, turning the area into resistance and prompting a search for liquidity at lower support levels. This setup provides a concrete price level for traders to monitor, offering a clearer signal than vague market sentiment amid Solana's current fragile conditions. The key takeaway is that this zone requires confirmation from price action and broader market behavior to determine the token's next directional move.

View original post on X

TL;DR

  • Analyst Ali Martinez flagged $65 to $71 as a major Solana demand zone.
  • More than 60 million SOL reportedly changed hands in that range.
  • The setup matters because SOL’s bullish structure may depend on whether that zone holds.

Solana’s Demand Zone Comes Into Focus

Crypto analyst Ali Martinez has highlighted a key Solana support zone between $65 and $71, noting that more than 60 million SOL reportedly changed hands in that range.

That type of level matters because markets often remember where large amounts of supply changed hands. If many holders bought or transacted in a specific price area, that zone can become important when price revisits it. Some holders may defend their entry. Others may sell if they get back to breakeven. Either way, liquidity tends to build around those areas.

For SOL, the $65-$71 range now becomes a clean line to watch. If buyers defend it, the broader structure can remain constructive. If it breaks, traders may start looking toward lower realized-price zones and prior support levels.

Why Cost-Basis Clusters Matter

A support zone is more useful when it is tied to actual transaction history rather than just a line on a chart.

The idea is simple. If a large amount of SOL changed hands between $65 and $71, then many market participants have a reference point there. That can influence behavior. Buyers who missed the move may see the zone as a second chance. Existing holders may add if the level holds. Short-term traders may use it as a risk marker.

But the same logic works in reverse. If price loses the zone decisively, the market may read it as a failed defense. That can turn prior support into resistance and push attention to lower levels.

That is why Martinez’s setup is useful. It gives traders a specific area to watch rather than a vague bullish or bearish call.

The Bigger Solana Picture

Solana remains one of the most closely watched altcoins because it combines strong retail attention, active on-chain trading, and a large developer ecosystem. But like most altcoins, SOL has also been dealing with weaker market sentiment and sharper rotations in risk appetite.

In that environment, support zones matter more. When momentum is strong, price can ignore levels for longer than expected. When conditions are fragile, the market becomes more sensitive to whether major demand areas hold.

For SOL bulls, defending $65-$71 would help keep the argument alive that the token is basing rather than breaking down. For bears, a clean loss of that range would suggest the market needs to search for deeper liquidity.

The takeaway is straightforward: Solana does not need hype here. It needs confirmation. The $65-$71 cluster is the area where that confirmation may start.

For readers, the useful approach is to treat this as a signal to monitor rather than a standalone trading call, because confirmation still has to come from follow-through in price, flows, and broader market behavior.

This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae.

This report is based on publicly available market and on-chain data. at X

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat specific price range has analyst Ali Martinez identified as a major Solana (SOL) demand zone?

AAnalyst Ali Martinez identified the price range of $65 to $71 as a major Solana (SOL) demand zone.

QHow many Solana (SOL) tokens reportedly changed hands in the identified demand zone?

AMore than 60 million Solana (SOL) tokens reportedly changed hands in the $65 to $71 range.

QWhy is a support zone based on significant transaction history considered more meaningful?

AA support zone tied to significant transaction history is more meaningful because it represents a price area where many market participants have a reference point (like a cost basis), which can influence their future buying or selling behavior and create a concentration of liquidity.

QAccording to the article, what are the broader implications for SOL's bullish structure if the $65-$71 zone holds?

AIf the $65-$71 zone holds, it would help maintain SOL's constructive bullish structure, supporting the argument that the token is basing or consolidating rather than breaking down.

QFor traders, what is the practical utility of Martinez's highlighted SOL demand zone?

AThe practical utility for traders is that it provides a specific, data-backed price area to monitor for confirmation of market direction, serving as a risk marker or a potential entry/exit point, rather than a vague trading call.

Related Reads

$2 Trillion: Countdown to AI's Largest IPO in History

The countdown for the largest IPO in AI history, a potential $2 trillion listing for Anthropic, is underway for October. The staggering valuation, reportedly projected by several investors, contrasts with the company's own internal restraint on setting a public target. Founded five years ago by former OpenAI core members, Anthropic's growth has been meteoric. Annual recurring revenue (ARR) surged from ~$9B in late 2025 to $47B by May 2026, with Q2 2026 revenue of $11.5B marking a 14x year-over-year increase. Bank valuations are even based on internal 2028 revenue forecasts of $190-200B. A key growth driver is Claude Code, its AI coding assistant. Its ARR quintupled in five months to $2.5B by February 2026, now constituting nearly 20% of total revenue. Surveys indicate Anthropic commands roughly 40% of enterprise LLM spending, doubling OpenAI's share in programming-specific use. However, alongside this explosive growth, reports detail significant internal cultural strife. Critics describe a divisive "priesthood" of PhD executives, led by CEO Dario Amodei, who promote a "save humanity" narrative that some employees find cult-like and alienating. This has reportedly created a demoralized workforce and a covert "underground network" of dissent among engineers torn between lucrative pre-IPO equity and a toxic work environment. Anthropic now faces a pivotal paradox: pursuing its mission of "safe" AI requires immense capital for compute, yet that capital demands relentless commercial growth. As it approaches its historic IPO, the company must navigate intense regulatory scrutiny, soaring operational costs, and internal tensions—any of which could destabilize its post-listing trajectory, much like SpaceX's significant post-IPO stock drop. The stage is set for a defining moment in tech history.

marsbit2h ago

$2 Trillion: Countdown to AI's Largest IPO in History

marsbit2h ago

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

"AI for Cost Reduction Makes VC Funding More Expensive" Despite the "cost-reduction and efficiency" narrative of AI, venture capital (VC) investment in the AI sector is becoming increasingly costly. While AI tools lower the initial costs for many startups—with team sizes shrinking across funding stages—the market is polarizing. For top-tier AI teams, especially those from leading companies like Google and OpenAI, funding rounds are now larger and valuations are higher than ever at the seed and early stages. For example, new ventures by prominent researchers are securing billions in funding with valuations reaching tens of billions before having a mature product. This creates a "barbell" market: lightweight startups need less capital, while elite AI firms attract massive investments early on. This dynamic raises the cost for VCs to acquire and maintain meaningful ownership stakes. As valuations soar early, securing the same equity percentage requires significantly larger capital commitments. VCs must now invest more upfront and reserve substantial funds for follow-on rounds to avoid dilution, prompting large firms like Accel and a16z to raise massive new funds. Consequently, capital is concentrating intensely in a few perceived winners like OpenAI and Anthropic, widening the gap between large and small VC funds. While high valuations bake in future growth expectations, they also compress potential returns, demanding that portfolio companies achieve unprecedented scale. For major VCs, the core strategy is clear: secure early positions in potential winners and maintain the capital to keep investing as valuations rapidly escalate.

marsbit3h ago

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片