Adam Back shuts down Quantum FUD that could ‘likely crash Bitcoin’s market’

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-16Last updated on 2025-12-16

Abstract

Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, dismisses claims that quantum computing poses an immediate threat to Bitcoin, stating current technology is incapable of cracking the network. He estimates it could take 20-40 years for quantum computers to become stable and powerful enough to threaten BTC, and by then, the network could be upgraded for quantum security. While some investors, like Charles Edwards, urge faster action, experts note that existing quantum prototypes have high error rates and far fewer than the 2,500+ stable qubits required to break Bitcoin's encryption. In the meantime, holders are migrating to more secure Segwit addresses to reduce vulnerability.

Quantum computing has made some progress, but not to the extent that it could pose a threat to the Bitcoin network and related wallets.

According to Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream and a cypherpunk who was once mistaken for Satoshi, quantum computers right now can’t crash BTC.

He discredited a post that claimed that the only thing that could crash BTC by 99% from $87k to $3 is a quantum computer capable of cracking wallets and the entire network.

Last month, Back said that quantum computers could only become stable and pose a threat to BTC in the next 20-40 years.

Still, the network could be secure by the time the risk becomes real. In fact, Blockstream researchers are already developing proposals for upgrading the Bitcoin network to a quantum-secure one.

However, not everyone believes the threat is two decades away.

Why quantum-secure BTC is urgent

Perhaps one of the most vocal investors about the risks of quantum computing is Charles Edwards, CEO of Capriole Investments. According to him, BTC has lagged behind gold in terms of price performance this year because of the risk.

The best solution, he added, is to reach a consensus in 2026 and make the Bitcoin network quantum-resistant.

For perspective, quantum computers differ from current classical computers because they utilize the so-called qubits instead of typical solid-state chips that operate on 0 and 1. However, they are currently difficult to create, scale, and shield from errors (such as overheating).

So far, IBM has a working prototype with about 1000 qubits, while Google and Microsoft have managed 50 and 8 qubits, respectively. Alas, the error rates have been extremely high.

To crack the current Bitcoin cryptography, a quantum computer must have at least 2,500 logical and stable qubits that can operate for days without errors. That’s why experts like Adam Back view the threat as a long-term issue, rather than an immediate or mid-term risk.

Bitcoin holders seek relative security

In fact, most of the top firms that are pushing for quantum computers will be at risk if they develop one without proper safeguards. Based on this premise, even Strategy founder Michael Saylor has downplayed the mid-term threats posed by quantum computers to Bitcoin.

“Google and Microsoft won’t sell you a quantum computer that cracks modern cryptography because it’ll destroy them, the US government, and the banking system.”

In the meantime, some top holders are already migrating to more resistant Bitcoin addresses (Segwit, blue) from the latest format (taproot, purple).

According to BTC analyst Willy Woo, Segwit reduces “quantum long range attacks” if the address is not reused.

The number of Segwit addresses has been increasing since 2024.


Final Thoughts

  • Cryptography experts believe that it could take decades for quantum computers to crack the Bitcoin network.
  • Some investors have already migrated to relatively secure Segwit addresses.

Related Reads

Huawei Cloud Rejects Token Price War, Zhou Yuefeng Seeks a New Winning Formula for AI Cloud

At the 2026 Huawei Cloud INSPIRE Creator Conference, CEO Zhou Yuefeng outlined Huawei Cloud's distinct strategy in the competitive AI cloud market. Instead of engaging in price wars based on token volume or Maas revenue—a common focus for rivals like Alibaba Cloud and ByteDance's Volcano Engine—Huawei Cloud is shifting the competition towards real-world productivity gains. Zhou highlighted three core differentiators: a fully domestic computing stack (Ascend, Kunpeng), a focus on government and enterprise clients rather than consumer internet, and a deep commitment to open-source ecosystems. To this end, Huawei Cloud launched a suite of new products under the "Agentic Infra" paradigm, including the AICS Lingqu computing cluster, AMS memory storage, and the ModelArts Next platform. These aim to solve enterprise challenges in deploying AI agents, such as latency, memory, scheduling, and security. The strategy further involves creating specialized industry zones ("AI Dream Factories") for sectors like healthcare and embodied intelligence. For example, a smart medical zone developed with Shanghai Ruijin Hospital aims to democratize expert-level diagnostic capabilities. In essence, Huawei Cloud is positioning itself not as a commodity token provider, but as the foundational infrastructure for industrial AI, leveraging its domestic supply chain and hybrid cloud solutions to serve sectors where productivity, not just scale, is the ultimate measure of value.

marsbit1h ago

Huawei Cloud Rejects Token Price War, Zhou Yuefeng Seeks a New Winning Formula for AI Cloud

marsbit1h ago

70% of the Public Opposes AI, Americans Hope the U.S. Loses the AI War

70% of Americans believe AI development is moving too fast, with growing public resistance evolving from online criticism to real-world protests and violence. This widespread anti-AI sentiment stems from fears of job losses, rising utility costs, environmental damage, threats to democracy, and financial instability. Key incidents illustrate the backlash: Google's former CEO Eric Schmidt was loudly booed at a graduation for promoting AI; AI company ads are vandalized; protests and even violent attacks target AI firms and data centers. Polls show deep public pessimism and strong local opposition to data center construction, often surpassing resistance to nuclear power plants. The core grievances are economic and practical: AI is seen as automating jobs, concentrating wealth, and increasing household electricity and water bills due to massive data center resource demands. Environmentalists also oppose AI's high energy use and carbon emissions. This opposition has turned AI into a major political issue in the US. While the Trump administration prioritizes AI innovation for global competition, bipartisan pushback is growing. Democrats and factions within the MAGA movement are forming temporary alliances to support stricter regulations and local bans on new data centers, pressuring the administration to choose between its tech industry backers and its voter base. The situation highlights a profound national divide over AI's future.

marsbit2h ago

70% of the Public Opposes AI, Americans Hope the U.S. Loses the AI War

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片