Trump’s Crypto Deals May Have Increased The Family Fortune By $2 Billion—At Investors’ Expense

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-06-10Last updated on 2026-06-10

Abstract

A Reuters investigation alleges the Trump family generated approximately $2.3 billion from four main crypto ventures, while investors in those projects incurred roughly equivalent losses. The primary source was World Liberty Financial token sales, estimated to have yielded over $1.4 billion for the family. Significant gains also came from sales of the TRUMP memecoin, calculated at over $1.2 billion, and from related corporate partnerships. Investors, however, faced substantial losses. Early World Liberty token buyers faced restrictions on selling most holdings, and post-listing price declines contributed to estimated investor losses of $674 million. TRUMP coin buyers, who spent at least $1.2 billion, saw the value plummet, implying over $700 million in losses. Additionally, sharp share price drops for associated public companies ALT5 Sigma and American Bitcoin left investors down about $875 million combined.

A new investigation by Reuters alleges that the Trump family has generated $2.3 billion from its four main crypto ventures, while investors in those projects have absorbed losses of a similar magnitude, amounting to roughly $2.3 billion, including paper losses, by the end of April.

World Liberty Sales

The investigation describes World Liberty Financial’s token fundraising as the largest component of the Trump family’s alleged crypto windfall. World Liberty has disclosed raising $1.4 billion by selling 30 billion WLFI tokens, which Reuters says yielded roughly $987 million for the Trump family.

However, Reuters argues that the Trump family’s earnings from World Liberty token sales may be higher than the disclosed estimate. The outlet says that in an October 2025 filing tied to European crypto sales regulations, World Liberty reported it held 3 billion fewer tokens than it previously stated publicly.

Using a weighted average of token prices during the relevant period, Reuters calculates that if sold, those tokens would have generated at least $460 million for the Trump family.

Reuters says these likely additional sales would bring total Trump family earnings from World Liberty token sales to more than $1.4 billion, representing the largest share of the $2.3 billion overall figure cited in the investigation.

TRUMP Memecoin Cashout

For the President’s official memecoin, Reuters used blockchain data to trace gains from coin sales across online marketplaces and to identify coin movements to crypto exchanges.

The investigation says movements to exchanges strongly suggest sales, and it attributes that method to experts, including finance and computing professors, a law professor, and an industry analyst.

Reuters reports that using weighted average prices during the periods when coins were moved to exchanges, it calculated that those movements—if they represented sales—raised more than $880 million. Reuters says total revenue, including sales through other channels, was about $1.2 billion.

Reuters also details token flows involving ALT5 Sigma and World Liberty Financial. It says ALT5 Sigma, transformed into a crypto acquisition vehicle, partnered with World Liberty Financial to buy $717 million worth of World Liberty tokens. This purchase allegedly sent more than $500 million to the Trump family.

Beyond token sales, Reuters says it found that Eric Trump’s stake was worth over $70 million at the end of April, while it says the value of Donald Trump Jr.’s stake was not disclosed.

The report also states that Hut 8 Corp, the Trump family’s partner in the venture, bought $25 million of World Liberty tokens shortly after the company launched, sending about $19 million to the Trump family.

Crypto Investor Losses

To estimate investor losses, Reuters says it compared what initial buyers paid for TRUMP and World Liberty tokens and for new shares in ALT5 Sigma and American Bitcoin against the current market values.

For investors in World Liberty governance tokens, Reuters says early purchasers paid either $1.5 or $0.5 per token. Those early buyers may have profited on tokens they sold after trading began on crypto exchanges, but Reuters notes they were restricted from selling 80% of their holdings.

Reuters says that for tokens bought after exchange trading began, prices have fallen as well. Altogether, Reuters estimates losses for investors in World Liberty tokens total about $674 million.

Reuters says buyers spent at least $1.2 billion on TRUMP, at prices up to $75.35. Using the April 30 price of $2.38, the report says those coins were worth $521 million, implying a loss of more than $700 million for buyers.

For the Nasdaq-listed companies, Reuters reports that ALT5 Sigma and American Bitcoin disclosed the number of shares sold and the money they raised through the end of March 2026.

Since August of last year, Reuters says ALT5’s share price fell sharply, leaving investors down about $675 million. It says American Bitcoin’s shares dropped from $11 to $1.15 by the end of April after declining since September, leaving investors down more than $200 million.

The 1D chart shows TRUMP’s price crash to $1.6. Source: TRUMPUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image created with OpenArt; chart from TradingView.com

Related Questions

QAccording to the Reuters investigation, how much total profit did the Trump family allegedly generate from its crypto ventures, and what was the approximate total loss for investors?

AThe investigation alleges that the Trump family generated $2.3 billion from its crypto ventures, while investors absorbed losses of a similar magnitude, roughly $2.3 billion by the end of April.

QWhich venture is described as the largest contributor to the Trump family's alleged crypto windfall, and what was the reported fundraising amount and Trump family earnings from it?

AWorld Liberty Financial's token fundraising is described as the largest component. It disclosed raising $1.4 billion by selling WLFI tokens, which reportedly yielded roughly $987 million for the Trump family, with potential additional sales bringing the total to over $1.4 billion.

QWhat method did Reuters use to estimate gains from the TRUMP memecoin sales, and what was the total estimated revenue from this coin?

AReuters used blockchain data to trace coin movements to crypto exchanges, which strongly suggest sales. Using weighted average prices during those periods, it calculated that these movements raised over $880 million, with total revenue from all channels reaching about $1.2 billion.

QHow did Reuters calculate the estimated losses for investors who bought the TRUMP memecoin?

AReuters compared what initial buyers paid for TRUMP tokens (at least $1.2 billion at prices up to $75.35) against the market value on April 30 ($2.38 per token, totaling $521 million). This implied a loss of more than $700 million for buyers.

QWhat were the reported investor losses for the Nasdaq-listed companies ALT5 Sigma and American Bitcoin according to the article?

AFor ALT5 Sigma, investors were down about $675 million due to a sharp share price fall since August. For American Bitcoin, shares dropped from $11 to $1.15 by the end of April, leaving investors down more than $200 million.

Related Reads

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

In 2026, a wave of investor anxiety questions the defensibility of AI startups as models improve, fearing that most companies are just "thin wrappers" destined to be absorbed by foundation models or chipmakers. The author argues against this despair, positing that true moats lie not in benchmark performance but in areas models cannot easily reach. The logic of despair is that if models excel at all measurable tasks, only compute and cutting-edge model weights hold lasting value. However, the essay contends that the most valuable work is inherently "untrainable." Benchmarks measure what can be measured and thus optimized for, but real-world correctness often resides in private, complex systems. Examples include legacy codebases, intricate legal transactions, or hospital workflows. This kind of correctness is proprietary, costly to establish, and cannot be validated quickly—it requires time and trust within an organization. As models commodify visible, measurable tasks from both above (labs absorbing scaffolding) and below (saturation by cheaper models), value shifts to "untrainable ground." This encompasses work where correctness is a private truth, locked behind integration barriers, licenses, liability frameworks, and entrenched user habits. Trust and adoption are slow, human-centric processes that smarter models cannot accelerate. Successful companies defend their position by embedding deeply into client operations, owning the definition of "good" within a specific domain (e.g., Harvey in law, OpenEvidence in medicine), and pricing on outcomes rather than tokens. While labs compete fiercely, they are incentivized to keep the application layer vibrant. The future belongs not to those competing on generic benchmarks but to those navigating unscoreable terrain, doing the "unsexy work" of translation between models and messy human realities. The most cited benchmark scores are thus maps of territory about to become worthless, signaling who will lose the right to define what counts as good.

marsbit9m ago

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

marsbit9m ago

Three-Year High Smashes Rate-Cut Hopes, Who's Using CPI to Clean Out Whale Holdings?

U.S. CPI inflation accelerated to 4.2% year-over-year in May, reaching a three-year high and dampening market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts in 2026. The surge was primarily driven by a sharp 23.5% annual increase in energy prices, fueled by geopolitical conflicts. While core CPI rose 2.9% year-over-year, showing relative moderation, the hotter-than-expected headline data prompted a repricing in interest rate markets. Traders now overwhelmingly expect the Fed to hold rates steady, with some even pricing in potential rate hikes for late 2026 or 2027. The report triggered declines in major U.S. stock indices and pressured risk assets like Bitcoin, which remained volatile around $61,000-$62,000. Analysts note that while the energy-driven inflation spike is concerning, the controlled core figures provide the Fed room for patience. However, the "higher for longer" interest rate narrative has solidified. For crypto markets, this translates to continued outflows from Bitcoin ETFs, heightened volatility, and a market seemingly in a "capitulation" phase, with leverage reset but sustained demand yet to materialize.

Foresight News29m ago

Three-Year High Smashes Rate-Cut Hopes, Who's Using CPI to Clean Out Whale Holdings?

Foresight News29m ago

The Ethereum Indicator That Never Missed A Bottom Is Signaling Again, This Time At $700

Ethereum (ETH) is trading around $1,606, down 70% from its all-time high. Analyst Ali Martinez points to the Delta Price indicator, which has historically signaled market bottoms and is now at $708. This suggests ETH could face another 56% drop from current levels to approximately $700 before a sustained recovery. Martinez identifies key support levels at $1,560 and $1,070. For a bullish reversal, ETH needs to reclaim the 200-week SMA near $2,500 and then the 50-week SMA near $3,100, conditions not currently met as selling pressure persists.

bitcoinist41m ago

The Ethereum Indicator That Never Missed A Bottom Is Signaling Again, This Time At $700

bitcoinist41m ago

Trump's Crypto Empire: A $2.3 Billion Wealth Transfer Experiment

In June 2026, Reuters investigations revealed that since Donald Trump's return to the White House, his family has accumulated roughly $2.3 billion in profits from four core crypto ventures: World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the $TRUMP meme coin, American Bitcoin, and ALT5 Sigma (later renamed AI Financial). Coincidentally, overall investor losses in these projects were estimated to be a similar amount. The businesses, spanning DeFi, stablecoins, meme coins, Bitcoin mining, and digital payments, largely relied not on technological innovation but on converting the political influence and notoriety of the Trump brand into financial assets sold to the market. This marks a dramatic shift from Trump's earlier skepticism of cryptocurrencies. The ventures operated on a similar logic: leveraging the Trump name to generate market hype and trust, attracting investment through token sales or public listings, and enabling the family to capture profits upfront through equity, token allocations, and fees, while later entrants often bore the brunt of the risk as markets cooled. WLFI, the most profitable venture, generated an estimated $1.6 billion for the family, primarily through sales of its locked, illiquid governance token and its USD1 stablecoin. The $TRUMP meme coin, a direct monetization of the presidential IP, brought in over $600 million for Trump-linked entities before its price crashed nearly 97% from its peak. American Bitcoin gained a "Trump stock" premium for its mining operations, and ALT5 Sigma/AI Financial combined Trump, AI, and crypto themes for a temporary valuation surge. The episode underscores how political influence can be packaged into financial assets, creating substantial wealth for promoters while highlighting the risks for investors who base decisions on hype and brand allegiance over fundamental business models and cash flows.

marsbit49m ago

Trump's Crypto Empire: A $2.3 Billion Wealth Transfer Experiment

marsbit49m ago

CFTC Proposes New Rules for Prediction Markets, Redefining Which Events Can Be Listed and Who Can Participate

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has proposed new rules to establish a clearer regulatory framework for prediction markets. The proposal aims to modify how "event contracts" are reviewed, creating a structured process to determine if contracts involving terrorism, assassination, war, or illegal activities violate the public interest. This moves away from a blanket ban toward a case-by-case assessment of whether a contract's subject matter is acceptable for financial trading. A key focus is distinguishing between predicting the impact of risks and predicting the occurrence of harm. The proposal suggests that many sports-based prediction markets—such as those on game outcomes, scores, or season standings—may be permissible as they can provide price discovery and meaningful information. However, markets on easily manipulated events like specific player injuries, referee calls, or outcomes of youth sports would face stricter scrutiny. The rules directly target insider trading and manipulation risks, highlighting cases where individuals with non-public information or the ability to influence an event's outcome could unfairly profit. This underscores a shift toward ensuring market fairness. The proposal does not end the regulatory debate, particularly with state gambling regulators who argue that sports prediction markets are essentially sports betting and should fall under state jurisdiction. Nonetheless, the CFTC's action signals a move toward formalizing prediction markets, pushing the industry from a phase of rapid, often unregulated expansion into a more institutionalized, rule-based environment that more closely resembles traditional financial markets.

marsbit1h ago

CFTC Proposes New Rules for Prediction Markets, Redefining Which Events Can Be Listed and Who Can Participate

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow