1inch confirms Anton Bukov’s departure after co-founder says he was fired

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-16Last updated on 2026-07-16

Abstract

Decentralized exchange aggregator 1inch has confirmed that co-founder Anton Bukov is no longer involved with the project. Bukov stated he was fired in late November 2025 and announced a new DeFi venture, Second Tier. While he remains a co-founder and shareholder, he has no operational or security role at 1inch. The company confirmed his lack of active involvement since December 2025 but stressed that operations, protocols, and development roadmap remain unaffected under co-founder Sergej Kunz and the existing team. The departure follows several unrelated security incidents in 2024 and 2025, but 1inch maintains its core systems and user funds were not impacted.

Decentralized exchange aggregator 1inch has confirmed that co-founder Anton Bukov is no longer involved with the project. This was after Bukov publicly revealed that he had been fired from the company late last year and announced a new DeFi venture.

In a statement posted on X, Bukov said he was dismissed in late November 2025, adding that he no longer has any role in 1inch’s operations, product architecture or security.

Shortly afterwards, 1inch confirmed that he has not been actively involved with the project since December 2025. It stressed that the protocol and its roadmap remain unchanged.

Bukov announces departure and new project

Bukov, who co-founded 1inch in 2019, said his work focused on the protocol’s architecture, security and economic design. He credited himself with leading the development of several core products, including the 1inch Router, Fusion and its cross-chain infrastructure.

According to Bukov, user and colleague feedback prompted him to become more involved in the company’s leadership and operational management. However, he said those efforts ultimately ended with his dismissal in late November 2025.

Despite his exit from day-to-day operations, Bukov said he remains a co-founder and 50% shareholder in the company.

He also announced the launch of a new DeFi project, Second Tier [tier.xyz], which he said will focus on building secure and efficient financial infrastructure.

1inch says operations remain unaffected

Responding to Bukov’s announcement, 1inch confirmed that he is no longer contributing to the project and has not been actively involved in any associated organizations since December 2025.

The company said Bukov’s departure does not affect the operation of the 1inch Network. It added that its protocols, infrastructure, and core systems continue to function normally.

It also said co-founder Sergej Kunz and the existing executive leadership team remain responsible for the network’s strategy and development.

While 1inch acknowledged Bukov’s contributions over the years, it did not address his claim that he was fired.

Departure follows security incidents in 2025

Bukov’s exit comes after 1inch addressed several security incidents across its broader ecosystem.

In March 2025, attackers exploited an obsolete Fusion V1 resolver contract, resulting in losses of approximately $5 million. The company said the incident affected only outdated resolver integrations.

At the same time, the live Fusion V2 protocol and end-user funds remained unaffected.

It later recovered most of the stolen assets after reaching an agreement with the attacker.

Earlier, in December 2024, 1inch disclosed that a resolver smart contract had been compromised following a private key breach. The company also said that the incident did not affect the core protocol or users’ funds.

There is no indication that either security incident was connected to Bukov’s departure.


Final Summary

  • 1inch has confirmed that co-founder Anton Bukov is no longer involved with the project after Bukov revealed he was fired in late 2025.
  • The company said operations, infrastructure, and development remain unchanged under the existing leadership.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, why is Anton Bukov no longer involved with 1inch?

AAnton Bukov stated publicly that he was fired from 1inch in late November 2025. The company later confirmed he is no longer contributing to the project and has not been actively involved since December 2025.

QWhat new project did Anton Bukov announce after his departure from 1inch?

AAnton Bukov announced the launch of a new DeFi project called Second Tier (tier.xyz), which will focus on building secure and efficient financial infrastructure.

QHow did 1inch describe the impact of Anton Bukov's departure on its operations?

A1inch stated that Bukov's departure does not affect the operation of the 1inch Network. It said its protocols, infrastructure, core systems, and development roadmap remain unchanged under the leadership of co-founder Sergej Kunz and the existing executive team.

QWhat were the two security incidents mentioned in the article that occurred prior to Bukov's departure?

AThe two security incidents were: 1) In March 2025, an exploit of an obsolete Fusion V1 resolver contract led to ~$5 million in losses (most later recovered). 2) In December 2024, a resolver smart contract was compromised due to a private key breach. 1inch stated neither affected the core protocol or user funds.

QWhat key roles and contributions did Anton Bukov claim for himself at 1inch?

ABukov stated his work focused on the protocol's architecture, security, and economic design. He credited himself with leading the development of core products like the 1inch Router, Fusion, and its cross-chain infrastructure.

Related Reads

Stripe's $53.4 Billion Acquisition of PayPal: The Final Piece of the Stablecoin Empire Puzzle

Stripe has reportedly made a $53.4 billion acquisition offer for PayPal, a move that could signal a major shift in the stablecoin landscape from a "technology race" to a "customer war." Over recent years, Stripe has been quietly building nearly every layer of a stablecoin empire: acquiring the issuance platform Bridge, wallet provider Privy, co-incubating the payments-focused Layer 1 network Tempo with Paradigm, and joining the Open USD (OUSD) alliance stablecoin initiative. What it lacks, however, is a massive direct consumer user base. PayPal, with its hundreds of millions of active accounts, the Venmo app, and its own PYUSD stablecoin, would provide exactly that. The acquisition could create a closed-loop system where Stripe handles the merchant side, PayPal/Venmo serve consumers, and transactions are settled via stablecoins on a blockchain like Tempo, potentially bypassing traditional card networks and their fees. While the deal is not yet finalized and may face hurdles—including potential resistance from PayPal's board or a higher bid—the mere offer suggests Stripe's strategic focus may have evolved. It indicates that having superior infrastructure alone may not be enough; distribution and user access are critical battlegrounds. Questions remain about how PYUSD, OUSD, and Venmo would integrate with Stripe's stack, and whether private equity co-investor Advent International would prioritize such crypto experiments. If successful, this acquisition could significantly boost Tempo's position in the competitive public blockchain space and further push crypto-based payments into the mainstream, potentially fulfilling PayPal's original vision of an internet-native currency through a new, crypto-native infrastructure.

marsbit5m ago

Stripe's $53.4 Billion Acquisition of PayPal: The Final Piece of the Stablecoin Empire Puzzle

marsbit5m ago

Hyperliquid's "Stock Price" for ChangXin Memory Tech Hits $8.64: How Was This Price Determined Before the IPO?

Title: Hyperliquid's "Stock Price" for CXMT Hits $8.64: How is This Pre-IPO Price Determined? Summary: On Hyperliquid, a derivative contract tracking the pre-IPO value of Chinese chipmaker Changxin Xinqiao (CXMT) has been trading, with its price reaching $8.64. This price is not a real stock price or a direct IPO valuation, but the result of a specific market mechanism. Trade.xyz deployed this "Pre-IPO Perpetual" (IPOP) contract via Hyperliquid's HIP-3 framework. It tracks the expected USD value of one Changxin A-share post-listing. The contract started with an artificial "discretionary reference price" of $5 set by Trade.xyz. Subsequent trading prices are primarily determined by supply and demand on Hyperliquid's on-chain order book. Since there's no tradable现货 before the IPO, the contract price isn't forced to align with the official IPO price of 8.66 RMB (~$1.28). Key mechanics shape the price: 1. **Order Book-Driven**: The actual成交价 comes from limit orders matched on-chain. 2. **Internal Oracle & Smoothing**: An internal oracle, run by Trade.xyz, calculates a smoothed price based on the order book's "impact price" using a 30-minute exponential moving average (EWMA). This oracle price influences funding rates. 3. **Mark Price for Risk**: A separate Mark Price, derived from the median of the internal oracle and other inputs, is used for calculating profit/loss and liquidation. 4. **Discovery Bound (Price护栏)**: A 20% "Discovery Bound" limits how far the price can move from the current reference point. However, if the price hits the bound, the reference price can be re-anchored upward (or downward) up to 7 times. This explains the阶梯状 jumps to $6, $7.2, and $8.64. 5. **Low Funding Rate**: A minimal funding rate (0.005 multiplier) allows positions to be held with low cost before the IPO, but it provides a weak anchor. Post-IPO, the contract is expected to convert to a standard stock perpetual, with its oracle switching to the actual A-share price converted to USD. This transition could cause price jumps and potential liquidations if there's a significant gap between the pre-IPO contract price and the real market price. In essence, the $8.64 price is a composite of: a人为设定的起点 + on-chain order book supply/demand +内部 oracle 平滑 + low funding rate damping + a moving price护栏. It represents a collective bet by specific market participants on the future public market valuation, not the company's current or official IPO price.

marsbit6m ago

Hyperliquid's "Stock Price" for ChangXin Memory Tech Hits $8.64: How Was This Price Determined Before the IPO?

marsbit6m ago

Prices From the Future Fool the Oracle, Ostium Drained of $24 Million in Five Minutes

Ostium, a perpetual trading platform, suffered a security incident on July 15, resulting in significant losses from its public liquidity vault. Initial analyses from Blockaid, Cyvers, and PeckShield estimate losses of up to $24 million. The exploit occurred over a five-minute window. According to security firms, the core issue was not a missing signature, but a data integrity failure: a registered price oracle (PriceUpKeep) submitted authorized price reports with manipulated future timestamps, creating false trading profits. The protocol’s verification process confirmed the signatures as authorized but did not enforce price sanity checks or timestamp boundaries, allowing the manipulated data to be accepted for settlement. This caused the liquidity vault to pay out on these fraudulent profits. Ostium’s co-founder confirmed the team paused trading within an hour and is collaborating with law enforcement and security experts. The extracted funds were reportedly swapped for ETH, with a portion moved to Tornado Cash. The incident highlights risks in DeFi oracle designs where cryptographic signature verification is insufficient without additional safeguards for data validity, timestamp freshness, and price reasonableness. Ostium's response and planned fixes—including stricter timestamp validation, independent price checks, and circuit breakers—will be critical to preventing similar exploits.

marsbit28m ago

Prices From the Future Fool the Oracle, Ostium Drained of $24 Million in Five Minutes

marsbit28m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片