Will Noah Doe’s Satoshi BTC claim ‘disrupt entire industries’? Defendants say…

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-07Last updated on 2026-07-07

Abstract

Noah Doe, along with two other pseudonymous plaintiffs, is suing in New York to claim legal ownership of 39,069 allegedly abandoned and dormant Bitcoin wallets, containing approximately 3.8 million BTC. Their argument hinges on posting abandonment notices via the Bitcoin blockchain and deeming wallets inactive after a 90-day non-response period as abandoned property. Defendants, including the listed wallet addresses, are seeking to dismiss the case. They argue that inactivity alone does not prove abandonment, as long-term holding is common, and that Noah Doe cannot be a legitimate "finder" without possessing the private keys. They warn a ruling for the plaintiffs would disrupt digital asset industries and undermine property rights. The argument was complicated when one of the named "dormant" wallets, linked to Satoshi and holding 35.55 BTC since 2011, recently moved 15 BTC, demonstrating active control.

After fourteen years, Satoshi-era Bitcoin is once again at the center of a lawsuit. On the 6th of July, a second amicus brief has been filed to oppose “Noah Doe’s” attempt to assert ownership of Satoshi’s coins as “abandoned property.”

The first filing happened back in May 2026, when “Salomon Brothers” was claiming the legal ownership of Satoshi’s coins.

That said, the three pseudonymous plaintiffs—Noah Doe, ABC Company, and XYZ Company—are making attempts to acquire legal ownership of 39,069 dormant Bitcoin wallets that they did not create and could not access.

Source: Galaxy Research

Why does Noah Doe claim these wallets were abandoned?

For context, the plaintiffs claim that they posted notices on the blockchain using Bitcoin’s OP_RETURN function. It was to direct wallet owners to an abandonment notice and provide them with 90 days to reply.

After the notice period, approximately 2,900 wallets were deleted, including 424 that were activated, leaving 39,069 that they say were abandoned.

But there are significant obstacles in the lawsuit.

In addition to acknowledging that the plaintiffs lack the private keys required to access the Bitcoin [BTC], it provides no evidence that the owners saw the notices and only uses wallet inactivity as proof of abandonment.

The case presented by defendants

Hence, the defendants contend the case should be dismissed. They caution that since many investors purposefully leave Bitcoin unaltered for years, this would compromise digital property rights.

The filing noted,

Granting the relief Plaintiffs seek would not quiet title, it would disrupt entire industries and the expectations of every owner of digital assets.

Lastly, it states that Noah Doe is ineligible to be a legitimate “finder” since he only discovered public wallet addresses and never acquired the private keys or authority over the Bitcoin.

Meanwhile, recent blockchain activity complicated that argument further.

In Bitcoin block 952,104, the Satoshi Bitcoin wallet with the address 1LwWtSs7tMCwcRczQd5kVMv3xpWw6w4Sxe, which had held 35.55 BTC since the 27th of March, 2011, moved 15 BTC to a new address and returned the remaining 20.55 BTC as change.

The wallet’s movement is noteworthy because it is one of 39,069 Bitcoin addresses that have been named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in New York by Noah Doe.

Source: Galaxy Research

Doe claims that the dormant wallets were abandoned and is suing for ownership of approximately 3.8 million BTC under New York law.

The 1LwWt wallet was on the final list of defendants after failing to reply to a notice sent on the 31st of July, 2025.

Remarking on the same, Alex Thorn, Head of Research at Galaxy Research, noted,

Source: Alex Thorn/X

Needless to say, long-time Bitcoin owners frequently hold their coins in self-custody for years at a time without transacting.

Therefore, wallet inactivity by itself does not establish abandonment. That’s because ownership ultimately rests on control of the private keys rather than transaction history.


Final Summary

  • The three plaintiffs, mainly Noah Doe, are making attempts to acquire legal ownership of 39,069 dormant Bitcoin wallets.
  • The defendants argue that Noah Doe is ineligible to be a legitimate “finder” since he never acquired the private keys.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main claim made by Noah Doe in the lawsuit regarding the 39,069 Bitcoin wallets?

ANoah Doe claims that the 39,069 dormant Bitcoin wallets are abandoned property under New York law and is suing to acquire legal ownership of them, which holds approximately 3.8 million BTC.

QAccording to the article, why do the defendants argue that the case should be dismissed?

AThe defendants argue the case should be dismissed because the plaintiffs lack private keys, provide no evidence that wallet owners saw the abandonment notices, and incorrectly use wallet inactivity alone as proof of abandonment. Granting the plaintiffs' claim would disrupt digital property rights and industries, as many investors intentionally hold Bitcoin without transacting for long periods.

QHow did the plaintiffs attempt to notify the wallet owners before declaring the wallets abandoned?

AThe plaintiffs posted notices on the blockchain using Bitcoin's OP_RETURN function. These notices directed wallet owners to an abandonment notice and provided a 90-day period for them to reply.

QWhat recent blockchain activity complicates Noah Doe's argument that the wallets are abandoned?

ARecent blockchain activity showed that a wallet from the list of defendants (address 1LwWtSs7tMCwcRczQd5kVMv3xpWw6w4Sxe), which had been inactive since 2011, moved 15 BTC to a new address and returned 20.55 BTC as change. This transaction demonstrates active control and contradicts the claim of abandonment.

QWhat is the key legal point, according to the defendants, that determines ownership of Bitcoin and undermines the plaintiffs' case?

AThe defendants state that ownership of Bitcoin ultimately rests on control of the private keys, not on transaction history or wallet inactivity. Therefore, since Noah Doe never acquired the private keys or authority over the Bitcoin, he is ineligible to be a legitimate 'finder' of abandoned property.

Related Reads

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片