Elon Musk's 'Granny Drain'

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-28Last updated on 2026-05-28

Abstract

Title: Musk "Milking the Old Folks" Author: Nancy, PANews As the memory sector surges with Micron and SK Hynix each surpassing a trillion-dollar market cap, Elon Musk is accelerating his own myth of becoming the world's first trillionaire. SpaceX, with its astronomical valuation, is speeding toward the capital markets. This potentially wealth-history-rewriting super IPO is pushing Musk toward that unprecedented personal fortune and delivering hundredfold or even thousandfold returns to early backers like Google, Valor Equity Partners, Founders Fund, and others. However, to sustain this most expensive space narrative in human history, new buyers are ultimately needed. As massive pension funds are set to be "forced to buy," the retirement savings of Americans are becoming the fuel for Musk's space dreams. Wall Street has begun paving a fast track for such super IPOs. Major indices like Nasdaq and S&P have recently eased rules, allowing mega-companies like SpaceX to be incorporated into key benchmarks like the Nasdaq 100 much faster post-listing. This matters because a vast portion of the U.S. retirement system—trillions in 401(k)s and pension funds—relies on passive index investing. Once a company enters a major index, all funds tracking it are compelled to buy its shares automatically, regardless of valuation, profitability, or risk. This has sparked significant backlash. Teacher unions and major public pension funds (collectively managing trillions) have warned the SEC ...

Author: Nancy, PANews

While the storage sector is going crazy, with Micron and SK Hynix both surpassing the trillion-dollar market capitalization mark, Elon Musk is personally accelerating the myth of creating a trillion-dollar fortune.

SpaceX, with its sky-high valuation, is accelerating towards the capital market. This super IPO, which may rewrite wealth history, is pushing Musk towards becoming the world's first trillionaire, while also delivering astounding returns of hundreds or even thousands of times to early allies.

However, for humanity's most expensive space narrative to continue, new buyers are ultimately needed. As massive pension funds will be 'forced to buy in,' Americans' retirement savings become the fuel for Musk's space dream.

Elon Musk is making American retirees 'pay up.'

Countdown to History's Largest IPO, Early Allies Reap Huge Profits

Wall Street has been waiting for SpaceX's IPO for many years.

Over the past decade, the company has grown from a startup valued at just $27 million into today's super unicorn valued at nearly $1.75 to $2 trillion, becoming one of the world's highest-valued private companies.

Now, this super IPO is finally set to list as early as June 12. This is not only the largest IPO event in human history but also means the wealth feast is entering its cash-out moment. Musk's long-term followers have finally waited for substantial returns.

For example, Google, through early investment, may become the biggest external winner. As of the end of 2025, it holds about 6.11% of SpaceX shares. An investment of just $900 million back then is now worth close to $120 billion; Valor Equity Partners, as a major shareholder second only to Musk, holds over 500 million SpaceX Class A shares, with equity value ranging roughly between $90 billion and $140 billion; Peter Thiel's Founders Fund, through multiple rounds of follow-on investments, holds about 3.5% of the shares, with paper gains exceeding $60 billion; Fidelity, as a major institutional investor in a 2015 co-investment round, holds shares worth about $35 billion; even Sequoia Capital, which entered relatively late, sees considerable returns, expected to be over $20 billion.

As for Musk himself, he is also poised to become the world's first trillion-dollar billionaire.

Bank of America strategist Michael Hartnett warns in a recent report that once super IPOs like SpaceX and OpenAI materialize, the weight of tech stocks in equity benchmark indices could easily surpass about 48%, exceeding the market concentration levels of all major bubble periods in history such as the 'Roaring Twenties' of the 1920s, the 'Nifty Fifty' of the 1970s, the Japanese bubble of the 1980s, and the dot-com bubble of the 1990s.

However, who will ultimately take on such a massive valuation?

To reduce selling pressure after listing and maintain stock price stability, SpaceX has made some adjustments. For instance, insider shares will use a phased unlocking mechanism instead of the traditional unified 6-month lock-up period common in IPOs. Additionally, the company approved a 5-for-1 stock split for common shares to lower the psychological barrier for retail investors and enhance liquidity. Musk has also publicly stated that he will not sell any SpaceX shares.

But market concerns haven't disappeared. Putting aside the uncertainty of the grand Mars narrative and looking just at financial data, SpaceX remains a fast-burning company. The prospectus shows that in the first quarter of 2026 alone, SpaceX's net loss was nearly $4.3 billion, almost equivalent to the full-year loss of the previous year. Meanwhile, Musk controls an absolute 85% of the voting rights, meaning the board can hardly fire him, and external shareholders can almost never push through any major business decisions.

To some extent, SpaceX is a highly Musk-ified company. Its valuation, governance, and future expectations are deeply tied to Musk personally.

After all early investors have made a fortune, who is still willing to buy this already outrageously expensive space ticket at a high price?

Wall Street Paves an Index Fast Lane, U.S. Pensions Become the 'Bag Holders'

Americans' retirement savings may become the potential fuel for Musk's space dream.

Wall Street has already started opening express lanes for super IPOs. On May 1 this year, new Nasdaq rules officially took effect. Newly listed companies ranking in the top 40 of the Nasdaq-100 index by market cap can be included in the index after just 15 trading days, compared to the usual wait of about three months previously.

S&P also launched a consultation in May, proposing to shorten the minimum listing time required for inclusion from 12 months to 6 months and considering exempting extremely large companies from profitability requirements. FTSE Russell similarly relaxed restrictions, allowing large IPOs to be assessed for inclusion in the Russell U.S. Equity Indexes (including Russell 1000, Top 200, etc.) as early as the 5th trading day after listing, without waiting for quarterly reviews.

Major U.S. indices quietly relaxing rules is undoubtedly paving a dedicated runway for SpaceX.

According to Business Insider disclosures, after SpaceX goes public, it may quickly enter mainstream indices and ETFs. The speed of passive fund allocation could far exceed that of previous large IPOs. For example, the CRSP indices tracked by Vanguard's VTI and Growth ETF VUG could include SpaceX as early as 5 trading days post-listing; the Nasdaq-100 index tracked by QQQ could include SpaceX after 15 trading days; and the S&P 500 index tracked by SPY might include SpaceX in 2027 after rule changes, among others.

Within the U.S. retirement system, a vast number of 401(k) plans, pension funds, and long-term savings accounts employ passive index investment strategies. Funds typically automatically allocate assets according to index constituents and their market cap weightings.

This strategy originated from the first index fund for ordinary investors launched in 1976 by index fund pioneer John Bogle. The core philosophy is to 'replicate the market, not beat it.' With extremely low management fees and high diversification, it became the preferred allocation method for pensions and 401(k) accounts. To date, total U.S. retirement assets exceed $49 trillion.

This means that once SpaceX is included in an index, all funds tracking that benchmark, without analyzing valuation, judging bubbles, or even caring if the company is profitable, are forced to buy according to the weight.

However, this game has sparked strong dissatisfaction within the pension system.

Recently, the American Federation of Teachers sent a letter to the SEC urging strengthened scrutiny of SpaceX's listing, warning that workers' lifetime savings could be controlled by a company that resembles a Musk family business more than a transparent public company.

Simultaneously, three major U.S. public pension funds managing over $1 trillion in assets (CalPERS, New York State, and New York City pension systems) also co-signed a letter to Musk, strongly opposing SpaceX's extreme governance structure. This includes super-voting rights, veto power over his own removal as CEO, and immunity from lawsuits.

They pointed out that Musk simultaneously leads SpaceX, Tesla, xAI, Neuralink, and other companies, posing significant risks due to divided attention. The letter demanded that SpaceX transition to a one-share-one-vote structure within seven years, establish a board with a majority of external shareholders, separate the CEO and Chairman roles, and remove Musk's self-veto rights.

This rule change, tailored by Wall Street for super IPOs, ultimately tightly binds the retirement savings of tens of millions of Americans to Musk's grand space dream. After early investors enjoy hundred-fold returns, the remaining 'bag-holding' cost is shifted onto passive investors incapable of making a choice.

The largest 'Granny Drain' game in history, under the guise of indexing, is officially beginning.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument of the article regarding the upcoming SpaceX IPO and its potential impact on certain investors?

AThe article argues that the massive upcoming SpaceX IPO, facilitated by Wall Street rule changes allowing rapid inclusion in major indices, will force passive investment funds (like ETFs and index funds) to automatically buy SpaceX stock. As these funds manage trillions in American retirement savings (e.g., 401(k)s and pensions), ordinary retirees' savings become the primary source of capital to 'fuel' Musk's space ambitions, effectively making them the 'bag holders' after early investors cash out their enormous gains.

QHow does SpaceX's proposed corporate governance structure pose a risk according to the article and certain institutional investors?

AThe article highlights that SpaceX's governance gives Elon Musk 85% of voting control, making the board unable to fire him and external shareholders powerless over major decisions. Major U.S. public pension funds (like CalPERS) have protested this structure, citing risks from Musk's divided attention across multiple companies and the lack of standard shareholder protections. They demand a shift to one-share-one-vote, an independent board majority, and the separation of CEO and chairman roles.

QWhat concerns are raised about SpaceX's financial performance as it prepares for its IPO?

AThe article points out that despite its high valuation, SpaceX is a company burning cash at a significant rate. Its IPO prospectus reportedly shows a net loss of nearly $4.3 billion in just the first quarter of 2026, approaching its total loss for the previous full year. This raises questions about the sustainability of its valuation and who will buy the stock at such a high price after early investors sell.

QWhat specific rule changes by major index providers are mentioned as paving a 'fast track' for SpaceX's inclusion post-IPO?

AThe article details several rule changes: Nasdaq reduced the waiting period for new listings to join the Nasdaq-100 index to just 15 trading days if ranked in the top 40 by market cap. S&P is considering shortening its listing requirement from 12 to 6 months and waiving profitability rules for mega-companies. FTSE Russell now allows large IPOs to be evaluated for inclusion in its U.S. indexes as early as the 5th trading day.

QWho are some of the early investors in SpaceX mentioned in the article, and what are their potential returns?

AThe article lists several early SpaceX investors and their potential gains: Google's initial $900 million investment could be worth about $120 billion; Valor Equity Partners' stake is valued between $90-$140 billion; Peter Thiel's Founders Fund could see over $60 billion; Fidelity's stake is around $35 billion; and Sequoia Capital could gain over $20 billion. These figures illustrate the immense returns for early backers compared to the perceived risk for later passive investors.

Related Reads

The Truth About Global Payments, Exposed by Airwallex

Airwallex's founder, Jack Zhang, outlines the three primary paths in the global payments industry and explains why the company chooses the most demanding one: building its own global financial infrastructure. The article begins by highlighting a common industry problem: payment platforms appear homogenized on the surface, offering similar features like global acquiring and multi-currency accounts. However, their underlying capabilities differ vastly. Customers truly care about payment stability, compliance robustness, and reliable market entry support. Zhang identifies three strategic paths: 1. **Bypassing Traditional Systems (Web3/Crypto):** This path promises efficiency via stablecoins and blockchain settlement but struggles with mainstream adoption, significant regulatory friction, and a lack of competitive edge against established players, often leaving it with niche or non-compliant markets. 2. **Packaging Existing Infrastructure:** The most common route, where companies layer a modern interface over legacy banking and partner networks. While enabling fast expansion, it fails to solve core issues like dependency on correspondent banks and intermediary risk, merely postponing the need for solid foundations. 3. **Building Own Global Infrastructure:** The path chosen by Airwallex, Ant International, and others. It involves obtaining local licenses, establishing direct regulatory relationships, building local teams, and controlling the full technology stack. This "heavy" approach is slow and capital-intensive but aims to internalize complexity, providing customers with a "lighter" experience. The core argument is that for business clients, the highest cost isn't transaction fees but hidden risks like frozen accounts, payment delays, and regulatory shocks. By investing heavily in its own infrastructure, Airwallex seeks to absorb these complexities, offering customers greater stability, cost savings (beyond fees), and long-term certainty. This foundational investment, though initially slow, enables compound growth, as evidenced by Airwallex's accelerated revenue scaling. In conclusion, while shortcuts enable faster growth, mastering the most difficult aspects—owning the underlying infrastructure—creates durable value for customers and sustainable advantage for the payment provider.

marsbit29m ago

The Truth About Global Payments, Exposed by Airwallex

marsbit29m ago

The Truth About Global Payments, Revealed by Airwallex

The article discusses Airwallex's approach to global payments, highlighting the key challenges and different strategic paths in the industry. It begins by addressing common user questions about platform reliability, cryptocurrency payments, and the necessity of Airwallex's "heavy" infrastructure model. The core argument is that while many payment platforms appear similar on the surface—offering features like global acquiring and multi-currency accounts—their underlying capabilities differ drastically. The piece identifies three primary paths for global payment providers: 1. **Bypassing Traditional Infrastructure (Web3/Crypto):** This path promises efficiency through stablecoins and on-chain settlements but faces significant regulatory hurdles and offers little advantage over established players for mainstream use, often serving only niche or non-compliant markets. 2. **Aggregating/Packaging Existing Infrastructure:** The most common route, where companies layer a better user experience over legacy banking and partner networks. While fast to market, this approach does not solve fundamental issues like dependency on intermediaries, correspondent banking risks, and compliance fragility. 3. **Building Proprietary Global Infrastructure:** The path chosen by Airwallex and similar firms. This involves obtaining local licenses, building direct regulatory relationships, establishing local teams, and controlling the compliance and technology stack. This is the most difficult and capital-intensive route but aims to internalize complexity. Airwallex's strategy of "heavy" investment in its own infrastructure is framed not as inefficiency, but as a long-term bet to provide clients with greater stability, cost savings beyond fees, and certainty. The platform's "heaviness" absorbs risk and operational complexity, aiming to deliver a "lighter" experience for business customers. The article concludes that in global payments, while shortcuts enable faster growth, mastering the most difficult aspects—the underlying infrastructure—is what creates durable value for clients and sustainable competitive advantage.

链捕手37m ago

The Truth About Global Payments, Revealed by Airwallex

链捕手37m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片