Solana: How memecoins are driving the ‘SOL cycle’ narrative in H2

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-06Last updated on 2026-07-06

Abstract

The article discusses the growing narrative of a "Solana cycle" in the second half of the year, driven by a surge in bullish sentiment around SOL. While a predicted $1,000 price target is seen as a technical stretch, on-chain data supports optimism: the network added over 1.6 million new addresses in two weeks and saw significant SOL withdrawn from exchanges, reducing sell-side pressure. A key driver is Solana's divergence from the broader memecoin market downturn. As the overall memecoin sector weakens, activity on Solana-based memecoins like BONK is rising, with platforms like Pump.fun leading in DEX volume. This sustained, sector-specific demand and network growth bolster the "Solana cycle" thesis, making SOL a key altcoin to watch despite its current price being below $100.

Traders usually name a market cycle after an asset when bullish sentiment reaches an extreme.

Currently, that seems to be happening with Solana [SOL]. Several traders who were bearish on SOL just weeks ago have now flipped bullish. The sudden shift was so noticeable that it even fueled speculation on social media, with some users questioning whether Solana was paying analysts to push a pro-SOL narrative.

More recently, Ansem added to the buzz by calling SOL undervalued and arguing that it has the potential for a 100x move, citing the network’s ecosystem upgrades and continued growth. The biggest talking point, however, came from another analyst who predicted that SOL could hit $1,000 this cycle, calling the current market phase the “Solana cycle.”

Source: X

Technically, that target looks like a stretch.

Solana is still struggling to reclaim the $100 level, so a move to $1,000 this cycle remains a long shot. That said, the on-chain data is telling a different story. Over the past two weeks, the network has added more than 1.6 million new addresses, a sign that user activity continues to accelerate.

Meanwhile, around $120 million worth of SOL has been withdrawn from exchanges over the past week. Growing network activity combined with steady exchange outflows suggests demand is picking up while more holders are moving their tokens off trading platforms, reducing immediate sell-side pressure.

That said, Solana’s biggest growth catalyst may not be network expansion alone. Instead, the real momentum appears to be coming from sector-specific demand, making the idea of a “Solana cycle” heading into H2 less far-fetched than it first appears.

Memecoin demand strengthens Solana’s outlook

The memecoin market collapse is becoming a key driver of the 2026 cycle.

According to CoinMarketCap data, the total memecoin market cap has declined by over $10 billion so far this year and remains in the red, reflecting fading interest in meme-based tokens. Notably, this weakness is also visible in the data, with memecoin dominance falling sharply to 3.7%, its lowest level since February 2024.

However, Solana is clearly diverging from the broader market trend. As the chart shows, Solana-based memecoins have been in a steady uptrend since June, with Bonk [BONK] leading the move with over 13%+ gains during the period. Meanwhile, Pump.fun has climbed to the top spot by 24-hour DEX volume, surpassing Uniswap, as memecoin trading activity on Solana picks up again.

Source: CoinGecko

In simple terms, Solana network usage isn’t just driven by spot demand.

Instead, growth in new addresses has lined up with strong memecoin momentum on the network, showing that interest in Solana-based memes remains firm even as the broader memecoin market cools. That gives SOL a clear edge in the current setup.

So, while SOL may still be far from a $1,000 rally from a technical standpoint, the underlying demand and activity still support the idea of a “Solana cycle.” That keeps SOL a key altcoin to watch heading into H2.


Final Summary

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the primary factor driving the so-called 'Solana cycle' narrative according to the article?

AAccording to the article, the primary factor driving the 'Solana cycle' narrative is the sustained demand and momentum for memecoins on the Solana network, which contrasts with the broader cooling of the overall memecoin market.

QWhat are two key on-chain metrics mentioned that suggest growing demand and reduced sell-side pressure for SOL?

ATwo key on-chain metrics mentioned are: 1) The addition of over 1.6 million new Solana network addresses in the past two weeks, indicating accelerating user activity. 2) Approximately $120 million worth of SOL withdrawn from exchanges over the past week, suggesting holders are moving tokens off trading platforms.

QHow does the performance of Solana-based memecoins differ from the overall memecoin market trend?

AWhile the total memecoin market cap has declined significantly, Solana-based memecoins have been in a steady uptrend since June, with projects like Bonk (BONK) leading gains. This shows that interest in Solana-based memes remains firm as the broader sector cools.

QWhat is the analyst Ansem's view on Solana's (SOL) potential, as cited in the article?

AAnsem called SOL undervalued and argued that it has the potential for a 100x move, citing the network's ecosystem upgrades and continued growth.

QDespite the optimistic narrative, why does the article suggest a $1,000 price target for SOL this cycle is technically a stretch?

AThe article suggests a $1,000 price target is technically a stretch because Solana is still struggling to reclaim the $100 price level, making such a massive rally appear as a long shot from a current technical standpoint.

Related Reads

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

MicroStrategy, the world's largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, has significantly shifted its business model. Between June 29 and July 5, the company sold 3,588 bitcoins for approximately $216 million to fund quarterly dividends for its preferred stock. This marks its largest-ever Bitcoin sale and signals a strategic pivot: Bitcoin is transitioning from a "buy-and-hold" reserve asset to a liquidity management tool for the company. This move follows a recent authorization allowing Bitcoin sales when equity fundraising is less attractive. The announcement contributed to a more than 5% intraday drop in MicroStrategy's stock price, while Bitcoin fell to around $61,800—below the company's average holding cost of roughly $75,700. The sale represents a major departure from MicroStrategy's long-standing "never sell" commitment, which saw its first minor breach in May with a $2.5 million sale. The latest, hundred-times-larger transaction underscores growing financial pressures. Analysts note the company faces about $1.5 billion in annual preferred dividend obligations, far exceeding cash flow from its software business. As of July 5, MicroStrategy holds 843,775 bitcoins. Its current operational logic involves buying Bitcoin during favorable financing conditions and selling portions to cover dividends when needed, creating a flexible capital management cycle amidst a challenging market environment.

华尔街日报52m ago

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

华尔街日报52m ago

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

Quantum Computing's Threat to Cryptocurrency: A Countdown to Q-Day Quantum computing, specifically Shor's algorithm, poses a fundamental threat to the public-key cryptography (e.g., ECDSA, RSA) that secures blockchain networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum. This critical juncture, known as Q-Day, is estimated to occur potentially within the next 5-15 years. The core vulnerability stems from the public and immutable nature of blockchains. Assets in addresses where the public key is already exposed on-chain (e.g., spent outputs) are at direct risk, as a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive the private key. This threatens the very trust model of cryptocurrencies. The response lies in Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)—algorithms like lattice-based ML-DSA and hash-based SLH-DSA, which are resistant to quantum attacks. NIST has standardized key PQC algorithms (FIPS 203, 204, 205), providing a migration path. However, the primary challenge is not technical but socio-economic and involves complex governance: * **Bitcoin's** path is constrained by its conservative ethos. Migrating requires a soft-fork to new address types, facing hurdles like significantly larger signature sizes and, most critically, the divisive governance question of how to handle at-risk legacy UTXOs without violating core principles. * **Ethereum** is pursuing a "cryptographic agility" strategy, with a multi-layered roadmap. It leverages account abstraction for user accounts and is developing compressed hash-based signatures (e.g., leanXMSS) for its consensus layer, aiming for a full-stack upgrade over time. In conclusion, quantum computing does not spell an instant end for cryptocurrency but initiates a critical countdown. The industry has a limited "engineering comfort window" to orchestrate a coordinated, ecosystem-wide migration to PQC. The ultimate bottlenecks are the immense coordination efforts and governance decisions required for this foundational transition.

marsbit1h ago

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

marsbit1h ago

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

Former US President Donald Trump reported a record-breaking $2.2 billion in personal income for 2025, the highest annual income ever disclosed by a sitting president. This figure, from a 927-page government ethics filing, represented a 3.5-fold increase from his $600 million income in 2024 and boosted his net worth to $6.5 billion. The primary drivers were cryptocurrency (64% of income, approximately $1.4 billion) and real estate (26%, approximately $575 million). His crypto earnings stemmed largely from the launch of his personal meme coin, $TRUMP, generating over $600 million in licensing fees, and substantial profits from the WLFI token and its parent company. Despite a sluggish property market, his Mar-a-Lago resort and associated golf clubs saw revenue surges of 50% and 27%, respectively, attributed to their use as venues for presidential events. Trump's financial disclosure also revealed an unprecedented level of stock market activity, with over 22,000 trades executed in 2025, averaging 87 trades per market day. Media analyses noted several instances where significant trading coincided with major policy announcements, such as proposed tariffs, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. While the White House stated these trades were handled by a family-managed trust fund and not Trump directly, critics highlighted this as a departure from the blind trusts traditionally used by presidents post-Watergate. The report has intensified debate over the commercialization of the presidency. Supporters view it as a success story of a businessman-president, while critics argue it demonstrates an unprecedented conversion of public influence into private wealth, with policy decisions potentially linked to personal financial gains. The controversy centers on whether Trump's earnings represent innovative entrepreneurship or a fundamental conflict of interest, sparking renewed calls for stricter ethics reforms in US governance.

marsbit1h ago

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

marsbit1h ago

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

The article explores the existential threat quantum computing poses to cryptocurrencies and the urgent need for "post-quantum" migration. It outlines that quantum computers, through Shor's algorithm, could break the elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC) underlying blockchain security, potentially allowing private keys to be derived from public keys. The core challenge is not a lack of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards—like NIST's ML-KEM and ML-DSA—but the immense complexity of upgrading entire ecosystems before "Q-Day" (when quantum computers become capable of such attacks, estimated around 2035-2045). Key points include: * **Bitcoin's** risk is concentrated in legacy UTXOs with exposed public keys (e.g., early P2PK outputs). Migration faces massive hurdles: PQC signatures are much larger, increasing transaction size and cost, and the governance dilemma of handling un-migrated assets threatens its "code is law" ethos. * **Ethereum's** strategy focuses on "cryptographic agility," using Account Abstraction for user accounts and developing compressed hash-based signatures (like leanXMSS with SNARK aggregation) for consensus. Its migration is a complex, full-stack overhaul of execution, consensus, and data layers. * The "security debt" is enormous. The comfortable engineering window for a coordinated, ecosystem-wide upgrade is only 5-8 years. High-value infrastructure (exchanges, bridges) may face pressure before mainnet protocols. In conclusion, quantum computing is not an instant "doomsday" event but a forcing function for systemic change. Bitcoin's ultimate test is social consensus and property rights governance, while Ethereum's is technical complexity. Failure to migrate in time could lead to a fundamental re-pricing of crypto assets.

链捕手2h ago

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

链捕手2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片