Stock Price Plummets 32% in a Month! Has MicroStrategy's 'Leveraged Bitcoin Buying' Model Reached Its End?

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-22Last updated on 2026-06-22

Abstract

MicroStrategy's stock has declined 32% over the past month, with its flagship Series A Preferred Stock (STRC) falling below its $100 par value. Analysts attribute the weakness not to Bitcoin's price, but to market concerns over how the company will manage its growing fixed obligations and fund shareholder distributions. MicroStrategy recently sold a small portion of its Bitcoin holdings to meet these payments, marking a shift from its core narrative of continuous capital raises to accumulate Bitcoin. While the company asserts its substantial BTC reserves provide decades of liability coverage, the move has introduced complexity and questions about future financing efficiency. Analysts see this as a period of growing pains rather than an existential threat, noting that investor demand for higher returns reflects increased risk perception.

Written by:André Beganski

Compiled by:白话区块链

Decrypt pointed out that MicroStrategy's flagship preferred stock faced significant selling pressure on Thursday, with its price hitting a new all-time low after the company, which has been consistently buying Bitcoin, reiterated its commitment to continue making payments to its Stretch (STRC) shareholders.

At the time of writing, STRC is down 2.6% to $87.45, recovering somewhat from its intraday low of $82.53.

Although this preferred stock has not returned to its par value of $100 since mid-May, its performance is inherently cyclical: the price typically declines after STRC's ex-dividend date.

The ex-dividend date is the day from which investors who buy this flagship preferred stock will no longer be eligible for the upcoming distribution. By the end of this month, as STRC's next dividend payment date approaches, the company is expected to distribute approximately $100 million to investors.

James Butterfill, Head of Research at CoinShares, told Decrypt: "The continued weakness in STRC appears to be driven less by Bitcoin itself and more by market uncertainty about how MicroStrategy will fund and manage its growing fixed obligations. A Bitcoin rally would boost the value of the assets backing MicroStrategy, but it doesn't automatically increase its available cash."

Last year, the company established a cash reserve to manage its debt and dividends. At the beginning of the year, the company initially prepared $2.25 billion; but after repurchasing some debt at a discount, the cash reserve has now been adjusted to $1.1 billion.

STRC is designed to trade around its par value of $100. MicroStrategy has stated that when the preferred stock trades persistently below this level, it can stimulate demand by increasing the reset rate. For the past four consecutive months, this rate has remained at approximately 11.5%.

Mark Palmer, Managing Director and Senior Research Analyst at Benchmark-StoneX, told Decrypt that STRC's intensified weakness is therefore a mechanistic outcome, a sign of the company's predicament. He said that the product's price naturally drifts lower when its reset rate is effectively below market levels.

Palmer stated: "This structure is functioning as designed. At current price levels, we believe STRC offers investors an attractive total return opportunity: on one hand, there's the current yield, and on the other, there's a built-in mechanism that should drive the price back towards par value."

He added that analysts at Benchmark-StoneX expect MicroStrategy to increase STRC's reset rate in early July, "and we expect this move to support a move back towards its par value."

As STRC fell, MicroStrategy's common stock also came under pressure. The company's stock fell as low as $109.36 on Thursday, hitting a four-month low. Over the past month, its stock price has accumulated a 32% decline, outpacing the pullback in the price of Bitcoin itself.

This trend deepened further last month. The Tysons Corner, Virginia-based company decided to sell 32 Bitcoins, raising $2.5 million. The company had previously signaled this move, aiming to send a message that it could fulfill its commitment to make distribution payments to preferred shareholders, one way or another.

Butterfill said: "Previously, the core market narrative was MicroStrategy's strategy of continuously accumulating Bitcoin by raising capital. Positioning a small sale to meet distribution obligations means this flow of funds is being reset and makes the overall strategy more complex, though this impact is likely temporary."

This sale also raised market questions: will this publicly listed company, which holds the most Bitcoin globally, liquidate further holdings in the future? On Wednesday, MicroStrategy responded in a post on X, stating that its holdings demonstrate confidence in the market for STRC over the coming years.

The company stated: "With our BTC holdings, we have 32 years of liability coverage." This statement is based on its approximately $55 billion in Bitcoin reserves compared to annual obligations and interest payments of about $1.7 billion.

Udi Wertheimer, CEO of Taproot Wizards, noted on X that if MicroStrategy were to truly attempt to use its Bitcoin reserves for financing or liquidation, the value it could ultimately realize would likely be far below the nominal figure as the market gradually absorbs those sales.

According to CoinGecko data, Bitcoin fell below $62,500 on Thursday, down over 5% on the day. At this price, MicroStrategy's holdings of 846,842 BTC are worth approximately $53 billion. Even so, analysts believe the current pressure remains growing pains rather than a fatal flaw.

Butterfill stated: "At this stage, I don't think this is an existential problem. It does indicate that MicroStrategy's funding model is becoming less efficient, and that investors are demanding higher returns to bear this risk."

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat has been the recent performance of MicroStrategy's stock, and how does it compare to Bitcoin?

AOver the past month, MicroStrategy's stock has plummeted by 32%, hitting a four-month low of $109.36. This decline has been steeper than the concurrent drop in the price of Bitcoin.

QWhat is the core concern driving the weakness in MicroStrategy's flagship convertible note, according to a CoinShares analyst?

AAccording to James Butterfill, research head at CoinShares, the weakness in STRC appears to be driven less by Bitcoin's price and more by market uncertainty over how MicroStrategy will fund and manage its growing fixed obligations, such as debt and dividends.

QWhy did MicroStrategy sell a portion of its Bitcoin holdings in May, and what signal was it trying to send?

AIn May, MicroStrategy sold 32 Bitcoins for $2.5 million. The company had previously signaled this move to convey that it is capable of fulfilling its distribution commitments to preferred shareholders, regardless of the method used to generate the cash.

QHow does MicroStrategy justify its long-term financial stability despite market pressures, based on its Bitcoin holdings?

AMicroStrategy claims its Bitcoin reserves provide '32 years of liability coverage.' This calculation is based on its approximately $55 billion in Bitcoin reserves compared to annual obligations and interest expenses of about $1.7 billion.

QWhat mechanism is designed to support the price of MicroStrategy's STRC convertible note, and what action is an analyst expecting the company to take?

ASTRC is designed to trade around its $100 par value, and MicroStrategy can stimulate demand by raising its coupon rate if it trades below that level for an extended period. An analyst from Benchmark-StoneX expects the company to increase the coupon rate in early July, which should help push the price back toward par.

Related Reads

Commerce Ministry's Latest Export Controls Target 10 US Companies: Three Market-Moving Threads Explained

China's Ministry of Commerce placed 10 U.S. entities, including MP Materials, USA Rare Earth, Red Cat Holdings, and Teal Drones, on an export control list, banning the export of dual-use items. This move is seen as part of an ongoing countermeasure in the rare earth sector. The analysis suggests the primary impact is on U.S. companies within the **military, drone, and rare earth** sectors, aiming to restrict their access to critical Chinese materials and technology. For the Chinese market, the event is interpreted as reinforcing the **strategic value and pricing power** of domestic rare earth suppliers. However, the potential stock market reactions are nuanced: 1. **Chinese Rare Earth Upstream:** Companies like Northern Rare Earth are near yearly highs, indicating this event's "beneficiary" logic is largely priced in. It may confirm the trend but is unlikely to be a new major catalyst. 2. **Chinese Rare Earth Mid/Downstream & Drones:** Sectors like magnetic materials (e.g., Da Di Bear, Zhenghai Magnetic) and military drones (e.g., China Aerospace) are relatively undervalued. While the drone listing highlights sectoral competition, it doesn't directly translate to new orders for Chinese firms. 3. **Impact on Listed U.S. Companies:** The effect on stocks like MP Materials is ambiguous. While Chinese restrictions pose a challenge, these companies are also core to U.S. supply chain security efforts and may receive increased government support, potentially offsetting negative impacts. Their pre-announcement stock prices did not indicate panic selling. In summary, the export controls strengthen China's position in the global rare earth supply chain but have uneven effects across related stock market segments, with upstream Chinese gains likely priced in and downstream/drone sectors receiving more indirect, sentiment-driven attention. The outcome for the targeted U.S. stocks depends on the balance between restriction impacts and potential compensatory U.S. policy support.

marsbit3m ago

Commerce Ministry's Latest Export Controls Target 10 US Companies: Three Market-Moving Threads Explained

marsbit3m ago

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

Uniswap v4's Hook mechanism is a major innovation, enabling custom logic injection into liquidity pool lifecycle events like swaps and liquidity provisioning. This transforms the AMM into programmable infrastructure, shifting the security model from protocol-level to pool-level, as each pool's safety now depends on its bound Hook contract. The core architecture revolves around the singleton PoolManager contract, which manages all pools via a flash accounting system. State changes are tracked in transient storage and must be settled by the end of a transaction. Hook contracts are permanently bound to pools via a PoolKey, with their permissions encoded directly into their address via specific low-order bits. This design introduces unique security considerations and challenges for future upgrades. Key vulnerabilities and best practices identified include: - **Access Control Gaps:** Early versions of the BaseHook abstract contract only protect `unlockCallback()`, leaving other lifecycle functions (`beforeSwap`, `afterSwap`, etc.) exposed unless explicitly secured by developers. - **Unrestricted Pool Binding:** The `initialize()` function does not validate if a Hook "consents" to a new pool. Hooks must implement their own whitelisting in `beforeInitialize` to prevent unauthorized pool creation. - **Async/Custom Curve Hooks:** These high-risk Hooks can completely replace Uniswap's swap logic. Their security depends entirely on their own implementation, as they operate outside the native protocol's pricing safeguards. - **Delta Accounting Risks:** The system ensures final balance (NonzeroDeltaCount == 0) but cannot guarantee the *correctness* of intermediate delta states, which attackers could manipulate. - **Token Confusion:** Protocols must implement semantic validation for tokens in user-created markets, not just interface checks, to prevent cross-market confusion attacks. The article emphasizes that Hook auditing requires a "sub-protocol" approach due to extended interaction chains, highlighting a significant shift in security methodology for the v4 ecosystem.

marsbit55m ago

Uniswap v4 Hook Analysis: Architecture Design, Common Vulnerabilities, and Protection Practices

marsbit55m ago

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

Alibaba Executive Chairman Joe Tsai recently outlined the company's comprehensive AI strategy in a public discussion. He believes AI represents a massive opportunity, estimating its potential economic impact at up to $50 trillion, stemming from the automation of human intelligence and productivity. Tsai detailed Alibaba's four-layer investment approach across the AI stack: starting from the chip level, moving to cloud infrastructure (Alibaba Cloud), then the model layer with its open-source Qwen model, and finally applications within its vast digital ecosystem (e-commerce, logistics, etc.). The company avoids the energy layer due to China's efficient infrastructure. This broad strategy is designed to ensure Alibaba captures value regardless of where it ultimately concentrates in the AI value chain. He dismissed concerns about an AI investment bubble, pointing to the enormous $50 trillion opportunity. While acknowledging U.S. cloud giants' higher capital expenditure, he argued Chinese firms, including Alibaba (funded by its cash-generative e-commerce core), need to invest more in AI infrastructure. A key theme was technological sovereignty. Tsai positioned open-source models like Qwen as a solution for companies, especially in Europe, seeking independence from proprietary U.S. models and greater data privacy control. He contrasted this with the trend of U.S. giants keeping their models closed-source. Tsai highlighted Alibaba's collaborations with European manufacturers like Bosch and Siemens, using AI for design and quality control. He concluded with an optimistic vision of AI agents enhancing productivity, ultimately freeing up human time for leisure, family, and experiences like live entertainment.

marsbit1h ago

Chips, Open-Source Models, and $50 Trillion: Joe Tsai Reassesses Alibaba Once Again

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片